© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY SECOND LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil liability system in the Republic of Latvia.
Advertisements

Basel Convention Secretariat United Nations Environmental Programme ___________________________________ Key Elements of the Protocol Laura Thompson Legal.
Dr T H Moller Technical Team Manager INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMPENSATION CONVENTIONS.
CLAIMS SETTLING WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE EUROPEAN UNION.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Alla Pozdnakova Post. doc. Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law A comparative study of safety at sea regulation.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Sjøsikkerhetsseminaret Lysebu, 29 January 2008 Alla Pozdnakova Post. doc. NIFS Russian shipping safety regulation:
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Sjøsikkerhetsseminaret Lysebu, 29 January 2008 Eve de Coning Stipendiat NIFS ’IDENTIFYING THE RESPONSIBLE.
1 The Rotterdam Rules and General Average Svante O. Johansson AMD Forum Marrakesh November 6, 2009.
IAEA International Conference on the Safe and Secure Transport of Radioactive Materials: Session 4B P2 Liability Issues Thursday 20 October 2011 Kevin.
PEOPIL ANNUAL CONFERENCE MALAGA 2013 SILINA PAVLAKIS PAVLAKIS-MOSCHOS & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICE PIRAEUS - GREECE Cruise liner liability.
BELÉN GARCÍA ÁLVAREZ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF COMMERCIAL LAW UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO (SPAIN) ROTTERDAM SEPTEMBER OF 2014 VIII ECMLR.
AIDA XIV World Congress 2014 Rom, 30 th September 2014 Marine Insurance WP “Sue and labour expenses – H&M on German terms or P&I?” Dr. Maximilian Guth,
22 Lloyd’s Salvage Agreement LOF
BILBAO - CADIZ - MADRID - SEVILLA - VALENCIA International Maritime Law Seminar, 16th. October 2014 THE NEW SPANISH.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Owners’ liability EVE DE CONING Room 561, Domus Nova.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY FOURTH LECTURE LIABILITY FOR COLLISIONS.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Eve de Coning Research fellow PhD Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law October 2007 MARINE INSURANCE MARL16.
ROME II & INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS A CASE STUDY Silina Pavlakis Pavlakis-Moschos & Associates Piraeus, Greece.
Axel Luttenberger, Ph.D., Full Professor Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka DRIVES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE.
“In the vast area of legal jurisprudence, there are undoubtedly many instances where being the first, or only, jurisdiction to grant rights to persons.
Subrogation under Japanese Law
1 Keys for Chapter 5 Keys for Chapter 5 1. Do you think the insurance company should pay the claim to the insured? Why? Yes, the insurance company should.
Raymond P. Hayden “The Changing Rules on the Playground” President The Maritime Law Association of the U.S.
Consequences of Fukushima accident on international framework for nuclear liability and compensation Open lecture, Higher School of Economics, National.
The Islamic University of Gaza Engineering Faculty
THE ATHENS PROTOCOL & THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIERS OF PASSENGER SHIPS Graham Barnes BankServe Insurance Services Ltd.
1 HNSC: Insurers and Insurance Certificates Professor Erik Røsæg Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law, Oslo Tel
SHIP AND LIABILITY – an introduction to Norwegian Maritime Law
Oil Pollution and Compensation an overview of oil the international oil spill compensation regimes Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental.
