Modeling Tire Wear and Driver Behaviour in Open Pit Haulage Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P2 1. Motion.
Advertisements

EU Tire Label. April 2011 Tire Performance Label: A Global TrendTrend 2 EU World wide introduction of a tire label EU-Label for the performance in Rolling.
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Forces. Distance, Speed and Time Speed = distance (in metres) time (in seconds) D TS 1)Dave walks 200 metres in 40 seconds. What is his speed? 2)Laura.
Natural Laws & Car Control
Tyre Labelling (EC/1222/2009) June Tyre Labelling Tyres will be graded according to wet grip, fuel efficiency and external noise. The presentation.
The INTEGRATION Modeling Framework for Estimating Mobile Source Energy Consumption and Emission Levels Hesham Rakha and Kyoungho Ahn Virginia Tech Transportation.
Dynamics and transportation 1) Review of work, energy; 2) PRS questions on work; 2) Introduction to transportation.
Dynamic Traction Control By: Thiago Avila, Mike Sinclair & Jeffrey McLarty.
Practical Process Control Using Control Station
1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization.
PERFORMANCES IN ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Zaragoza 1 ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCES IN ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES PROF.
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
Friction There are many forms of friction. This lesson introduces the force laws for static friction, kinetic friction, and rolling friction. Students.
Tire Heating – The TMPH Rating ©Dr. B. C. Paul 2000 revised 2008 Note- These slides demonstrate the use of the FPC computer program developed by the Caterpillar.
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
Physics and Astronomy Outreach Program at the University of British Columbia Physics and Astronomy Outreach Program at the University of British Columbia.
Vinai Hudda.  What we know so far  Who can contribute to Reduce Rolling Resistance  Tyre Industry’s Role  Pneumatic Tyre – Awareness Level  Effect.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Determining Truck Speeds using Rimpull and Retarder Curves
What is a force? How does friction affect motion?
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 6 Machine Equipment Power Requirements.
Friction There are many forms of friction. This lesson introduces the force laws for static friction, kinetic friction, and rolling friction. Students.
Friction & Applications
Chapter 5 Natural Laws and Car Control. Gravity What is gravity? the force that pulls things towards the earth the force that pulls things towards the.
Presented to the California Energy Commission by Tim J. LaClair, Ph.D.
04 September September September Drive Safe Driving Safely ‘’LTS GZ’’
Natural Laws and Driving
WHAT IS POSITION? LOCATION RELATIVE TO A REFERENCE POINT (FRAME OF REFERENCE)
1 Vehicle Stability Function ● Directional Control ● Roll-over Control A functional overview with regard to commercial vehicles AMEVSC-03-04e August 2010.
What it does ? Continuously monitors critical industrial machinery providing information concerning wear and tear as well as the early warning of forthcoming.
Why………….? coz Speed thrills but Kills! Why Should Speed Governor / Limiter be Installed.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Inertia 2 rules of inertia –1. objects move in a straight line unless some force is put upon them –2. objects at rest stay at rest.
COMPUTER&AUTOMATIONCOMPUTER&AUTOMATION RESEARCH INSTITUTERESEARCH INSTITUTE Systems and Control Laboratory1 Commercial Vehicle Fleet Management System.
Optimal Power Control, Rate Adaptation and Scheduling for UWB-Based Wireless Networked Control Systems Sinem Coleri Ergen (joint with Yalcin Sadi) Wireless.
Note: 90% of the driving task is visual!
Next Part of Step II Determining Peak Speed ©Dr. B. C. Paul 2000 revised 2008 Note – The methods outlined here are typical of widely known published engineering.
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
Friction: Friction: from book, ever present resistance to motion whenever two materials are in contact with each other. Friction: (ME) Two surfaces rubbing.
Demonstration Design Light Sensor Truck Light As the truck passes the light, the light sensor turns off the power to the truck, ensuring that the truck.
Work&EnergyWork&Energy. 4.1 Work Done by a Constant Force.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
UNIT 6 VEHICLE HANDLING THE EFFECT OF CONDITIONS
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Automotive Technology, Fourth Edition James Halderman BRAKING SYSTEM PRINCIPLES 93.
Speed: Average Velocity: Instantaneous Velocity:
Arms, Legs, Wheels, Tracks, and What Really Drives Them Effectors and Actuators.
4.3 Free Fall and the Acceleration due to Gravity
André Rijnders1 Dutch proposal on tyre conditioning DTP-LabProcICE November 2012 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-169.
Automotive Braking Systems By Shane Dunlevy. Overview Brakes convert kinetic energy into heat by creating friction System must have very high reliability.
OBJECTIVES Discuss the energy principles that apply to brakes.
Kinematics.
Energy Consumption & Power Requirements of A Vehicle
HEV Fundamentals Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) are vehicles that combine an internal combustion engine (ICE) with an electrical traction system. It usually.
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
UNIT 5 CHALLENGES TO VEHICLE CONTROL
The Insiders Guide To Traction Control.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
P3.
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Motion.
Forces and their interactions AQA FORCES – part 1
Trilogy – Physics – CHAPTER 5 – Forces
Japanese Fuel Efficiency Standard for Heavy Duty Vehicles
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
lesson 9.3 VEHICLE BALANCE AND CONTROL IN CURVES
Forces and their interactions AQA FORCES – part 1
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Tire Wear and Driver Behaviour in Open Pit Haulage Operations

ExtendSIM Software Dynamic modeling of real-world processes Uses building blocks to explore processing steps Benefits Easy to use Inexpensive MS-Windows environment Handles both Discrete and Deterministic Models

