Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen Inside centres of excellence – funding schemes’ effect on researchers role identity and practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enabling non-technical innovation – enabling the demand side Professor Stephen Roper Warwick Business School, UK
Advertisements

Theory & Principles underpinning successful Technology Assessments Michael Decker Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis Forschungszentrum.
Overview of TransBonus project Overview of TransBonus project 1st Innovation Dialogue Forum : Towards a regional innovation system WBC-INCO.NET.
Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
D.G. for Technological Development and Innovation, Government of Cantabria Technological Governance Plan – TGP Santiago Garcia.
EuropeAid Co-operation Office Institutional Capacity Development Operations for the ACP Countries Unit AIDCO C4 Centralised Operations for the ACP Countries.
The role of Technology and Innovation Parks in Europe European Economic and Social Committee – Exploratory Opinion.
Dr Fiona Cameron, Executive Director, Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Australian Research Council Centres – an overview.
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
Martin Schuurmans Chair EIT The EIT Sustainable Growth and Competitiveness through Innovation.
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
Overview of European funding opportunities for CES Wednesday, 2 nd November 2011 Huw Merfyn Hughes European Research Funding Officer.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Centre for Disability Studies European Research Agendas for Disability Equality (EuRADE)
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
1 Scientists’ motivations for open access publishing Dr Dagmara Weckowska.
Science Technology Links Aldo Geuna Department of economics University of Torino.
TNO Measurable Impact EARTO Working Group on Quality and Excellence 20th June 2011.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Bologna and the Third Cycle Anthony J Vickers UK Bologna Expert.
Healthy Ageing Research – Developments and Lessons By Hal Kendig Faculty of Health Sciences University of Sydney National Symposium on Ageing Research.
Expression of Interest UNICA Science Parks and Incubator Network.
Report 1 Consortium composition and rationales underlying projects Slava Mikhaylov Trinity College Dublin Conference, How does research integration work?
Policies for research excellence: 2012 Eu-SPRI Conference Towards Transformative Governance, Karlsruhe 12 June 2012 A comparative study of centres of excellence.
An Enterprising University Roger Ford Chair of Innovation and Technology Strategy.
The Dutch R&D system characteristics and trends, with a focus on government funding Jan van Steen Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, The Netherlands.
Bringing Knowledge to the Market: IPR, Licensing and Collaborative Research Regions for economic change : innovating through EU regional policy Brussels.
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Shaping Capabilities in ICT ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Building Successful Partnerships Facilitating Innovation Through Collaboration.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
NEW INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES, case Finland Mervi Käki, CEO, Partner
TEMPUS ME-TEMPUS-JPHES “IMPROVEMENT OF PARTNERSHIP WITH ENTERPISES BY ENHENCEMENT OF A REGIONAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT POTENTIALS IN WBC” TEMPUS ME-TEMPUS-JPHES.
Toolbox CRC programme managers – Dag Kavlie, RCN Analysis of indicators used for CRC Monitoring and Evaluation Ljubljana, 15 September 2009.
20 YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN HEALTH/WORK/ENVIRONMENT September 6, 2012 Thoughts of a reviewer Prof Dick Heederik, PhD IRAS, Utrecht University, The.
1 Innovation and innovation policies in developing countries in the framework of PaceNet+ Ludovico Alcorta Director. Research, Statistics and Industrial.
SAMO PAVLIN, UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA – COOPERATION BETWEEN HEI AND BUSINESSES - WHY DO WE NEED TO COOPERATE? CMEPIUS, LJUBLJANA 25. OKTOBER 2013 LOOKING.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Bridging the gap? Trans contextual learning in work-based professional education A. Havnes, K.M.E. Kaarby, I.M. Lindboe.
Leading educational partnerships What’s new? What’s difficult? What’s the reward? Professor Ann Briggs Newcastle University
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Developing Multiple Identities: Collaborative research as a method of professional learning, in a team of teacher educators. Lin Savage Early Years Programmes.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
Research in the Global Society Ian Diamond ESRC. THE RESEARCH COUNCILS Arts and Humanities Research Council Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research.
Innovation Division. Innovation Its embedded novelty, providing qualitative increase in the efficiency of processes or products demanded by the market.
Technology Transfer in Lithuania: Has a Time Come to Boost Intellectual Property Commercialization? Gailė Sakalaitė Lawyer of Public Entity “Sunrise Valley"
Dr Ritva Dammert Director Brussels May 27, 2009 Evaluation of the Finnish Centres of Excellence Programmes
ONTARIO CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE Briefing for the York Boot Camp July 19, 2012.
Interdisciplinary research on consumers and consumption patterns Centre for Consumer Science.
What is CDR? – A Few Examples Water Resources in a Changing Climate – Idaho Climate Change Large CD consortia — not the case that everyone works on everything.
The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.
Outcomes of the online academia consultation Mr. Christopher Clark Head, Partnership and Resource Mobilization Division International.
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY Developing and Nurturing the Next Generation of Academics: Focus on emerging scholars A presentation BY` Prof. Lillian Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza.
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Global Health Research at Norwegian Institutions Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Visions for the future S.Møgedal
Building research and innovation capacity within the region to secure long term sustainability – achieving excellence WP 5 Juha Alarinta University Consortium.
Exeter Cascade project Baseline report and beyond.
Innovation and health – and some other things Presentation of TIK research for master students, February 16 th 2016 Magnus Gulbrandsen.
Overall Aim  To support Irish Aid’s mission in reducing poverty Key Objectives  To facilitate the establishment of collaborative N/S partnerships 
Value Creation and Capture with Open Source Software: Understanding the Role of Value Networks Lorraine Morgan National University of Ireland, Galway.
External interaction and the humanities Magnus Gulbrandsen Professor, TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo Introduction.
Turku Process – new Initiatives
Knowing science Synopsis of the state of the art based on collected research results of the team.
Strengthening multi-sectoral collaboration: a framework for building interactive capabilities Glenda Kruss HESA Conference 3-4 April 2012.
EuropeAid Co-operation Office
Kari Kleine Educating for Technology Entrepreneurship Through Scientist-Student Collaboration Kari Kleine SDU Technology.
Outcomes of the Surveys and Literature Reviews - Researchers
University-Business relationship:
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Doctoral Education in Europe: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Siri Brorstad Borlaug and Magnus Gulbrandsen Inside centres of excellence – funding schemes’ effect on researchers role identity and practices

