TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

ATLAS LHCC 28/11/00 A. Henriques/CERN 1 H8 : Pixel, SCT, TRT, Tiles, LAr em barrel, Muons SPS H6: EMEC, HEC, FCAL, Background studies GIF: Muons (MDT,
Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS Andrea Dell’Acqua - CERN PH/SFT on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
ATLAS Muon test beam, E. Etzion, NSS System Test of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer in the H8 Beam at the CERN SPS Erez Etzion (Tel Aviv University),
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
The Pixel Detector ByteStream Converter M.Cobal (1), L. Santi (2) (1) University of Udine and INFN Trieste, Italy (2) University of Trieste and INFN Trieste,
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Adele Rimoldi, Pavia University & INFN – CERN G4usersWorkshop Nov H8 Muon Testbeam Simulation CERN - 14 November, 2002 and the Physics Validation.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
Khaled Belkadhi (LLR-Ecole Polytechnique)1 DHCAL Test Beam Results using Full Train Reconstruction Khaled Belkadhi.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
Aras Papadelis, NIKHEF Jaarvergadering 19/12/06 1 Fresh results from the LHCb Vertex Locator test beam Aras Papadelis Ann Van Lysebetten, Anne Keune, Eddy.
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
NIPHAD meeting 16 September 2005, T. Cornelissen 1 Tracking results in the testbeam Thijs Cornelissen.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Track Finding.
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
Atlantis and the Inner Detector
Visual Checks of the Reconstruction using Atlantis
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 2 Introduction Detectors in their real positions as in ATLAS Primary objectives & motivations:  Combined data taking with all the detectors  Testing of the whole Dataflow system (common LVL1 trigger, EF, ATLAS Event Format, etc.)  Final prototypes of the electronics (RODs)  Combined calorimetry studies  Combined studies of the InnerDetector  Combined studies ID + Muons Combined Testbeam: ~ March – November 2004 Full ATLAS barrel slice, starting from the interaction point (origin of the global coordinate system, same for all the detectors) All relevant sub-detectors participate Noemen: H8 Letertype Jargon!

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 3 InnerDetector: Pixels: 6 modules, inside magnet (B=1.4T) SCT: 8 modules, also inside magnet TRT: 1/16th of the barrel

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 4 Combined setup InnerDetector:  Pixels: 6 modules, inside magnet (B=1.4T)  SCT: 8 modules, also inside magnet  TRT: 1/16 th of the barrel Calorimetry:  LAr: barrel module 0 + cryostat  TileCal: 3 layers of modules Muon detectors:  1 barrel projective tower (MDTs + RPCs)  1 endcap sector (MDTs+TGCs)

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 5 Offline software flow Geant4 Hits G4 SimDigitization Raw Data Objects Simulation and Detector response Data Preparation PrepRawData (Clusters and Drift circles) and Space Points CTB Bytestream Track reconstruction Tracks The full ATLAS offline software is used for the testbeam data. Excellent test for various components:  Bytestream converters  Calibration and alignment  Track reconstruction Some testbeam-specific solutions were inevitable, but still, many bugs solved already that would otherwise have appeared in 2007!

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 6 Data taking Beams used: GeV pion/electrons/photons A complete vertical slice of ATLAS is available and we can exploit the full power of the ATLAS detector for detailed particle id and measurement Situation where many detector communities interact, and have to work together towards a common physics aim

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 7 Event display

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 8 Event display Welke bundel Welke software

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 9 Event display

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 10 Some events are more difficult

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 11 SCT residuals after alignment Before alignmentAfter alignment After alignment, the average residual over all the planes is found to be 25 micron (again close to expected).

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 12 TRT calibration The TRT hits are represented by vertical lines. The top and bottom of the line are the edges of the driftcircle, so that’s where the track should be. Without calibration, Athena was assuming t0 = 0 for all the straws, while in reality it is more like 25 ns. As a result, the residuals are about 1 mm. Calibration clearly improves things. If the straw is not found in the map of calibrated straws then the average of all the straws is applied (still much better than the Athena default) Without calibration With calibration

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 13 Curved tracks with helix fitter Run , 9 GeV pions, B=1.4 T

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 14 Curved tracks with helix fitter

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 15

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 16 Ganged pixels The particle hits almost the same spot in each of the modules it hits. So often you get ganged pixels in three layers at the same time. Probably need detailed alignment to solve this reliably, these hits are ignored for now in the SL fitter.

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 17 Momentum reco with xKalman Run , 9 GeV pions, B = 1.4 T Alleen pixel en sct

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 18 Inner detectgor: conclusions Wat hebben we bereikt tot nog toe? Wat moeten we nog doen?  Aligniering  Calibratie  Conditions: noise levels + dead channels  efficiency  Algemene performance

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 19 Calorimetry: LAr-Tile correlation   e Quasi-online monitoring inside Athena Tile and LAr not calibrated Muons removed with Muon-tag

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 20 calorimeter

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 21 Muons: Sagitta measurements Create r-z and phi track- segments, perform pattern recognition Segments fit on each muon station Combination of inner and outer, compare with middle station Misalignment affects mean value and width Multiple scattering affects width Sagitta definition at the TB: Sagitta Outer Middle Inner station

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 22 Comparisons with G4 simulation G4 Data Athena Data G4 Athena Difference G4-Data  1/p: material problem (effect corresponding to ~ 3 cm aluminum equivalent). - Detailed check of materials associated to GeoModel volumes-problem was found in RPC DED RPC internal structure After fixing the problem Sagitta width

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 23 ID ID-Muon Track Correlation ID Muons

Thijs Cornelissen - NIKHEF Jamboree, Dec 2004 P 24 Conclusions Was het een leuke/leerzame testbeam periode? Testbeam volgend jaar? Zijn we nu helemaal voorbereid op het nemen van data bij Atlas?