Psychology of Prejudice 1.Types of Racism 2.Value Duality & Regressive Racism 3.Group Conflict (Sherif) 4.Causes of Prejudice (review) 5.Interdependence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 10 Racial and Ethnic Relations
Advertisements

Attitudes That Injure Prejudice. What is Prejudice? Negative attitude held against a member of a group.
Sherif Boys Camp Studies Participants and basic procedure? year old boys Naturally formed groups (e.g., friendships developed) Boys separated into.
Theories of Prejudice: Introduction. Review: Key Concepts Kovel: racism (institutional) vs. prejudice (individual) Malcolm X:overt vs. covert blatant.
Prejudice.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. THINK Social Psychology Kimberley Duff THINK SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Chapter Stereotypes, Prejudice,
1 Survey Research (Gallup) Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? 1958:
White Racism Joel Kovel 1970 / Key Ideas Types of Racism dominative aversive metaracism Fantasies of Race dominative: power, sex, aggression ( phallic.
Chapter 11: Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotyping and Prejudice II Conditions for reducing prejudice Three types of prejudice –Old-fashioned –Modern –Implicit.
Chapter 8: Sociological Perspectives on Race and Ethnicity Race and Ethnicity Prejudice and Discrimination Racial and Ethnic Interactions Sociological.
Chapter One Diversity in the United States: Questions and Concepts
Intergroup Relations: Prejudice and Discrimination
Aversive Form of Racism Samuel Gaertner & John Dovidio.
Chapter 2: Prejudice.
Psychology of Prejudice & Ethnocentrism. Germany.
1 Behavior in Social and Cultural Context. 2 Why?
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination Part 1: Sept. 24, 2010.
Stereotyping and Prejudice II What are the conditions under which contact reduces prejudice and stereotyping?
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination
Chapter 6: Prejudice and Discrimination. Defining Terminology u Prejudice- negative attitude toward members of some social group u Sexism- prejudice based.
Prejudice: Disliking Other
Prejudice Theories and research.
Intergroup Conflict. Outline Sources of intergroup conflictSources of intergroup conflict –Competition and conflict –Social categorization Intergroup.
Prejudice. 2 What is the difference between: Race? Ethnicity? Minority Group?
Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan.
CHAPTER 14: Social and Cultural Groups Psychology, 4/e by Saul Kassin.
1 Introduction to Psychology Class 23: Stereotypes Myers: See Aug 8, 2006.
Realistic Conflict Theory Mustafer Sherif Social Psychology.
Chapter 7 Prejudice: Foundations, Causes, Effects & Remedies.
Realistic Group (Theory) Experiment Conflict And Prejudice
Social Psychology Chapter 20 & 21 Review. Group Behavior When the desire to be part of a group prevents a person from seeing other alternatives.
Prejudice Hostile, negative attitudes toward a distinguishable group of people based solely on their membership in a group.
Subjective Perception: Attribution theory and Prejudice.
Ch. 15 Social Psychology. Social psychology is the scientific study of the ways in which the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of one individual are influenced.
RACE AND ETHNICITY RACE Biological characteristic that is common to a given group of people that society deems socially significant. Reality --humans come.
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination Part 2: Feb. 21, 2012.
Prejudice: Disliking Others Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Social Psychology by David G. Myers 9 th Edition Prejudice: Disliking Others.
Attitudes The Nature of Attitudes –Relatively stable Beliefs – facts and general knowledge Feelings – love, hate, like, dislike Behaviors – inclination.
Prejudice  What is prejudice?  Why are people prejudiced?  Individual view  Intergroup view  Can prejudice be reduced? psychlotron.org.uk.
Racial / Ethnic Prejudice and Discrimination. I. Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination A. Stereotype: a generalized belief about a group of people.
The Political Psychology of Race
Overview Victims’ responses to discrimination Victims’ responses to discrimination Ways to reduce prejudice/discrimination Ways to reduce prejudice/discrimination.
Section 5: Group Conflict
Race and Ethnicity. In the past 25 years there has been a decrease in racial prejudice and discrimination against African Americans. a. Yes b. No.
Social Attitudes Miss Gambino Year 11 PSYCH. What is influenced by our attitudes? Preferences Goals Tastes Friendships Votes We have positive and negative.
Group Conflict and prejudice Section 5. List the origins and functions of prejudice (3) Explain and measures of prejudice Analyze the ways to reduce prejudice.
Attitudes Shape Behaviors
Ch.10 Sect.1:Race,Ethnicity, and the Social Structure.
Theories of Prejudice 8 June Today’s Lecture Cultural Theories of Prejudice Realistic Conflict Theory (Sherif) Social Identity Theory –Minimal Groups.
Prejudice. An unjustifiable attitude toward a group and its members Based on the exaggerated notion that members of other social groups are very different.
©2002 Prentice Hall Behavior in Social and Cultural Context.
Social Psychology.  Social Psychology  Scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.  Why do people do the things they.
Stereotypes and Prejudice Chapter 5. Stereotypes and Prejudice Chapter 5.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: GROUP BEHAVIOR, PREJUDICE, & AGGRESSION UNIT 14 MODULES
Cultural Diversity Law Enforcement I. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
INTERGROUP RELATIONS Social psychologists study in-groups vs. out-groups, ethnocentrism, and the difference between prejudice and discrimination.
Social Thinking: Attitudes & Prejudice. What is an attitude? Predisposition to evaluate some people, groups, or issues in a particular way Can be negative.
Most research on race in the courtroom now centers around modern racism. Today, racism is loaded with social stigma. It is no longer socially acceptable.
Prejudice & Discrimination Heuristics to Hate. Social CategoriesStereotypesPrejudice Discrimination Prejudice & Discrimination COGNITIVEAFFECTIVEBEHAVIORAL.
Race and Ethnicity.
Group Influence and Prejudice
Myers’ Psychology for AP®, 2e
Nick Lentz. Sarah Williams Azima Jariwala. Tiffany wood
Complete the cartoon activity
Prejudice Theories and research.
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination
Chapter 6: Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Psychology of Prejudice 1.Types of Racism 2.Value Duality & Regressive Racism 3.Group Conflict (Sherif) 4.Causes of Prejudice (review) 5.Interdependence & Jigsaw Classroom

