Bart Bretherton, RG Region 2 Hazmat Coordinator Lessons Learned from Unanticipated Cleanup on a Preservation Project (a tale of whoa)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging Challenges for LDCs due to Climate Change
Advertisements

Construction Management. Players Owner – owns project upon completion of construction –Private – owner owns land and pays for construction of facility.
+ African Legal Support Facility Negotiations of natural resource contracts : Role of ALSF 2013 African Legal Support Facility Stephen Karangizi Director,
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS CEM-512 Value Engineering Think Value Engineering Prakash Acharya Charles Pfrommer Charles Zirbel JOURNAL.
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
PROCEDURES FOR SELECTING THE CONTRACTOR
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Construction Engineering 221 Cost Estimating and Bidding.
Project Management Functions of a Project Manager
South Carolina Housing Trust Fund An Introduction for New Participants January, 2006.
Convention Center Community Coalition 1. Time Line 2008: Feasibility Study by CS&L May 2009: Follow-Up Data April 2010: Appleton Council/Mayor Appoint.
POWER LUNCH AUDIT PREPARATION MIKUNDA, COTTRELL & CO. Certified Public Accountants and Consultants 3601 “C” Street, Suite 600 Anchorage, Alaska (907)
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Managing HAZMAT Liability in Easement Acquisitions Gary Fremerman NRCS Easement Programs Division Workshop Denver, Colorado October 31, 2006.
Chapter 1 Project Management Concepts
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
Legal Perspectives May 19, 2014 Jay Fox Regional Counsel FTA Region III.
Field Questions. –Asked by sub or GC when discrepancy in construction docs or existing site conditions Design change verification request Field information.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Chapter 1 Project Management Concepts. 22 Learning Objectives Definition of a project and its attributes Key constraints within which a project must be.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
Construction Why Construction The Construction Which are closely related to swimmingly project completion Which Mean: every thing related to Project participants.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
Specification & Quantities Estimating
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
Project Life Cycle.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Pre-Project Components
Project Delivery Business Operations Overview June 2015 Final PD Training FMD WUSM 6/15/15 1.
Considerations In Dealing With NEPA and 3 rd Party Contractors PLA NEPA Conference June 11, 2008.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
Chapter 1 Project Management Concepts
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
RISK MANAGEMENT YULVI. Introduction Time Quality Cost Project Constraints Success Introduction.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Resident Engineer Panel Discussion Jack Stone, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Chad Aagard, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Pete Hallsten, P.E. District.
Division 1 – General Requirements ACT Objective O Learn to write Division 1 sections in a manner that governs but does not limit the content of.
Overview of 3 rd Party Inspection Program for USTs.
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
University of Calgary Continuing Education Construction Contract Law and Documents Week 12 Changes Delays Claims Contract Documentation.
ISO Most Common Problems May 25, 2000 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. May 25, 2000 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Program and Quality.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request authorization to award Professional Services Agreement (PSA) No with Geomatrix; and PSA No with Hart Crowser for.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
PRESENTED BY HENRY RUHNKE WALD, RUHNKE & DOST ARCHITECTS, LLP SIERRA HOUSE & DROP-IN CENTER.
Principles of Information Systems Eighth Edition
1st Avenue Revitalization Project Brownfield Pilot Study Public Outreach Property Owner Stakeholder Meeting June 1999.
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
“Plan the work. Work the plan.” ~ Old Saying
Traffic Control Plan Development Course
State Aid Plan Approval Process
Alabede, Collura, Walden, Zimmerman
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
CEN 4021 Software Engineering II
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
The emphasis of Construction Management and Preconstruction Services in the AEC industry Preconstruction Services Construction Management.
Chapter # 4 Development and Quality Plans
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Unit 7 Documentation Documentation
National Visitor Use Monitoring
Right of Way Certification
TOTAL COST CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Presentation transcript:

Bart Bretherton, RG Region 2 Hazmat Coordinator Lessons Learned from Unanticipated Cleanup on a Preservation Project (a tale of whoa)

Defining Factors During Project Development January 2004  Project starts  Scoped as Pavement Pres job  No hazmat anticipated  Expected completion- one const. season Midpoint in project development Project expands with addition of SWIP Funds Dec 2005 Hazmat Phase 1 requested by R/ W and Project Leader May 2006 Project let R/W develops area of take

Consequences of Unanticipated Hazmat to Project Construction Project completion time severely impacted  Almost doubled! Significant increase in volume of materials to be managed and disposed  50 tons estimated; 967 tons actually removed  Saturated soil increased actual tonnage and management issues  Additional subcontractors necessary  Licensed tank removal contractors and continual hazmat supervision Unanticipated hazmat issues were 40-50% of total cost overrun  $600K over engineer’s estimate

Lesson Learned: Involve Hazmat in Early Scoping and Part 3 Dev Issue: Part 3 did not recognize and/or include possible hazmat sites.  Easily retrievable public documents were not reviewed.  Notable site characteristics were not evaluated for impact to the project. Resolution: Essential to include the Region Hazmat Coordinator in review and preparation of Part 3.

Lesson Learned: Beware of Project Scope Creep Issue: Addition of SWIP funds in the middle of the project development seriously impacted the Part 3 hazmat evaluation.  Required property acquisition and trenching.  Should have triggered a full Phase 1 earlier.

Issue: Late hazmat evaluation prevented needed Phase 2 work.  Phase 2 would have greatly increased ability to evaluate the financial impacts and constructability of the project.  Phase 2 would have produced more accurate info than RP supplied site information.  A lack of characterization resulted in incomplete special provisions. Resolutions:  The 2005 implementation of PD-02 helps to limit scope creep.  Hazmat review should continue through entire development process up to PS&E.  Don’t just “check the box” as completed – read the report! Lesson Learned: Beware of Project Scope Creep cont.

Lesson Learned: Obtain Cost Sharing Agreements with Property Owners ASAP Issue: Too many property owners and multiple agencies involved.  No time to negotiate agreements and assign liability or;  Litigate responsibility. Resolutions:  Leave sufficient time to interact and negotiate with property owners.  Develop well-defined cost recovery process.

Lesson Learned: It’s Not Over Until It’s Built Issue: Contractor did not have sufficient special provisions. Resolution: Make sure to have all special provisions for increased project flexibility.

In Closing: There are some things that are fun to dig up. (Petroleum contaminated soil is not one of them!)