1 GRS and Accreditation March 2012. Learning objectives After reviewing this presentation, you will understand  How the Global Rating Scale supports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: Advance the adoption of proven strategies to improve the reliability, safety and quality of care received by patients in Tennessee hospitals.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance of ICT in Education NAACE is the professional association for those who are concerned with advancing education through the appropriate.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
JAG Accreditation outline of the process
Teacher Certification Assessor Information Session November 27, 2014.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Strengthening the Role of MCNs Hilary Davison Head of Standards Development Unit.
Performance management guidance
1 Professionalising Programme & Project Management Developing programme & project management capacities for UNDP and national counterparts External Briefing.
PREPARING FOR REVALIDATION. Licences issued Revalidation pilots ongoing to test the whole process – completion March 2011 Responsible Officers – to be.
Standard 1: Governance for safety and quality in heath service organisations Advice Centre Network Meeting Margaret Banks Senior Program Director February.
Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation Peer review for quality improvement Guidance B l Version 2 l November 2014 Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
System Office Performance Management
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009.
LSA Audit 2012/13. How satisfied were you with the following ?
We help to improve social care standards March 2013 Excellence through workforce development Karen Stevens Area Officer – Sussex.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Multidisciplinary An Introduction to the Support available to Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals.
Assessing Capabilities for Informatics Enabled Change: The LISA Toolset Informatics Capability Development LISA – Local Health Community Informatics Strategic.
Independent Sector Workforce Development Reference Group Scottish Care Update: 25 June 2013.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.
Is a systematic process of evaluating and managing employee performance in order to achieve the best outcomes for a business PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT NTPS Capability and Leadership Framework.
June 5, Use of the district’s financial resources is key to the ongoing operations : Facilities Transportation Food Service Staff Development.
Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation Peer review for quality improvement Guidance B l Version 1 l May 2013 Presentation for departments of anaesthesia.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Telemedicine Technology Use Plan Brenda Janot Telemedicine Coordinator
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
David Stone, Education Specialist NIHB Public Health Summit May 31, 2012 Partners in Accreditation: _ Supporting Tribal Health Departments for Public Health.
August 2014 Dr James Fergsuon-Clinical Lead Debbie Johnston–RCP Head of Assessors & Accreditation Consultant Liver quest project Project update.
Medical Revalidation. What is revalidation? Revalidation is the process by which doctors will have to demonstrate to the GMC, normally every five years,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
© 2011 Royal College of Physicians, JAG Office Global Rating Scale and Knowledge Management System July
Shaping the Future: A Vision for Learning Disability Nursing United Kingdom Learning Disability Consultant Nurse Network.
Community Based Services and Clinical Futures 2008.
What is a Health Promoting School? ‘Health Promoting Schools are schools which display, in everything they say and do, support and commitment to enhancing.
Endoscopy Global Rating Scale and Knowledge Management System National Endoscopy Team April
Introducing Improving Quality Together. Purpose Improving Quality Together aims to support a change in mindset in NHS Wales, where each individual demonstrates.
Documentation Requirements for Hospital Accreditation -By Global Manager Group.
Standards and Competencies for Cancer Chemotherapy Nursing Practice in Canada: CANO/ACIO AN INTRODUCTION.
HEALTH AND CARE STANDARDS APRIL Background Ministerial commitment 2013 – Safe Care Compassionate Care Review “Doing Well Doing Better” Standards.
What is a Health Promoting School?
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Senior Management Briefing. Children’s Division 0-19 Vision and the Children’s Division Business Plan Nicky Adamson-Young – Children’s and Families Divisional.
The Endoscopy Global Rating Scale Workforce Domain National Endoscopy Team April
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
Update on Together for Health and the Information Plan Chris Riley, DHSSC Strategy Chris Riley, DHSSC Strategy.
MLCF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Professor Peter Spurgeon University of Warwick Medical School Project Director, Enhancing Engagement in Medical.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION & RETAINING QUALITY
Kaiser Permanente National Nursing Research
Part 1 Being professional
Why participate in Accreditation?
An introduction to ACSA
World class healthcare for Wales by 2015
Preventing VTE in hospitalised patients
Quality and Accreditation in Health care setting
Why Accreditation, why IQIPS?
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Presentation transcript:

1 GRS and Accreditation March 2012

Learning objectives After reviewing this presentation, you will understand  How the Global Rating Scale supports accreditation  Understand what is meant by quality improvement  Understand the tools available to support improvements in endoscopy services 2

The basics  The Endoscopy Global Scale (GRS) is a quality improvement system designed to provide a framework for continuous improvement for endoscopy services to achieve and maintain accreditation 3

Accreditation definition  Usually a voluntary process by which an independent agency grants recognition to organisations which meet certain standards that require continuous improvement in structures, processes and outcomes. 4

