Assessing “Success” in Anti-Poverty Policy Lars Osberg Dalhousie University October 1, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Properties of Random Variables
Advertisements

Income Inequality International Comparisons. Data Sources 4 Luxembourg Income Study -- uses survey income from 25 countries; data organized to maximize.
Isn’t it Well Being That We Want to Improve? - The Metric of Evaluation Lars Osberg - Department of Economics, Dalhousie University - Institute for Social.
Authors: J.A. Hausman, M. Kinnucan, and D. McFadden Presented by: Jared Hayden.
Income Inequality: Measures, Estimates and Policy Illustrations
© 2003 By Default!Slide 1 Poverty Measures Celia M. Reyes Introduction to Poverty Analysis NAI, Beijing, China Nov. 1-8, 2005.
The Evolution of Poverty Measurement - with special reference to Canada Lars Osberg Economics Department, Dalhousie University Workshop on Low Income,
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
International trends in poverty: how rates mislead but intensity and labour supply matter Lars Osberg - Department of Economics, Dalhousie University.
Analysis of Inequality across Multi- dimensionally Poor and Population Subgroups for Counting Approaches Suman Seth and Sabina Alkire Development Studies.
Chapter 6 Economic Inequality.
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation
Frank Cowell: TU Lisbon – Inequality & Poverty Poverty Measurement July 2006 Inequality and Poverty Measurement Technical University of Lisbon Frank Cowell.
Has Economic Well-being improved in Western Nations? Lars Osberg Department of Economics, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Presentation at Wuhan.
The Simple Regression Model
Labor Market Trends in North America – Has Economic Well-being improved ? Lars Osberg Department of Economics, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia.
New Estimates of the Index of Economic Well- Being for Canada Lars Osberg - Dalhousie University Andrew Sharpe - Center for the Study of Living Standards.
What should an index of segregation measure? Rebecca Allen Institute of Education, University of London Presentation to Bristol Segregation.
Experimental Evaluation
Statistics 800: Quantitative Business Analysis for Decision Making Measures of Locations and Variability.
Regulating for Decent Work July, Geneva The impact of minimum wage adjustments on Vietnamese workers' hourly wages By Henrik Hansen, John Rand.
Schiller, Chapter 3: Counting the Poor
Health inequalities The most significant health inequalities in Scotland are described in the Long-term Monitoring of Health Inequalities annual report.
Poverty Lecture 4 Schiller, Chapter 3: Counting the Poor.
Poverty Lecture 4 Schiller, Chapter 3: Counting the Poor.
Poverty measures: Properties and Robustness
POVERTY PRESENTATION AT UNDP OFFICE POVERTY STATUS AND TREND IN TANZANIA MAINLAND, /12 Presented by Sango A. H. Simba National Bureau of Statistics.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 13-1 Chapter 13 Introduction to Multiple Regression Statistics for Managers.
UK POVERTY GCSE ECONOMICS: UNIT 12 Measurement of standards of living.
Principles and practicalities in measuring child poverty - Miles Corak Measuring child benefits: measuring child poverty - Michael Mendelson & Sid Frankel.
CENTRE FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH AND COMPETENCE IN THE LEARNING ECONOMY Session 2: Basic techniques for innovation data analysis. Part I: Statistical inferences.
An Index of Labour Market Well-being for Canada and the United States Lars Osberg Economics Department, Dalhousie University Andrew Sharpe & Jeremy Smith.
Impact of business environment on poverty reduction Gessye Ginelle Safou-Mat American University School of International Service.
Fuel Poverty. Structure of the Presentation Background: What is fuel poverty? Issues to consider when measuring fuel poverty. Ways to measure fuel poverty.
Chapter 3 – Descriptive Statistics
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Section 10-1 Review and Preview.
Decomposing Variations in the Watts Multidimensional Poverty Index.
Summer School on Multidimensional Poverty 8–19 July 2013 Institute for International Economic Policy (IIEP) George Washington University Washington, DC.
STA Lecture 161 STA 291 Lecture 16 Normal distributions: ( mean and SD ) use table or web page. The sampling distribution of and are both (approximately)
Xavier Sala-i-Martin Columbia University June 2008.
ECON Poverty and Inequality. Measuring poverty To measure poverty, we first need to decide on a poverty line, such that those below it are considered.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Eleventh Edition and the Triola.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
INTERACTIONS AMONG POVERTY, ACCESS TO MODERN ENERGY SOURCES AND GENDER IN NIGERIA BY FIDELIS O. OGWUMIKE AND UCHE M. OZUGHALU.
Session 5 Review Today Inequality measures Four basic axioms Lorenz
1 1 Slide © 2007 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Labour Supply and Inequality Trends in the U.S.A. & elsewhere Lars Osberg Department of Economics Dalhousie University
1 Chapter 12 Simple Linear Regression. 2 Chapter Outline  Simple Linear Regression Model  Least Squares Method  Coefficient of Determination  Model.
Managerial Economics Demand Estimation & Forecasting.
Variable Population Poverty Comparisons (Written with Subbu Subramanian) Nicole Hassoun.
CORRELATION: Correlation analysis Correlation analysis is used to measure the strength of association (linear relationship) between two quantitative variables.
Chapter 16 Data Analysis: Testing for Associations.
Adjusted from slides attributed to Andrew Ainsworth
OPHI Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative Department of International Development Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford
Four elementary points about multidimensional poverty Francisco H. G. Ferreira Deputy Chief Economist, LCR.
Has Economic Well-being improved in Canada and the United States? Lars Osberg Department of Economics, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Andrew.
Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective Lars Osberg -Dalhousie University -I.S.E.R. U of Essex.
COMMENTS ON THE ANDERSON TRILOGY: - Boats and Tides and “Trickle Down” Theories - Polarization of the Poor - Examining Convergence Hypotheses Lars Osberg.
Frank Cowell: Oviedo – Inequality & Poverty Poverty Measurement March 2007 Inequality, Poverty and Income Distribution University of Oviedo Frank Cowell.
Targeting of Public Spending Menno Pradhan Senior Poverty Economist The World Bank office, Jakarta.
CROSS-COUNTRY INCOME MOBILITY COMPARISONS UNDER PANEL ATTRITION: THE RELEVANCE OF WEIGHTING SCHEMES Luis Ayala (IEF, URJC) Carolina Navarro (UNED) Mercedes.
Targeting Outcomes, Redux Coady, Grosh, and Hoddinott (forthcoming in World Bank Research Observer) Presentation at Reaching the Poor Conference Washington,
Measurements and Their Analysis. Introduction Note that in this chapter, we are talking about multiple measurements of the same quantity Numerical analysis.
1 Measuring Poverty: Inequality Measures Charting Inequality Share of Expenditure of Poor Dispersion Ratios Lorenz Curve Gini Coefficient Theil Index Comparisons.
AISHA KHAN SUMMER 2009 SECTION G & I LECTURE FOURTEEN & FIFTEEN ECO 102 Development Economics.
Issues in the Use of Equivalence Scales - comments Lars Osberg Economics Department, Dalhousie University Workshop on Low Income, Poverty and Deprivation.
Statistical Inference: Poverty Indices and Poverty Decompositions Michael Lokshin DECRG-PO The World Bank.
Poverty measures: Properties and Robustness Michael Lokshin DECRG-PO The World Bank.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression
OPHI Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative Department of International Development Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
Presentation transcript:

Assessing “Success” in Anti-Poverty Policy Lars Osberg Dalhousie University October 1, 2004

Helping People out of Poverty? Poverty reduction = “success” for social policy Implicitly – statistical criterion is poverty rate Policy focus: wages, jobs & poverty Problem: poorest have multiple problems, expensive to move out of poverty Implications of focus on rate of poverty: Can achieve apparent “success” by creaming off marginally poor Triage, time limits, “Opportunity Accounts” rhetoric The convenience of abandoning “no-hopers”

Is there a better Index of Poverty Policy Success? Sen (1976) & large literature since Depth of Poverty also matters Principle of transfers – transfer from poor person to richer person increases poverty NOT satisfied by Poverty Rate Axioms + Communicability => Useful + Used focus, monotonicity, symmetry, replication invariance, transfer sensitivity, continuity + communicable

Axioms to Measure Poverty ? (1) Focus: the poverty measure should be independent of the nonpoor population. (2) Weak monotonicity: a reduction in a poor person’s income, holding other incomes constant, must increase the value of the poverty measure. (3) Impartiality: A poverty measure should be insensitive to the order of incomes. (4) Weak transfer: An increase in a poverty measure should occur if the poorer of the two individuals involved in an upward transfer of income is poor and if the set of poor people does not change. (5) Strong upward transfer: An increase in a poverty measure should occur if the poorer of the two individuals involved in an upward transfer of income is poor.

