Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal Level Steve Pickrell Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

Overview of a Timely Publication. Transportations importance has been recognized since colonial times National defense Economic vitality Quality of life.
Interstate Tolling: Financing Reconstruction and Shifting to Mileage-Based User Fees by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
October 10, 2013 Federal Transportation Revenue Options Discussion.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Fiscal Policy and Fossil Fuels Ian Parry, Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the author and should not.
Presented by presented by David M. Laney September 2005 Funding of Highways: Crisis and Solutions.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
3 rd Annual California Passenger Rail Summit Innovative Transportation Financing Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public Transportation Association.
Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Diesel Emissions: The “ Next ” Challenge in Air Quality Management in Asia BAQ 2002, Hong Kong December 16, 2002.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Funding the Gap: Making the Beneficiaries Pay 1 4th June, 2008 Steer Davies Gleave Upper Ground London, SE1 9PD +44 (0)
Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.
Critical Issues in Transportation 2011 “The Future Ain’t What it Use to Be” February 17, 2011.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.
Policy Options for Taxing Real Property
Transportation 1. Learning Objectives Understand that gasoline combustion moves the vehicle as well as emit greenhouse gases. Understand that carbon emissions.
Revenue Assignment Strengthening Fiscal Framework for Local Government Reform FDI Workshop, January 21, 2003 Gábor Péteri, OSI/LGI.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
IBTTA Washington Briefing Washington, D.C. March 30, 2015 Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D. George Mason University / Research.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
Reforming Transportation Finance: Needs, Opportunities, Constraints Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies UC-Berkeley.
Winners and Losers: Distributional Impacts of Highway User Fees B. Starr McMullen Lei Zhang Kyle Nakahara Oregon State University.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Introduction to Government Finance
Looking for a New Deal a presentation to the CITY OF EDMONTON April 15, 2004 Melville McMillan and Paul Boothe Institute for Public Economics  Department.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE.
1 Potential User Benefits and Costs of Rising Fuel Prices in the Puget Sound Region TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 By Maren Outwater.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion Workshop October 23, 2009 Patrick E. Quinn Co-Chairman & President U.S. Xpress Enterprises.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
Interstate 2.0: a 21 st -Century Network Financed by All- Electronic Tolling by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Status of Funding and Authorization Subcommittee's of Traffic Engineering and Operations and Management Manchester NH 2009 Ken Kobetsky.
1 Alternative Financing Methods and Roles of Different Levels of Government Presentation to the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing.
Trucking Industry Perspectives on Transportation Funding Greg Owen Head Coach Ability/Tri-Modal Talking Freight – December 16, 2009.
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “It’s time…New Zealand extended charging for public infrastructure” Opponent: Peter Conway.
An Optimal Economic Growth Strategy for Alabama Dr. Sam Addy Associate Dean for Economic Development Outreach & Senior Research Economist Montgomery, AlabamaJanuary.
Darrin Roth American Trucking Associations, Inc. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROAD PRICING.
Public Policy in Texas Chapter 12. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LO 12.1 Analyze and evaluate Texas tax policies. LO 12.2 Describe the politics of state spending.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy
Presentation transcript:

Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal Level Steve Pickrell Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Funding Options and Trends at the State and Federal Level Steve Pickrell Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 1

How Does Oregon Compare to Other States ? Primary State Transportation Revenue Sources – State and Local Gasoline Taxes – Vehicle Registration Fees Size of Surface Transportation Program – Total Roadway Lane Miles, NHS Lane Miles – VMT, Number of Vehicles and Drivers Size and Economic Activity – Population, Gross State Product 2

Oregon’s Rank Among States on Several Key Descriptors 3 Source: FHWA 2011; U.S. Census 2012; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis 2012; Idaho Transportation Dept. 2011; Washington Transportation Dept. 2011

When Other Taxes Are Accounted For, Oregon’s Fuel Tax is Close to U.S. Average 4 Source: American Petroleum Institute, 2014

Weight-Distance Tax Four states currently have a weight-distance tax: New Mexico, Kentucky, New York and Oregon Maine and South Carolina have recently considered adding distance-based tax on heavy vehicles, and higher tolls for them Rationale: Internalize the cost of damage that heavier vehicles inflict on public roads 5

Weight-Distance Tax Dollars per Mile Traveled, by Vehicle Weight $0.00 $0.02 $0.04 $0.06 $0.08 $0.10 $0.12 $ New York New Mexico Oregon Kentucky Dollars Per Mile Vehicle Weight in Thousands of Pounds Oregon’s weight-distance tax rate is the highest by far…. but its commercial vehicle registration fees are among the lowest in the nation (47 th lowest in rank).

