Speech Coders – a VoIP perspective Roar Hagen CTO SIP/

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voice over IP By: Adiel AKPLOGAN CAFE Informatique S. A. - TOGO - Web:
Advertisements

Saif Bin Ghelaita Director of Technologies & Standards TRA UAE
Loading Welcome To My Presentation. Hybrid Next Generation Mobile System Analysis Based on Internet Applications A Presentation On Prepared by Abu Sayed.
Robust Header Compression Mikael Degermark Co-chair, ROHC WG (to be) University of Arizona/ Ericsson Research.
UBIFone & The Technology Ahead 25 th June 2006 This presentation is the property of UbiFone. Distributors or any other individuals or entities are not.
SkyWay 4000 & 7000 QoS systems David Gell VP Engineering.
N Team 15: Final Presentation Peter Nyberg Azadeh Bararsani Adie Tong N N multicodec minisip.
A Presentation on H.323 Deepak Bote. , IM, blog…
Copyright © by Elliot Eichen. All rights reserved. RTP – Real Time Protocol (and RTCP)
Media: Voice and Video in your SIP Environment Jitendra Shekhawat.
29.1 Chapter 29 Multimedia Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Wireless & VoIP Christian Huitema February 26, 2000.
Speech codecs and DCCP with TFRC VoIP mode Magnus Westerlund
© 2006 AudioCodes Ltd. All rights reserved. AudioCodes Confidential Proprietary Signal Processing Technologies in Voice over IP Eli Shoval Audiocodes.
1 © NOKIA GPP2 Wideband Codec Presentation Interoperable Wideband Speech Coder for CDMA2000 and WCDMA Systems W-VRM: Wideband Variable-Rate Multi-Mode.
A STUDY OF DESIGN COMPROMISES FOR SPEECH CODERS IN PACKET NETWORKS 1.INTRODUCTION In voice over packet networks, the coding gain achieved by prediction-based.
Understanding the Internet Low Bit Rate Coder Jan Linden Vice President of Engineering Global IP Sound Presented by Jan Skoglund Sr. Research Scientist.
Voice over the Internet (the basics) CS 7270 Networked Applications & Services Lecture-2.
PROJECT PRESENTATION “ Analyzing Factors that affect VoIP Call Quality ” Presented By: Vamsi Krishna Karnati 11/24/2014.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services in the environment of Next Generation Network.
Testing SIP Services Over IP. Agenda  SIP testing – advanced scenarios  SIP testing - Real Life Examples.
Application layer (continued) Week 4 – Lecture 2.
VoIP Using SIP/RTP by George Fu, UCCS CS 522 Semester Project Fall 2004.
VoIP Voice Transmission Over Data Network. What is VoIP?  A method for Taking analog audio signals Turning audio signals into digital data Digital data.
In-Band Flow Establishment for End-to-End QoS in RDRN Saravanan Radhakrishnan.
CS158B Project By Shing Chau Jerry Ko Ying Li
TCP/IP Protocol Suite 1 Chapter 25 Upon completion you will be able to: Multimedia Know the characteristics of the 3 types of services Understand the methods.
K. Salah 1 Chapter 28 VoIP or IP Telephony. K. Salah 2 VoIP Architecture and Protocols Uses one of the two multimedia protocols SIP (Session Initiation.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Multimedia Service Delivery on Next Generation Networks Pradeep De Almeida, Group Chief Technology Officer Dialog Telekom.
Voice & Data Convergence Network Services January 11, 2001.
QoE Assurance Division Solutions for ToIP – VoIP service assurance and service performance.
6. Next Generation Networks A. Transition to NGN B
VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol) CDA 4527 Fall 2006.
1 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. Course Number Presentation_ID Voice Data Integration Cisco do Brasil Jonio Cavalcanti VoIP Network Design.
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM)
Secure Steganography in Audio using Inactive Frames of VoIP Streams
Voice Over Packet Networks Getting the most from your voice codec Philippe Gournay VoiceAge Corp. 750 Lucerne Road, Suite 250 Montreal (Quebec) H3R 2H6.
VoIP Technology Developments Co-leaders: José A. Domínguez (University of Oregon)
Computer Networks: Multimedia Applications Ivan Marsic Rutgers University Chapter 3 – Multimedia & Real-time Applications.
1 VoIP – Voice over Internet Protocol Patrick Hügenell, Andreas Vetter – TIM01AGR – 2003 VoIP Voice over IP.
1 Lab Introduction – software Voice over IP. 2 Lab Capability and Status  Software used in this course installed in Engineering labs including the lab.
Unified. Simplified. Unified Communications Launch 2007.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
What’s new in Wideband Audio?
The Way Forward Factors Driving Video Conferencing Dr. Jan Linden, VP of Engineering Global IP Solutions.
Voice over IP Why Challenges/solutions Voice codec and packet delay.
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Basic Components of a Telephony Network.
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. IT412 Voice and Data Integration : Unit 8 Slide 1 Unit 8 Voice Over IP Network Fundamentals.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
January 23-26, 2007 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Converged Conferencing The TIME is Now.
Chapter 28. Network Management Chapter 29. Multimedia
January 23-26, 2007 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Challenges in Deploying VoWLAN.
LOG Objectives  Describe some of the VoIP implementation challenges such as Delay/Latency, Jitter, Echo, and Packet Loss  Describe the voice encoding.
1 “ ” Multiservice networking is emerging as a strategically important issue for enterprise and public service provider infrastructures alike.The proposition.
Developing Applications with Host Media Processing David Asher.
Dave Martin Vice President, Product Management
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
Voice and Video over IP.
Voice Coding in 3G Networks
Voice over Internet Protocol Presenter: Devesh Patidar Arunjay Singh August 2, 2009.
August 3-4, 2004 San Jose, CA Successfully Offering VoIP- Enabled Applications Services Jan Linden Vice President of Engineering.
Telecommunications Essentials Chapter 9. Cost savings & revenue generation Logical rather than physical connections IPT – Telephony IPTV – Digital Television.
Introduction Chapter 1 “ Carrier Grade Voice over IP. ” D. Collins, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Scalable Speech Coding for IP Networks
Voice over IP Presentation on Voice over IP Telecommunication and Computer Networks Presenter: Subash Chandra Pakhrin (072MSI616) MSC in Infromation and.
VOICE AND VIDEO OVER IP VOIP, RTP, RSVP.
Audio Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science
VoIP—Voice over Internet Protocol
Understanding the Internet Low Bit Rate Coder
Discussion Issues on IMS-based NGN
Presentation transcript:

Speech Coders – a VoIP perspective Roar Hagen CTO SIP/

Agenda Speech Coders – a VoIP perspective Demo Q&A

QoS – (endpoints) status ”A lot of talk,... but not much work” Year after year the same story More then 3000 papers since 1984 Limited ToS support at the end points

QoS – status Industry’s perspective quality concerns unproven technology PSTN works fine too busy to switch not compelling economics percentage of respondents source: Forrester Research/AT&T (2000)

Background - Diverse Environment PSTN Managed network Wireless Public Internet Managed network Next generation codecs should address the needs of all applications []

Packet Loss San Francisco – Hong Kong

Jitter San Francisco – Hong Kong

Homg Kong to China VoIP Call

Wireless VoIP – The Big Unknown ? LAN 2G/2.5G WLAN Bluetooth 3G Vehicle Walk Fixed Mbps Mobility

Approach We need holistic view/approach for both Horizontal (end-to-end) perspective Vertical (top-down) perspective

Vertical (Top Down) Perspective Physical LinkMLPPP/FR/ATM AAL1 NetworkIP/WFQ/IP-prec TransportRTP/UDP/RSVP SessionSIP/H.323 PresentationSpeech Codecs/…

VoIP Aspirations IP innovation rather than PSTN replication New features and services through voice and data convergence End-to-end IP Better than PSTN sound quality

Current speech processing technology not designed for packet switched environments * M EAN O PINION S CORE C ONGESTED N ETWORK O VERPROVISIONED N ETWORK MOS = U SER E XPERIENCE “ F ALL O FF A C LIFF” shape of curve forces over provisioning “ F ALL O FF A C LIFF” shape of curve forces over provisioning

…congestion related VoIP QoS problems can be solved without over provisioning… * M EAN O PINION S CORE C ONGESTED N ETWORK O VERPROVISIONED N ETWORK MOS = U SER E XPERIENCE Operate A T and A BOVE congestion point without customer knowing

GIPS Ehanced G.711+ GIPS NetEQ™ G.711+GIPS NetEQ™ G.711+ITU PLC G.729A G.711+No PLC Matching PSTN Quality Telephony bandwidth speech test result S OURCE L OCKHEED M ARTIN GLOBAL T ELECOMMUNICATION (COMSAT) N ETWORK C ONDITION (% P ACKET L OSS) 0%5%30%10%15%25%20% MOS GIPS iPCM™-wb+ GIPS NetEQ™-wb G.722+ GIPS NetEQ™-wb G Source +no PLC Better Than PSTN Quality Wideband speech 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% MOS N ETWORK C ONDITION (% P ACKET L OSS) narrow band sound quality equal to PSTN wide band sound quality

Jitter Buffer/PLC Enhancements Source: Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications (COMSAT)

Delay gain with NetEQ™ approx ms compared to traditional jitter buffers Adaptive jitter bufferJitterFixed jitter bufferNetEQ™ Packet number Delay (ms)

The NextGen Speech Codec Ideal Need one concept that will work for a long time –footprint importance Need to handle large diversity of transport network –low rate –high quality, high rate –packet loss –jitter –low delay Manageable IPR situation Signal Robustness –speech –music Suitable for variety of applications, e.g. IP video-conferencing

iLBC (internet Low Bitrate Codec) Speech sampled at 8 kHZ, using a block-independent linear-predictive coding (LPC) algorithm. Bandwidth kbps (52 bytes per 30 ms) Frame size 30 ms (support for 20 ms in the next revision) Complexity and memory requirements are similar to ITU G.729A Basic Quality is equal to or better than G.729. Packet loss robustness is significantly better than G.729. Packet loss concealment - Integrated example solution

MOS Results Source: Dynastat Inc.

iLBC - IETF work IETF deliverables, submitted during February ‘02: –iLBC codec specification draft - experimental standards track –iLBC RTP Payload Profile- regular standards track (AVT) –Statement about IPRs in iLBC and its “freeware nature” MOS results submission to the AVT mailing list during March ‘02

Why iLBC !? Current low bit rate codecs: ITU G.729, G.723.1, GSM-EFR, and 3GPP-AMR were developed for circuit switched & wireless telephony and are all based on the CELP (Code Excited Linear Prediction) paradigm. CELP coders are stateful, they have memory, error propagation results from lost or delayed packets. iLBC treats every packet individually, making it suitable for packet communications.

More information Coming Soon - web site with: –Info about initiative –Info about codec –Latest iLBC IETF drafts (spec and payload format) –Latest iLBC float point Source code –FAQ list IETF drafts: –draft-andersen-ilbc-00.txt - codec spec (exper. stds track) –draft-duric-rtp-ilbc-00.txt- RTP payload profile (AVT group) Web site Free demo SIP client available, please request at: SIP/

Summary Current speech coding technology not suited for VoIP VoIP opens possibilities –Move quality exprience to the next level with wideband coders NGN will not be NGN unless we move step forward on all of its fields iLBC – internet Low Bit Rate Codec –Provide an open standard ”the Internet way” for coder

Demo