A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean Inc. High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction & Groundwater Treatment Systems Noel Shenoi Principal Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiphase Extraction Techniques
Advertisements

Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Spill Response Waste Reduction. Gold Crew Gold Crew with the following capabilities: Spill Cleanup – Concentrated Type II Water based Oil Spill Dispersant.
Young-Rainey STAR Centre
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Overview: I.Introduction/Background A.Kevin Allen B.Noel Shenoi II.Core Basics III.Solutions IV.Additional Literature.
Gasoline Spill Cleanup (Volatile Components) Rose Adam Allison Rose Adam Allison.
Air Sparging at Fort Greely, Alaska Presented by Aung Syn & James Powell.
1 Experience with IR 70kW installations on LFG, will current emission performance be enough? January 26, 2005.
1 In Situ Oxidation of PAH Contaminants Associated With Former Manufactured Gas Plants Ron Jensen Southern California Edison 1.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Presented by: Jonathan Silvester Oliver Kiernan. Maxey Flat Site Located in Fleming County, Kentucky Low level Nuclear Disposal Facility o Isolate waste.
1 Thermal Remediation Services, Inc. Electrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil & Groundwater December 10, 2002 Greg Beyke (770)
“Where Can CalClean Work In ARIZONA?”
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Biodegradation of btex
“GAS MART” petroleum facility in Florida By: Ernest Twum-Barimah Zhengzhong Fang (John) Zhengzhong Fang (John)
Mark Strong, P.E. CH2M HILL Christopher Bozzini, P.E. CH2M HILL
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Multiphase Extraction for Soil and Groundwater Remediation Nick Swiger Spring 2007.
Clean-up at BP Paulsboro New Jersey (USA) Roxane Fisher and Mark Ferguson.
DREDGING YOUR DOCKS 2012 Organized By CRA Hydrographic Surveyors Orion Marine Group.
Contaminated ‘Brownfield’ site in south-eastern Michigan By Zhanyuan Cai And William Chow.
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
Green Remediation An Overview of the State of the Practice
Release Reporting. Lesson #17 - Release Reporting How Do I Know If I Have a Leak in My UST System?
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
Site Activities Update Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting January 16, 2013.
Remediation System Design & Implementation Presented by.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Utilizing CPT/UVIF to Delineate Free- Phase Dowtherm® in the Subsurface Bryan Heath, URS Corporation (URS Diamond) Steve Shoemaker, DuPont Corporate Remediation.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Presented by Michael Taraszki, PG, CHG Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Perchlorate Monitoring in the Llagas Groundwater Subbasin South Santa Clara County,
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Aerojet Environmental Update Carmichael Town Hall Meeting March 12, 2008 Michael Girard Aerojet Environmental Site Remediation (916)
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Francis Farm Landfill. How’d We Get Here?? Francis Farm Landfill (FFLF) began accepting waste in 1973 and remained open until October years of.
A Tree-Based Remediation System for Treatment and Hydraulic Control of a Hydrocarbon Plume in a 20 Foot Deep Aquifer at a Former Refinery in Central Oklahoma.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Stake Holders: Newport –Mesa Unified School District State of California, Orange County Health Care Agency State of California, EPA Costa Mesa Local Community.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update July 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Feasibility Study Workplan Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting May 23, 2013.
Engineering Evaluation Unit Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board (916) ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK (AST) VAPOR RECOVERY.
Release Reporting. How Do I Know If I Have a Leak in My UST System? 1. Unusual operating conditions; such as, erratic behavior of the dispensing pump.
ESAC Meeting December 1, pm LOS REALES LANDFILL UPDATE Entrance Facility Rodeo Wash Erosion Control Structure Scale House Drainage and other Stormwater.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
Location and construction of water wells
Groundwater Pollution
Melissa Boggs California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2014 / 15 Fourth Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
Excavation & Trenching Awareness Plus
Treatment of Perchlorate in Water
Release Reporting Lesson 17 covers the subject of Release Reporting. You will learn how you know when you have a leak and what leaks require reporting.
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
BUILDING BLOCKS FOR AN EFFECTIVE FOG CONTROL PROGRAM Presented By:
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
Olusola Ayilara, P.E., P.G. PST-DCRP Section, Remediation Division
Presentation transcript:

