Co-witnesses’ effects on eyewitness memory: The Misinformation Paradigm Date & Time: 7th of January 1030 hours Chair: Kazuo Mori, Shinshu University Contributors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METHOD PARTICIPANTS 393 undergraduates completed the study, (M age = 20; 75% female; 50% Asian, 21% Caucasian). MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE All subjects completed.
Advertisements

Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
Are You Right-Brained or Left-Brained? Your learning style is influenced by whether you are right-brained or left- brained.
Malaysian Psychology Conference The MORI Technique: Projecting two different visual stimuli without being noticed by viewers A breakthrough for a variety.
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O P E N H A G E N Suppression of neutral but not emotional words Background Anderson & Green (2001)
Factors affecting EWT Age. Starter activity Think and make notes in pairs about the following two questions: O How do you think “Age” may affect the accuracy.
March 11, 2014 Colloquium at Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Presentation tricks for a variety of psychological research: Projecting two different.
Eye-witness testimony
Memory part I Memory Distortions Eyewitness Testimony Lineup Studies.
ICOM5-D51 Memory of a Contrived Success Promoted Scholastic Achievement in Japanese Junior High Students Akitoshi Uchida & Kazuo Mori Togakushi Junior.
Internet Vision - Lecture 3 Tamara Berg Sept 10. New Lecture Time Mondays 10:00am-12:30pm in 2311 Monday (9/15) we will have a general Computer Vision.
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
Eyewitness Identification: An Examination of the Other Race Effect
HCI and Usability Issues of Multimedia Internet broadcasting Lecture 3.
 The misinformation effect refers to incorrect recall or source attribution of an item presented after a to-be-remembered event as having been presented.
Accelerated Reader Questions & Answers
Memory and the power of suggestion
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
Beliefs about memory can have consequences for how people behave. For example, therapists who believe that traumatic memories are.
Outline Discuss paper assignments Discuss paper assignments Student input on aesthetics rsch. Student input on aesthetics rsch. Social Influence Social.
Results.
Eye Witness Identification
The effect of warning against conformity on memory accuracy after cooperative remembering Yuji Itoh, Satoshi Umeda, Jun Kawaguchi Keio University University.
Chapter12 Reconstructive Processes in Memory(II) by Luan Feng.
Public Charity as a Proximate Factor of Evolved Reputation- Building Strategy Brittany and Bo.
Introduction to Appointment Scheduling
Encoding Specificity Memory is improved when information available at encoding is also available at retrieval.
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Memory Chapter 7 Continued…. How is knowledge organized?  Clustering: the tendency to remember similar or related items in groups  Conceptual Hierarchy:
Memory Construction Period 3 #10
Conformity and Obedience. CONFORMITY “ The tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behaviour in ways that are consistent with group norms” (Brehm,
From Bad to Worse: Variations in Judgments of Associative Memory Erin Buchanan, Ph.D., Missouri State University Abstract Four groups were tested in variations.
Memory Modules Module 22 Questions 1- What are the three basic steps in processing information and define each: a. Encoding- getting information.
Ensuring rigour in qualitative research CPWF Training Workshop, November 2010.
MODES-650 Advanced System Simulation Presented by Olgun Karademirci VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF SIMULATION MODELS.
Research Methods Revision January Research Methods Revision BATs describe the different types of experimental and non-experimental techniques in.
Promotion of academic achievement of junior high school students through enhancing their self-efficacy by a contrived success experience Kazuo Mori & Akitoshi.
Reliability of one cognitive process
The 10 th Biennial Conference of SARMAC Conformity and Scholastic Levels: An fMORI-Asch Experimental Study of Japanese Junior High School Students Kazuo.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 22.
+ Interviews This course material is for non-commercial use only. Any public display, distribution and adaptation is not allowed for any purposes.
Thinking About Psychology The Science of Mind and Behavior 3e Charles T. Blair-Broeker & Randal M. Ernst PowerPoint Presentation Slides by Kent Korek Germantown.
The effect of contrived success in calculation tasks on the self-efficacy of junior high school students Akitoshi Uchida Akitoshi Uchida Togakushi Junior.
Older Driver Failures of Attention at Intersections: Using Change Blindness Methods to Assess Turn Decision Accuracy Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
LOGO Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Learning Mathematics Sarah Stover Literature and Society Dr. Sherry 10/03/11.
Memory Construction We sometimes alter our memories as we encode or retrieve them. Your expectations, schemas, environment may alter your memories. Elizabeth.
Sociocultural Level of Analysis: Social and Cultural Norms Part III.
Picture change during blinks: looking without seeing and seeing without looking Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Social Influences on Behavior Chapter 14. Effects of Being Observed  SOCIAL FACILITATION: tendency to perform a task better in front of others than when.
Studies that Illustrate Errors in Attributions IB Psychology I (1A)
CHILDREN’S BOOK CRITIQUE Bayley Savage. INTASC STANDARD PAGE Standard #5: Application of Content The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use.
 Evidence : Something that tends to establish or disprove a fact.  Examples of evidence: › Documents › Testimony › Other objects.
1 Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data Deborah K. van Alphen and Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge.
Cognition Domain kali9/istockphoto. Memory Rodrigo Blanco/istockphoto.
BHS Memory and Amnesia Methods and Principles.
1. What large brain structure allows us to hold facts or events in short-term memory? The cortex.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.
Akitoshi Uchida & Kazuo Mori
Cognitive interview.
Kazuo Moria & Hiroshi Itob
Alison Burros, Nathan Herdener, & Mei-Ching Lien
Post event discussion (PED) and EWT
Eyewitness Investigation
Cognition of spatial separation in the interior
Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data
You will have 30 seconds to look at the next picture…
Presentation transcript:

Co-witnesses’ effects on eyewitness memory: The Misinformation Paradigm Date & Time: 7th of January 1030 hours Chair: Kazuo Mori, Shinshu University Contributors: Kazuo Mori, Shinshu University Yuji Itoh, Keio University Fiona Gabbert, University of Aberdeen Elizabeth F. Loftus, University of California, Irvine

Introduction: Three researchers will present their experimental findings of co-witness influences on memory using new experimental paradigms. Despite differences in their methods, similar findings have been obtained. Witnesses tended to conform to their co-witnesses and report what the co-witnesses had observed as if it had been observed by themselves. Following the presentations, Beth will discuss the main findings and implications of them.

A New Experimental Paradigm for Collaborative Eyewitness Testimony Using a Presentation Trick Kazuo Mori Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan

Wanted

The MORI technique: A new experimental procedure for research in memory distortion. Mori, 2003b) Uses the polarization properties of light. Two different images presented on the same screen can be seen separately by two groups of viewers without them noticing that there are two different overlapping images. Projector B is tilted 90 degrees to make its polarized image perpendicular to Image A.

Outline of the event Fig.3 Two versions of basically the same event A car pulls up in front of a female pedestrian. The driver gets out of the car to ask her for directions. While she explains the directions, another passenger sneaks out of the car to steal something from her bag. The pedestrian walks away without noticing the theft.

Three Differing Points Color of the car: dark car vs. white car Fig.4 Three Differing Points in the Two Versions Clothes of the driver: parka with stripes vs. white shirt Direction of the pedestrian after the thievery: walking toward the viewer vs. walking away from the viewer

One or two weeks Fig.5 Experimental Schedule Discussion Pre-Discussion Report (Separate) Post-Discussion Report(Unified) Week-Later Report (Separate) Presentation of the Event Post-Discussion Report(Separate) About 20 to 25 minutes