Motivation The innovation literature often emphasise the synergies between academic excellence and (potential) for innovation (e.g.Van Looy et al., 2006 and Nesta, 2006) –High correlations between high quality publication and academic entrepreneurship Researchers experience tensions between different role identities –Academia and commerce Policy’s focus on combination of excellence and innovation through dedicated funding schemes – a golden opportunity to study researchers role in relation to the goals of excellence and innovation 3

Research question How do funding schemes aiming at excellence and innovation affect researcher role identity and practices?

Researchers’ role identity –Basic and applied research functions as normative identity markers –Settler – merchant (Atkinson-Grosjean, 2006) –Buffering processes towards the world of industry and science (neither in nor out) –Researchers’ conception of own identity and their practices are affected by institutional logics 5

Institutional logics of excellence and innovation Institutional logics (Friedland and Alford, 1991) Excellence and innovation- ambiguous concepts Excellence associated with basic research, high quality publications, open science (Gulbrandsen & Kyvik, 2010; Lamont, 2009) Innovation associated with applied research, knowledge and technology transfer (Hollingsworth, 2008; Geuna & Muscio, 2009) Track these associations to early writing on the norms of science and norms of innovation (Merton, 1973; Mitroff, 1974): –Universalism versus particularism –Communalism versus private property –Disinterestedness versus personal interest

Method Case study of 8 centres –4 Centres of Excellence in Research and Innovation (CoERI) –4 Centres of Excellence (CoE) Sweden and Norway One university in each country (largest and oldest, classical multi-disciplinary) Semi-structured interviews with 33 researchers 7

Centre of Excellence and Centre of Excellence in Research and Innovation- what are they? CoE Time limited research centres, characterised by concentrated, focused and long-term fundamental research on a high international level 10 years Partners: Universities, colleges and research institutes Main selection criteria: Scientific quality CoERI Time limited research and innovation centres aimed at supporting long-term research that generates new knowledge and technology for innovation 8-10 years Partners: Universities, colleges, research institutes, firms and public offices Main selection criteria: Scientific quality and potential for innovation and value creation

Organisational conditions Formal/informal collaboration with industry and public agencies Formation of centre: embedded networks or engineered/emerging The institutional logics of innovation is embedded in the CoERI - scheme 9

Researchers’ role Bridging logicsBuffering logics CoE”I do basic and relevant research” ”What we do in the centre should be basic research” CoERI”We are a CoE + I””I have a basic researchers’ head” 10

Practices Bridging logicsBuffering logics CoEMutual interests ”We kill two birds with one stone” ”We decide upon our own agenda” CoERIIntegrated collaboration – but “I must motivate the researchers through carrots such as new equipment” Traditional academic communication practices ”I have to train the scientists to work in the innovation arena and tell them ”this is not the usual paper”” 11

Four categories Bridging logicsBuffering logics CoETension free «branded as excellent» Confine to excellence and basic research CoERILegitimating innovation logics Tensions between the logics 12

Overall results -Technology transfer – individual practices in all centres – also in CoERIs (which has this as a goal) –CoERI perceived as less acknowledge by peers and the university –CoE the A-team 13

Conclusion Funding mechanisms dedicated to excellence and innovation affect researchers’ identity Different degrees of negotiations between the two logics from bridging to buffering Organisational conditions important –embedded/emerging networks –Formal/informal collaboration They do not affect researchers’ technology transfer practices 14