Definitions J. Kovel, White Racism Racism: social institutions which disadvantage a group Prejudice: a person’s negative stereotypes, hostility, misunderstandings

Types of Prejudice Joel Kovel: White Racism Dominative Racism Aversive Racism Metaracism

Dominative Racism Southern Slavery Face-to-face domination Emotionally “hot” –Aggression –Sexuality

Aversive Racism Northern segregation Separation; distance Emotionally “cold ” –Pollution –Dirt

Metaracism Post-Civil Rights Movement Official anti-discrimination Institutional Racism –Discrimination & inequality preserved without personal prejudice –Stereotypes operate automatically –Value duality & ambivalence –“reverse” & “regressive” racism

Ambivalence / Value Duality Theories Katz & Hass: Attitudinal Ambivalence Value Duality Rogers & Prentice-Dunn: Reverse Racism & Regressive Racism

Ambivalence / Value Duality ( Katz & Hass ) Background Stigma  ambivalence  quick to help, exonerate quick to blame, avoid, reject

White Attitudes Less overt prejudice; still covert prejudice Lip-Service? Positive & negative “side by side”? Co-existence of anti-discrimination attitudes & racial bias Duality: Blacks seen as disadvantaged & deviant

Unintentional Harm Experiments Subjects who inflict unintentional harm derogate (view negatively) their victims Cognitive dissonance theory: harm  dissonance  justification

Unintentional Harm Experiments Whites shock confederates (black or white) Give more negative “personal impressions” of blacks than whites Prejudice scale & sympathy scale ( Uncorrelated ) Whites high on both -- “ambivalent” -- gave most derogatory views of black “victim”

