Bia Henriques, David Johnston and Muthanna Al-Dahhan Results/Analysis New Green Process Technology For Energy Efficient Ethanol Production and Decreased.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fermentation By C Kohn Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI Most information is based on materials from the DOEs Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center,
Advertisements

Adding Cellulosic Ethanol (ACE) Quad County Corn Processors IRFA Summit January 28, 2014.
GK-12 WORKSHOP DECEMBER 7, 2011 Fun with Fermentation.
1 9/21/2010 Iman Rusmana Department of Biology Bogor Agricultural University What is Ethanol? Ethanol Production From Biomass Ethanol Production From Grains.
From Waste to Algae Viability of carbon dioxide and wastewater utilization for algae biofuel production.
Industrial Processing Integration of alcohol and sugar production, Cogeneration of electricity Brazil’s Ethanol Experience and its Transferability World.
R. Shanthini 06 Feb 2010 Ethanol as an alternative source of energy Bioethanol is produced from plants that harness the power of the sun to convert water.
Small Scale NZ Biofuel Techno-Economic Investigation VISHESH ACHARYA MASTER OF ENGINEERING DR. BRENT YOUNG CHEMICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY.
Improve Xylose Utilization 1.The significance of improving xylose utilization: The commercialization of second-generation bioethanol has not been realized.
DNA Extraction Outline Purpose of DNA extraction
Christianson & Associates, PLLP Ethanol Energy Efficiency Report & Iowa Plants Analysis Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Summit John O. Christianson.
The Profitability Impact of a Qualified and Trained Analytical Lab Staff Sabrina Trupia, Ph.D. and Jessica M. Sido NCERC.
The Dry Grind Corn to Ethanol Process TM National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Center Southern Illinois University Education and Workforce Development 400.
Water Conservation & Treatment Strategies for Ethanol Plants Governors Ethanol Coalition EPA Joint Meeting Kansas City, MO Feb 10, 2006 Bibb Swain, President.
Green Chemistry Case Studies: Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards 2012 Winners Nicole Casasnovas Hannah Needleman July
Glass recycling: environmental and economic case IMA – November 14, 2012.
Michael Ladisch + Laboratory of Renewable Resources Engineering Agricultural and Biological Engineering Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Purdue.
©October, 2006 Masada OxyNol  MASADA OxyNol, L.L.C. FINALLY, A CLEAN SMART SOLUTION TURNING WASTE INTO ETHANOL Presentation for Alternative Energy Solutions.
Optimizing extraction methods to improve utilization of wheat gluten in bio-product manufacturing Project Title: Mentors: Dr. Andrew RossDr. Kaichang Li.
Ethanol Production. Feedstock 1.Biomass 2.Starch.
Initial Comparative Process Economics of Leading Pretreatment Technologies Richard T. Elander, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Charles E. Wyman, Dartmouth.
Rectifier Thermo siphon Reboiler To recycle water tank Degasser Hammer mills Slurry Tank Steam Jet Cook Tube Flash Tank Liquefaction tank Plate & Frame.
Proprietary and Confidential © Copyright 2007 Pavilion Technologies Ethanol From Corn Process Dry Mill Ethanol Process Lina M Rueda.
April, 2012 Membrane Aided Solutions STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT COPY OR DISTRIBUTE Presentation to Presentation to Isaac Gaon CEO.
Ethanol-Gasoline Fuels: Are they Effective? Presented by Steve Cavadeas.
Production of Ethanol by Fermenting Sugars. ETHANOL.
Intrinsic Characteristics of Modified DDGS and Effective Handling Strategies NC -213 Meeting, February th Kansas city,
Passive Solar Energy  Uses solar radiation to maintain a comfortable temp in the building without electrical aid  South-facing windows, which absorb.
Making Biorefineries Competitive: PRO.E.SA TM The only sugar platform available today Guido Ghisolfi June 8, 2012.
Pretreatment Application of Ligninolytic Enzymes Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Christine Kelly School of CBEE Group Members: Uranbileg Daalkhaijav, Faraz Ebrahimi,
ERT Biofuel BIO ETHANOL What, Why, How, How much, ….
FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATE OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS:. 1) LIGHT As light intensity increases, the rate of photosynthesis initially increases, and thereafter,
Understanding Corn Processing Co-products Use in Livestock Feeds John D. Lawrence, Iowa State University Darrell Mark, University of Nebraska.
Ion Exchange for the Production of Cellulosic Ethanol A.Hammervold, C. Cochran, J. Belsher, K. Childress Sponsored by Trillium FiberFuels, Inc. IntroductionProject.
Energy and Operating Efficiencies In Dry-Mill Ethanol Production Governors’ Ethanol Coalition February, 2007 Greg Krissek, Governmental Affairs Director.
Respiration. Free Energy Is Released and Incorporated into a Form (ATP) that can Be Readily Used for the Maintenance and Development of the Plant cell.
Biofuels Developed by Beth Morgan Dept. of Plant Biology.
Kansas Renewables Today. Current Ethanol Production  Nine plants million gallon capacity.  They consume 96 million bushels of grain sorghum.
Ligno-Cellulosic Ethanol Fact Sheet Cellulosic Ethanol Production Most plant matter is not sugar or starch, but cellulose, hemicellulose,
Biochemistry The study of chemical reactions of living things.
Dry Mill Ethanol Plants – Today’s Technology and Tomorrow’s Future.
Biomolecules and Biofuels Laura Penman. Q. Why Biofuel?
The effects of glucose concentration, ethanol concentration, and temperature on the fermentation rates of yeast species Aleah TelekAdvisor: Dr. Spilatro.
BY: NATHAN WINESBURG Ethanol Process. Goals for This Project To describe from beginning to end the process of making ethanol. Talk about how ethanol plants.
