1 Support system of final quadrupole magnet in a Detector Contents -Introduction -Calculations -Installation -Conclusions Nov., ’08 KEK H. Yamaoka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Granite table 1000×1500×500, 2.2tons CFRP SUS Channel 100x50 → 150x75 Level Jack < 5000kg Dec. 04,’03 KEK H. Yamaoka.
Advertisements

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Field measurements of QEA magnets at KEK Mika Masuzawa May 30, 2006.
1 Vibrations studies at KEKB/Belle KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka.
Vibration issues for SuperKEKB M. Masuzawa, R. Sugahara and H. Yamaoka (KEK) Vibration issues for SuperKEKB (IWAA2010)
ILC Cryomodule Earthquake response simulation H. Hayano, H. Nakai, Y. Yamamoto LCWS13 AWG7-SCRF.
Buckling and harmonic analysis with FEM E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Harmonic Analysis Workshop 10. Workshop Supplement Harmonic Analysis March 29, 2005 Inventory # WS10-2 Workshop 10 – Goals Goal: –In this workshop.
Simulations and measurements of the pre-isolator test set-up WG5 Meeting F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist November 9, 2010.
ATLAS Pixel Detector October 2001 Pixel Week N. Hartman LBNL 1 PST Design Update PST CDR october 2001.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
1 ATF2 project: Investigation on the honeycomb table vibrations Benoit BOLZON 33rd ATF2 meeting, 24th January 2007 Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration.
Installation of FD in September A.Jeremie, B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With the help of KEK, SLAC, KNU and CERN colleagues For.
1 FD Support and Pacman for GLDc 27 Aug Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.
1 Design of Solenoid and iron yoke for GLD KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Ken-ichi Tanaka July 13, ‘05.
1 FEA of Towers for Dome C JL Dournaux / JPh Amans GEPI, Pôle Instrumental - Paris Observatory
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
1 GLD Surface Assembly Y. Sugimoto KEK
1 ILD/CMS Engineering Meeting M. Joré – ILD integration philosophy Integration philosophy of ILD Matthieu Joré – January 21st Integration of the subdetectors.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
ILC / ILD TPC Requirements of the support mechanics Volker Prahl ILD Workshop 2013 Cracow
1 ILC Push-Pull : Platform Marco Oriunno, SLAC ILD Workshop, Paris May 24, 2011.
Response of a joint passive crowd- SDOF system subjected to crowd jumping load Jackie Sim, Dr. Anthony Blakeborough, Dr. Martin Williams Department of.
KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Task list for Magnet/Iron yoke Solenoid magnet Iron yoke Experimental hall and other facilities May 11, ’05.
1 H. Yamaoka R. Sugahara M. Masuzawa IR stability at SuperKEKB June 14, ‘10 H. Yamaoka.
Pre-isolator & QD0 support modeling 5th WG5 Meeting F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist September 7, 2010.
Support Tube Dynamic Analysis KEK’s ANSYS simulation –model details –Single Point Response Spectrum analysis SUGGESTED improvements –beam model –Harmonic.
1 GLD and GLDc Sep. 12, 2007 Y. Sugimoto KEK. 2 Compact GLD Option Motivation –GLD and LDC will write a common LoI –The detector design should have common.
SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.
SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.
Magnets and Supports Bob Wands October 20, 2006 PPD/MD/Engineering Analysis Group Fermilab 4 th Concept Detector at Fermilab October, 2006.
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
1 Mechanical calculations of the CDC end-plates KEK H. Yamaoka July 8 th, '09 KEK H. Yamaoka.
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
Summary of Support tube R&D Nov. 11, ’04 KEK H. Yamaoka.
Preliminary Design & Steel Deck Alternative Presentation
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
1 ILD meeting LAL M. Joré – Integration status Matthieu Joré – 25 th of May ILD integration status and open issues.
1 MIDTERM EXAM REVIEW. 2 m 081.SLDASM REVIEW Excitation force 50N normal to face k=10000N/m m=6.66kg Modal damping 5%
AMS-02 Delta CDR Structural Analysis and Certification Process Carl Lauritzen Structural Analysis Lead Jacobs Engineering
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
LCGT f2f meeting/ICRR, 04/Aug./2011 N. KIMURA Status of the Cryogenics Design N. KIMURA A, S. KOIKE B, T. KUME B, T. OHMORI D, Y. SAITO C, Y. SAKAKIBARA.
1. Introduction 2. Magnetic field design Optimization of yoke configuration in several conf. Boundary conditions -
September 20, 2007H. J. Krebs/B. Wands/B. Cooper1 SiD Collaboration Preliminary End Door Design Concept Support of Forward Systems H. James Krebs Bob Wands.
1 KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Vibration analysis of the ILD QD0-support system Oct, 2 nd '09 KEK H. Yamaoka - Results of Vibration analysis - Coherency measurement.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
ATF2: final doublet support Andrea JEREMIE B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With constant interaction with colleagues from KEK, SLAC.
GWADW2011 Elba/Italy, 23/May/2011 N. KIMURA and Y. SAKAKIBARA Present Design of LCGT Cryogenic Payload - Status of Cryogenic Design - N. KIMURA*, Y. SAKAKIBARA**,
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
1 Investigation of vibration properties of the KEKB tunnel after the Great East Japan Earthquake Contents Situations after the earthquake Geological survey.
MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 12. July 2007ILC IRENG07 WG-A1 LDC Engineering Design (Status) Introduction General Design Detector.
What’s new at LAL-LLR ( MDI issues) M.Jore, C.Clerc Visit at CMS Forward detectors meeting at LLR Vacuum in Beam pipe, first LAL results.
LHCb RICH2 Analysis of Super-Structure
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.
HCAL preliminary analysis and results
Period of Simple Harmonic Motion
Very preliminary draft
Vibration studies for the QD0-support system
Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization
Waves.
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.
Status of the TESLA Magnet Package and Vibrations at TTF
Status of Vibration Analysis
1/10 prototype support tube
Yoshiyuki Obuchi NAOJ / Mechanical Engineering shop Dec. 29th 2016
Fixed Support Design & Testing
Presentation transcript:

1 Support system of final quadrupole magnet in a Detector Contents -Introduction -Calculations -Installation -Conclusions Nov., ’08 KEK H. Yamaoka

2 QD0(700kg) BeamCAL(100kg) LHCAL(3000kg) LumiCAL(250kg) ECAL(420kg) Cylindrical Support Tube ‘MDI at GLD’ by Y. Sugimoto ILD Workshop at DESY, Zeuthen Strength, Installation scheme will be presented. Components of IR- region are planed to support with the Support tube. Introduction

3 Boundary conditions; -Models - Half-Cylinder - Full-Cylinder - Half-cylinder with reinforcement ribs - Thread Bolts connection -FEM analyses ・ Static analysis ・ Modal analysis ・ Dynamic load such as ground motion - Materials - Stainless steel - Aluminum -Load condition See: right-upper -Constraints - Only cylinder’s end. (Cantilever) Fixed QD0: 700kg BeamCAL: 100kg LHCal: 3000kg LumiCal: 250kg ECal: 420kg Self-weight

4 Results Static analysis deformation: 20mm Half-cylinder - Stainless-steel - 50mm-thick Fixed  Deformation(Static)=20mm  The deformation is too large. Half-cylinder with reinforcement ribs. - Stainless-steel - 50mm-thick - Each weight + Self-weight  Deformation(Static)=8.5mm  The deformation is also large.  Complicate fabrication.  Support tube should be full-cylinder.

5 - Materials -Stainless steel or Aluminum -Load condition See: right-upper -Assumptions - Fixed only cylinder’s end (Canti-lever). - Bolt pre-tension was defined. - Defined slide on the boundary of half- cylinders. Fixed QD0: 700kg BeamCAL: 100kg LHCal: 3000kg LumiCal: 250kg ECal: 420kg Self-weight ・ Full-Cylinder is assembled from two half-cylinders 500mm 24-M24 Supp. tube= 50mm-thick.

6 Results Static analysis deformation: 6mm - Full-cylinder assembled from two half-cylinder. - Stainless-steel - 50mm-thick - Each component weight +Self-weight Fixed - 3.2mm(Full cylinder) - 20mm(Half-cylinder)

7 Natural frequencies 2 nd mode: 81Hz 3 rd mode: 111Hz 1 st mode: 9.6Hz 10Hz(Full cylinder) 4Hz(Half-cylinder)

8 - Input Acc. : a= 2x10 -7 m/s 2 - Mass: m=( )/9.8[m/s 2 ] - Damping ratio=2% F 0 =2x10 -3 N  0 – 1000Hz ATF(17:00 Feb. 10, 2004) Linear Spectrum 2x10 -7 m/s 2 Self-weight Amplitude due to ground motion FFT F 0 cos(  t)=(m ・ a)sin(  t) ・ Input Acc. is the measurement data at ATF in KEK. ・ Input data is assumed to be harmonic vibration.

9 Calculation result The maximum amplitude: 9.5Hz(1 st mode) 2.7nm

10 Installation scheme ‘MDI at GLD’ by Y. Sugimoto ILD Workshop at DESY, Zeuthen Initial condition

11 - Temporal rigid scaffold is set on the floor. - The bottom half-cylinder is connected. -Top of the support tube is supported by tension-rods. - or, It is supported by timbers at the bottom.  20mm sagged in case of the half-cylinder Tension rods Scaffold Timbers

12 - Set Calorimeters. (a) Set chain hoist on the inner cryostat. or (b) Assemble support frame on the temporal scaffold. - QD0 is lifted by crane. - Set it to the correct position Calorimeters QD0

13 -Remove the temporal scaffold. -Finished Upper support tube is lifted by crane. - Set it to the correct position.

14 Stiffness at the support position 4.5mm 3.2mm Fixed Fixed!  Deformation is 40% increased. 3.2mm  4.5mm(Full cylinder) 6.0mm  8.4mm(Estimation: Bolts connection)  There must be some ideas to increase the stiffness at the support position. (Full-cylinder)

15 Conclusions - Half-cylinder is too large deformation. Support tube should be assembled to full-cylinder. - Adequate material for the support tube is supposed to be stainless steel. Smaller deformation/stress rather than aluminum case. CFRP/Tungsten for the support tube is not realistic. - Amplitude due to the ground motion is a few nm. It is necessary to check whether it’s acceptable or not. - Preliminary installation scheme was thought. This scheme should be made more realistic. End