Discrete and Deterministic Discrete Events Probabilistic method Maintenance, Loading, Dumping Deterministic First Principles Truck movement – Fuel consumption – Tire temperature Fuzzy Models (A.I.) Road conditions (rolling resistance and traction) Tire wear Driver behaviour (velocity, acceleration, reaction time)

Fuzzy Road Conditions Rolling Resistance varies from 2.5% to 3.5% Traction varies from 0.44 to 0.55 Value depends on schedule for grader and water truck and rain/snow intensity/duration

Rolling Resistance Fuzzy Model

Conventional Approach to Tire Wear All tire suppliers use the TKPS (TMPS) method Tonnes-Kilometers per Hour Actually, this is simply an Alarm System If TKPH is exceeded on a real-time basis, the truck is prevented from operating in 5 th gear to restrict velocity A better method would be to monitor tire temperature and pressure in real time

Real-time Measurement of Tire Temperature External chassis-mounted IR temperature sensor Temperature sensor embedded in tire tread External sensor subject to ambient conditions (shade/sun) Embedded sensor can wirelessly send data to on-board computer

Tire Temperature Decline (until T tire = T atm ) Dynamic calculation every 100 msec Tire load and speed determine temperature change Temperature drop by ambient heat loss: ΔT d = (T atm – T tire )·e -k d t where ΔT d = temperature decline (°C) T atm = ambient temperature (°C) T tire = current tire temperature(°C) k d = heat transfer coefficient (1.6 x ) t= time step (seconds)

Tire Temperature (continued) Temperature increase due to load and velocity: ΔT i = K T (1 – e -k i t ) – ΔT d whereΔT d = temperature increase (°C) K T = x (P + GMW)V k i = x (P + GMW)V 2 t= time step (seconds) ΔT d = temperature decline (°C) P= payload (tonnes) GMW= gross machine weight + fuel (tonnes)

Tire Temperature Change

Tire temperature cycles (14.7% idle time) Velocities = 16 kph loaded / 32 kph empty

Tire temperature cycles (9.3% idle time) Velocities = 16 kph loaded / 32 kph empty

Tire temperature cycles (9.3% idle time) Velocities = 19 kph loaded / 38 kph empty

Tire wear rate reported by Miller Rubber Co. in 1928 Popular Mechanics, (1928). Burning 'em Up, June, 49(6), p (Miller Rubber Co. graph, p.940) Wear rate as a function of tire temperature

Tire wear rate reported by Miller Rubber Co. in 1928 Popular Mechanics, (1928). Burning 'em Up, June, 49(6), p (Miller Rubber Co. graph, p.940) Wear rate as a function of tire temperature

Wear Rate = V 2 e -7,106/RT + 11,931Ve -8,621/RT There are two terms in the equation: First term relates to Energy flow through the tire Second term relates to force (momentum of tire) Wear rate as a function of tire temperature

Miller Tire Calculated wear rate = mm / 10, kph and 45 °C Calculated wear rate = mm / 10, kph and 45 °C Estimated Load (Miller tire) = 2.44 kg/cm 2 Load (CAT793) - full = 4.44 kg/cm 2 Load ratio = 1.82 Load (CAT793) - empty= 2.00 kg/cm 2 Load ratio = 0.82 Tire surface element contact ratio = 1.22 Road surface condition ratio = 12.5 CAT 793D Travelling fully-loaded= x 1.82 x 1.22 x 12.5 = 7.61 mm / 10,000 km Travelling empty= x 0.82 x 1.22 x 12.5 = 6.69 mm / 10,000 km Scale-up to a Haulage Truck tire

CAT 793D Travelling fully-loaded= 7.61 mm / 10,000 km Travelling empty= 6.69 mm / 10,000 km Average = 7.15 mm / 10,000 km Calculated Tread Depth Change = 7.15 x 11 = 78.7 mm Mine Data Typical Tread Depth Change at scrap = 75 mm for ~ 110,000 km (5,500 hrs) Error = 4.9% Assumed Maximum Wear Rate = 10 mm / 10,000 km Validation from Real Tire Wear Data

Fuzzy Tire Wear Model (mm/10,000 km) Payload Velocity ZeroSlowModerateNormalFastVery Fast EmptyZeroLowestLowModerateNormalHigh SmallZeroLowestLowModerateNormalHigh QuarterZeroLowModerate NormalHigh HalfZeroLowModerateNormalHighVery-High Three-quartersZeroLowModerateNormalHighVery-High FullZeroModerateNormalHighVery-High Over FullZeroModerateNormalHighVery-HighMaximum Three main factors:payload, speed, tire temperature Additional factors:tire pressure, road conditions, tire rotation

Tire Wear Model based on Fuzzy Logic Calibration factors:maximum tire wear rate = 10 mm / 10,000 km maximum velocity = 35 kph maximum payload = 440 tonnes (average = 219 tonnes)

Driver Behaviour Sub-Model

Behaviour Criteria Driving Speed Acceleration Braking Reaction Time Lateral Position Control Many factors –gender, energy level, age, health, family and personal issues, tiredness, skill level, time since training, personality, time in shift, time in work period Too many variables and far too complex to validate

Driver Behaviour – Aggressiveness Factor

Driver Behaviour – Set Points (average) Driver Velocity (kph) Acceleration Reaction Time Type Loaded Empty (m/s 2 ) (msec) Passive ± 100 Normal ± 100 Aggressive ± 50 Autonomous ± 0

Driver Behaviour – Aggressiveness Factor Aggressiveness Factor Stability Highly Stable Little Change Highly Variable Aggressiveness Passive-1.00 to to to Normal-0.10 to to to Aggressive+0.80 to to to +1.00

Driver Behaviour - 1 km modeled test drive