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean Inc. High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction & Groundwater Treatment Systems Noel Shenoi Principal Engineer Arthur Shenoi Safety and Health Manager Update Presentation to CA - UST Cleanup Fund January 21, Dow Avenue, Suite 142 Tustin, CA (714) (fax: )

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Overview Remediation Capabilities CalClean’s Performance Review New Remediation Techniques Learned New “Interruptible” Pricing Program Permits (Air & Water) Advantages of Using CalClean’s Systems Recommendations

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Remediation Capabilities Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Seven Truck- mounted 450-CFM High Vacuum Systems) –MtBE and Other Oxygenates (ETBE, TAME,DIPE, TBA, etc.) –BTEX –Other Aromatic Hydrocarbons –Fuels (gasoline, diesel, etc.) Onsite Groundwater Treatment (Ten Trailer- mounted 20-GPM Systems)

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s HVDPE & Groundwater Treatment

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Year One HVDPE Truck -One Water Treatment Trailer -Recommended 5-Day Events -Removed Approx. 113,000 pounds -Cost/Pound Removed = $5.32

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Year Three HVDPE Trucks -Five Water Treatment Trailers -Recommended 15-Day Events -Removed Approx. 346,000 pounds -Cost/Pound Removed = $4.90

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Year Five HVDPE Trucks -Seven Water Treatment Trailers -Recommended 30-Day Events -Began Full Scale Cleanups -Removed Approx. 564,000 pounds -Cost/Pound Removed = $4.44

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Year Seven HVDPE Trucks -Ten Water Treatment Trailers -Seven Auxiliary Fuel Trailers -Recommended 30-Day Events -Began Using Air Sparging w/HVDPE -Removed Approx. 690,000 pounds -Cost/Pound Removed = $4.38

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Year Recommend Multiple 30-Day Events -Use Air Sparging w/HVDPE -Implement “interruptible” rate program -Concentrate on quality of “Up-Time” -Better maintenance of systems - Provide minimum up-time guarantee

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean’s Performance Review Average Cost Per Pound Summary -Year $5.32 (113,000 pounds) -Year $4.90 (346,000 pounds) - Year $4.44 (564,000 pounds) -Year $4.38 (690,000 pounds) Total Pounds Removed = 1,713,000 Average Cost Per Pound = $4.56

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters New Remediation Techniques Learned -Use Air Sparging to enhance HVDPE -Use HVDPE to remove diesel product -Clean up contaminated vadose only sites quickly with high vacuum systems -New well box and underground piping design for HVDPE operations -Use periodic extractions (w/interruptible pricing) to address interim rebound - Can extract from great depths (>270 feet)

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Interruptible Pricing Program -Timesharing with several other sites -Minimum Contract Days -Complete over 9 months -Minimum 7-day events each return -Address rebound on every return to site - $1,500/day pricing for HVDPE system -Special lower pricing for water treatment

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Various Locations Permits Air Districts (Vapor Treatment) –SCAQMD, BAAQMD (ISSUED) –SDAPCD, MBUAPCD, EDAPCD (ISSUED) –VCAPCD, MDAQMD, SLOAPCD (ISSUED) –PCAPCD, SJVUAPCD, GCAPCD (ISSUED) –SMAQMD, SBCAPCD, GBUAPCD (ISSUED) –MAQMD, ICAPCD (ISSUED) –OTHER AQMDs/APCDs(PENDING) NPDES (Onsite Water Treatment and Discharge) –SANTA ANA (RWQCB-8) (ISSUED) –CENTRAL COAST (RWQCB-3) (ISSUED) –OTHER RWQCBs (PENDING APPLICATION)

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Advantages Of Using CalClean Most Cost Effective (lowest $ / lb. HC Removed) No Capital or Maintenance Cost Outlays Can Mobilize Quickly to a Site No Shutdown of Station for Trenching Low Noise for 24-Hour Operations in Neighborhoods Occupies Less Space at Station High Capacity Equipment (SCFM and GPM) Various Locations Permits Already Obtained Consolidated Pricing &100% Guaranteed Up Time Quality Technical Expertise and Supervision

