SMOS Ocean Salinity Retrieval Level 3 Marco Talone, Jérôme Gourrion, Joaquim Ballabrera, Marcos Portabella, and the SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre (SMOS-BEC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Data. Basic Bayes theorem Bayes theorem relates the conditional probabilities of two events A, and B: A might be a hypothesis and B might.
Advertisements

SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Commissioning Plan, 07/05/2009 Level 2 Ocean Salinity Processor Commissioning Plan 7 May 2009 ARGANS ACRI-ST ICM-CSIC.
REVIEW OF OBSERVED BIAS TRENDS OVER THE OCEAN AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROCESSOR EVOLUTION Joe & Nicolas IFREMER/CLS ESL Quality Working Group #5 May 30-31,
SMOS – in situ comparisons J. Boutin*, N. Martin*, O. Hernandez*, N. Reul , G. Reverdin* *LOCEAN,  IFREMER.
F. Wentz, T. Meissner, J. Scott and K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November ,
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) CP34/BEC L3-L4 maps internal production chain BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity L2OS RFI study 9 May 2011 ARGANS & L2OS ESL.
OSE meeting GODAE, Toulouse 4-5 June 2009 Interest of assimilating future Sea Surface Salinity measurements.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
Clima en España: Pasado, presente y futuro Madrid, Spain, 11 – 13 February 1 IMEDEA (UIB - CSIC), Mallorca, SPAIN. 2 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton,
Aquarius Status Salinity Retrieval and Applications D. M. Le Vine NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD E. P. Dinnat, G. Lagerloef, P. de Matthaeis, H. Kao, F.
SAR Altimetry in Coastal Zone: Performances, Limits, Perspectives Salvatore Dinardo Serco/ESRIN Bruno Lucas Deimos/ESRIN Jerome Benveniste ESA/ESRIN.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
AGU 2004 Fall Meeting, May 19, 2015Slide 1 Jointly Retrieving Surface Soil Moisture from Active and Passive Microwave Observations using Cubist Data-Mining.
Error bar estimates Estimates of the uncertainties on input LwN Estimates of the error model Estimates of the uncertainties on outputs Chla, bbp,cdm (Co-variance.
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
Argo Products at the Asia-Pacific Data-Research Center Konstantin Lebedev, Sharon DeCarlo, Peter Hacker, Nikolai Maximenko, James Potemra, Yingshuo Shen.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
SMOS Ocean Salinity Retrieval Level 2 Marco Talone, Jérôme Gourrion, Fernando Martin Porqueras, Nicolas Reul, Joe Tenerelli, Marcos Portabella, and the.
SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Workshop, 18-19/11/2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Mediterranean flights C.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Chapter 15 Modeling of Data. Statistics of Data Mean (or average): Variance: Median: a value x j such that half of the data are bigger than it, and half.
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
Progress Meeting #27, April 2015, Barcelona SPAIN T3.2 Retrieval algorithm Estrella Olmedo BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
UPDATE ON THE SUN GLINT Joe Tenerelli Ocean Data Lab SMOS Level 2 OS Progress Meeting 26 SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Barcelona, Spain April 2015.
Ocean Salinity validation of mission requirements review / improvements: Points of Reflexion ESL teams Mission Requirements: The so-called GODAE requirements:
A. Montuori 1, M. Portabella 2, S. Guimbard 2, C. Gabarrò 2, M. Migliaccio 1 1 Dipartimento per le Tecnologie (DiT), University of Naples Parthenope, Italy.
1 / 13 Current activities at ICM-SMOS-BEC J. Gourrion, C. Gabarró, R. Sabia, M. Talone, V. González, S. Montero, S. Guimbard, F. Pérez, J. Martínez, M.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
ROSA – ROSSA Validation results R. Notarpietro, G. Perona, M. Cucca
2nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop - June Ocean state estimates from the observations Contributions and complementarities of Argo,
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity v63x product design evolution 22 April 2015 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) LO calibration frequency impact Part II C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, V. González, A. Turiel & BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) Assessment of impact of new ECMWF cycle 38r2 BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona.
QWG-10 ESRIN 4-6 February 2013 Quality control study for SMOS data / Flags analysis C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, E. Olmedo M. Portabella, J. Font and BEC team.
SMOS Quality Working Group Meeting #2 Frascati (Rome), September 13 th -14 th,2010 SMOS-BEC Team.
ICM/UTM - CSIC Hymex activities Joaquim Ballabrera Jordi Font Jordi Salat Marta Umbert.
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
1 Module One: Measurements and Uncertainties No measurement can perfectly determine the value of the quantity being measured. The uncertainty of a measurement.
Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Assimilating Satellite Sea-Surface Salinity in NOAA Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Dave Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC Avichal Mehra, NWS/NCEP/EMC Sudhir Nadiga, IMSG.
21-23/04/2015PM27 J-L Vergely, J. Boutin, N. Kolodziejczyk, N. Martin, S. Marchand SMOS RFI/Outlier filtering.
Geophysical Ocean Products from AMSR-E & WindSAT Chelle L. Gentemann, Frank Wentz, Thomas Meissner, Kyle Hilburn, Deborah Smith, and Marty Brewer
QWG-10 – 4-6 February 2013 – ESRIN (Italy) SMOS Level3 and Level 4 Research Products Provided by the Barcelona Expert Center Jordi Font and BEC team SMOS.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Errors on SMOS retrieved SSS and their dependency to a priori wind speed X. Yin 1, J. Boutin 1, J. Vergely 2, P. Spurgeon 3, and F. Gaillard 4 1. LOCEAN.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
Tests on V500 Sun On versus Sun Off 1)Tbmeas. –Tbmodel in the FOV X. Yin, J. Boutin Inputs from R. Balague, P. Spurgeon, A. Chuprin, M. Martin-Neira and.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Ocean Salinity Science 2014, 26–28 November, Exeter (UK) J. Ballabrera, N. Hoareau, M. Portabella, E. Garcia-Ladona, A. Turiel SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Eric Bayler NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Aquarius SSS space/time biases with respect to Argo data
‘Aquarius’ Maps Ocean Salinity Fine-scale Structure
Search for point-like source in ANTARES
Weighted Least Squares Fit
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
5.2 Least-Squares Fit to a Straight Line
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Presentation transcript:

