The UK performance management framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scotlands place in a just world Shaping a coherent policy on international development for Scotland.
Advertisements

Local Education and Training Boards Adam C Wardle Managing Director, Yorkshire and the Humber Local Education and Training Board.
GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY Towards delivery of the London Health Inequalities Strategy London Public Health Network 21 st May 2010 Helen Davies GLA Health.
“Fit and Well – Changing Lives 2012 – 2022” Michael Mc Bride Chief Medical Officer DHSSPS Fit and Well – Changing Lives is the new cross – cutting Public.
Digital public services and innovation
The NHS White Paper A system not structure Outcomes focused Robust Quality & Economic regulation Empowered professionals in autonomous providers.
The Millennium Development Goals the fight against global poverty and inequality.
ANGUS COMMUNITY PLANNING PARTNERSHIP SOA IMPLEMENTATION GROUP 3 December 2009.
Australia’s new development policy and performance framework.
City outcomes. City Outcomes: a single set of aims for Sheffield A single set of aims for Sheffield which are of common and mutual interest to – public.
New Horizons in School Governance: The Changing Landscape of SEN.
UK Government experience in Performance Framework Reform
One Council - One City Equality Framework for Local Government Peer Review for Excellent.
Induction to Dr Jon Stephenson. What is Partners IN Salford Partners IN Salford is the Local Strategic Partnership for Salford Partners IN Salford is.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU 1 Linking Quality to Strategy: Benefits of Balanced Scorecards.
Department of Planning and Community Development Corporate Plan: Government priorities we contribute to Building friendly, confident and safe.
Adrian Colwell Visiting Senior Research Fellow November 2007.
© National Literacy Trust 2010 Diagram showing how the PiL strategy can contribute to national policy and local targets The diagram demonstrates: the key.
The Future of Adult Social Care John Crook March 2011.
Family awareness, access and action: the Partners in Literacy approach.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Equality and Diversity Forum London, 17 October 2007 Alison Rose - Deputy Director, Government Equalities Office Equalities PSA.
Reform and change in Australian VTE and implications for VTE research and researchers By Aurora Andruska 20 April 2006.
Health inequalities post 2010 review – implications for action in London London Teaching Public Health Network “Towards a cohesive public health system.
Inter faith strategy Towards a framework for inter faith dialogue and social action Equality and Diversity Forum 12 th March 2007.
The New UK Sustainable Development Strategy Neil Witney June 2005, Oslo, Norway.
Spatial Patterns of Deprivation David McPhee Communities ASD.
“Strong and Prosperous Communities” The New Local Government White Paper.
Early Help Strategy Achieving better outcomes for children, young people and families, by developing family resilience and intervening early when help.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE New Executive Leadership Team 15 December 2004 Ms Heather Gray Chief Executive.
Reverse Commissioning An Effective Process to Engage BME Communities Dr Vivienne Lyfar-Cissé MBA Chair NHS BME Network.
East Midlands Regional Volunteering Conference 9 th September 2009 Sarah Benioff, Deputy Director, Office of the Third Sector, Cabinet Office.
OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Regulation and the Governance Agenda in the 21 st Century Josef Konvitz, Public Governance Directorate.
Liberating the NHS: Developing the healthcare workforce Workforce planning, education and training Consultation Engagement.
A Strategy for Children and Young People : The Poverty Dimension Heather Stevens Children and Young People’s Unit Office of the First Minister & Deputy.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
Terry Reynolds June 2009 Priorities for Improving Opportunities for Children and Young People.
Greater Merseyside Learning Partnership Network Meeting 11 January 2005 Kirsty Evans, Director of Strategy and Finance.
Joining the Dots… The Children’s Plan: National Strategy – Local Delivery Steve Walker Principal Consultant Children and Young People.
Ambition, confidence and risk: holding our nerve in difficult times Andrew Cozens Strategic Adviser, Children Adults & Health Services SSRG Annual Workshop.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme January 2008 Capacity development.
Devolution in Greater Manchester October 2015 Alex Gardiner, New Economy.
Single Outcome Agreements
© National Literacy Trust 2009 Partners in Literacy: Improving outcomes for families through local coordination Diagram showing how the PiL strategy can.
Herts Children’s Trust Partnership: Progress and Performance 2009/10 Making a Positive Difference to the Lives of Children and Young People John Harris.
National and International Development Strategy International Development Unit / Gordon Thomson / January 2016.
Regulation Inside Government: Approach and lessons learned Punita Goodfellow, Better Regulation Executive, Cabinet Office, UK.
Single Outcome Agreements and Purpose Targets: measuring progress Euan Carmichael Office of the Chief Economic Adviser 20 th March 2009.
Devolution in the North East Opportunities for the VCSE Jane Hartley Chief Executive.
PwC 1 July 2015 Department of Education and Training strategic intent Strategic intent Vision Our future Approaches How we will achieve this Together we.
Local Area Agreement Strengthening delivery Improving Outcomes Jon Bright Director of Policy and Delivery Birmingham City Council.
INDEPENDENCE, WELL-BEING AND CHOICE VISION FOR THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL CARE FOR ADULTS.
A Vision for the future of partnerships in Ealing?: the principles Review of the Local Strategic Partnership Initial Report to LSP Executive 26 May 2010.
Health and Social Care Integration Update Name Role October 2015.
For our Future Presentation and discussion: University of Glamorgan 24 September 2010 Jim Cowan, Head of HE Strategy and Sponsorship
MHPP Forum James Shuttleworth Planning and Infrastructure Manager, MCC 9 December 2015 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.
“Helping Great Britain Work Well” The start of the conversation….
Local Education and Training Boards Tim Gilpin Director of Workforce and Education NHS North of England.
Existing Programs to support development of micro-enterprise for informal economy workers and other poverty reduction programs 16 March 2012 Banyan tree.
Wellbeing through Partnership: Collaborating for Improvement in West Wales Martyn Palfreman Head of Regional Collaboration 23 March 2016.
North Somerset Partnership Priorities & Opportunities 2 December 2015.
The Transformation of Social Care Janet Walden 13th November 2008.
‘It’s not always about funding and resources; it’s about working better together. As we’ve got areas of common interest if we can just coordinate our services.
Children and Young People’s Strategy
CONNECT INFLUENCE DELIVER ‘Where now?’ What does ESP need to deliver? What are the opportunities for ESP? Workshop Questions What does ESP need.
Reflections on Implementing Gender Budgeting
Developing a new City Partnership Partnership Executive
Our Vision / A look forward
Presentation transcript:

The UK performance management framework Kit Charnaud, Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit United Kingdom Tuesday, 28 October 2008

Context 40% GDP spent on government services Real terms increases in public spending of 4.1% (05/06), 2.7% (06/07), 2.8% (07/08); Key principles of the strategy for public services embed value for money across the public sector, focus on key cross-government priorities, respond to the needs of users PMDU role: small unit within Treasury, jointly accountable to Prime Minister and Chancellor

History - Key features of what was introduced in CSR 1998 Features of the 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review: Three-year spending plans Separate capital and current budgets Resource accounting and budgeting Introduction of Public Service Agreements (PSAs) Strengths of UK approach to performance management: public statement about the Government’s priorities; created an outcome-oriented system, sharpened the Government’s accountability to the electorate and to Parliament No mechanistic link between performance and resource allocation in Spending Review

Comprehensive Spending Review Comprehensive Spending Review (1998) Evolution of the PSA framework A reformed framework: Cross-govt PSAs with published delivery agreements Objectives for all departments. Emphasis on devolution and user engagement Comprehensive Spending Review CSR07 30 PSAs 110 targets Increased consultation, Introduction of standards focus on outcomes Spending Review 2004 SR04 130 targets Greater continuity, architecture refined Spending Review 2002 SR02 Spending Review 2000 SR00 160 targets Significant changes to CSR model Comprehensive Spending Review (1998) CSR 98 600 targets First set of PSAs published

CSR07 PSA set A more secure, fair and environmentally 28. Secure a healthy natural environment for today and the future 26. Reduce the risk to the UK and its interests overseas from international terrorism 16. Increase the proportion of socially excluded adults in settled accommodation and employment, education or training 25. Reduce the harm caused by alcohol and drugs 15. Address the disadvantage that individuals experience because of their gender, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion or belief 30. Reduce the impact of conflict through enhanced UK and international efforts 24. Deliver a more effective, transparent and responsive Criminal Justice System for victims and the public 14. Increase the number of children and young people on the path to success 7. Improve the economic performance of all English regions and reduce the gap in economic growth rates between regions A more secure, fair and environmentally sustainable world Stronger communities and a better quality of life Fairness and opportunity for all Sustainable growth and prosperity 17. Tackle poverty and promote greater independence and wellbeing in later life 29. Reduce poverty in poorer countries through quicker progress towards the Millennium Development Goals 23. Make communities safer 13. Improve children and young people’s safety 6. Deliver the conditions for business success in the UK 22. Deliver a successful Olympic Games and Paralympic Games with a sustainable legacy and get more children and young people taking part in high quality PE and sport 12. Improve the health and wellbeing of children and young people 5. Deliver reliable and efficient transport networks that support economic growth 21. Build more cohesive, empowered and active communities 11. Narrow the gap in educational achievement between children from low income and disadvantaged backgrounds and their peers 4. Promote world class science and innovation in the UK 20. Improve long term housing supply and affordability 10. Raise the educational achievement of all children and young people 3. Ensure controlled, fair migration that protects the public and contributes to economic growth 19. Ensure better care for all 9. Halve the number of children in poverty by 2010-11, on the way to eradicating child poverty by 2020 2. Improve the skills of the population, on the way to ensuring a world-class skills base by 2020 27. Lead the global effort to avoid dangerous climate change 18. Promote better health and well-being for all 8. Maximise employment opportunity for all 1.Raise the productivity of the UK economy CSR07 PSA set

