1.0 Abstract The purpose of this poster is to provide an overview of a GIS data framework and a suite of hydrology tools being developed to support watershed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Advertisements

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Alberta Tools ESRD Hydrology Community of Practice Chiadih Chang
G EOSPATIAL D ATA L AYERS FOR A RC H YDRO R IVER Arc Hydro River Meeting Clark Siler Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
Alberta Rainfall-Runoff Analysis September, 2002.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources David R
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS and Environment Dr Steve Carver
1 CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Session #1 (some material from Dr. David Maidment, University of Texas) January 18, 2006 Learning Objectives:
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Opportunities for Development of a Global Water Information System David R. Maidment, University of Texas at Austin Definition of an information system.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
Applied GIS On Kuwait’s water
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Frank Kenny and Bryce Matthews Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada The North American Drought Monitor Status in Canada Presented by: E. G. (Ted) O’Brien.
Florida Water Management Arc Hydro The Florida Experience Maryam Mashayekhi South Florida Water Management District Aisa Ceric St. Johns River Water Management.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
Suitability of High Resolution NHD for NHDPlus (Version 02) March Hydrography Practice Quiz Stromness Bay, South Georgia Island (Southern Atlantic). Point.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
David K. Arctur, David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin OGC Hydro DWG Annual Workshop BRGM, Orleans France,
Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA April 2, 2002.
Characterization of Hydrological Networks and Surfaces Theory and Tools.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
The Modelshed Framework Praveen Kumar and Ben Ruddell, CUAHSI HIS Update July 28, 04.
CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Lecture 1 – Introduction to the course Readings for today –Applied Hydrology, Chapter 1 –“Integrated Observatories to.
CWH-Term Project Ganesh Mallya Goal: Developing Arc Hydro data model for Western Kenya – Delineate the watershed and building a geo-database Data used:
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
UC 2006 Tech Session 1 Louis Wasson GeoResources Institute Mississippi State University Arc Hydro: A User’s Experience.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Gary Darling - GISP Office of the State CIO Acting Deputy Geographic Information Officer Melody Baldwin Division of Flood Management JOC –FOC GIS Unit.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Data Requirements for StreamStats December 18,
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
UC2008 Pre-conference Seminars 1 Arc Hydro Groundwater Gil Strassberg (Aquaveo) Norm Jones (Brigham Young University) David Maidment (University of Texas)
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Bdsfbdsfb NHDPlus for Corpus Christi Bay Term Project Report Nishesh Mehta Nishesh Mehta 21 st November st November 2006.
Introduction to GIS David R. Maidment
Key Concepts from Exercise 4
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
National Hydro Data Programs
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM)
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2009
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Presentation transcript:

1.0 Abstract The purpose of this poster is to provide an overview of a GIS data framework and a suite of hydrology tools being developed to support watershed management in Alberta. The poster outlines the rationale and vision for the work, progress to date, and highlights some examples that show data quality and utility. Project milestones include: - progress on a GIS database using an ArcHydro framework; - enhancements on DEMs and live update on time-series data; - development of tools to delineate watersheds and extract key watershed characteristics and data; and - coupling ArcHydro capabilities with hydrology models. 2.0 Background Understanding the Pressures on Alberta’s Natural Environments HYDAT GIS: Visualize, manage, manipulate, analyze, and help to model temporal and spatial processes GIS: Visualize, manage, manipulate, analyze, and help to model temporal and spatial processes WISKI Enterprise Data Warehouse Naturalized Flow Climate Water Quality EMS Water Use Air, Land and Biodiversity AlbertaArcHydroFramework Streams & Monitoring Drainage Areas Hydrogaphy Channels Surface Terrain Rainfall & Snow Ortho- Photography Land Cover/Use Soil Geology Remote Sensing ModellingInterfaces Automated Watershed Delineation & Characterization Water Resources Models Week of year Discharge (m Natural flow Desktop (Hydrological) SSRB IFN (Holistic) Week of year Discharge (m Natural flow Desktop (Hydrological) SSRB IFN (Holistic) IFN recommendation Week of year Discharge (m Natural flow Desktop (Hydrological) SSRB IFN (Holistic) Week of year Discharge (m Natural flow Desktop (Hydrological) SSRB IFN (Holistic) IFN recommendation Geospatial Data Time Series Data ArcHydro Geodatabases ArcHydro Tools ArcHydro Geodatabases ArcHydro Tools Naturalized flow Flood mapping Water quality mapping Water allocation (e.g., AWAIT) SOE reporting Groundwater mapping 3.0 Rationale – Why the need for watershed management tools? 4.0 Vision – ArcHydro as a Foundation for Watershed Management As seven established Watershed Planning and Advisory Councils (WPACs) become mature over time, their planning tools and requirements will become increasingly more complex (e.g. near real-time modelling). Alberta is leading the way to develop, design, and implement integrated resource (air, land, water & biodiversity) management plans to meet the Land Use Framework’s legislated mandate. GIS and ArcHydro provide a strong foundation and start point for progress down this path, and Alberta is also a busy place and is facing significant pressure on its biodiversity, air, land and water resources! Pressures include activities related to hydrocarbon recovery, agriculture, forestry, mining, expanding settlements, water control structures, municipal and industrial discharges, and linear disturbance such as transportation, pipelines and seismic exploration. These pressures pose complex social, economic and environmental challenges. Water for Life: Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability endorsed a partnership approach to watershed planning and management. Factors Influencing the Variability of Alberta’s Natural Environments The Province of Alberta includes some of the most diverse terrain and waterscapes in North America. Totaling 661,000 km 2, Alberta’s landscapes vary from hot dry badlands, vast unbroken forests, alpine tundra, massive icefields, rich agricultural lands to rolling grasslands. These landscapes are also home to a rich diversity of plants, mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians. are well suited to the adaptive management challenges of Alberta. Water Ground Data accessed through GoA Citrix and Canada Internet Map Service Data accessed through GoA Citrix and ministry websites LiDAR

