1 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Simultaneous Confidence Regions corresponding to Holm’s Step-down MTP (and other CTPs) Olivier Guilbaud.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating the detector coverage in a negative selection algorithm Zhou Ji St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital Dipankar Dasgupta The University of Memphis.
Advertisements

Gatekeeping Testing Strategies in Clinical Trials Alex Dmitrienko, Ph.D. Eli Lilly and Company FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop September 2004.
A Flexible Two Stage Design in Active Control Non-inferiority Trials Gang Chen, Yong-Cheng Wang, and George Chi † Division of Biometrics I, CDER, FDA Qing.
1 Health Warning! All may not be what it seems! These examples demonstrate both the importance of graphing data before analysing it and the effect of outliers.
Significance Tests Hypothesis - Statement Regarding a Characteristic of a Variable or set of variables. Corresponds to population(s) –Majority of registered.
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 13 Nonlinear and Multiple Regression.
A new group-sequential phase II/III clinical trial design Nigel Stallard and Tim Friede Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK
Design and analysis of clinical trials MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing Slides prepared by John M. Butler June 2009 Appendix 3 Probability and Statistics.
Probability & Statistical Inference Lecture 6 MSc in Computing (Data Analytics)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS DEPT Esimating Population Value with Hypothesis Testing.
ANOVA Determining Which Means Differ in Single Factor Models Determining Which Means Differ in Single Factor Models.
Inference (CI / Tests) for Comparing 2 Proportions.
Elementary hypothesis testing Purpose of hypothesis testing Type of hypotheses Type of errors Critical regions Significant levels Hypothesis vs intervals.
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
8. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 8.1 Elements of a Designed Experiment
Horng-Chyi HorngStatistics II41 Inference on the Mean of a Population - Variance Known H 0 :  =  0 H 0 :  =  0 H 1 :    0, where  0 is a specified.
Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials
Confidence Interval A confidence interval (or interval estimate) is a range (or an interval) of values used to estimate the true value of a population.
Qian H. Li, Lawrence Yu, Donald Schuirmann, Stella Machado, Yi Tsong
Multiple testing in high- throughput biology Petter Mostad.
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing - II
Hypothesis Testing.
Proprietary and Confidential © AstraZeneca 2009 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 O Guilbaud, FMS+Cramér Society, AZ-Södertälje, Alpha Recycling in Confirmatory.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 2 – Slide 1 of 25 Chapter 11 Section 2 Inference about Two Means: Independent.
Testing and Estimation Procedures in Multi-Armed Designs with Treatment Selection Gernot Wassmer, PhD Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und.
The Role of Statistical Methodology in Clinical Research – Shaping and Influencing Decision Making Frank Bretz Global Head – Statistical Methodology, Novartis.
Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik Aesthetics and power in multiple testing – a contradiction? MCP 2007, Vienna Gerhard.
Ch9. Inferences Concerning Proportions. Outline Estimation of Proportions Hypothesis concerning one Proportion Hypothesis concerning several proportions.
Multiple Testing in Microarray Data Analysis Mi-Ok Kim.
Closed Testing and the Partitioning Principle Jason C. Hsu The Ohio State University MCP 2002 August 2002 Bethesda, Maryland.
Decision-Theoretic Views on Switching Between Superiority and Non-Inferiority Testing. Peter Westfall Director, Center for Advanced Analytics and Business.
4 Hypothesis & Testing. CHAPTER OUTLINE 4-1 STATISTICAL INFERENCE 4-2 POINT ESTIMATION 4-3 HYPOTHESIS TESTING Statistical Hypotheses Testing.
MBA Statistics COURSE #2 Do we have winning conditions? Decision making from statistical inference.
All-or-None procedure: An outline Nanayaw Gyadu-Ankama Shoubhik Mondal Steven Cheng.
통계적 추론 (Statistical Inference) 삼성생명과학연구소 통계지원팀 김선우 1.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005 Dr. John Lipp Copyright © Dr. John Lipp.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 4 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Overview.
Lecture 3: Statistics Review I Date: 9/3/02  Distributions  Likelihood  Hypothesis tests.
Ex St 801 Statistical Methods Inference about a Single Population Mean.
Suppose we have T genes which we measured under two experimental conditions (Ctl and Nic) in n replicated experiments t i * and p i are the t-statistic.
1 Chihiro HIROTSU Meisei (明星) University Estimating the dose response pattern via multiple decision processes.
Data Analysis: Analyzing Individual Variables and Basics of Hypothesis Testing Chapter 20.
Inen 460 Lecture 2. Estimation (ch. 6,7) and Hypothesis Testing (ch.8) Two Important Aspects of Statistical Inference Point Estimation – Estimate an unknown.
MPS/MSc in StatisticsAdaptive & Bayesian - Lect 51 Lecture 5 Adaptive designs 5.1Introduction 5.2Fisher’s combination method 5.3The inverse normal method.
Comparing k > 2 Groups - Numeric Responses Extension of Methods used to Compare 2 Groups Parallel Groups and Crossover Designs Normal and non-normal data.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Section 9-4 Inferences from Matched.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
9-1 ESTIMATION Session Factors Affecting Confidence Interval Estimates The factors that determine the width of a confidence interval are: 1.The.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Comparing I > 2 Groups - Numeric Responses Extension of Methods used to Compare 2 Groups Independent and Dependent Samples Normal and non-normal data structures.
Bonferroni adjustment Bonferroni adjustment (equally weighted) – Reject H 0j with p i
1 השוואות מרובות מדדי טעות, עוצמה, רווחי סמך סימולטניים ד"ר מרינה בוגומולוב מבוסס על ההרצאות של פרופ' יואב בנימיני ופרופ' מלכה גורפיין.
Hypothesis Tests for 1-Proportion Presentation 9.
A Parametrized Strategy of Gatekeeping, Keeping Untouched the Probability of Having at Least One Significant Result Analysis of Primary and Secondary Endpoints.
Estimating a Population Mean:  Not Known
3. The X and Y samples are independent of one another.
STAT 312 Chapter 7 - Statistical Intervals Based on a Single Sample
Testing a Claim About a Mean:  Known
Multiplicity Testing Procedure Selection in Clinical Trials Rachael Wen Ph.D JSM 2018 of 8.
OMGT LECTURE 10: Elements of Hypothesis Testing
Inference on the Mean of a Population -Variance Known
Covering Principle to Address Multiplicity in Hypothesis Testing
David Edwards and Jesper Madsen Novo Nordisk
Hui Quan, Yi Xu, Yixin Chen, Lei Gao and Xun Chen Sanofi June 28, 2019
Exact Inference for Adaptive Group Sequential Clinical Trials
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Presentation transcript:

1 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Simultaneous Confidence Regions corresponding to Holm’s Step-down MTP (and other CTPs) Olivier Guilbaud AstraZeneca R&D, Sweden

2 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Outline Bonferroni Confidence Regions Elements of Proposed Simultaneous Confidence Regions The Simultaneous  Confidence Regions Illustration Extensions Nice Reduction Property

3 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Bonferroni Confidence Regions Estimated quantities (m specified): Marginal  -Confidence Regions (m specified): Simultaneous (  )-Confidence Regions: Bonferroni m -adjustment Nice properties: Flexible, Generally valid (if marginal regions are valid) No restriction to particular kinds/dimensions of  i s and C i,  s

4 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Can other simultaneous confidence regions based on marginal confidence regions be constructed that share these nice properties ? YES, and Bonferroni regions constitute a special case in a class of such regions.

5 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Elements of Proposed Simultaneous Confidence Regions Estimated quantities (m specified): Marginal  -Confidence Regions (m specified): Target Regions of interest (m specified): Aim is to ”show”, if possible, that  i  R i (target assertion) Additional

6 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Elements … (cont.) Examples with  i       and Target region R i   for  i : Show, i.e., ”superiority” or ”non-inferiority” Show, i.e., ”inequality” Show, i.e., ”equivalence” using appropriate marginal confidence regions C i,  s for  i s No restriction to particular kinds/dimensions of  i s, R i s, or C i,  s

7 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Elements … (cont.) Raw p-value p i = p i (data) : p i = ( infimum of levels  ' for which the test rejects H i ) Marginal Confidence-Region  ' Test of H i :  i  R i to Show H i c :  i  R i : Connection with Holm’s (1979) Step-down MTP through