Miss :Salsabeel H. AL-Joujou
Ethanol as an alternative source of energy Bioethanol is produced from plants that harness the power of the sun to convert water and CO 2 to sugars (photosynthesis),
Biorefinery for Biofuel Production
Topic : Bio-Ethanol Advisor : Prof. Jo-Shu Chang NURHAYATI / 林海亞 N PAPER REVIEW.
© British Sugar 2010 Chemical reactions Learning objectives: Identify the chemical reactions used in sugar production, both in industry and in the laboratory.
Created By: Alyssa Hughes. The Implementation of Organosolv Pretreatment Team Members: Shuai Tan, Kelsey Thrush, Alyssa Hughes, Neil Neuberger.
Topic 2: Molecular Biology 2.5 Enzymes Nature of science: Experimental design—accurate, quantitative measurements in enzyme experiments require replicates.
Enzyme Optimization for Cell-Free Ethanol Production Eric J. Allain Assistant Professor Dept. of Chemistry Appalachian State University.
1 Ethanol Production from the Mixture of Cotton Gin Waste and Recycled Paper Sludge by Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Jiacheng Shen and.
By: Brooke Winters, Kelly Li, Darius Reiter
Colour Latent heat Density Next Surface Tension Cohesion State at room
Cellulosic Ethanol Snoop Loops Addison, Kane, Samantha.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM WASTE PAPER
Overview Fusel Alcohols Fusels in Corn Mash Fermentation
DNA ISOLATION: Strawberry Lab
Nassim NADERI MS Food Biotechnology Research Assistant
Low-Moisture Anhydrous Ammonia (LMAA) Pretreatment of Corn Stover
By C Kohn Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
ETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIALS
Corn Mash and Distillation
Colour Latent heat Density Next Surface Tension Cohesion State at room
Corn to ethanol.
Chemical Reactions and Enzymes
John Nowatzki NDSU Extension Service
Bioenergy-Fermentation
Presentation transcript:

Bia Henriques, David Johnston and Muthanna Al-Dahhan Results/Analysis New Green Process Technology For Energy Efficient Ethanol Production and Decreased Fermentation Time Via Enzymatic Water Removal From Distillers Grains Discussion/Conclusion Background Dewatering increased with increasing GC220 load Dewatering effect tapers off at around mL of enzyme/100 mL of mash 95% of maximum dewatering achieved with mL of enzyme Small increase in dewatering with increasing protease load Control No Treatment Thank you Genencor and Novozymes for all of the enzymes Thank you Dr. Vijay Singh for providing the corn from UofI – Urbana/Champagne I would like to thank the following people for all their support: Dr. Muthanna Al-Dahhan (Advisor) Dr. David Johnston (Advisor – USDA) Dr. Kevin Hicks (Research Leader – USDA) Dr. Andy McAloon (Modeling and Economics – USDA) Financial support from: USDA WashU-SIUE/NASEO Grant # CREL sponsors Acknowledgements Bonds between water molecules and polyssacharides Different bonding types and strengths Maximum water binding capacity One hydrogen bond between water and polyssacharide Molecule is highly hydrophilic Attempt to disrupt network of hydrogen bonding Free water Cell wall degrading enzymes hydrolyze and cleave cellulose and hemicellulose Possible use of enzymes to disrupt bonding Cell wall degrading and proteolytic enzymes Increase: Water removal during centrifugation Productivity Decrease: Drier temperature, residence time and emissions Fermentation time Addition of enzymes to fermentation Maximize activity time Look at commercially available enzyme combinations Maintain industrial parameters Temperature pH Residence times Centrifugal force Corn Grind Liquefaction Saccharification, Fermentation and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Analysis DDGS Corn Water Yeast Enzyme Mash Tank Fermentor Distillation Column Centrifuge Evaporator Dryer Ethanol Whole Stillage Thin Stillage Wet Grains CO 2 Backset Methodology Filtration EvaporationCentrifugation Multifect GC showed highest dewatering capability Suggested dosage of 0.67kg per metric ton dry corn Mash with 30% solids loading Observed 16-20%/w increase in dewatering GC106 gave highest reduction in fermentation time Suggested Dosage of 0.67kg per metric ton dry corn Mash with 30% solids loading Significant reduction in fermentation time Reduction in viscosity of mash with enzymes Potential oil separation with Multifect GC Benefits to drier: Emissions reduction Residence time reduction Operating temperature reduction Energy input reduction Benefits to fermentation: Fermentation time reduction Productivity increase Benefits to centrifuge: Viscosity reduction Evaporator able to handle extra water Possible improvement in water recycle Possible savings of $0.8 to $1.2 million for 40mmgpy plant Ferm Gen Experiment Reduce fermentation time Centrifuge Modeling Compare theoretical to experimental data Plant Trial Center Ethanol: Sauget, IL Scheduled October 2008 Future Work Decrease in dewatering with increase in protease load Specially as MGC load is increased, dewatering effect decreases with increasing protease load MGC and GC106 could have inhibiting effect when added together to mash Highest dewatering seen when no protease is present Graph shows weight loss of fermentation flasks over time Enzyme treated mash has significant increase in weight loss rate compared to control At 32 hours enzyme treated mash is at 95% completion whereas control is at 79% completion Fermentation time can be decreased, increasing ethanol production Duplicate data Definite downwards trend in the dry solid pellet weights Statistically only weights at 0.02 mL of GC220 and above are different from rest Some solubilization could be occurring but not possible to quantify Duplicate data Differences in dry solid pellet weight were not significant for the most part Some material may be solubilizing but the amount is too small to be quantified GC220, Multifect GC and GC 106 are commercially available, enzyme cocktails Schematic diagram of the dry grind process. Enzyme addition is represented by dashed line into fermentor.