Sustainable growth and prosperity Fairness and opportunity for all Stronger communities and a better quality of life A more secure, fair and environmentally sustainable world 1.Raise the productivity of the UK economy 8. Maximise employment opportunity for all 18. Promote better health and well-being for all 27. Lead the global effort to avoid dangerous climate change 2. Improve the skills of the population, on the way to ensuring a world-class skills base by 2020 9. Halve the number of children in poverty by 2010-11, on the way to eradicating child poverty by 2020 19. Ensure better care for all 3. Ensure controlled, fair migration that protects the public and contributes to economic growth 10. Raise the educational achievement of all children and young people 20. Improve long term housing supply and affordability 28. Secure a healthy natural environment for today and the future 4. Promote world class science and innovation in the UK 11. Narrow the gap in educational achievement between children from low income and disadvantaged backgrounds and their peers 21. Build more cohesive, empowered and active communities 5. Deliver reliable and efficient transport networks that support economic growth 12. Improve the health and wellbeing of children and young people 22. Deliver a successful Olympic Games and Paralympic Games with a sustainable legacy and get more children and young people taking part in high quality PE and sport 29. Reduce poverty in poorer countries through quicker progress towards the Millennium Development Goals 6. Deliver the conditions for business success in the UK 13. Improve children and young people’s safety 23. Make communities safer 7. Improve the economic performance of all English regions and reduce the gap in economic growth rates between regions 14. Increase the number of children and young people on the path to success 24. Deliver a more effective, transparent and responsive Criminal Justice System for victims and the public 30. Reduce the impact of conflict through enhanced UK and international efforts 15. Address the disadvantage that individuals experience because of their gender, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion or belief 25. Reduce the harm caused by alcohol and drugs 16. Increase the proportion of socially excluded adults in settled accommodation and employment, education or training 26. Reduce the risk to the UK and its interests overseas from international terrorism 17. Tackle poverty and promote greater independence and wellbeing in later life

Cross-cutting nature of PSA targets PSA 20: Improve long term housing supply and affordability – 8 Departments Indicator 1: Number of net additional homes provided. TARGET Indicator 2: Trends in affordability: This will be measured using the ratio of lower quartile house prices to lower quartile earnings Indicator 3: Number of affordable homes delivered (gross). TARGET Indicator 4: Number of households in temporary accommodation. TARGET Indicator 5: Average Energy Efficiency Rating for new homes. Indicator 6: Local planning authorities to have adopted the necessary Development Plan Documents, in accordance with their Local Development Schemes, to bring forward developable land for housing. TARGET

CSR07: key features of reform National, outcome-focussed indicators underpin all PSAs Collaboratively developed Delivery Agreement for each PSA Accountability within Whitehall strengthened Embed genuine user engagement in design, delivery and governance across key public services. Reduced bureaucracy and unnecessary data burdens

Accountability structures that drive delivery Published set of 30 PSAs, that set out what they aim to achieve and how they are going to do it, and are supported by a clear accountability structure. Accountability is key and rests with both politicians and officials: Prime Minister, Chancellor, Cabinet Named Secretaries of State Senior Responsible Officer for each PSA A Delivery Board, comprising senior officials from contributing departments and chaired by the Senior Responsible Officer A single responsible Cabinet Committee for each PSA Permanent secretaries Transparency and accountability to public

Measures and levers drive delivery Hard levers of influence No formal or legal sanctions for ministers or departments Some PSAs have national targets in their Delivery Agreement Inspections – performance against national target e.g. Ofsted in education Accountability structures Contracts – train companies can be fined for delays Financial – sometimes extra funding or closure of frontline services Earned Autonomy for the frontline e.g. NHS Foundation Trusts Performance management – individual performance reporting mechanisms Reputational motivations – Departmental performance reporting and performance tables Direct accountability E.g. Skills PSA - Indicator 2. 6 Higher education initial participation rate Target: Increase participation in Higher Education towards 50 per cent of those aged 18 to 30 with growth of at least a percentage point every two years to the academic year 2010/11. Contractual / regulatory Common purpose Wider community Soft levers of influence

PSAs have worked best when… Focus on priorities across delivery chain Understand the delivery chain Are ambitious Based on systematic delivery planning Have defined indicators and targets Have timely, high quality information Recognise targets are not the only tools to improve performance Vision for the future… Citizen empowerment New professionalism for the frontline Strategic leadership from the centre