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Recommendations Aggressive Cleanup using interruptible pricing program Remedial well design/location is critical to effective cleanups around source area(s), add one or more air sparge wells near source area Allow consultants to lengthen HVDPE events to maximize effectiveness in certain cases Increase duration of Pilot Tests to 5 days Encourage NPDES or Sewer Discharge Permits vs. Offsite Transportation and Disposal

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Summary of HVDPE w/Air Sparging LocationConcentrationConcentration w/o Air Spargingw/Air Sparging Gardena600 ppmv10,000 ppmv Dia. Tire500 ppmv11,000 ppmv Glen Avon200 ppmv6,000 ppmv

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters End of Presentation to USTCF on January 21, 2004 Remaining slides for information purposes only

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Steps for Treatment and Discharge of MtBE Water 1.Extract affected water from ground 2.Process in aboveground HVDPE unit to remove most of the hydrocarbon concentrations 3.Polish with Activated Carbon & Discharge to storm drain / sewer system

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters EXTRACTION PROCESS HIGH VACUUM VAPOR EXTRACTION PLUME IN VADOSE ZONE PLUME IN SATURATED ZONE DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION TANK

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters STINGER TUBE * TIMING FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY ( Longer Events usually increase Cone of Depression and expose more saturated zone for vapor extraction) 8hr.* 24hr.* 5 days* 20 days* 1 month* Cone of Depression Vapor and Groundwater Extraction

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters FLOW DIAGRAM

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Aggressive Source Control, Removal, and Treatment 1.Remove Groundwater by Vacuum Extraction 2. Lower Water Table, i.e. increase Cone of Depression 3. Extract Vapors from Exposed Zones - Vadose Zone, Capillary Fringe & Saturated Zone 4. Process Water in System to Reduce Concentrations 5. Polish Processed Water with Activated Carbon 6. Discharge Treated Water to Storm Drain (NPDES Permit) or Sewer (Sanitation Permit) 7. Vapor Destruction in permitted Thermal Oxidizer

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Pricing for UST Cleanup Fund Projects HVDPE Event (w/o water treatment) 8-hour day 24-hour day 2 Days (48 hours) 3 Days (72 hours) 4 Days (96 hours) 5 Days (120 hours) Recommended 15 Days Recommended 30 Days Recommended 31+ Days Cost / Event Not Applicable $2,700 $5,340 $7,920 $10,440 $12,900 $34,200 $54,000 $1,800/day Cost/hr - $112 $111 $110 $109 $107 $95 $75 (For 5 or more day events anywhere in California, Mob/Demob and Per Diem costs are included at no extra charge. ) Groundwater Treatment $150 Mob/Demob for Trailer (includes analyses) + $0.35 per Gallon** **Projects longer than 5 days will be provided special pricing

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Comparisons (Specifications) Truck-Mounted Mobile Systems High Capacity 450 CFM Systems Can Extract 5-50 GPM Water Can Extract & Destroy up to 130 pounds of Hydrocarbons per hour Can Extract up to 29” Hg (394” H 2 O) i.e.. Large Radius of Influence, Less Extraction Wells Required for Site Extract Vapor & Groundwater Can Lower Groundwater Table to Address Vadose, Capillary Fringe & Saturated Zones Fixed Based Systems (Few Mobile Systems) Typical System is 250 CFM But Cannot Extract Water Typical System can Destroy up to 40 pounds per hour of hydrocarbons Typically Extracts up to 10” Hg (136” H2O) i.e.. Smaller Radius of Influence, More Wells Required, Greater Costs Extract Vapor Only Cannot Extract Groundwater Fixed Based Systems (Few Mobile Systems) Typical System is 2-20 GPM But Cannot Extract Vapors Cannot Destroy Hydrocarbon Vapors. Not Applicable For Vapors Extract Groundwater Only Can Only Remove Groundwater, No Vapor CalClean HVDPEStandard S.V.E.Pump & Treat