Others Version 2 of AB_ArcHydro was produced using the raster Provincial 100m DEM plus high quality hydrography (stream network) that was burned into the DEM. When a Hydrocorrected 25m DEM became available it was used for Version 4 of ArcHydro. It was presumed that since the DEM had been resampled* with the drainage network taken into account, this would be an improvement over ArcHydro 2. (*the 25m grid size was resampled from the 100m DEM, by interpolation) However, user acceptance testing of ArcHydro 4 data set is ongoing as several issues have been identified with the Hydrocorrected Provincial 25m DEM layer. For the moment, ArcHydro 2 remains the endorsed version for watershed delineation purposes. Raster Data Raw DEM Filled DEM Flow direction Flow accumulation Stream Definition Stream Segmentation Catchment Grid Slope Slope greater than 30% Vector Data Catchment Drainage Line Adjoint Catchment Drainage Point Longest Flow Path For Catchment Longest Flow Path For Adj.Catchment Centroid of Catchment Daily Time Series Data Streamflow data Water level data Precipitation data Snowfall data Rainfall data Temperature data Sunshine data Snow pillow data Wind speed/direction data Network The geometric network The complex edge feature class The hydro junction of the network The relationship of hydro junction and catchment watershed Data Created in AB-ArcHydro 5.0 AB-ArcHydro: Progress to Date SDE geodatabases created for each of the 18 ‘major’ basins in the province (stream definition of 5 km 2 ) AB-ArcHydro is currently accessed two ways: - Stand-alone Desktop ArcGIS - Citrix thin-client AB ArcHydro example for North Saskatchewan River Basin Data organized into 18 major basins 6.0 AB_ArcHydro: Current and Future Applications and Development Reconciling the Provincial DEM Coupling to Hydrologic Models Maidment, D.R Arc Hydro – GIS for Water Resources, ESRI Press The “Alberta Desktop Method” Recommendation for Environmental Flows uses historical natural flows to come up with an instream flow recommendation that is fully protective of the aquatic environment and in the absence of reach specific studies. It is typically applied on a weekly time step, meaning that there are 52 recommendations based on the weekly flow duration curve and computed environmental baseflow for that week. This results in fairly routine but intensive computations, and has been automated within an Application that functions with the AB_ArcHydro data. ArcHydro Geodatabases ArcHydro Tools Water Budget Summary MIKE SHE Integrated Hydrologic Modelling Simulated Hydrograph Watershed/Climatic Characteristics Channel Characteristics DHI ( Evaporation data Humidity data Natural flow data Evapotranspiration data Others A process for reconciling identified variances and known issues arising between different topographic-based datasets needs to be developed. This is a broader initiative than just ArcHydro. It is recognized that no data set is without issues; but migration toward a single, adequately maintained and continually updated topographic data set for routine watershed delineations using common digital methods and tools would be ideal. Example: Drainage areas derived for WSC Sub-regions using pour points and the Alberta 25m Hydrocorrected DEM (colour polygons), as compared with prior drainage boundary delineations (black lines) Areas circled in red indicate places where the hydrocorrected DEM is at significant variance to existing watershed delineations. In both cases this has been tracked to likely DEM errors – canals not being removed from the terrain – resulting in portions of the lower Bow draining south to Oldman (pink) or north to Red Deer (green). Live data links to Department databases Versions 1, 3 and 4 of AB_ArcHydro were each published with a time series (TS) database of hydrologic and climate data. Although comprehensive, the data was static in nature. Copies of time series were used to populate the ArcHydro database, meaning that the update of new information (and subsequent corrections to data) requires continued maintenance. The update process depends on resource needs that are not predictable or assured. Alberta Desktop Method Application: Computations and Report A major goal for establishing a single source of hydrology- related time series and spatial data is to make model development, calibration and operation quicker and easier. Models that can process ArcHydro-compliant databases will be able to seamlessly interface with data sources. It is expected that ArcHydro databases and tools will support models that estimate water budgets, compute natural flows and simulate hydrographs in ungauged basins. Testing of the MIKE SHE model for several pilot projects has been undertaken (MIKE SHE does not yet directly support ArcHydro but was planning to develop that functionality.) Weekly Flow Recommendations Historical Availability Matrix Hydrologic Stats/ Summary Charts Word Document Summary Report TS 1 TS 4 TS 2 TS 3 TS 5 While this is workable, in principle it is preferred to reference a single true source of original data, rather than rely on standalone replications. A better solution would be to develop permanent and open data connections to Department information systems (like the WISKI time series manager, or the Enterprise Data Warehouse/EDW) to ensure the most correct and up-to-date information is always presented by AB_ArcHydro. WISKI TS 1TS 5 TS 4 EDW TS 2 TS 3 AB_ArcHydro Applications AB_ArcHydro Applications