Welcome!. What do we aim to achieve today? Providing you with a clear understanding of the new inspection plans by: Introducing our new inspection model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The matrix Standard. Welcome Mark Wem emqc International Strategic Associate & matrix Assessor Dubai 15 th October 2012.
Advertisements

Commission for Health Improvement CHI: The national perspective Emilie Roberts Development Manager 10 December 2003.
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Performance audit and evaluation: common ground with Internal Audit ? The UK National Audit Office experience Jeremy Lonsdale.
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
Research and Development at Tuxford Academy Improving Effective Written Feedback Chris Wray and Hanna Davies Research and Development at Tuxford Academy.
BRAUNTON BMX CLUB The Role of the Secretary / Go-Ride contact The Secretary/Go-Ride Contact is the principal administrator for the club. This is a pivotal.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Session Objectives: For Mentors to know:
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Welcome!. What do we aim to achieve today? Providing you with a clear understanding of the new inspection plans by: Introducing our new inspection model.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
Practitioner Forum Innovation and Improvement for Safeguarding in Salford.
Multi Agency Inspection Briefings 27 th & 28 th March 2013 Meena Kishinani Divisional Director Strategic Commissioning and Safeguarding.
Improving Multi-Agency Safeguarding Assessments A Children’s Social Care Perspective 2013: A golden opportunity for us to improve our safeguarding system.
Children’s Wellbeing Stakeholder Event Thursday 14 th May 2015 ‘Shaping local priorities and supporting a responsive market’
CQC’s new approach to inspecting and regulating GP and OOH providers
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services Inspectorate, HIQA.
Generic Employability Skills Centre for Developing and Evaluating Lifelong Learning (CDELL)
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Accessibility Planning, Training & Advisory Programme Making the connections—making it happen Putting Accessibility Planning withinreach! Derek Palmer.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Presentation for Age Cymru ADULT PRACTICE REVIEWS Mick Collins
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 New inspection methodology from September 2009 NATSPEC conference Lorna Fitzjohn May 2009.
1 Children’s Services Pilot Inspection Briefing session 10 January 2013.
Assessment for improvement [Name] [Title] [Date / Event] V4.5.
Bridlington Children’s Centres Development Plan East Riding Children’s Centres Bridlington “working in partnership”
Investors in People Champions. Interpretation of the Standard Purpose To give a brief overview with the necessary background information on the Investors.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Youth to adult transitions 14 March 2013 Frances Done Chair Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.
Maine SIM Evaluation Subcommittee April 2015 April 22, 2015.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Accelerating progress through guided writing
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Provider Briefing Welcome
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
ECU Forum 2011”Leading in a downturn” “Leading in a downturn” Ian Saunders and Ray Charlton Transition Partnerships “ Developing leaders and organisations”
1 Older Citizens’ use of Scrutiny A workshop presentation by Sharon Brearley, Director Age Concern Salford Natalie Davies, Project manager LinkAge Plus,
Transforming lives through learning SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME Welcome and Introductions Alastair Delaney Strategic Director Education Scotland.
The National Quality Standard The National Quality Standard (NQS) is a key aspect of the NQF and sets a national benchmark for early childhood education.
Leo Flatters County Head of Service. Same Way Together?
Barnardo’s Registered Charity Nos and SC Funded by Children of offenders: the national picture Polly Wright
Providing assurance and promoting improvement through inspection of Youth Offending Work - the 2012 framework The programmes are new but the purpose is.
Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) Supporting the improvement of social care, child care and social services in Wales.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
ENGLISH APP TRAINING Cohort 3 NOVEMBER AIMS To be familiar with the APP materials and how they link together To develop understanding of the APP.
Youth Justice Resource Hub An online resource for the youth justice community A presentation for Team Meetings
Moving to Outstanding Ofsted Findings Improvement update meeting.
Welcome and House Keeping
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
Regulating new care models
Welcome to the CSBM operational workshop:
David James – CQC Policy Team
Consumer Conversations and Aged Care Standards
Management and supervision of men convicted of sexual offences
Julie Hayman Quality Assurance Officer RBSCB and RBSAB
Restorative Approaches with Families in Elder Abuse Cases
Safeguarding Adults Review into the death of ‘Bert’
Why do we request a PIR? The information provided in the PIR helps inspectors to understand how the service meets the five key questions and the plans.
Career Ready Mentor Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Welcome!

What do we aim to achieve today? Providing you with a clear understanding of the new inspection plans by: Introducing our new inspection model Guiding you through the 3 phases of our new inspection methodology- 1.Pre-inspection – analysis 2.Fieldwork weeks – uncovering barriers & enablers and examining robustness of public protection & safeguarding arrangements 3.Post inspection – report, recommendations & follow-up Involving you in further developing & implementing the new inspections by: Providing time today to discuss the plans Welcoming further feedback.

Current impact What is the level of effectiveness of relevant services in the local area? Current impact levels for recent offenders in the area (across agencies) tested on three dimensions of indicators Reduced offending | Reduced risk of future offending | Abiding by sentence (including harm) Disseminating promising practice found Recommending changes informed by knowledge base comprising experience, research & promising practice More effective probation services locally and across England and Wales Case review a sample of offenders, with “boost” for any serious further offending Understood by discovering Understood by discovering IMPACT-LED APPROACH Promoted by addressed by Enablers What helped achieve positive impact with individuals? Barriers What hindered more positive impact with individuals? Effective Probation Services = protecting the public from harm and reducing future victims of offending Case review follows the individual offender’s journey backwards from impacts, encompassing all relevant agencies for a system-wide search for influencing factors

Impact-led inspection Which impacts will we focus on for adults? Reduced offending (including harm) Reduced risk of future offending Abiding by sentence

HMIP IMPACT-LED APPROACH Practical advantages of the new model Judgements support services striving to reduce reoffending Focus on public protection and safeguarding maintained Independent ongoing monitoring of impacts for the public Innovation promoted Allows ‘whole system’ issues to be highlighted, e.g. partnership working (tracing offender journey) Flexibility to inspect by various units Ability to drill down.

Methodology of an impact-led inspection Phase 1: Pre-inspection: identifying areas to be inspected - establishing service-user journey - arranging fieldwork & devising schedule - planning lines of enquiry Phase 2 : Fieldwork weeks: case file examination - observation of practice - understanding perspectives (offenders, practitioners, families, victims etc) - uncovering enablers and barriers through investigation - reviewing robustness of public protection and safeguarding arrangements - checking initial findings (week two) - leadership and governance Phase 3: Post fieldwork feedback on impacts - feedback on enablers & barriers and public protection & safeguarding arrangements - qualitative analysis - identifying promising practice from enablers - identifying ways to address barriers - reporting recommendations - intelligence led re-inspection.

Initial questions What questions were raised in your mind during this presentation? What concerns (as questions) do you have for putting it into practice (especially affecting your organisation)? What we would like you to do next…. Engage with facilitated group discussions (for up to 60 minutes each session) then give brief feedback to the whole group.

Plenary Opportunity for final questions & comments Thank you for your attendance, attention & valuable input.