Bahamas Ship Owners’ Association (BMA) Maritime Labour Convention Ammendments Maurice Kelleher Manager, Management Systems Certification, ABS Americas.
Maritime Liability and Compensation Conventions
Hanne Sofie Logstein, NIFS LIABILITY Spring 2007 Faculty of Law, University of Oslo Research fellow Hanne Sofie Logstein (based on the material worked.
NEW AMENDMENTS TO THE CROATIAN MARITIME CODE Koper, 30 May 2013 Jasenko Marin University of Zagreb Faculty of Law.
RESEARCH TRAINING INFORMATION INSTITUT DU DROIT INTERNATIONAL DES TRANSPORTS ET DE LA LOGISTIQUE.
RECOVERING AND REMOVAL OF WRECKS AND SUNKEN OBJECTS Dr. sc. Adriana Vincenca Padovan ADRIATIC INSTITUTE OF THE CROATIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS European.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY THIRD LECTURE OIL POLLUTION LIABILITY.
INTERSPILL 2012 Bunkers Convention 2001 LLMC Conventions Jonathan Hare
The Norwegian Marine Insurance Plan
1 Commodore (H.C.G) GEORGIOS GIANNIMARAS Director General Ministry of Mercantile Marine General Directorate for Shipping Policy & Development.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 27 International legal framework for environmental maritime crime: UNCLOS, IMO and MARPOL.
SHIPPING and the LAW Managing the Risks THE LIABILITY OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES Siccardi Bregante & C.1.
International Group of P&I Clubs Presentation to EU Transport Attachés Third Maritime Safety Package – Civil Liability of Shipowners Directive Brussels.
DUTY OF THE ASSURED Prepared by: Ms. Norazimah Mazlan.
The Law of Salvage Lecture 2008 Professor, jur. dr Svante O. Johansson.
The Development of Environmental Salvage and Review of the Salvage Convention 1989 Archie Bishop Holman Fenwick Willan.
Hanne Sofie Logstein, NIFS LIABILITY Spring 2007 Faculty of Law, University of Oslo Research fellow Hanne Sofie Logstein (based on the material worked.
WALA Conference, Ciudad Real, 18/19 May 2009 Damages to third parties on the surface Update of Rome Convention Heinz Dillmann Vice President Special Legal.
MCGILL CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY & INSURANCE Liability for Acts of Terrorism: The New Unlawful Interference Convention General The.
Marine Pollution Professor Harry Roque Public International Law Mangaban, Ma. Lourena M. 3-E.
Contracts of carriage by sea involve an international dimension. The carriage of goods across nations separated by sea are often done by shipping lines.
Incorporated in the Motor Tariff. Agreement between two insurers. Each insurer shall bear its own policyholder’s vehicle damage loss irrespective.
Chapter 5 Maritime Lien. 一、 Definition of maritime liens(ML) : CMC Art. 21 A maritime lien is the right of the claimant, subject to the provisions of.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
THIRD LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
Eastern Mediterranean University
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
به نام خدا موضوع ارائه: مسئولیت متصدی حمل و نقل دریایی در قبال مسافر
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| May 24th 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
General (Global) Limitation of Liability System
Carriage of Goods by Sea – liability of a carrier
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| 28 May 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE Lecture 1 – introduction to mtl 1 MARCH 2018 doc.dr.sc. IVA SAVIĆ Department for Maritime and Transport Law.
Maritime Law General introduction Chapter1.
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
RATIFICATION TO THE HAZARDOUS AND NOXIOUS SUBSTANCE BY SEA CONVENTION 2010 PRESENTATION TO NCOP:SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.
1996/2010 HNS Convention.
PROTECTION & INDEMNITY
Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Action
Volcafe Ltd v CSAV 11 April 2019
Presentation transcript:

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY SECOND LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Chapter 9 ‘Limitation of Shipowners’ Liability’ Overview: 1.Background 2.The legal application of the global limitation rules (MC chapter 9) a) persons who may invoke the rules; b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund; and c) conduct barring a claim 3.The practical application of the global limitation rules 4.Procedural rules

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background 1.Overview of the limitation of liability regime 2.International instruments concerning global limitation

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background (cont.) Global limitation instruments: 1.Grotious: unlimited liability is “inequitable and injurious to the interests of trade” 2.International unifying attempts: a) The 1924 Brussels Convention on Limitation of Liability; b) The 1957 Brussels Convention and the 1979 Protocol; and c) The 1976 London Convention and the 1996 Protocol 3. Norway: 1996 Protocol (in terms of the Maritime Code Amendment Act of 17 June 2005 no 88 which entered into force 1 November 2006)

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules: a) persons who may invoke the limitation MC section 171 Identified persons May limit claims against each other (however cf the English position) Catch all group in relation to salvage and wreck removal Also if vicariously liable Cannot evade limitation by pursuing the insurer directly

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules: b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund MC section 172 (subject to the limitations in section 173) ‘A right to limit liability in terms of section 175 applies, whatever the basis of liability may be, to claims raised in respect of 1)loss of life or personal injuries or loss of or damage to property if the damage occurred on board or in direct connection with the operation of the ship or salvage; (subject to section 173 no. 5) 2)loss resulting from delay in carriage of goods by sea of cargo, passengers or their luggage; 3)other loss resulting from infringement of rights other than contractual rights, occurring in direct connection with the operation of the ship or salvage; 4)measures taken in order to avert or minimize loss for which the person liable may limit his liability in terms of the Act, and further loss caused by such measures.’ (subject to section 173 no. 1) ‘…by a person other than the person liable…’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) MC s 172a. ‘The right to limit liability in terms of section 175a will apply to ships above 300 tons, whatever the basis of liability, in respect of claims arising from: 1.raising, removal, destruction or the rendering harmless of a ship which is sunk, wrecked, stranded or abandoned, including anything that is or has been on board such ship; (subject to section 173 no. 1) 2.removal, destruction or the rendering harmless of the cargo of the ship; 3.measures taken in order to avert or minimize loss for which the person liable may limit his liability in terms of the Act, and further loss caused by such measures.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) MC section 173 ‘Claims for which limitation of liability is not available: 1.claims for salvage, general average contribution, or any contractual claim for payment in respect of measures referred to in section 172 no 4 or 172a no 1; 2.claims for oil pollution damage which may be limited according to the special rules regarding oil pollution liability (sections 191 and 207); 3.claims subject to any international convention or national legislation governing or prohibiting limitation of liability for nuclear damage; 4.claims for nuclear damage caused by nuclear powered vessel; 5.claims for damage or injury caused to any employee of the persons entitled to limit their liability and whose duties are connected with the vessel or the salvage operation; 6.claims for interest and litigation costs.

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) MC section 175 ‘The liability for claims based on section 172 are limited as follows: 1.For claims relating to personal injury of the ship’s own passengers the limit of liability is SDR multiplied by the number of passengers that the ship in terms of its certificate is authorised to carry. 2.For other claims relating to personal injury the limit of liability is SDR. For ships with tonnage exceeding tons the limits of liability will increase as follows: for each ton from to tons, with 800 SDR, for each ton from to tons, with 600 SDR, and for each ton from , with 400 SDR.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) MC section 175 (cont.) ‘3. The limits of liability in respect of all other claims, as well as uncovered claims as mentioned in no. 2, is SDR. For ships with tonnage exceeding 2000 tons the limits of liability will increase as follows: for each ton from to tons, with 400 SDR, for each ton from to tons, with 300 SDR, and for each ton from , with 200 SDR.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) MC section 175a. ‘The limit of liability for claims raised in terms of section 172a, is SDR. For ships with tonnage of more than tons the limit of liability is increased as follows: for each ton from to tons with SDR, and for each ton over tons, with 500 SDR.’ Special tonnage calculation rule in relation to salvage: MC section 175 no. 5 (also applies to section 175a.) ‘If salvors do not operate from a ship or only operate out of the salvaged ship, then the limitation limit will be estimated from a tonnage of tons.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules b) categories of claims and corresponding limitation fund (cont.) Additional points: 1.Single liability principle Section 172 (also applies to section 172a and section 175 no. 5, salvors): ‘If the liable party is subject to a counter-claim, and claim and counter-claim arises out of the same occurrence, then the limitation will only apply to that part of the claim which exceeds the counter-claim.’ (Compare 1976 convention art 5) 2. ‘Occurrence’ Section 175 no. 4 (also applies to section 175a) ’The limits to liability in no. 1 to 3. [of section 175 and 175a] applies to the aggregate of all claims which arise out of one distinct occasion against the reder, the shipowner, the charterer or the operator, as well as any other person that the above answers for.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. The legal application of the global limitation rules c) conduct barring a claim MC section 174 and 1976 Convention art 4: ’A person liable shall not be entitled to limit his liability if it is proved that the loss resulted from his personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such loss, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 3. The practical application of the global limitation rules: The Green Ålesund

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The Green Ålesund (cont.) 1.Owner, Green Como of Bergen, did not want to remove wreck or cargo. 2.SFT spent NOK on the operation. 3.Gross tonnage: 2280 tons. Global limitation: Who may limit? Is this a claim for which liability may be limited? What limitation applies?

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Global limitation ceiling in terms of section 175a (with todays SDR value): Liability first 1000 tons: SDR Liability following 1280 tons:(2.000 SDR x 1280 tons) = SDR Global limitation on claims: SDR NOK conversion rate (8.88 on 31 August 2007) = NOK If 1976 Convention with 1996 Protocol applied: Liablity first tons: SDR Liability following 280 tons: (400 SDR x 280 tons) = SDR Global limitation on claims: SDR NOK conversion rate 8,88 = NOK If 1976 Convention applied: Liability first 500 GT: SDR Liability following 1780 tons: (167 SDR x 1780 tons) = SDR Global limitation on claims: SDR NOK conversion rate 8,88 = NOK

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Suggested further reading: For an English summary of the latest amendments to the MC in relation to limitation of liability: Griggs, Williams and Farr Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (LLP, 2005, 4ed), library reference 25 GRI, in particular Chapter 32: Lund and Gjelsten ’Norway’ at 343