SMOS Ocean Salinity Retrieval Level 3 Marco Talone, Jérôme Gourrion, Joaquim Ballabrera, Marcos Portabella, and the SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre (SMOS-BEC) Team. Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, 2010

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 SMOS processing chain Level 1Level 0Level 2Level 3 Level 4 Data Assimilation MeasurementsObservationsGlobal mapData fusionRaw data

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 not manageable!! Motivation Estimates quality and reliability is improved by degrading the spatial and/or temporal resolution Spatial resolution is km The SMOS level 2 product consists on files containing half-orbit data (from pole to pole) on the ISEA4H9 (Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area projection, level 4, resolution 9) grid defined at level 1. not manageable!! observational error is larger than acceptable lot of uncertainties than contaminate the final SSS value In addition to that, the observational error linked to the SSS data is larger than acceptable for scientific purposes. The complex procedure needed to retrieve SSS from brightness temperatures (Tb) recorded by the MIRAS radiometer is subject to a lot of uncertainties than contaminate the final SSS value. each point is revisited by the satellite, at least, every 3 days

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 SMOS requirements Scientific requirements for salinity retrieval: Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE, 1997) 0.1 psu, 200 km, 10 days Salinity and Sea Ice Working Group (SSIWG, 2000) 0.1 psu, 100 km, 30 days SMOS (Mission Requirements Document v5, 2002) 0.1 psu, 200 km, 30 days Smith, N., and M. Lefrebvre, The global ocean data assimilation experiment (GODAE); monitoring the oceans in the 2000s: An integrated approach, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE), pp. SMOS MRD, Smos Mission Requirements Document, avilable at enlaces/SMOS MRD V5.pdf

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 products ProductDescriptionΔSΔSΔTΔT Product 1Maximum spatial resolution (to locate salinity gradients). Only temporal averaging using a weighted (by measurements uncertainty) averaging method over the L2 products. ISEA4H km 10d every 3d Product 1BHigh spatial resolution. Spatio-temporal averaging of using weighted averaging method over the L2 products. ISEA4H km 3d every 3d Product 2GODAE. Spatial and temporal averaging using optimal interpolation method over the L2 products. 200km10d every 10d

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 products ProductDescriptionΔSΔSΔTΔT Product 3Climatology-like. Spatial and temporal averaging using optimal interpolation method over the L2 products. 100km30d every 10d Product 3aSeasonal average. Same as product 3 but temporal averaging by season (JFM, AMJ, JAS and OND) over Product km3M every 3M Product 3bYearly average. Same as product 3 but temporal averaging by natural year over Product km1Y every 1Y Note: Three versions ascending, descending, and both Note: Three versions of each product will be generated using ascending, descending, and both types of orbits. absolute salinity anomaly mean value, error value Each absolute salinity value will be accompanied by its anomaly (difference between the absolute value and a predefined temporal mean), this predefined mean value, and a computation error value both for the absolute and mean values.

