Chapter Twelve Hate Crimes This multimedia presentation and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: * any public performance or display, including transmission of any over a network; * preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; * any rental, lease, or lending of the program. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Cultural Awareness Definitions –Cultural awareness can be defined as the understanding as individual has regarding different cultures –The term culture includes different races, religions, genders, ages, physical disabilities, and gay or lesbian issues Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Cultural Awareness Training –One study suggests using the following techniques Lectures Role-playing Simulations Work Groups or Presentations Critical Incidents or Case Studies Local Culture Video Profiles and Cross-Culture Films Experiential Assignments Interactive Computer Video Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Hate Crimes Introduction –Hate violence has a long history in the United States –Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990 is still relatively new which makes measuring the number of hate crimes difficult –Lack of training by law enforcement causes many officer to fail to recognize incidents of racial violence –Natural reluctance on the part of many victims to report such incidents to law enforcement agencies Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Legal Aspects of Hate Crimes –The First Amendment prohibits the federal government and the states from enacting any law that unduly regulates a person’s freedom of expression –However from the beginning, the Supreme Court has held that such freedom of expression is not unlimited –U.S. Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin v Mitchell, stating bias or hate crimes were valid for three main reasons While the government cannot punish an individual’s abstract beliefs, it can punish a vast array of depraved motives for crime, including selecting a crime victim based on race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry Hate crimes do not punish thoughts, rather they address the greater individual and societal harms cause by bias-related offenses in that they are more likely to provoke retaliatory crimes, inflict distinct emotional harms on their victims, and incite community unrest Hate crime penalty enhancement laws do not punish people because they express their views Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Identifying Bias Crimes –In the Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990, bias crimes are those offenses that are motivated by hatred against a victim based on race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin. –The Office for Victims of Crime has identified seven general categories that should be examined when evaluating criminal acts Racial, Ethnic, Gender, and Cultural Differences Written or Oral Comments or Gestures Drawings, Markings, Symbols, and Graffiti Representations of Organized Hate Groups Previous Existence of Bias or Hate Crime Incidents Victim-Witness Perception Lack of Other Motives Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007

Typology of Offenders –Levin and McDevitt have established three categories Thrill-seeking offenders Reactive offenders Mission-oriented offenders –Sapp and his associates classified hate groups into three basic categories Christian conservatism based on the identity movement White racial supremacy Patriotism and survival Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007