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Comparisons ($$) System Manned At All Times To Adjust Stinger Depths to Maximize Recovery No Capital Cost Outlay Closures Can Be attained Earlier (possibly in less than 1 year) No Trenching Needed No Shutdown Of Station No Long Time Commitment Needed For Use At A Site No Cost Of Decommissioning System Unmanned, Cannot Adjust Depths in Extraction Wells High Capital Cost Closures Typically Take 3 to 10 Years Trenching Required Shutdown Station for Weeks - Loss of earnings Long Term Commitment is Needed High Cost Of Decommissioning And Loss Of Value Of System CalClean HVDPE Standard S.V.E.Pump & Treat System Unmanned, Cannot Adjust Depths In Extraction Wells High Capital Cost Closures Typically Take 5 to 30 Years Trenching Required Shutdown Station for Weeks - Loss of earnings Long Term Commitment is Needed High Cost Of Decommissioning And Loss Of Value Of System

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Comparisons (misc.) Can Mobilize To A Site Within Hours Of Call. Can Attack Source Immediately Can Startup At A Site Quickly Can Pull Offsite When Concentrations Drop Off To Allow For Rebound Can Adjust Number Of Days Of Operation To Maximize Recovery Constant Onsite Monitoring Of Influent Vapor Concentrations Occupies Space At Station Only During Onsite Operation Low Noise Operation (Great For Residential Areas) Typically Takes 9-15 Months To Install System - Allows Plume Size To Increase Takes Many Months Before Startup Cannot Pull Offsite since fixed Cannot Adjust Days Of Operation No Onsite Monitoring Of Influent Vapor Concentrations Occupies Full-Time Space On Small Station Property High Noise Systems (Complaints From Neighbors) CalClean HVDPEStandard S.V.E.Pump & Treat Typically Takes 6-15 Months To Install System - Allows Plume Size To Increase Takes Many Months Before Startup Cannot Pull Offsite since fixed Cannot Adjust Days Of Operation Not Applicable Occupies Full-Time Space On Small Station Property. Low Noise

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters

$/hr. Comparison For Services Principal Engineer$105/hr. Senior Engineer/Geologist $90/hr. Project Manager $75/hr. Driller $ /hr. On-site Lab$1,100/day or $ /hr. CalClean (Includes Engineer & H&S Manager Oversight and Reports) –Based on 24-hour event =$112/hr. –Based on 5-day event = $107/hr. –Based on 30-day event =$75/hr.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters COMPARISON OF HYDROCARBON REMOVAL EFFICIENCY CALCLEAN’s HVDPE vs. FIXED BASED SVE UNIT Confidential Client - Service Station in Huntington Beach, CA CalClean’s Events in May 00 Equivalent Days for Fixed (450 cfm) ____________ Based SVE Unit (250 cfm) 8 hours (2,400 gallons of water) 1 week (0 gallons) 24 hours (4,000 gallons of water) 1 month (0 gallons) First 5-day (20,000 gallons of water) 1 year (0 gallons) (approx. 1,000 pounds HC) Second 5-day (30,000 gallons of water) 1-1/2 year (0 gallons) (approx. 1,500 pounds HC) COST COMPARISON CalClean’s 5-day event cost to client = $13,550 ($10 per pound HC) Cost of Operation and Maintenance of the Fixed Based SVE Unit For 1 year (including Electricity, Natural Gas, Maintenance, Depreciation, Permanent Space at Site, etc.) = approx. $40K - $80K ($40 - $80 per pound HC)

