Chinyere Ekine-Dzivenu (PhD Candidate) Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Friday, September 28 Revising Content Writing Process Map.
Advertisements

TILAPIAS FROM DIFFERENT AQUACULTURE SYSTEMS CONTAIN VARIABLE AMOUNTS OF -3 AND -6 POLYUNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION Ioannis.
Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs.
The Effect of Animal Disposition on Carcass Traits
NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES CIGENE 1 Modeling carotenoid dynamics in salmon BMSW, Bangalore 2008 Hannah Rajasingh Centre for Integrative.
Stephen B. Smith Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © John B. Cole 1,*, Kristen L. Parker Gaddis 2, Francesco Tiezzi 2, John S. Clay 3, and Christian Maltecca.
Antibody Response During a PRRS Outbreak can be Predicted Using High-Density SNP Genotypes Nick V.L. Serão 1 *, R.A. Kemp 2, B.E. Mote 3, J.C.S. Harding.
WHOLE BODY ANIMAL GROWTH ANSC 590 ANIMAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
The search process: A way to rank endophenotypes (e) for relevance to a disease (i) phenotype.
The Inheritance of Complex Traits
Ch. 5 Nutrition Review Appetite is: A. A desire for food B. A response to stretched stomach walls C. A physical need for food D. An inborn response.
1 Investigating Opportunities Available in Genetic Selection for Healthy Beef J R Tait and James Reecy Iowa State University.
Teresa Przytycka NIH / NLM / NCBI RECOMB 2010 Bridging the genotype and phenotype.
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall Review session 5pm Thursday, Dec. 11 GPB100.
Quantitative Genetics
FAT SUBSTITUTIONS IN FOODS ADRIENNE ORTEGA  APRIL 21, 2015.
Beef - From Pasture to Plate Many Choices, All Nutrient Rich Jennifer Leheska, Ph.D., R.D. Nutrition Research Consultant Funded by The Beef Checkoff.
 Draw growth curves  Explain different changes in body measurements  Explain different changes is body components  Explain different changes in carcass.
Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: epidemiological evidence Tom Rohan Dept. of Epidemiology and Population Health Albert Einstein College Of Medicine.
International Workshop on LHC, Astrophysics, Medical and Environmental Physics. Shkodra (Albania), 6-8 October OLIVE OIL COMPOSITION AND HEALTH BENEFITS.
3.1. NUTRITION IB SEHS.
Established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program Functional Foods Program 3 Enhancing capacity to deliver.
Strong Heart Family Study Phase VI Genetics Center Aims October 8, 2009.
Exploring Current DNA Research of Longhorn Cattle.
Wilnerys Colberg Hernández
We All Change in Many Ways What Is Body Composition? Body composition = the body’s relative amounts of fat mass and fat-free mass (bone, water, muscle,
1. 2 What You Will Do Identify factors that influence your food choices. Explain the role of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats in your eating plan. Identify.
Dr. Anne Maria Mullen Ph.D Principal Research Officer Teagasc, Food Chemistry and Technology Department.
Omega-3 Fatty Acid Composition of Habitual Diets in Australia Melbourne Australia Neil J Mann Department of Food Science.
AAFC-Lacombe. Why conduct beef fat research? A 1200 lb steer with ½ inch backfat, average muscling, yields a 750 pound carcass. The 750 pound carcass.
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Curt Van Tassell, George Wiggans, Tad Sonstegard, and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory and Bovine Functional Genomics.
INTRODUCTION Nutrigenomics Dr. Muhamad Firdaus
Taipei Medical University. Adolescents with Higher Althernate Healthy Eating Index For Taiwan (AHEI-T) Scores Have Lower Blood Lipid Level De-Zhi Weng,
Wang Y 1,2, Damaraju S 1,3,4, Cass CE 1,3,4, Murray D 3,4, Fallone G 3,4, Parliament M 3,4 and Greiner R 1,2 PolyomX Program 1, Department.
Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University,
Mosby items and derived items © 2006 by Mosby, Inc. Slide 1 Chapter 3 Fats.
2008 ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting Indianapolis, July 7-11 Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Estimated by Test-Day Model.
QTL Associated with Maize Kernel Traits among Illinois High Oil × B73 Backcross-Derived Lines By J.J. Wassom, J.C. Wong, and T.R. Rocheford University.
Interbull Meeting – Dublin 2007 Genetic Parameters of Butter Hardness Estimated by Test-Day Model Hélène Soyeurt 1,2, F. Dehareng 3, C. Bertozzi 4 & N.
NUTRITION What is it? ?.
Professor Alan Jackson, Professor Alan Jackson, Chair of Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition SACN position statement “Update on trans fatty acids.
Introduction Hereditary predisposition (mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes) contribute to familial breast cancers. Eighty percent of the.
The International Consortium. The International HapMap Project.
Obesity, Nutrition and Nutri-genonmics
 Milk fat composition varies with the season (summer vs. winter) but also with the milking time (AM vs. PM).  These observations could allow the diversification.
Genetic correlations and associative networks for CNS transcript abundance and neurobehavioral phenotypes in a recombinant inbred mapping panel Elissa.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
Mosby items and derived items © 2006 by Mosby, Inc. Slide 1 Chapter 3 Fats.
MargiAnne Isaia, MD MPH Advanced Nutrition Lipids 3.
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Predicted by MIR Spectrometry : MIR Spectrometry + Quantitative Models.
Comprehensive Review Review Points Case Study: Nolan.
Lab (6): Lipids profile KAU-Faculty of Science- Biochemistry department Clinical biochemistry lab (Bioc 416) 2012 T.A Nouf Alshareef
Chapter 11 Diet and Health
Dietary Guidelines and Recommendations
Individual fatty acid measurements in milk from Danish dairy cows
University of Tennessee-Memphis
Chapter 5 Lipids: Triglycerides, Phospholipids, and Cholesterol
برهم کنش مواد مغذی و ژن در دفاع سلولی بدن
EBV Selection Required less time to apply genotype body composition
Figure 27.1 Metabolic fate of the foods we eat.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages e6 (June 2018)
Genomics at the Forefront of Health and Medicine
INTRODUCTION Nutrigenomics Dr. Muhamad Firdaus
What You Will Do Identify factors that influence your food choices.
EBV Selection Required less time to apply genotype body composition
Jan – Dec RuminOmics Connecting the animal genome, the intestinal microbiome and nutrition to enhance the efficiency of ruminant.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Chinyere Ekine-Dzivenu (PhD Candidate) Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 1

Background Objectives Materials and methods Results and discussion Conclusion Acknowledgement 2

3

SFA Increased Plasma cholesterol - Cardiovascular diseases - Cancer - Obesity MUFA & PUFA Reduced plasma cholesterol CLA Anti-carcinogenic, anti-atherosclerotic Anti-diabetic Anti-Obesity Type of dietary fat (fatty acid profile) matters more than the amount of fat. 4

Improving beef fatty acid composition Nutrition approach –Added cost –Change not permanent –May affect flavor Traditional genetic improvement approach –Permanent and accumulative change BUT difficult/expensive to measure and measured after slaughter Genomics –Marker assisted selection/genomic selection 5

Estimate heritability of fatty acids in beef brisket adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue and longissimus luborum muscle to assess the potential for genetic improvement Discover SNP markers associated with FA profile in beef for marker assisted selection or marker based diet management Estimate phenotypic and genetic correlation between FAs within each tissue in order to prevent antagonism when genetic selection is made

7

Phenotype Genotype Over 80 FA in the brisket adipose on 223 beef steers Over 80 FA in the subcutaneous adipose and longissimus luborum muscle on 1366 animals Heritability and correlations estimated using univariate and bivariate animal model implemented in ASreml after accounting for fixed effects. 961 polymorphic markers for Bayesian candidate gene association study on adjusted data 8

9

% FAME B.Adipose % FAME S.Adipose % FAME Muscle Fig1. Variation among individual animals for different fatty acids Each dot represents an individual animal 10

Longissimus Luborum Muscle (n=1366) Subcutaneous Adipose (n=1366) Brisket Adipose (n=223) Fatty AcidsMeanh 2 ±SEMeanh 2 ±SEMeanh 2 ±SE 14: ± ± ± : ± ± ± : ± ± ± : ± ± ± : ± ± ± c-14: ± ± ± c-16: ± ± ± c-17: ± ± ± 0.1 9c-18: ± ± ± t-18: ± ± ± c-18: ± ± ± t-18: ± ± ± c-18: ± ± ± :2n ± ± ± 0.13 Sumtrans18: ± ± ± 0.11 SumCLA ± ± ± 0.1 SFA ± ± ± 0.11 MUFA ± ± ± 0.1 PUFA ± ± ± 0.12 BFA ± ± ± 0.1 SFA+BFA ± ± ± 0.11 n ± ± ± 0.13 n-6/n ± ± ± 0.1 Health Index ± ± ± 0.12 Health Index = ΣMUFA +ΣPUFA 4X14:0+16:0 High Moderate Low Table 1. Heritability of selected fatty acids in 3 beef tissues 11

TraitSFAMUFAPUFASumCLAHealth_Index SFA-0.99±0-0.31± ± ±0.01 MUFA-0.99± ± ± ±0.01 PUFA-0.41± ± ± ±0.06 sumCLA-0.29± ± ± ±0.06 Health Index-0.99± ± ± ±0.44 Table 2. Phenotypic (above diagonal) and genetic (below diagonal) correlation between selected fatty acid groups in beef tissues TraitSFAMUFAPUFASumCLAHealth Index SFA-0.59± ± ± ±0.02 MUFA-0.77± ± ± ±0.08 PUFA-0.18± ± ± ±0.1 sumCLA-0.02± ± ± ±0.11 Health Index-0.89± ± ± ±0.19 Brisket adipose Subcutaneous adipose Longissimus Luborum TraitSFAMUFAPUFASumCLAHealth Index SFA-0.98±00.05± ± ±0.03 MUFA-0.98± ± ± ±0.03 PUFA-0.15± ± ± ±0.11 sumCLA-0.56± ± ± ±0.1 Health Index-0.84± ± ± ±

Fig.2. Schematic overview of associations of fatty acids with SNPs in candidate genes. Allele substitution effect indicated by color key 13

Receptors SCD PNPLA2 LPL F5 CPT2 ACADL BDH1 ATIC Transporter SLC27A2 ATP2B1 AP2B1 Transcription Regulator NR1H3 RUNX1T1 IRF2 BRCA1 ANKRD1 CRHR1 RARA TRHR EIF3H Enzyme Translation Regulator Fig 3. Variation in FA among individuals as a result of variation in different cellular processes 14

15

Variation exists in the amount of each fatty acid in beef tissues. Individual animals vary in the amount of each FA deposited in tissues. Each fatty acid in beef is a complex trait (influenced by several genes). Identified markers throw light on processes that can cause variation in FA between animals. Results show possibility of selecting beef with superior genetics to improve not only beneficial FA content but also eating quality of beef. Results show possibility of simultaneously improving beneficial FA in the adipose. Attention should be paid to the moderate negative correlation between muscle MUFA and PUFA. 16

Use a higher density SNP panel (bovine 50K SNP chip) to capture more markers explaining a significant amount of variation for beneficial fatty acids among individual animals. Phenotypic and genetic correlation of fatty acids in the subcutaneous adipose tissue and longissimus luborum muscle with carcass and meat quality traits 17

Supervisor: Dr. Changxi Li Group members, co-investigators and committee Liuhong ChenMichael Dugan Michael VinskyJennifer Aalhus John BasarabNoelia Aldai Paul StothardTim McAllister Fiona BuchananCarolyn Fitzsimmons Erasmus OkineZhiquan Wang Funding: 18

19