Main Results (Kanematsu et al.,1996/2003) No subjects noticed the presentation trick. No group failed to reach agreement even on the three differing points. –Witnesses would easily change their opinion about what they had seen. There was no clear tendency concerning who conceded to whom. Even those who changed their original report had high confidence in their memory. –Confidence would not insure the accuracy. Discussion improved memory performance in general. ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■■ Absolutely Confident Highly Confident Rather Confident Neutral Not So Confident Hardly Confident Least Confident■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■:Reported what they had seen correctly ■:Reported consciously what the other party had seen ■:Reported unconsciously what the other party had seen ■:Reported mutually what the other party had seen Confidence Ratings Fig.6 Distribution of Confidence Ratings and their Accuracy

Summary of Results of Experiments Using the MORI Technique Sex and gender comparison –No sex differences in conformity Fig.7 Group size of witnesses –One always concedes to two –Fewer conformities in two vs. two Mother-child pairs –Mothers not always dominant Animations –Easy to remember –Fewer conformities Pre-schoolers –Poorer memory performance –More conformities

Effects of Group Size (Mori & Mori, 2004) Less frequent ‘ Conscious agreements ’ (■) in Two-vs-Two Fig.8 Agreement in Week-Later Reports More frequent ‘ Conscious agreements ’ (■) in Two-vs-One No differences among ‘ Unconscious agreements ’ (■)

Mother-Child Pairs (Mori, 2003a) No differences were found concerning whose opinions were taken. Mothers’ Opinions Children’s Opinions Others Fig.9 Dominant Opinions for the Three Differing Points No significant tendencies for choosing between original and agreed answers. Back to Originals Maintain Agreed Answers Other Choices Fig.10 Choices in Week-Later Reports

Animation: a new technique Events presented by an animated picture were much easier to remember than those by real pictures. Fig.11 Fig.12 Fig.13 Subjects made fewer adoptions of the other party ’ s opinions.

Preschoolers vs. Undergraduates (Mori & Takahashi, 2004) Pre-schoolers showed poorer recall than undergraduates in general. Mean Recall Scores at the Three Recall Periods Fig.14 Poorer Recall in Preschoolers p<.01 Pre-schoolers tended to conform more frequently than undergraduates in the Week-Later Reports. p<.05 Fig.15 More Frequent Conformity among Preschoolers Adjusted Frequency ofConformity

References Hirokawa,K.,Matsuno,E.,Mori,K.,& Ukita,J.(2003) The relationship between masculinity-femininity and suggestibility in an experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony. Submitted to Asian Journal of Social Psychology. Kanematsu,H.,Mori,K.,& Mori,H. (1996/2003) Memory distortion in eyewitness pairs who observed nonconforming events and discussed them. Ninchi-Kagaku (in Japanese, 1996); Journal of the Faculty of Education Shinshu University,109, 75-84, (2003). Mori,K.(2003a). “No, Mum. It was a white car”: What happens if mother and child dyads witness the same event differently? Poster presented at the 4th Tsukuba International Conference on Memory, Tsukuba, (March, 2003) Mori,K.(2003b). Surreptitiously projecting a different movie to two subsets of viewers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, Mori,K. & Mori,H.(2004). Second-Order Effects of the Presence of Co-witnesses on Memory Conformity in Experimental Collaborative Eyewitness Testimony. Submitted to Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Mori,K. 、 & Takahashi, R. (2004). Pre-schoolers’ reports of conflicting points surreptitiously inserted into a co-witnessed event. Paper presented at the 5th Tsukuba International Conference on Memory, Tsukuba, (March, 2004) Acknowledgments. This research was supported by the Grant-in-Aid from Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology (Grant No ).

Wanted

Two Different Verbal Materials Are Presented Simultaneously

The fMORI Technique (Mori, 2004) A single projector can project two different items onto a single screen to be seen separately by two groups of viewers. Projector (EPSON LP-700) Component G and Components R&B are overlaid. Component G and Components R&B are seen separately through polarizing sunglasses. T S

Merits and demerits of the two MORI Techniques The original MORI Full color movies Two DLP projectors are needed. Difficult to arrange the suitable position. The fMORI Monochrome, still pictures, or words Only one LCD projector is needed. Arrangement is not necessary.

Collaborators are Wanted. If you want to use the MORI technique, me: