Issues and Outcomes in Graduate Education Christopher D. Ingersoll, PhD, ATC Joe H. Gieck Professor of Sports Medicine University of Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Developing HPPAE at the Salt Lake City VA/GRECC and the Role of Academic Mentors Marilyn Luptak, PhD, MSW, LICSW Associate Professor & Chair, MSW Aging.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Education For Social Work
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
June 26, 2003NATA Grad Ed Session1 Christopher D. Ingersoll, PhD, ATC, FACSM Joe H. Gieck Professor of Sports Medicine Why Certified Students Should Enroll.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
An Overview of The Profession of Athletic Training.
What do we mean when we talk about PD?
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
McCann Associates Presented by: Michael Childs, Barbara Dyer, Ira Taylor, Bruce Nugyen Chad Warner & Joe Koury, McCann Associates.
Dr. Brenda R. Shaw Director/PI National Association of HBCU Title III Administrators, Inc. Annual Technical Assistance Workshop June 21-24, 2010 Orlando,
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
POST INSTRUCTOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE PURPOSE: To provide standardized, multi-level, multi-track programs to develop professionalism in the delivery of.
How do we go about program assessment? What we are doing and why? Robert Gabriner, San Francisco State University Debby Zambo, Arizona State University.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
Instructors & Clinical Faculty Art Spisak, Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs Julie Masterson, CHHS Fellow, Faculty Development Tracy Dalton, Sr. Instructor.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
INITIAL AND IN-SERVICE TRAINING OF PRACTITIONERS AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF GUIDANCE IN FINLAND Professor Marjatta Lairio University of Jyväskylä Department.
University of Strathclyde Faculty of Education A long history in the field of teacher education (Early Years, Primary and Secondary) and the graduate training.
American Chemical Society The Role of Undergraduate Research in the Certified Chemistry Major Thomas Wenzel Department of Chemistry Bates College Lewiston,
Siena Heights University Graduate Teacher Education REFLECTIVE PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO OF CONTINUOUS PROGRESS for Ima Student Last updated: Fall 2009.
Learning within Teaching What professors can learn about their students and themselves as teachers when they innovate in their teaching ANABELLA MARTINEZ,
Collaborative Model of Social Work Education with Strong University – Agency Partnerships Michael A. Patchner, Ph.D. Indiana University School of Social.
School of Healthcare FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH The design and delivery of an interdisciplinary MSc in Advanced Practice Professor Claire Hale.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
NATA Athletic Training Educational Competencies 4th Edition 2006.
Pennsylvania State University Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate June 12-14, 2007.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
FLIBS June 2015 Biology Category 1
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
 Is the study and practice of medical principles related to the science of sports, particularly in the areas of sports diagnosis and treatment of sprots.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
The NAGs and the Principal National Aspiring Principals Conference April 2010.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Curriculum Implementation Support Program (CISP).
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
AL Maaref University The Road Ahead FBA Student Induction Day Hussin Jose Hejase, PhD March 4, 2016.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Careers in Sports Medicine and Athletic Training
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Preparing for Graduate School
Health Care Interpreting
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Clinical Education Coordinator
Julie Kaiser, PhD Doctoral Professional Development Coordinator
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Dr. Sheryl Zajdowicz and Dr. Rhonda Eaker
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Issues and Outcomes in Graduate Education Christopher D. Ingersoll, PhD, ATC Joe H. Gieck Professor of Sports Medicine University of Virginia

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference2 Issues 1.ATCs are advising students to pursue graduate degrees in something other than Athletic Training 2.Concerns that Post-Certification Athletic Training Graduate Programs are not delivering advanced knowledge 3.There are relatively few Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training programs (accredited or not) 4.Reasons students select graduate programs

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference3 1.ATCs are advising students to pursue graduate degrees in something other than Athletic Training

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference4 Common Advice to New ATCs “Since you did your undergraduate work at an accredited program, you don’t need to attend an accredited graduate program.” “You need to get your Masters in something else because athletic training alone is not enough to get a job.” “It doesn’t matter what you get your Masters degree in as long as you have one.”

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference5 “Since you did your undergraduate work at an accredited program, you don’t need to attend an accredited graduate program” Graduate programs used to be a route to certification –Programs had to meet needs of “advanced” and “entry- level” students –Graduate programs of study used to look very similar to undergraduate courses of study –Students from accredited undergraduate programs may have not been challenged during this time

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference6 “You need to get your Masters in something else because athletic training alone is not enough to get a job”

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference7 “It doesn’t matter what you get your Masters degree in as long as you have one” Unfortunately, this is probably true, but is this an idea we want to perpetuate? We haven’t done a good job educating employers

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference8 2.PCGE Programs Not Advanced? Accredited PCGE programs: –“are different from entry- level programs in purpose, design and content” (II.B.) –have a mission “to expand the depth and breadth of the … knowledge and skills of entry-level certified athletic trainers” (II.B.) –are “characterized by advanced systematic study and experience” (II.B.) –provide “instruction in advanced skills and knowledges” (II.C.) –provide “advanced educational experiences designed to enhance … ability to function in clinical, teaching, administrative, or research environments” (II.C.) –“include new and advanced, in-depth educational experiences designed to enhance … professional practice” (II.C.) Note: Parenthetical information refers to section in Standards & Guidelines for Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference9 3.Very Few PCGE Programs 3007: # students taking BOC exam for first time in 2003 (BOC 2003 Annual Report) 13: # accredited graduate programs 160 : approx. # of students accepted into accredited PCGATEPs ea. yr. 10: approx. % of students pursuing advanced study in AT (including non accred. progs.) 70: approx. % of ATCs with graduate degrees

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference10 Very Few Students Pursuing Advanced Study in Athletic Training 10% We need more programs!

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference11 4.Reasons Students Select Graduate Programs No data on this (we need some) Often influenced by mentors –Program directors –Clinical coordinators –Clinical instructors Anecdotally, many pick graduate programs based only on the clinical experience –Thought of as a job where they have to take classes –Meeting clinical responsibilities takes priority over learning More

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference12 4.Reasons Students Select Graduate Programs, cont. Some apply based on reputation of the program, without regard for what they will learn Other reasons –Location –Finances –Duration of program

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference13 What Students Should Know About PCGATEPs Nearly 100% placement in jobs or professional programs Accredited GATEPs are targeted for job placement and networking Research and mentoring with expert scholars and clinicians Instruction in advanced skills and knowledges that directly relate to AT Programs meet rigorous standards and guidelines that assure quality

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference14 Outcomes What the Standards and Guidelines for Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs document has to say about outcomes

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference15 General Principles of Graduate Education Mastery of subject matter Critical thinking Theoretical understanding Proficiency in research and/or creative activities Service orientation Diverse representation of perspectives –Standards & Guidelines for Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs, II.A.1-6.

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference16 Philosophy of PCGAT Programs Graduate Education Programs are different from entry-level programs in purpose, design and content. The mission of a PCGATEP is to expand the depth and breadth of the applied, experiential, and propositional knowledge and skills of entry-level ATCs, expand the athletic training body of knowledge, and to disseminate new knowledge in the discipline. Graduate education is characterized by advanced systematic study and experience—advanced in knowledge, understanding, scholarly competence, inquiry, and discovery. –Standards & Guidelines for Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs, II.B.

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference17 Principles of PCGAT Programs Instruction in advanced skills and knowledges, the preparation of ATCs for leadership roles, and a research experience are considered to be the distinguishing characteristics of graduate education in athletic training. Advanced educational experiences designed to enhance the ATC’s ability to function in clinical, teaching, administrative, or research environments are considered to be essential components of the PCGATEP. While minimal graduate courses and resource requirements are specified in this document, flexibility and innovation in curricular development are encouraged. However, the program must demonstrate its contribution to advanced education of athletic training practitioners. –Standards & Guidelines for Post- Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs, II.C.

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference18 Principles of PCGAT Programs The NATA EC has developed a comprehensive list of AT educational competencies and clinical proficiencies in order to provide guidance and direction in the professional preparation of entry-level AT students. They represent guidelines for curriculum design, development of individual course content, and structuring of clinical experiences for the entry-level programs. Development of an effective PCGATEP depends on a thorough assessment of those education experiences typically offered at the entry-level. PCGATEPs include new and advanced, in-depth educational experiences designed to enhance the athletic trainer's professional practice. –Standards & Guidelines for Post- Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs, II.C.

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference19 Outcomes The Standards and Guidelines is an advocacy document aimed at encouraging thought and empowering institutions and program directors so they can develop programs around their unique strengths or points of distinctiveness. There will be much greater variety in program design, content, and foci amongst graduate programs than amongst undergraduate and entry-level graduate programs. Institutions have increased freedom to innovate, experiment with new ideas and approaches, and venture into the unknown. Successful innovations will be retained and shared with colleagues and will therefore lead to stronger graduate education programs, stronger graduates, and a stronger profession. –Standards & Guidelines for Post- Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs, I.B.

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference20 Assessment (scan environment) Identify/revise strengths and weaknesses Identify/revise points of distinctiveness Build/revise mission statement Develop/revise goals and objectives Develop/revise program to support POD Measure outcomes Self Study Site Review Develop/revise outcomes Facilities, community, faculty These come from your assessment These are strengths. Distinctiveness is not necessarily uniqueness. May have more than one. Must support points of distinctiveness, but may include other things Courses, clinical experiences, research experiences should support POD Define what program is supposed to do Quantitative and/or qualitative, show you are accomplishing what you said you would

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference21 We Need to Become Experts “Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.” Thomas Jefferson, 1816

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference22 Thanks Graduate Education Committee –Kenneth Knight, PhD, ATC: Brigham Young University –Leamor Kahanov, EdD, ATC: San Jose State University –Joni Roh, EdD, ATC: California University of Pennsylvania –Jeffrey Seegmiller EdD, ATC: Ohio University –Eric Sauers, PhD, ATC: A.T. Still University –Charles Swanik, PhD, ATC: Temple University –Gary Wilkerson, EdD, ATC: UT - Chattanooga –Richard Williams, PhD, ATC: University of Northern Iowa Graduate Review Committee –Bruce Barnhart, EdD, ATC: California University of Pennsylvania –Michelle Cleary, PhD, ATC: Florida International University –Mitch Cordova, PhD, ATC: Indiana State University –Kevin Guskiewicz, PhD, ATC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill –Carl Mattacola, PhD, ATC: University of Kentucky –Bonnie Van Lunen, PhD, ATC: Old Dominion University

1/22/2005Athletic Training Educators' Conference23 Questions?