Team Members:Refined Model:Targets and Challenges: Top view Front view Design of a New Middleweight BattleBot for the IUPUI Robotics Team Side view Weight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6x6 with articulating Center-wheel and CG Migration Team 33 Killer Bees.
Advertisements

IGVC Power Team (BZZZZT!) Presentation October 17 th Electrical Engineering Senior Projects 1 Nate – Jake – Tim.
The Physics of Mark Dobbins, Mike Grayson, Jennifer Burton
George Tillinghast, Rebecca Stein, Mike Suriani Tom Dinetta, Jon Richardson.
Ryan O’Connor. The Problem  The problem identified is that it is difficult to effectively lay down straight and accurate foul lines on a baseball field,
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
UNH Combat Robot April 15-17, 2011 Drive System The robot maneuvers with two drive wheels and tank style steering. NPC- T74 DC motors provide the drive.
The Robot Mech Team by: Nick Thomsen, Faraz Khan, Mark Wei and Vish Gopalakrishnan.
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
1 5/20/2015 Space Cowboys Team Project Final Report Defensive Weapon Subsystem Mark Foster.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Spring Quarter P. 1 Drive Train Calculations Week 3 Day 1.
Robotics Intensive: Day 6 Gui Cavalcanti 1/17/2012.
Tug of War Battle Bots A tug of war game designed to demonstrate engineering and physics concepts in grades 6-12.
February 8, 2011 Review from design process
P11310: Parabolic Dish Autopoint Solution Project Family Team Leader: Trae Rogers (ME) Project Engineer: Pat Ryan (EE) Kyle Norlin (ME) Chris Reed (CE)
PIT Crew Design Concepts By Dan Chapman, Tim Wilson, and Jon Miller December 11, 2002.
Mini-Baja Advisory Presentation April 27, 2007 Quentin Holmes Chris Meyer.
Bangarang Musical Engineering University of Notre Dame Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Group Members: Roberto Ayala, Ryan Bradley, Pat.
Team: Derek Arnold Lawrence Derdzinski Athanasios Gkourlias Amber Mescher Chris Sangster Faculty Mentor: Ferat Sahin Sponsor: Getinge USA Corporation,
SENIOR PROJECTS I KICK OFF MEETING LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY THE TEAM: STEVE HAYESMIKE MALKOWSKI TIM NORMANBILL PAJOT BRUCE TAYLOR THE ADVISOR:
Engineering H193 - Team Project Spring Quarter 2003 P. 1 Performance Test 2 Week 4 Day 3.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1 Spring Quarter Individual Competition Week 8 Day 2.
FIRST Robotics A view from the Systems Engineering Perspective Chris Mikus January 2, 2006 Rev 0.2.
Guide to Reports and Presentations Your team’s Project Report is the most important means to document design ideas, procedures, and implementations. While.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
Designing Products and Processes with a Future. What does it take? Involve the customer Meet with the customer Listen to customer Educate the customer.
W IND –2– H 2 O MECH 4010: Design I Group 12: Jeffrey Allen Daniel Barker Andrew Hildebrand Supervised by: Dr. Alex Kalamkarov Client: Dr. Graham Gagnon.
Final Presentation.  Chris Johnson, Team Leader  Tim Hahn  Bradley Lesher  Michael LaPuma  Project Advisor: Gene Hou  Student Advisor: Stanton Coffey.
Lesson #33 Topic: Lesson #33 Topic: Net force in two dimensions Objectives: (After this class I will be able to) 1.Examine Normal force and observe different.
Review- 7th. Rules 1 right answer= 1 candy If you do not like the candy, hold onto it until the end of the class to replace it If you did not have the.
UMR Opening Week 2004 PROJECT “X”. New Student Programs & Enrollment Management NIKKO and UMR working together for Powerful FUN! Freshman Class of 2004.
Group 1: Material Testing Device Jobe Dyson Brie Witherspoon John Chandler Brett Newstead.
Let’s JAM Team 35: Jason Chen, Justin Ho, Andrew Wilkinson Presenting: The Jammer.
Poway High School Robotics Team Spyder 1622 FRC Team (FIRST Robotics Competition) Spring For more information, please contact: Rodger Dohm, Poway.
Launching Station for Sensor Deployment Team Members: Brian Molnar, Shawn McGrady, Joe Liquore, Ken Schroeder Faculty Advisor: Dr. Jeff Faculty Advisor:
CS-EE 481 Spring Founder’s Day, 2006 University of Portland School of Engineering Electric Vehicle Drive System Authors Steven Arlint Abdullah Binsaeed.
Thoughts on the Design Process Navigational Aids for the Journey of Creation.
Ryan O’Connor. The Problem  The problem identified is that it is difficult to effectively lay down straight and accurate foul lines on a baseball field,
Ryan O’Connor. The Problem  The problem identified is that it is difficult to effectively lay down straight and accurate foul lines on a baseball field,
Introduction to Robotics Lab 10 – Robot Sorter Felix Duvallet, Matt Faria.
Small Engine Performance Jesse Morris Spring 2002 Virginia Tech Edited by CTAE Resource Network March 2011.
1 ME 462 Capstone Design Sponsor: Remy International Inc. IUPUI Design Team #1 Proposal Presentation May 3 rd 2007 Matt Schonauer Ibraheem Nezamuddin Martha.
1 Introduction to Engineering Team Design Project Agenda Team project description Introduction to design process. Brainstorming.
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ENGINEERING AND DESIGN School of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering (SMAE) Dr Linda Lee, Peter Lo and Lim Siew Kuan June.
In Unit 5: Speed, Power, Torque, and DC Motors, you build a VEX test stand winch that enables you to learn key engineering concepts and principles so.