Axioms Continued (6) Continuity : The poverty measure must vary continuously with incomes. (7) Replication invariance : The value of a poverty measure does not change if it is computed based on an income distribution that is generated by the k-fold replication of an original income distribution. Is there “something different” about being Poor Social Exclusion ?

Poverty Intensity Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) Index. P = (RATE ) (GAP ) (1+G (g )). Empirically: inequality of poverty gaps [1+G (g)] is very nearly constant. SST = volume of Box, one dimension nearly constant. Changes over time, differences across jurisdictions can be approximated by. RATE x GAP. Poverty Box – in 2 dimensions. Poverty Intensity proportional to area RATE X GAP.

Foster, Greer,Thorbecke Index Based on weighted average of poverty gap ratios, where weights = poverty aversion parameter  Satisfies the transfer axiom for  > 1 and the transfer sensitivity axiom for  > 2 Higher values of  imply greater weight to deprivation of least well-off Ethically desirable – but is data on the most disadvantaged dependable?

What is the cost of simplicity ? Poverty rate FGT  = 0 Poverty Intensity Poverty Box = rate x % gap FGT  = 1 SST FGT  = 2…6 Simplest – ignores depth Fails Monotonicity, Transfer Fails transfer axiom Implicitly - $1 deprivation has constant value Formally Satisfies Axioms - insensitive in practice ? Satisfies Axioms - excess sensitivity to bad data on poorest ?

But does it matter ? Do we get the Same Results ? International variation > national changes over time Do alternative indices of poverty differ in ranking of social states ? Luxembourg Income Study data After-tax, after transfer equivalent income LIS equivalence scale: Y i = Y f / N 0.5 Relative poverty line = ½ median equivalent

Same Cross Sectional Country Rankings ? In Mid 1990s Luxembourg Income Study data, the average poverty gap differs significantly Implication: country rankings by poverty intensity frequently diverge from rankings by poverty rate

Qualitative Conclusions Re: Poverty Trends Often Differ Relative poverty in early 1990s ? Canada, UK, Sweden: intensity & rate disagree US & Germany: indices agree Over-all – 22 year/year comparisons 4 no change rate but change intensity 5 opposite direction change: intensity & rate 9/22 = 40% disagreement Absolute poverty line UK - poverty rate and poverty intensity change in opposite directions every time /79/86/91/95

Communicability ? The whole point of measuring poverty is to influence the policies that might affect poverty A poverty index not used or understood by the public & by policy makers is pointless How much of the variation in Higher Order Poverty (FGT  = 2…6 ) is explained by [rate*gap] ? To what extent do international rankings change for FGT  = 2…6 ? Do plausible corrections for bad data matter ?

How might measurement choices affect results ? Great Public Interest in “League Tables” but Very small changes may re-rank order of countries Unequal range of Indices implies scaling to unit interval desirable Linear Scaling = (Value – Min)/(Max – Min)

Sensitivity to “Bad” Data ? Very poorest lead lives where likely to find: Response error in income Sampling bias Homeless Unlikely to be able to report ‘in-kind’ income Unlikely to be recorded in sample surveys As   = 2…6, any measurement errors increase in importance

Plausible magnitudes of implications ? Assume all incomes less than $2,000 US (PPP) must be wrong Caution is in order !!!!! Assume Number of Unreported Homeless = [(r i / r US )* Scale up number of very low income households Both

Better Measurement Matters Poverty Intensity / FGT 1 / Normalized Poverty Gap Makes a Difference to conclusions Often has different trend to poverty rate Easily communicated – visually and verbally Decomposable Useful for policy evaluation Count each $ reduction in poverty gap as part of “success” FGT  = 2…6 Less impact on rankings & much harder to communicate