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Santa Ana RWQCB - Santa Ana Region Groundwater Analytical Results Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct a 24-hour dual phase extraction pilot test for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater beneath the site including the oxygenated gasoline additives methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) and tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME). The lithology beneath the site consisted of sand/silty sand (0-15 feet below ground surface [bgs]), clayey silt/silty clay (15-55 feet bgs), and sand/gravelly sand (>55 bgs). Shallow groundwater was located in a thin saturated zone approximately 24 feet bgs. Results: The results of the dual phase extraction pilot test indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 29 feet. Approximately 495 pounds of hydrocarbons were destroyed and extracted groundwater was treated utilizing CalClean’s dual phase system and groundwater treatment trailer. The results of the groundwater samples are presented in Table 1.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Santa Ana RWQCB - Santa Ana Region Groundwater Analytical Results - Table 1 MtBE360,000 µg/L6,740 µg/L98%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% TPHg228,000 µg/L TAME2,590 µg/L25.3 µg/L99%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% Benzene33,700 µg/l267 µg/l99%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% Toluene52,700 µg/L987 µg/L98%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% Ethylbenzene6,580 µg/L162 µg/L98%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% Xylenes40,900 µg/L1,497 µg/L96%ND (<1.0 µg/L)100% Napthalene10,200 µg/L147 µg/L98%ND (<0.5 µg/L)100% MtBE - Methyl tert-Butyl Ether TPHg - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Gasoline Range TAME - tert-Amyl Methyl Ether ND (<0.5 µg/L) - Not Detected Above the Laboratory Reporting Limit of 0.5 µg/L Parameter Prior To Extraction After CalClean’s Treatment Process Percent Reduction Carbon Polishing Post Treatment Percent Reduction 11,300 µg/L95%ND (<50 µg/L)100%

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Chino RWQCB - Santa Ana Region High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct a 96-hour HVDPE pilot test, a 15-day event, and two 7- day events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater beneath the site including the oxygenated gasoline additives methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE).Several municipal wells were within 1,000 feet of the site. Results: The results of the dual phase extraction pilot test indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 60 feet. During the four events at the site, approximately 13,200 pounds of hydrocarbons were destroyed. In addition, 61,060 gallons of extracted groundwater were treated utilizing CalClean’s dual phase system and groundwater treatment trailer. TPH-G in groundwater has reduced from 125,000 ug/L to 8,440 ug/L, Benzene has reduced from 7,560 ug/L to 143 ug/L, and MtBE has reduced from 2,170 ug/L to 1,920 ug/L. Monthly 10- day events are currently being performed to reduce concentrations to regulatory satisfaction for closure. The cost of HVDPE so far has been $87,000, which is approximately $6.60 per pound HC..

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Irvine RWQCB - Santa Ana Region High Vacuum Vapor Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct weekly 24-hour high vacuum vapor extraction events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil beneath the site including the oxygenated gasoline additive methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE). The Orange County Health Care Agency had required a fixed-based system to be installed at the site. As an interim remedial measure until permits to install site utilities were obtained, CalClean performed a 24-hour event every week over 28 consecutive weeks. Results: The results of the weekly high vacuum vapor extraction indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 55 feet. Approximately 11,100 pounds of hydrocarbons were extracted. TPH-G vapor concentrations were reduced from 53,000 ppmv to 1,900 ppmv, Benzene vapor concentrations were reduced from 1,200 ppmv to 9.2 ppmv, and MtBE vapor concentrations were reduced from 1,100 ppmv to 48 ppmv. The total cost for CalClean’s operations was $75,000 (or $6.80 per pound). The Client is still being required to install a fixed-based system at a cost of around $180,000. Inefficient operation and high O&M costs to remove the remaining low concentrations are not cost-effective.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Orange RWQCB - Santa Ana Region High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct HVDPE events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region. The subject site (valued at around $4 million) exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater beneath the site. The Orange County Health Care Agency approved mobile HVDPE to clean up the site to closure. At first, HVDPE was performed for a total of 44 days to clean up the groundwater, cap fringe and saturated zone. Then, a trailer-mounted HVDPE system (7.5 hp LRP) was used continuously over a one year period to clean up the vadose zone. Finally, a truck-mounted system (25 hp LRP) was used intermittently over a three week period to polish off the remaining hydrocarbons at the site. Results: The results of the high vacuum dual phase and vapor extraction indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 80 feet. Approximately 55,000 pounds of hydrocarbons were extracted over 2 years. TPH-G soil vapor concentrations were reduced from 125,000 ppmv to 130 ppmv, Benzene vapor concentrations were reduced from 4,000 ppmv to 5 ppmv. The total cost for HVDPE and high vacuum vapor extraction operations was around $600,000 (or around $10.90 per pound). Verification boring samples taken week of June 10 were non- detect and closure is being applied for.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Orange RWQCB - Santa Ana Region High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct monthly 2-day high vacuum dual phase extraction events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board - Santa Ana Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil beneath the site including the oxygenated gasoline additive methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE). The Santa Ana RWQCB wanted a fixed-based system to be installed at the site. However, as an interim remedial measure, CalClean performed five 2-day events over 5 months. [The Client had previously used another firm with a mobile HVDPE system that was powered by a 20 hp liquid ring system (in comparison to CalClean’s 25 hp system)] Results: The results of the weekly high vacuum vapor extraction indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 55 feet. Approximately 1,000 pounds of hydrocarbons were extracted. TPH-G vapor concentrations were reduced from 4,200 ppmv to 1,100 ppmv, Benzene vapor concentrations were reduced from 5.4 ppmv to ND, and MtBE vapor concentrations were reduced from 13 ppmv to ND. The total cost for CalClean’s operations was $27,000. The Client is resisting regulatory requirement to install a fixed-based system (which could cost around $180,000). Due to CalClean’s more powerful LRP, every 2-day event with CalClean’s system was equivalent to previous firm’s 5-day HVDPE event with respect to pounds HC vapor extracted and gallons groundwater extracted.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Cambria RWQCB - Central Coast Region High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct 15-day high vacuum dual phase extraction events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board -Central Coast Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil beneath the site. Region 3 wanted a fixed-based system to be installed at the site. As an interim remedial measure, CalClean performed four 15-day events at the site. Results: The results of the HVDPE events indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 12 feet. Approximately 21,600 pounds of hydrocarbons were extracted. TPH-G vapor concentrations were reduced from 12,000 ppmv to 3,100 ppmv, and Benzene vapor concentrations were reduced from 78 ppmv to ND. The total cost for CalClean’s operations was $140,000 (which is $6.48 per pound). CalClean’s strategy was to extract the HC vapor, before the groundwater gets further contaminated. Across the street, another firm has installed equipment over $1.0 million. Their strategy has been to let the groundwater get contaminated with MtBE, extract the contaminated groundwater, and haul the extracted water to their refinery in N. California. It has been reported that approximately 5 pounds of MtBE have been removed to date at a cost of around $2.0 million (or $400,000 per pound!!).

