Modeling Alabama Tornado Emergency Relief (MATER) Joe Cordell Spencer Timmons Michael Fleischmann
Overview Background Problem Abstract Network Overview (Nodes, Arcs) Mathematical Model Scenarios Results Conclusions Further Work Video Link Video Link 2
Background State of Alabama Major Cities: Birmingham, Montgomerey, Huntsville, Mobile, Tuscaloosa Population: 4.7 million Average 23 Tornados Per Year $13 million in average annual damages 3
Background Tornado Outbreak on April 27 th tornados across the United States 248 fatalities Over $16 billion in damages over 3 days Listed by NOAA as the fourth deadliest in United States history 4
April 27 th, 2011 – Tornados 62 Tornados in Alabama alone 2219 injuries 192 fatalities Only the second day in history that there were three or more F5 or EF5 tornadoes. 5
Background Cordova Population: 2260 Two tornados Four fatalities 6
Problem Abstract Relief supply flow as a Min-Cost Flow Model Goal: To supply damaged cities in the least amount of time and determine if prepositioning of supplies will affect total travel time Key modifications to the basic model Randomized delay Interdiction represented by arc delays Measures of Effectiveness: Total travel time Access to damaged cities 7
Nodes 8 Huntsville Birmingham Tuscaloosa
Arcs 9 Huntsville Birmingham Tuscaloosa
Abstract Network 10
April 27 th, 2011 – Tornados 11 We Modeled Jasper, AL Area
Mathematical Model 12 MIN-COST FLOW Objective: Move humanitarian supplies to damaged towns in shortest time where costs are hours of movement required to deliver supplies. There is a demand for supplies at each damaged town. MATER looks at worst case scenario by implementation of a “smart” tornado which seeks to damage roads so as to inflict the greatest cost on the operator. AirPort City t s C=0 C=20 C=24 C=5
Mathematical Model 13 MIN-COST FLOW Objective: Move humanitarian supplies to damaged towns in shortest time where costs are hours of movement required to deliver supplies. There is a demand for supplies at each damaged town. MATER looks at worst case scenario by implementation of a “smart” tornado which seeks to damage roads so as to inflict the greatest cost on the operator. AirPort City s C=0 C=20 C=24 t C=50 C=5 1
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1a Destroyed Roads-Jasper Only 14
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 15
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 16
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 17
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 18
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 19
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 20
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1b Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs 21
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 22
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 23 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 24 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 25 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 26 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 27 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 28 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 29 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta
Damaged City City Node Airport Node 30 Scenario 1c Destroyed Roads-Jasper and Blount Springs
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 31
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 32
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 33
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 34
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 35
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 36
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 37
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 38
Damaged City City Node Airport Node Scenario 2c Delays Roads-Jasper, Blount Springs and Oneonta 39
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 40
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 41
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 42
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 43
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 44
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 45
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 46
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 47
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 48
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 49
Damaged City Prepositioned Stocks City Node Airport Node Scenario 3 Prepositioned Aid 50
Scenario 1: Operator Resilience Curve 51
52 Scenario 1 Results With roads completely destroyed, tornado quickly cuts off access to affected area. 5 Roads knocked out cuts off Jasper from relief supplies Must then use Chinook helicopters to deliver supplies to the city, and vehicle delivery for surrounding areas affected less Most damaging path with fewer destroyed roads is south of the city, taking out the roads from 2 of the 3 airports Supplies then flow through Huntsville Airport Main storm actually followed this path
Scenario 2: Operator Resilience Curve 53
54 Scenario 2 Results With delayed roads, ramp-up in time is more gradual Spikes when moving across multiple delayed roads Most damaging tornado path remains the same No longer possible to cut off supplies to ground shipment
Scenario 3: Operator Resilience Curve 55
56 Scenario 3 Results With supplies pre-positioned instead of flown-in, travel time is decreased, but not significantly Original flown-in supply model does not include flight time to airport Change in travel time due to proximity of prepositioned supplies to area
Prepositioned Supplies Comparison 57
Model Useability Model is easily customizable to a given scenario Can be used to show movement of supplies to any affected city/area Scalable for multiple damaged cities via adding demands to those nodes Can use flown-in supplies or prepositioned supplies Useful to quickly formulate delivery plan for FEMA/military responders
Conclusions Depending on the city, tornado damage can quickly cut off area from relief supplies if roads are rendered unusable Helicopter delivery via US Army National Guard would then be necessary Best option for high network resiliency is to keep road network in good repair and clear of neighboring trees Prepositioned stocks of relief supplies would not make a large difference Must still get vehicles and personnel to distribute Not much closer than airports
Potential Future Work Model entire state or other areas prone to natural disasters Adjust model to depict hurricane or earthquake damage instead Analyze changes in results with a more micro- resolution network (more roads, towns)
References Map images and road distance maps.google.com Past tornado path and strength data: City statistics/demographic info: Consolidated list of information and articles: _tornado_outbreak
62 Questions?