BoRit Superfund Site Timeline

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised Environmental Site Assessment Guidelines & Asbestos Inspection Guidelines for Bridges.
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
1 BoRit Asbestos & The Superfund Process Stacie Peterson, Remedial Project Manager (RPM)
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
Hazardous Materials. Regulation of Hazardous Materials Over 1000 new man-made chemical enter commerce each year Pose a potential risk to life, health.
1 Fort Monroe: An Update on the Environmental Cleanup VDEQ Presentation to the Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority March 19, 2009.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.
Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Case S-4_SRS Par Pond1 Case Study 4: CERCLA INTERIM ACTION AT THE SRS PAR POND.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Lucia Machado, NPS Coordinator.  Under Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) ◦ Part (h) provides the grant program.
Assessing Your School An Environmental Investigation You have been hired by Eagle Environmental, Inc. to perform an Environmental Assessment of South Hunterdon.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Update for 2011 ITRC Spring Anna Willett ITRC Director 2011 ITRC Spring Meeting Minneapolis, MN, April 4-8, 2011.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
A Hazardous Waste Site PCB Contamination. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Man-made class of oil-like chemicals used in the manufacture of electrical.
Site Activities Update Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting January 16, 2013.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Maryland Department of the Environment Harbor Point – Regulatory Overview Horacio Tablada, Director Land Management Administration November 14, 2013.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Superfund Process National Priorities List (NPL) Procedures.
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
Outreach for the On-Call Hazardous Waste Site Investigation and Design Services Contract Caltrans D9 February 17, 2016.
Hazardous Waste Management Legislation RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Regulate management and disposal of wastes currently being produced.
Status of Sediment and Groundwater Remedies. Or… What’s up with that O&F Determination?
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
111 Area-Wide Planning, Superfund Sites, Environmental Justice and Green Infrastructure: Tying it All Together in the Freeport Community Planning Project.
Fort Detrick Installation Restoration Program Area B Groundwater November 1, 2010 Fort Detrick, Maryland A Sustainable Community of Excellence.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
UNC Superfund Research Program
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Introduction EPA is overseeing the RI/FS for the Rolling Knolls Landfill being conducted by several companies under a 2005 administrative order on consent.
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
Presentation transcript:

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline Removal Action Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection National Priorities Listing (NPL) Process Remedial Investigation (RI) Feasibility Study (FS) A “removal action” is an action intended to stabilize or clean up an incident or site which poses an immediate threat to human health or the environment. If the release of hazardous substances requires immediate or short-term response actions, these are addressed under the Emergency Response program of Superfund. A Preliminary Assessment (PA) is designed to determine whether a sites poses little or no threat to human health and the environment or if it does pose a threat, whether the threat requires further investigation. A Site Inspection (SI) identifies sites that enter the NPL listing process and provides the data needed for Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Scoring and documentation. A list of the most serious sites identified for possible long-term cleanup. After a site is listed on the NPL, a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) is performed at the site. The RI serves as the mechanism for collecting data to: characterize site conditions; determine the nature of the waste; and assess risk to human health and the environment. The Feasibility Study (FS) is the mechanism for the development, screening, and detailed evaluation of alternative remedial actions. The RI/FS is a multi-step process including: Scoping Site Characterization Development and Screening of Alternatives EPA Process Phase I: July 2008-June 2009 – Stabilization of stream banks so that asbestos-containing material (ACM) does not enter the streams is begun. In June 2009, EPA completed stream bank stabilization at Wissahickon Creek. Phase II: July 2009-May 2010 - Stream bank stabilization was completed at Rose Valley Creek. Phase III: May 2010-June 2010 – Stabilization completed on the reservoir berm parallel to the Wissahickon Creek. Phase IV: June 2010-July 2011 - Pile clearing and stabilization of Tannery Run completed. Phase V: July 2011-September 2011 – Stabilization completed at Wissahickon Creek from the dam to its confluence with Tannery Run. In April 2006, an EPA Site Assessment Team conducted a baseline sampling event at the BoRit Asbestos Site. Results from the sampling event showed the presence of asbestos in the air, soil, surface water and sediments. Proposed to the NPL September 2008. In April 2009, the site was listed on the NPL, making the site eligible for federal cleanup funding. Work began November 2009. Phase I of field work, which included surface water, sediment, soil, and waste sampling, completed January 2010. Phase II activities, which included community air monitoring, installation of groundwater monitoring wells, and additional onsite and offsite (including residential) soil sampling, began October 2010 and completed November 2010. Activity based sampling occurred in summer/fall 2011. EPA expects to complete the RI/FS in approximately 3 years, depending on the needs of the investigation. BoRit Process Please Note: Time frames for site activities can vary depending on influences such as schedules, contracts and weather. Draft updated March 12, 2012

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline Record of Decision (ROD) Remedial Design (RD) Remedial Action (RA) Post-Construction Completion NPL Deletion Reuse A ROD contains site history, site description, site characteristics, community participation, enforcement activities, past and present activities, contaminated media, the contaminants present, scope and role of response action and the remedy selected for cleanup. Preparation and implementation of plans and specifications for applying site remedies. All new fund-financed remedies are reviewed by the National Priorities Panel. Remedial Action (RA) follows the remedial design phase and involves the actual construction or implementation phase of Superfund site cleanup. The bulk of the cleanup usually occurs during this phase. Ensures that Superfund response actions provide for the long-term protection of human health and the environment. Included here are: Long-Term Response Actions Operation and Maintenance Institutional Controls Five-Year Reviews Remedy Optimization Removes a site from the NPL once all response actions are complete and all cleanup goals have been achieved. EPA’s goal is to make sure that at every cleanup site, the Agency and its partners have an effective process and the necessary tools and information needed to fully explore future uses, before the cleanup remedy is implemented. This gives the Agency the best chance of making it’s remedies consistent with the likely future use of the site. In turn, EPA gives communities the best opportunity to use sites following cleanup. EPA Process It is important to note that EPA has NOT chosen a long-term cleanup option for the site. EPA plans to work with the community to keep them informed of our progress and of the options we’re considering for the final cleanup. Once the RI/FS is completed, EPA will propose a final cleanup option and will offer the community a sixty day period to comment on the proposed plan. Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes BoRit Process Please Note: Time frames for site activities can vary depending on influences such as schedules, contracts and weather. Draft updated March 12, 2012