Accreditation represents A risk reduction strategy  That an endoscopy service is doing the right things and doing them well;  Thereby significantly reducing the risk of error in the delivery of services 5

Accreditation process The process stimulates continuous improvement  Continuous: uninterrupted, without cessation  Improvement: bringing into a more desirable or excellent condition; making more valuable; making or becoming better. (Macquarie Dictionary definition) 6

JAG Accreditation What is JAG Accreditation intended to accomplish?  Stimulate continuous improvement in processes and patient outcomes  Strengthen endoscopy services  Provide a knowledge base of best practices  Increase patient confidence in services  Improve the management and efficiency of services  Provide education on better/best practices 7

SEQOHS Accreditation (Cont’d) What is JAG Accreditation intended to accomplish?  Provide comparison with self and others  Enhance the workforce, retention and satisfaction  Increase chances to add to and grow services 8

Strengths of JAG Accreditation  Stimulates quality improvement culture in the service  External, objective evaluation  Uses agreed standards  Involves health professionals  Puts the patient at the heart of the process  Proactive not reactive  Annual re-evaluation against standards 9

Benefits for medical and nursing staff  Improves professional staff development  Provides education on standards  Provides leadership for quality improvement within medicine and nursing  Increases satisfaction with working conditions, leadership and accountability 10

Benefits for all employees  Values employee opinions  Involves them in quality activities  Improves employee job satisfaction and retention  Clearer lines of authority and accountability  Promotes teamwork 11

12 Endoscopy Services What does a quality endoscopy service look like?

13 Quality Endoscopy Service 1.Patient centered with good customer service 2.Use standards and guidelines to continually improve safety and quality of care and the environment 3.Led and coordinated with efficient safe processes 4.Safe, low risk facility and environment 5.Staff with excellent skills and knowledge 6.Quality improvement culture supported by leaders and managers

Quality Endoscopy Service The GRS & accreditation pathway will assist you to both achieve and demonstrate this.

JAG Requirements  The JAG Accreditation process is based on the GRS Standards  The JAG will require GRS levels to be demonstrated though clear evidence submission  The JAG accreditation website, incorporates the GRS standards has an online accreditation system that services will have to participate in and upload the required evidence 15

Pathway - Stage one Endoscopy service registers to complete GRS self- assessment Guidance and set up with Online GRS System by the JAG Office Endoscopy service completes self assessment and gather evidence Online system automates a rating for each item according to the measures completed Endoscopy service reviews results and plans improvements Access to action planning and KMS 0yr 1yr

To progress to stage two An endoscopy service must:  Be operational for a minimum of a year with supporting audits/evidence over an agreed period  Have completed the GRS over 2 census points  Ensure that evidence demonstrate agreed levels for domains of the Endoscopy Global Rating Scale (GRS): –Clinical quality –Quality of the patient experience –Workforce –Training  Ensure that there is a safe environment for patients and staff  Meet requirements for decontamination

Making progress: working through the standards Actively progressing well with good engagement Achieving all the standards Ready now for accreditation Had a look at: progressing slowly Had a look at: progressing slowly Where are you on the GRS and accreditation pathway? 20% 40% 60% 100% 80%

Successful services … ActionsQuestions Lead, plan, involve the whole teamWho is leading? Who is co coordinating? Are clear about their starting pointWhat does your GRS assessment really say? Run it as a project, meticulous organisation will pay off How will you prioritise the work and organise yourselves to be successful? Develop a communication planWho needs to know about this? Have effective meetingsWhat meeting structure do you have ? Gather new knowledge and examples How will you do this?

Meeting the standards  The GRS is not a “one man show” leadership across the disciplines was cited as the number one factor in achieving success. Clinical engagement is key

The GRS-practical advice  Complete it at each census point. The GRS must be completed twice a year to apply for and maintain accreditation  Answer the statements critically each time  Look the tools and advice available on the KMS  Involve the whole team  Engage with as many people as you can and publish results

Work in partnership  Clinical lead for endoscopy  All endoscopists  General Manager  Nursing lead for endoscopy  Nursing staff  Support services: IT Audit Patient groups Documentation groups Clinical Governance  External networks Involve as many as possible in doing the work :

Pathway- Stage two Agree date for JAG Accreditation Access to training How to pass accreditation Seminars JAG Assessors review evidence prior to visit Review checklist, provide feedback to the endoscopy service and add comments for fellow assessors JAG Assessors conduct assessment and prepare a report Assessors carry out assessment and complete their report online with their findings and recommendations

Other specific support  Specific Training –How to pass your accreditation assessment  Schedule of teleconferences and Webinars –Specific Webex training and support  Dedicated support through ‘contact us’ on the website 24

Conclusion  Accreditation is the most comprehensive and powerful tool for quality improvement  Accreditation has been found to be effective in many systems in many other countries with very different systems  The JAG Accreditation Scheme is working to improve endoscopy services through the accreditation process 25