Post-Harm Helping Experiment White subjects shock black vs. white “Victim” departs, leaving request for help on research project: writing sentence many times Subjects give black “victims” 3 times the help they give to white “victims”

Value Duality Egalitarianism  Blacks as disadvantaged (Egalitarianism scale) Competitive Individualism  Blacks as deviant (Protestant Ethic scale)

Attitude Ambivalence Study Pro-black scale (r =.58 with scale of egalitarian values) Anti-black scale (r =.49 with scale of Protestant Ethic values) Ambivalence = pro score X anti score

Attitude Ambivalence Study 100 Subjects (college students) Student endangered by chem lab fire Questionnaire with 4 versions: –White X Black main character –Brave X Timid actions Higher ambivalence  higher praise & blame of blacks

Conclusion “A substantial number of whites hold two opposing and contradictory racial attitudes, one friendly and the other hostile. “This ambivalence can cause behavior toward minority persons to be unstable and extreme – in either a positive or a negative direction, depending on the situation.

Regressive Racism ( Rogers & Prentice-Dunn ) New egalitarian norms  “reverse discrimination” (preferential treatment)

“Behavior Modification” / “Biofeedback” Experiment 96 white college S-s in groups of 4 Monitoring confederate’s heart rate Giving shocks when heart rate drops Dependent Variable: shock intensity shock duration

2 x 2 x 2 Factorial Design Insult Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Deindividuation Yes No Yes No Victim White Black

Results Main effect of deindividuation –Deindividuation  higher shock No main effect of race of victim Interaction effect of insult & race

Race X Insult Interaction Effect

Reverse discrimination Regressive racism

Discussion Ambivalence: Katz’s ambivalence  amplification Disinhibition: de-indiv & insult allow deep-seated prejudice to be expressed Regression: de-indiv & insult cause regression to older prejudice

Conclusions Americans take a Janus-faced view of interracial encounters, one face looking forward but the other face focusing grimly on the past.

Implications In conditions of meta-racism… many whites feel anxious & ambivalent. They hold sincere anti-prejudicial attitudes… but when threatened, quick to reject and “slip into” stereotyping

What to do? …to overcome ambivalence & prejudices

Boys’ Camp Experiment on Group Conflict Muzafir Sherif 1956

“Robbers’ Cave” Camp Mapped friendship networks Introduced group competition Mapped new friendship networks Observed behavior Non-competitive social interaction Staged Emergency

No groups: friendship networks formed

In-Group Formation: New Friendship Networks

In-Group Formation: New friendship networks

Robbers Cave Experiment Group Competition

Group Competitions In-group solidarity + prejudice against out-group Hostility: scuffles & raids Bullies become leaders & heroes Epithets (even for former “best friends”) “Ladies first!” “Get the dirt off!”

How to Reduce Conflict? Friendly social interaction: more hostility, epithets, taunting

Staged Emergency

Rattlers & eagles cooperate Hostility, taunting drop New cross-group friendships form

“Robbers’ Cave” Camp Opportunities for pleasant interaction  continued hostility Interdependence (staged emergency)  decreased hostility, cooperation, re-formed friendship patterns

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) Low social status Scapegoating Authoritarian Personality Realistic Group Conflict Conformity to Social Norms

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) Low socio-economic status  higher prejudice

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) 1. Economic & political competition ( “realistic group conflict theory” ) Sherif experiment

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) 2. Scapegoat Theory frustration  displaced aggression –Jews as scapegoats in Nazi Germany – Lynchings correlated with cotton prices –Pogroms against Chinese in Indonesia

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) 3. Prejudiced Personality Authoritarian Personality

Causes of Prejudice ( Elliot Aronson ) 4. Conformity to community norms people who move shift attitudes miners: prejudiced above ground integrated below

“Stateways can change folkways” Changing attitudes often doesn’t change behavior Changing behavior often changes attitudes

De-segregation “Equal status contact”  succeeds “Inequality & competition”  increases hostility

Successful Integration Equal Status + Interdependence –Sherif experiment Jigsaw Classroom

What to do? Inter-dependence ! ! !