Stephanie Cooper, MD FRCSC Beyond Aneuploidy- Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes with First Trimester Screening: PAPP-A Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Examples of Sound Screening:
Advertisements

Outcomes of Five Years of Planned Home Birth Attended by Regulated Midwives vs. Planned Hospital Birth in British Columbia P Janssen, PhD, 1,2,4,5, MC.
IMPACT OF PREECLAMPSIA ON BIRTH OUTCOMES Xu Xiong, MD, DrPH Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Farhan Hanif,MD Maternal Fetal Medicine
Screening “the systematic application of a test procedure to identify individuals at sufficient risk to warrant diagnostic investigations” CVS 12wks Amniocentesis.
Genetic Testing in Pregnancy
Second-trimester maternal serum screening
Towards Early Biochemical Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy in the First Trimester Niels Tørring 1, Olav B Petersen 2 1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry,
BROWN Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21: Recent Advances and Guidelines Jacob Canick, PhD Alpert Medical School of Brown University Women & Infants Hospital.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common medical complication of pregnancy, is defined as “any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first.
Progesterone Therapy for Preterm Labor Perinatal Conference April 14, 2006.
Genetics and Primary Care
Management of SGA with 2SD increased UA PI and standard measurement
The New Prenatal Screening Tests
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction Study University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; PI – Professor Gordon CS Smith BACKGROUND The current pattern of.
Enhanced Prenatal Screening Program
Biochemical tests and ‘marker chemicals’
IN THE NAME OF GOD. CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC If there is a Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies with low FPR at first trimester? If we can.
Pregnancy & Newborn Screening Developments
Photo: courtesy Travel Alberta.  The provision of information for individuals  Women have the right to access information about the health of their.
Introduction  Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal death.  Handicap in children and the vast majority of mortality and morbidity relates.
Women’s health in pregnancy and post- partum Michelle Wise BSc MD FRCSC MSc Senior Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, U of A Consultant.
Normal physiology of pregnancy First trimester-Increased insulin sensitivity. Late 2 nd and 3 rd trimester insulin resistance possible associated with.
First Trimester Screening
The State of Ohio Universal Prenatal Booking David S. McKenna, MD, RDMS Maternal-Fetal Medicine Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton OH.
I. Hospital admissions II. Intervention result in relation to FFN III. Gestational age In relation to FFN IV. In relation to delivery V. Relation of delivery.
National Women’s Screening for Aneuploidy Dr Emma Parry CMFM Clinical Director Maternal-Fetal Medicine National Women’s Health.
In the name of god First Trimester Screening Dr.M.Moradi.
Is Antenatal Care Worthwhile? Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations for Undergraduates
VI. Hrvatski kongres o ginekološkoj endokrinologiji, humanoj reprodukciji i menopavzi s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem , Brijuni DARIJA STRAH.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and different reference ranges: Does it really matter? Lo W., Mustafa.
POSTTERM PREGNANCY: THE IMPACT ON MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOME Dr. Hussein. S. Qublan- Al-Hammad Jordanian Board in Obstet &Gynecology European Board in.
Vajiheh Marsoosi, M.D Associate Professor of TUMS Shariati Hospital.
The New Prenatal Screening Tests Langley Memorial Hospital Grand Rounds November 8, 2007 Ken Seethram, MD, FRCSC, FACOG Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burnaby.
The Role of Prenatal screening as part of Routine Obstetric Care
Screening for Down’s syndrome
TEMPLATE DESIGN © UTERINE ARTERY VELOCIMETRY AT MIDGESTATION AND ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOME IN LOW RISK PRIMIGRAVIDAE Angela.
Erika Castro, PGY 3 Cook County-Loyola-Provident Family Medicine Residency 2/27/2014 PRENATAL SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS COUNSELING
Definition & Risk Factors of FGR FGR, also called IUGR is the term used to describe a fetus that has not reached its growth potential because of genetic.
Genetic Testing in Pregnancy Lisbeth M. Lazaron, MD March 2013.
In the Name of God. All women should be assessed at booking for risk factors for a SGA fetus/neonate to identify those who require increased surveillance.
Stillbirth in twins, exploring the optimal gestational age for delivery: a retrospective cohort study S Wood, S Tang, S Ross, R Sauve.
UOG Journal Club: January 2016 Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results.
UOG Journal Club: March 2016 Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of.
UOG Journal Club: July 2013 Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies M. M. Gil, M. S. Quezada, B. Bregant,
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis. What is Prenatal Diagnosis?  In-utero detection of fetal anomalies General population risk is 3-5% for any birth defect.
a systematic review and meta-analysis
UOG Journal Club: June 2017 Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE.
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: January 2016
UOG Journal Club: March 2016
Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre
Hypothyroidism during pregnancy
Vitamin D insufficiency, preterm delivery and preeclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes – an observational study MARIANNE VESTGAARD1,2,3 , ANNA L. SECHER1,2.
Ümit Görkem1, Cihan ToğruL1, Emine Arslan1, Nafiye Yılmaz2,
Tabassum Firoz MD MSc FRCPC University of British Columbia
Aneuploidy and NTD screening
Jeffrey A. Kuller, MD; Sean C. Blackwell, MD
Investigation of early prognostic factors in the development of early onset preeclampsia Nilay Karaca MD.
UOG Journal Club: September 2018
UOG Journal Club: July 2012 Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation and risk of pre-eclampsia A. Khalil, R. Akolekar, A. Syngelaki, M. Elkhouli.
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts
UOG Journal Club: October 2018
Dr. Elahe Zarean Dr. Sharzad Shabaninia
Prenatal Screening for Genetic Conditions
Risk factors for SGA fetus /neonate
Anna David Reader in Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
IN THE NAME OF GOD First trimester screening for aneuploidy
Presentation transcript:

Stephanie Cooper, MD FRCSC Beyond Aneuploidy- Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes with First Trimester Screening: PAPP-A Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes with First Trimester Screening: PAPP-A

Prenatal Screening Sensitive and accessible prenatal screening for aneuploidy and open neural tube defects is a standard recognized in the 2007 SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy

“All pregnant women in Canada, regardless of age, should be offered, through an informed consent process, a prenatal screening test for the most common clinically significant aneuploidies” SOGC- Clinical Practice Guidelines Prenatal Screening for Aneuploidy (2007)

FTS Quad Test Integrated Test (IPS) Serum IPS IPS without inhibin Triple Screen (MSS) MA + NT + free ß-hCG + PAPP-A at weeks DR 84%, FPR 5% MA + AFP + uE3 + ß-hCG (or total hCG) and Inhibin-A DR 77%, FPR 5.2% MA + NT + PAPP-A (11-14 weeks) + quad test (15-17 weeks) DR 87%, FPR 1.9% MA + PAPP-A (11-14 weeks) + quad test (15-17 weeks) DR 85%, FPR 4.4% MA+ NT + PAPP-A + triple screen DR 88%, FPR 3% MA + AFP + uE3 + ß-hCG (or total hCG) DR 71%, FPR 7.2 %- MA= Maternal age, NT= nuchal translucency Current Screening Combinations in Canada

BEYOND ANEUPLOIDY

Why is early prediction of adverse outcomes important? Alberta has highest rate of preterm birth and low birth weight in Canada Preeclampsia is the 2nd most common cause of maternal death worldwide and most common cause of iatrogenic prematurity Strategies to identify risk factors and interventions that may improve pregnancy outcome in this group is a priority

Low Birth Weight - Province of Alberta

Preterm Births Canada vs Alberta

Where it all starts The pathologic changes of preeclampsia, IUGR (and in some cases of preterm labour) occur as early as the first trimester, long before clinical manifestations are observed

Where it all starts Early placental cells invade maternal spiral arteries transforming them from small muscular arterioles to large vessels of low resistance.

Where it all starts In pregnancies destined for preeclampsia and IUGR, the cytotrophoblasts infiltrate the decidual portion of the spiral arteries, not the myometrial portion. The vessels remain narrow leading to hypoperfusion

A detectable maternal humeral response to inadequate placentation might predict those pregnancies at risk

What is PAPP-A?

PAPP-A PAPP-A is a protease for IGFBP-4 IGF binding proteins inhibit the action of IGFs, which play a key role in regulating fetal growth and trophoblastic invasion of the decidua

PAPP-A “Additional monitoring should occur in such circumstance*” “Screening reports should highlight such cases with increased risk*” PAPP-A levels in the first trimester of pregnancy are predictive of a range of adverse outcomes* PAPP-A levels in the first trimester of pregnancy are predictive of a range of adverse outcomes* * Smith et al. JAMA 2004: , Dugoff et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: , Krantz et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: , Spencer et al. Prenat Diagn 2005: 25: However, as prospective data assessing PAPP-A as a screening tool in a low risk population is limited, the finding of low PAPP-A in women undergoing FTS presents a clinical management dilemma

Impaired trophoblastic invasion of maternal spiral arteries is associated with increased impedance to flow in uterine arteries Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound can assess blood flow for adequate or reduced perfusion Uterine Artery Doppler

Normal Abnormal Uterine Artery Doppler

Combining uterine artery Doppler at weeks with low PAPP-A (10-14 weeks) improves detection of hypertension than by either marker in isolation. Combining uterine artery Doppler at weeks with low PAPP-A (10-14 weeks) improves detection of hypertension than by either marker in isolation. Spencer et al. Prenat Diagn 2005: 25:

SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline “Uterine artery Doppler may be performed at the time of the weeks...in women with the following risk factors”: Previous early onset gestational hypertension Placental abruption IUGR Stillbirth Pre-existing hypertension Gestational hypertension Pre-existing renal disease Long standing IDDM with end organ involvement Abnormal maternal serum screening (hCG or AFP >2.0 MOM) Low PAPP-A Fetal Health Surveillance: Antepartum and Intrapartum Consensus Guidelines. JOCG Sept 2007

Association between first trimester maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and adverse pregnancy outcome Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Calgary Calgary Laboratory Services Cooper S, Johnson JM, Metcalfe A, Connors G, Pollard J, Simrose R, Jones D Roggensack A, Krause R, Lange I

PURPOSE A: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of maternal serum PAPP-A <0.4 MOM (<5 th %ile) at weeks gestation in detecting adverse obstetrical outcomes in a low risk population. B: To determine if the addition of UA Doppler pulsatility index (PI) at 18 and 22 weeks gestation improves the predictive accuracy of low first trimester PAPP-A in the detection of adverse obstetrical outcomes.

METHODS- Part A TYPE OF STUDY Prospective, non-intervention, matched cohort study INCLUSION CRITERIA All pregnant women attending for FTS at single site with: –Live singleton gestations at weeks –Able to provide informed consent EXCLUSION CRITERIA Pregnancies with chromosomal or structural abnormalities Low PAPP-A (< 0.4 MOM’s) No interventions specific to low PAPP-A (patients and physicians ‘blinded’) Followed to pregnancy outcome “Normal” PAPP-A (> 0.4 MOM) Matched by independent reviewer to cases (2:1) for ethnicity, age, FTS date Followed to pregnancy outcome

METHODS: Part B TYPE OF STUDY Prospective cohort study INCLUSION CRITERIA All pregnant women attending FTS February- Oct 2007 with: –Live singleton gestations at weeks –PAPP-A < 0.4 MOM –Agreeing to additional pregnancy surveillance –Provided informed consent EXCLUSION CRITERIA Pregnancies with chromosomal or structural abnormalities PAPP-A < 0.4 MOM: counseled and consented Uterine artery Doppler 18 weeks ( + = PI > 1.45) Uterine artery Doppler 22 weeks( + = PI > 1.45) Followed to pregnancy outcome Additional surveillance & management as clinically indicated

Primary Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOMES ( A&B) Manual in-patient chart review at 3 hospital sites Low Birth Weight (LBW) (<2500 grams) Preterm Delivery (PTB) (< 37 weeks gestation) Pre-eclampsia 1 (PIH) Small for gestational age (SGA) (< 10 th %ile ) 1.SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnosis, evaluation and management of hypertension in pregnancy. JOGC March 2008

Statistical Analysis Part A: –Chi square tests were used to compare outcomes (LBW, PTB, PIH and SGA) between groups –Logistic regression was used to determine if low PAPP-A predicts negative outcomes Part B : –Logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in low PAPP-A patients with positive and negative UA Doppler at both gestational age groups

RESULTS: Part A March 2006 – December 2006: –3815 women completed FTS –Low PAPP-A (< 0.4 MOM) n= 198 (5.6%) –Eligible patients with complete obstetrical outcomes n=150 (80%), matched to 300 controls Demographics –Low PAPP-A group representative of controls: Average Age: 32 yrs (31% ≥ 35, 4.6% > 40 yrs) 87%: High school +/- University 35%: Primiparous 18%: Non-English speaking (ESL)

RESULTS : Part A Incidence (%) of Adverse Outcomes

RESULTS: Part A OR (95% CI)P-value LBW 3.13 ( ) 0.01 PTB 2.26 ( ) 0.03 HTN 1.50 ( ) 0.24 NS SGA 1.26 ( ) 0.53 NS Cumulative 1.40 ( ) 0.16 PAPP-A as a predictor of adverse outcomes

Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI) LBW 59% ( ) 68% ( ) 11% ( ) 96% ( ) PTB 52% ( ) 68% ( ) 12% ( ) 95% ( ) HTN 38% ( ) 67% ( ) 9% ( ) 93% ( ) SGA 44% ( ) 67% ( ) 11% ( ) 93% ( ) RESULTS : Part A PAPP-A: Test performance for adverse outcomes

0.4 MOM0.3 MOM0.25 MOM0.2 MOM Sensitivity 66%32%18%6.7% Specificity 51%81%90%96% PAPP-A: Test performance for any adverse outcome using cut-offs 0.2 MOM- 0.4 MOM RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS- Part A 1.Low PAPP-A is a significant predictor of adverse obstetrical outcomes This association would support pregnancy monitoring and surveillance 2.However, the predictive value of low PAPP-A for these outcomes is weak Therefore the clinical utility of isolated low PAPP-A as a predictor of adverse obstetrical outcomes is limited 3.Further study is needed to determine if adjunctive biochemical and ultrasound markers can better identify risk

RESULTS- Part B January - October 2007; –5359 women completed FTS –Low PAPP-A (< 0.4 MOM) n= 289 (5.3%) –Patients consenting to ongoing surveillance, n= 229 (79%) –Complete obstetrical outcomes, n= 202 (89%)

+ Doppler 18 weeks (n= 34) + Doppler 22 weeks (n= 11) PTB (<37 w) OR= 1.95 ( ), NS OR= 12.6 ( ), p= PIH (< 2500g) OR = 1.15 ( ), NS OR= 3.77 ( ) NS SGA (< 10 th %ile) OR= 2.28 ( ), p= 0.04 OR= 8.24 ( ), p= LBW (<2500 g) OR= 1.56 ( ) NS OR= 6.85 ( ), p=0.003 RESULTS Uterine artery Doppler as a predictor of adverse outcomes in low PAPP-A patients + uterine artery Doppler = PI > 1.45

SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV PTB <37 21%98%73%83% PIH 1.7%95%27%48% SGA 18%97%64%83% LBW 16%97%64%79% At least 1 of above 91%67%15%99% RESULTS 22 Week Uterine Artery Doppler: test performance for adverse outcomes

SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV PTB 31%82%31%82% PIH 23%79%83%93% SGA 33%83%36%80% LBW 26%80%31%78% At least 1 of above 27%83%50%65% RESULTS 18 Week Uterine Artery Doppler: test performance for adverse outcomes

RESULTS: SUMMARY A positive uterine artery Doppler (PI >1.45) at 18 weeks in low PAPP-A patients was found to significantly predict SGA but not found to significantly predict PTB, PIH or LBW A positive uterine artery Doppler (PI >1.45) at 22 weeks in low PAPP-A patients was found to significantly predict PTB, SGA and LBW but not PIH

CONCLUSIONS- 18 w Uterine artery Doppler at 18 weeks was found to have good specificity and a strong negative predictive value, however, there was a high rate of false positives Economic analysis is required to determine the cost effectiveness of a 2 stage uterine artery Doppler protocol

CONCLUSIONS- 22 w Due to small sample size, we are unable to conclude if uterine artery Doppler at 22 weeks can accurately predict the risk of adverse outcomes in low PAPP-A patients At present, clinical judgement is advised Consider third trimester ultrasound for fetal growth and well- being Future studies are required to verify our findings –Larger sample sizes –Additional ultrasound and biochemical markers should be evaluated in low PAPP-A patients

But most importantly, clinical assessment and judgment of the maternal-fetal unit as a whole can never be forgotten