P11211, P11212, P11213 Land Vehicle for Education System Team: Michael Deyhim & Megan Ott Project Description: The Land Vehicle for Education, or LVE,
Analyze Phase SENIOR DESIGN TEAM 25: PALM HARVESTER.
Mechanical Workshop FIRST Mid Atlantic Region January 2016.
NASA’s MOONBUGGY STUDENT COMPETITION On the Grounds of the U.S. Space & Rocket Center Huntsville, Alabama April 8, 2000 Participated by the Senior Design.
January 16, 2009Senior Design I - System Level Design Review System Level Design Review Senior Design I Low Energy Printing Project P09505.
ASME Battlebots  Design, analyze, fabricate, test and compete combat robots  SolidWorks  Focus on high strength structures and designs  Use of small.
Engineering Design 3-D Printing Curriculum. Overview The challenge The plan The engineering process Meet the requirements Design iteration Plan for next.
Small Engine Performance Jesse Morris Spring 2002 Virginia Tech This presentation has not been edited by the Georgia Curriculum Office.
 How does a windmill create energy?.  You should be able to understand the purpose of gearing in a windmill.  You should understand how electricity.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Tug of War Battle Bots A tug of war game designed to demonstrate engineering and physics concepts in grades 6-12.
FIRST Tech Challenge Drive Train Testing
6x6 with articulating Center-wheel and CG Migration
Design of a Solar Tracker
Yr 10 Candle Holder.
Full Pull Engineering Notebook
Chemical Solidification and Breakdown
Autonomous Surgical Robotics
Angel Hambrecht, Justin Kibler, Nate Watts, and Maxine Laroche
Tug of War Battle Bots A tug of war game designed to demonstrate engineering and physics concepts in grades 6-12.
Clean Sheet Design – Metallic Tubular Chassis
The “Yarn Bully” Transport Cart
Dr. Chung-Hao Chen (ECE)
BattleBots: Let the Games Begin!
Final Project Review -Senior Design 2
Presentation transcript:

Team Members:Refined Model:Targets and Challenges: Top view Front view Design of a New Middleweight BattleBot for the IUPUI Robotics Team Side view Weight – The weight limits are 40 to 120 lbs. Final weight was 118lbs Challenge: The plating on the chassis for armor was the heaviest part of the robot and the chassis was continuously modified to minimize plating. Cost – Budget was set by IUPUI BattleBot team at $2500. The actual cost from BOM is close to $2300. Challenge: Throughout the process the cost gradually climbed due to the need to chose lighter weight components without compromising quality. Force of Attack – The ability to inflict damage is a BattleBot’s main function. Ram force – attack delivered by BattleBot ram provides approximately 5000 lb-force. Pneumatic Punch - delivers a force of 3000 lb behind a tool grade steel punch. Challenge: Designing a robot that could inflict maximum damage without damaging itself. # Attacks Per Round – BattleBot is built to run and ram for the entire match. The pneumatic punch is able to deliver 35 punches a match. Challenge: As the chosen cylinder got bigger the force applied rose as well as weight. The larger the cylinder, the fewer punches could be achieved a match. Current Draw – The BattleBot must run for the entire 6 minutes of the match. Onboard battery has 18amphour rating. Worst case - robot will run at stall torque (pushing against a wall the entire match) and pull 200+ amps constant current. At this rate the battery will die in 5.4 minutes. A realistic average of amps over the entire match shows battery will be more than adequate for the 6 minute match. Challenge: Each battery weights 18 lbs and therefore we must design the electrical system so only one is needed. Project Consultants: Insert picture 3-D Model (Pro/ENGINEER) Insert Image Prof. Dr. Jie Chen Faculty Advisor Dept. of Mech. Engr. Brian Deckard President IUPUI Robotics Team Daniel Reed Vice President IUPUI Robotics Team BattleBot description: BattleBots is the sport of remote-controlled robotic combat. Contestants all over the world design robot warriors to compete in a fast-paced, ruthless competition to see who can destroy their opponent’s robot first. Project purpose: -Assist IUPUI Robotics team. -Gain experience dealing with design criteria. -Learn integration of technologies and principles of systems design. Project expectations: -Complete design of a BattleBot structure, armor, drive system and weapon. -Design within competition parameters - Must perform competitively - Opponents of the IUPUI BattleBot must be pounded into Oblivion!! Final Battlebot Design: - Battlebot weight: 118 lbs - Battlebot cost: $ Ram Attack: 4800 lb force. Punch Attack: 3000 lb force - Adequate Ram Attacks per match, 35 Pneumatic Punch Attacks/Match - Battlebot Run Time: 20 minutes Mechanical Design Process: Jamin BakerSenior, Mechanical Engineering. Experience in assembly language and three-dimensional modeling; F.I.R.S.T. Robotics Benjamin BurnsSenior, Mechanical Engineering. Experience in three-dimensional modeling with specialty in I-DEAS; F.I.R.S.T. Robotics Ginger JessopJohnson Controls, Inc. Senior, Engineering Management. Experience in marketing, business law, operations management and project management. Michael LongRolls-Royce Senior, Mechanical Engineering. Experience in three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis; F.I.R.S.T. Robotics ME 462 Capstone Design: Spring 2004 Insert picture Colin Callahan Student Designer F.I.R.S.T. Robotics PROJECTS ASSIGNED SPLIT PROJECT? DRIVE SYSTEM QFD WEAPON/ CHASSIS QFD SPLIT PROJECT? YES CONCEPT GENERATION CONCEPT EVALUATION PRODUCT GENERATION PRODUCT EVALUATION ONLY OFF- SHELF PARTS? THE END