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 2 data discrimination

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 L2 data discrimination 1.Orbit Selection: Ascending/Descending/Both 2.Across-Track distance: maximum distance from boresight of the points to be included in the L3 calculation 3.Quality of the measurement/retrieval: sigma, chi2, chi2_P, outliers, sunglint, moonglint, gal_noise, TEC, ice, rain, num_meas_low 4.Number of valid observations 5.Geophysical conditions

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 processing

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation An example: Lets estimate the temperature of a room by using 2 thermometers: a 0.2 C- and 0.5 C-precision thermometers. The first one measures 27.7, while the second one How can we use the Least Square Algorithm to estimate both the real temperature and its uncertainty? Variable to estimate= temperature Observations = and Analysis result =

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation Assuming Gaussian statistics, centered in the mean value (27.7 and 28.0) and with a standard deviation equal to the precision of the instrument (0.2 and 0.5)

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation Assuming independent observations, the joint probability is the product of the probabilities: Maximizing is equivalent to minimizing

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation The solution can be easily found as: 27.7 is not the arithmetic average of the two measurements (27.9), but the result of a weighted average where the weight is inversely proportional to the error in the measurement. Reducing the error in the measurement is equivalent to increasing its weight in the averaging.

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation Using a more general notation: Cost Function Distance from the observations Covariance matrix of the error on the observations

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation least square estimatemaximum likelihood estimate This formulation has been obtained assuming Gaussian incorrelated errors on the observations. In this case the least square estimate is equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimate.

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Optimal Interpolation Assuming the presence of a background field, the cost function becomes distance from the observations covariance matrix of the error on the observations Minimizing this cost function results in find the field which is most similar to the reference and, at the same time, with the lowest distance from the observations. distance from the reference covariance matrix of the error on the reference The analytic solution of is analysis result Background field Observations minus information from the background observation

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Examples

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Climatologic SSS

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 SMOS Level 3 Averaged SMOS Level2 data as provided by DPGS Data Processing Ground Segment

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 SMOS Problems at L3 Anomaly with respect to climatology at level 3 the land-sea transition effect is evident RFI

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 L3 synthesis – Asc. vs. Desc. vs All

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 L3 synthesis – Asc. vs. Desc. vs All

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 L3 synthesis – Asc. vs. Desc. vs All Fresher when ice/land enters in the FOV Saltier when it exits

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 Products

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 Products SMOS Level 3 User Data Product are distributed by CP34: Some of the entities participating in the CP34 are: CDTI Instituto de Ciencias del Mar ICM INDRA INSA GMV Universitat de València Universitat Politècn. de Catalunya SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 Products As for Level 2, different programs are available to open, display, and export SMOS Level 3 products, among them CP34View CP34 View software, is distributed through the CP34 website Binary.DBL files can be read by using ad-hoc programs (C, Matlab, Fortran…), exported data can feed any program you are most used to (IDL, Matlab, ODV…) Details on DBL file structure can be found in the L3 Product Specification Document, on: SM_VAL__M___OFCAF5_ T000144_ T004906_200_005_1.zip SM_VAL__M___OFCAF5_ T000144_ T004906_200_005_1.HDR header in XML SM_VAL__M___OFCAF5_ T000144_ T004906_200_005_1.DBL binary data file start YYYYMMDDThhmmss end YYYYMMDDThhmmss proc version

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 Products Variables at Level 3, for each SSS retrieval (3): level 3 SSS variance at level 2 anomaly error reference (mean to compute anomaly) error on the reference background (climatology/model) error on the background fg_discarded: some L2 discarded fg_num_meas_low fg_quality fg_radiom fg_inversion (chi2) fg_range fg_sigma fg_rain fg_ice fg_tec fg_geophysical fg_num_meas_valid fg_L3_gn_pol (galactic noise) fg_L3_invert (marq) fg_averall (too many fg_quality at L2) fg_coast fg_suspect_ice fg_sst_front fg_sss_front fg_high_wind fg_low_wind fg_high_sst fg_low_sst fg_high_sss fg_low_sss fg_sea_state (young sea) fg_failed (level 3 algorithm failed) fg_background (L3 SSS far from background) fg_background_quality (high background error) fg_error_ratio (1-4 quantifies fg_background)

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 Level 3 Products

Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, /29 SMOS Land Cover Tool Tool from GMV to display and export SMOS product to Google Earth files

Thank you! Course on Earth Observation Understanding of the Water Cycle Fortaleza, Brasil, November 1-12, 2010 Marco Talone, Jérôme Gourrion, Joaquim Ballabrera, Marcos Portabella, and the SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre (SMOS-BEC) Team.