Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.

Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.

May 18, 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.

National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Developing the NCSI 2012 document: taking action to improve outcomes.

1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.

1 BoRit Asbestos & The Superfund Process Stacie Peterson, Remedial Project Manager (RPM)

2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline

Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.

Case S-4_SRS Par Pond1 Case Study 4: CERCLA INTERIM ACTION AT THE SRS PAR POND.

Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.

Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.

Self-Organised Learning SOL Introduction. Advance Organiser.

Information Sharing and Riparian Discussions Almaty, Kazakhstan May 17-19, 2011 Assessment Studies for the Proposed Rogun Hydropower and Regional Reservoir.

Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.

1 Delta Levees Investment Strategy Delta Stewardship Council Central Valley Flood Protection Board Levees Workshop July 10, 2015.

Engineering Risk Assessments and Risk Communication Sarah Arulanandam, Hazard and Risk Group RWDI West Inc. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES:

Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.

Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.

Consideration Of The Aggregate Recycling Systems Illegal Disposal Site For The Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program and Augmentation.

Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.

Assessing Effects on Human Health Meadowbank Gold Project Margaux Brisco Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearings, Baker Lake, Nunavut March 27 to 31,

Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda April 25, 2013, MassDEP, One Winter Street Boston.

Lisa Babcock & Tim Post Expedited Claim Account Program (ECAP) State Water Resources Control Board April 20, 2015 (modified June 2015)

1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Retiring “Product Name” Date Presenter: V4 July 22, 2015 Guidance can be found on the note pages. Delete this banner when submitting.

Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,

Site Completion Preliminary Assessment Site Inspection Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study Remedial Design Remedial Action LTRA O&M Site Identified.

Convention Center District Property Owners’ Association Long-Range Strategic Plan May 20, 2008.

1 Chair’s Report on the 2011 Annual Plan Priorities Dan Tonsmeire May 18, 2011.

Management of Change ► The health, safety, security, environmental, technical and other impacts of temporary and permanent changes are formally assessed,

Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.

Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.

1 1 Reasonably Foreseeable Compliance Measures Sandi Potter Engineering Geologist.

What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.

Mid – Late 1970’s Emergence of recombinant DNA technology Concerns among both scientific community and general public:  Public health and safety  Environmental.

Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.

Impact of Two Studies on Future of NGC AHRQ Annual Conf Sept 19, :30 – 3:00pm.

By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.

Name/Office Symbol/(703) XXX-XXX (DSN XXX) / addressDate-Time-Group 19 September 2008 Fort Monroe Closure Environmental Planning.

Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.

UK Tour de Table NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Baia Mare, Romania 2003 Dr Theresa Kearney.

1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.

EPA Superfund Program Risk Initiatives in Indian Country Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country March 14-16, 2000 Lakewood, CO James Konz U.S. EPA.

2013 Assessment of the Efficacy, Availability, and Environmental Impacts of Ballast Water Treatment Systems for Use in California Waters Nicole Dobroski.

NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Pharmaceutical Contaminants DEC Actions to Reduce Exposure Presentation to the Watershed Science and Technical.

1 Six Year Improvement Program Public Hearings FY 2005 to FY 2010.

Integrated Health Assessments Jacksonville, Florida – Fairfax St. Wood Treaters Presented by Vernice Miller-Travis and Sarah Malpass.

Massachusetts Waste Site Cleanup Program _________________________________ Privatized program since 1993 Direct oversight of only the highest priority.

Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW.

Specialist Palliative Care Data Professor Julia Verne Clinical Lead – National End of Life Care Intelligence Network (NEoLCIN) West Midlands Strategic.

HFQLG Independent Science Panel Phase Two (Final review) October 17 – July 31, 2013 Onsite Review March 18 th – March 21 st.

111 Area-Wide Planning, Superfund Sites, Environmental Justice and Green Infrastructure: Tying it All Together in the Freeport Community Planning Project.

Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015

THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing

Spill & Historic Release Notification, Investigation & Remediation

Tribal Hazard Mitigation Planning

ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING

Surveillance. Public Health Approach Surveillance What is the Problem ? Problem Risk Factor Identification : What Is the Cause ? Intervention Evaluation.

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

CY 2017 Goals and Objectives

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

Update on Water Quality

Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400

Department of Environmental Quality

Some Quiz Questions Unit: Risk Assessment.

Department of Environmental Quality

Board of Public Utilities August 17, 2017

Management of Pollution Risks at Activity Cessation GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-421) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets the HSE requirements for the management.

Presentation transcript:

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Conduct Pilot Tests Investigation Stages

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment 30-day public review and comment period Set cleanup goals We Are Here Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Cleanup Stages Investigation Stages Date of Milestone 6/24/13 Conduct Pilot Tests

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment 30-day public review and comment period Set cleanup goals We Are Here Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Conduct Pilot Tests Investigation Stages Cleanup Stages Date of Milestone 6/24/13 12/31/13 Phase I RAP submitted to Water Board (Remedy and Relocation Plan) 30-day public review and comment period

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment 30-day public review and comment period Set cleanup goals We Are Here Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Conduct Pilot Tests Investigation Stages Cleanup Stages Date of Milestone 6/24/13 12/31/13 TBD Phase I RAP submitted to Water Board (Remedy and Relocation Plan) 30-day public review and comment period 45-day public review and comment period CEQA Feasibility Study Environmental Impact Report

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment 30-day public review and comment period Set cleanup goals We Are Here Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Conduct Pilot Tests Investigation Stages Cleanup Stages Date of Milestone 6/24/13 12/31/13 TBD Phase I RAP submitted to Water Board (Remedy and Relocation Plan) Implement the Phase I remedy Community is notified 30-day public review and comment period 45-day public review and comment period CEQA Feasibility Study Environmental Impact Report

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment 30-day public review and comment period Set cleanup goals We Are Here Develop Investigation Priorities Work Plan Develop Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Develop Conceptual Site Model Identify Exposure Pathways Conduct Pilot Tests Investigation Stages Cleanup Stages Date of Milestone 6/24/13 12/31/13 TBD Expert Panel Dates July /Aug Board Mtg Analysis of: 1.Assessment Data 2.Pilot Tests and ID of remedial options 3.Site Specific Cleanup Goals September Board Mtg 1. Evaluation of remedial options Jan/Feb ‘14 Board Mtg Recommendation on: 1.Remedial Action obj 2. RAP Phase I RAP submitted to Water Board (Remedy and Relocation Plan) Implement the Phase I remedy Community is notified 30-day public review and comment period 45-day public review and comment period CEQA Feasibility Study Environmental Impact Report