General Typology of Revenue Sources Direct User Fees – Directly associated with a trip: Tolls, transit fares, VMT fees, weight-mile fees, parking fees, etc. Indirect User Fees – Collected from transportation users, but not associated with a trip on a specific facility: Fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees and excise taxes, driver licensing fees, etc. Specialized Taxes and Fees – Collected on non- transportation activities, but dedicated to transportation: local option taxes, value capture techniques, lease rents, etc. General Taxes – Collected on non-transportation activities but used for wide range of expenditures: Income taxes, property taxes, general sales taxes, other ad valorem taxes

Common Criteria for Evaluating Revenue Sources Yield: Revenue generation capacity Reliability: Predictability, sustainability of revenue stream Economic Efficiency: Promotion of economically sound behavior Equity: Disproportionate burden on low-income households or other disadvantaged groups Administrative Effectiveness: Ease and cost of collection, distribution, enforcement, etc. Public Acceptance: Possible or probable, and in what timeframe Policy Objectives: What does the state want to achieve?

What Revenue Sources Are Other States Considering ? There are few if any “new” sources of revenue for transportation being widely discussed Relatively few recent comprehensive studies of revenue at the state level…the work has previously been done Political will and public opinion are driving the decisions Most recent activity involves shifting from one known revenue source to another, reflecting a policy shift unique to each state 9

Current Trends in State Revenue Discussions Increase the state excise tax on fuels Vehicle sale and/or transfer taxes Increase vehicle- and driver-related fees Electric/Alternative fuel vehicle fees Area- and facility-based tolling Index existing motor fuel taxes to inflation and/or changing fleet fuel efficiency Shift from at-the-pump gas tax to wholesale fuel tax Mileage-based fees or road usage charges 10

Recent State Transportation Finance Legislation More than a dozen states have implemented legislation and policies in past three years Relatively few have actually raised or indexed their gas tax rates A comparable number have eliminated at-the- pump gas taxes in favor of wholesale fuel taxes Alternative fuel and electric vehicle fees are gaining momentum 11

Recently Proposed State Transportation Revenue Sources Tolls, including higher tolls for heavy trucks Wholesale fuel taxes Parity in propane and diesel taxes Alternative fuel tax & electric vehicle fees Sales tax on fuel General sales tax Elimination of current subsidies Assorted other: rental car taxes, lease rent 12

P3 Activity in the U.S. 35 states have enabling legislation Only about half have used it Legislation varies significantly across states Five states account for 75% of activity in U.S. – – TX, CA, FL, VA, CO Not as common here as in other countries – U.S. is 9% of the global P3 activity Source: Eno Foundation,

Local Revenue Trends Local option sales and fuel taxes Area-based tolling (congestion pricing to generate revenue) Transit fares, peak pricing, station parking fee Private sector exactions and contributions: development fees, traffic impact mitigation fees, direct transit subsidies, access payments Freight-specific taxes, tolls and fees 14

International Revenue Characteristics High fuel taxes are common Sales and carbon taxes used as well P3 more prevalent in Europe, Australia, Asia – Europe is 50% of global P3 funding Dedication of specific revenue source to transportation is rare – General fund more common approach – Cultural preference for blended funds Source: Eno Foundation,

Perspectives on Future of Federal Transportation Funding Future of the Highway Trust Fund in question Viability of federal gas tax as main revenue source Few perceived realistic alternatives Era of heavy reliance on Federal funding may be drawing to a close Support across the political spectrum for seriously considering these questions Source: Innovation NewsBriefs, January 2015www.innobriefs.com 16

Trust Fund Options T4America proposes shifting more funding responsibility to state and local level – Defacto approach underway in many states – 30 states passed transportation fiscal initiatives in last 3 years (including P3 projects) – 20 more poised to tackle transportation funding at state level in 2015 Eno Foundation proposes General Fund appropriation, citing: – Political opposition to gas tax hike – Declining travel per capita, improved fuel efficiency – Movement away from user-funded system – “Every person and business” benefits 17

Reauthorization Prospects Annual highway and transit expenditures exceed annual Trust Fund revenue by ~$16B/year Six-year reauthorization needs estimated to be $100B Federal gas tax increase seems unlikely today….but ask again tomorrow! Despite drop in gas prices, prospects dim for long-term T-bill or gas tax increase White House believes “corporate tax reform” is best option 18

Summary of Trends Long-term projections for declining fuel tax revenue, declining condition and performance of system Road Usage Charges gaining momentum in west, but implementation costs and other hurdles are large Increased future reliance on state and local sources, reduced expectations of Federal support Little political will to tackle revenue problem at Federal, but some evidence of changing attitudes “Tipping Point” theory: Nothing will happen until it happens….and then it may happen quickly 19

Questions / Discussion 20