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Case Study Confidential Client/Site in Artesia RWQCB - Los Angeles Region High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Scope: CalClean was contracted to conduct six 15-day and two 21-day HVDPE events for a confidential client located within the Regional Water Quality Board -Los Angeles Region. The subject site exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil beneath the site. As an interim remedial measure, CalClean extracted HC vapor and groundwater from several monitoring wells onsite. Results: The results of the HVDPE events indicated an effective radius of influence of approximately 30 feet. Approximately 35,000 pounds of hydrocarbons were extracted. The total cost for CalClean’s operations was $430,000 (which is $12.29 per pound). CalClean had been extracting from existing monitoring wells at the site. These wells were installed to 40 feet, approximately 14 feet below the deepest contamination. While HC vapor and groundwater were being extracted from several monitoring wells, CalClean’s operations would have been more efficient if remedial wells screened only the hot zone were used for extraction. The deeper wells yielded clean water along with contaminated water, thus increasing the overall cost of the project for water treatment. A new consultant has used a specialized boring rig to determine the location of the contamination and will install the appropriate remedial wells in the next few weeks. These wells will only be drilled to the deepest contamination so that additional HVDPE will be efficient and cost-effective.

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters Lessons Learned Perform 5-day HVDPE pilot tests at sites with fixed- based systems and shutdown the ineffective systems Pre-approve budgets provided by consultants for entire scope approved by regulatory agencies Allow consultants to increase duration of HVDPE events as needed to maximize effectiveness (provide guidelines for notification) Install remedial wells around source area to remove HC from vadose, capillary fringe and saturated zone To maximize efficiency of HVDPE system, perform HVDPE only in source area wells; use down-hole pumps to extract HC-affected water in other wells

A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters PFP Projects CalClean is interested in PFP projects anywhere in California. We can work with existing consultants, or provide a new consultant to a responsible party. We are willing to accept the PFP for just the “Contractor” portion of the cleanup. With trucks and water treatment systems located in N. and S. California, we can mobilize for PFP projects anywhere in California. With a single owner, CalClean’s finances are able to work with several PFPs at one time.