8 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 (Brief Refresher) Ordered p-values: p (1)  p (2)  …  p (m) ; Corresp Hs: H (1), H (2), …, H (m) Bonferroni-Holm’s (1979) MTP with multiple-level  : Reject successively H (1), H (2), …, H (m), as long as p (1)   /m, p (2)   /(m-1), …, p (m)   /1 ; Stop at first > ! Sture Holm

9 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Elements … (cont.) Can be arbitrarily chosen. Can be chosen to sharpen inferences about  1, …,  m Given , introduce I Reject  ( set of 1  i  m of H i s rejected by Holm at multiple level  ) I Accept   1, 2, …, m   I Reject (i) : the 2 index sets (ii) : additional Estimated quantity & Marginal  Confidence Region

10 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 The Simultaneous  Confidence Regions For 1  i  m+1, define : Main Result : Bonferroni |I Accept | -adjustment of marginal conf region for  i Reflects by how much/little one missed the Target assertion ”  i  R i ” Useful to sharpen inferences for 1  i  m

11 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Nice Reduction Property What happens if all target regions R 1, …, R m are chosen to be empty ? Reduction to m ordinary Bonferroni  Conf Regions for  1, …,  m ! because : Only this is informative Empty

12 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Illustration Estimated quantities in , , e.g. Differences of Trt-means Show, if possible, that each ! That is, each. Marginal 1-sided  -Confidence Regions ( t or W based t or W p-values for H 0 :  i  0 vs. H 0 c :  i > 0 ) Possible realization of  Conf Regions with m  5 : 0  Holm non-rejections (Bonf 2 -adjustm) Holm rejections (Target assertions) ”extra free information”

13 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Illustration (cont.) (Reasonable if scales of are equal or sufficiently similar) Possible choice of additional and to sharpen inferences : Rectangular region Sharpening of  Conf Regions with m  5 if occurs : 0  0  instead of L min

14 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Extension 1: Holm with Weights Holm’s (1979) MTP based on p 1, …, p m and given weights 1, …, m > 0 For 1  i  m+1 : Holm rejection index set

15 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Extension 2: Hommel, Bretz & Maurer (2007) class of MTPs CTP with Bonferroni test of H I using certain w i (I)s, i  I, I  {1, …, m}. (Fixed-Seq MTP, Holm’s MTP, Gatekeeping MTPs, Fallback MTP, …) For 1  i  m+1, again : Weights w i (I) are such that for each non-empty I  {1, …, m} : H-B-M rejection index set

16 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Final Comments Flexible (no restriction concerning kinds/dim of  i s, R i s and C i,  s) Multi-dimensional  i s and R i s can be combined with ”marginal” simultaneous CIs within  i s (e.g. Hsu-Berger CIs for  i -components): Generally valid (if marginal confidence regions are valid) Intuitively appealing Simple to implement Leads e.g. to Simultaneous Confidence Regions corresponding to the Bonferroni-Holm MTP for m families of hypotheses (Bauer et al appendix, Bauer et al. 2001) with Extra ”free” Information m=2 : Superiority vs. PlaceboNon-inferiority vs. Placebo

17 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Selected References Aitchinson, J. (1964). Confidence-region Tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 26, Hsu, J. C. and Berger, R. L. (1999). Stepwise Confidence Intervals Without Multiplicity Adjustment for Dose-response and Toxicity Studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, Bauer, P., Brannath, W., and Posch, M. (2001). Multiple Testing for Identifying Effective and Safe Treatments. Biometrical Journal 43, Bauer, P., Röhmel, J., Maurer, W., and Hothorn, L. (1998). Testing Strategies in Multi-dose Experiments Including Active Control. Statistics in Medicine 17, Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, Hommel, G., Bretz, F., and Maurer, W. (2007). Powerful Short-Cuts for Multiple Testing Procedures with Special Reference to Gatekeeping Strategies. Statistics in Medicine (in press).

18 O Guilbaud, MCP2007, July 8-11, Vienna, v.1 Summary Bonferroni Confidence Regions Elements of Proposed Simultaneous Confidence Regions The Simultaneous  Confidence Regions Illustration Extensions Nice Reduction Property