Public Internal Control in the European Union

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), Maastricht E. Best © EIPA, 2008 The European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA): Learning to.
Advertisements

Multi-level governance in EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler VI EU-China High-Level Seminar On Regional Policy Multi-level Governance And Support.
Radmila Trkulja, Head of the CHU of Republika Srpska.
The Committee of the Regions A political assembly of the European Union, representing local and regional government.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Development of internal control: methodology and responsibility
Public Internal Audit PEM-PAL Center for Excellence in Finance Ljubljana, December 2006 Robert de Koning European Commission DG BUDGET.B.3 PIFC Team.
Financial Inspection in the Public Sector Svilena Simeonova 1.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
We’re here for you. “European Exchange of Best Practice in Arson Investigation and Prevention” European exchange of best practice in arson investigation.
PIFC in the Turkish Public Sector Ankara March 30th, 2005 Robert de Koning European Commission DG Budget B.3.
Financial Management and Control Arrangements in Practice Monika Kos, Ministry of Finance, the Republic of Poland.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
IEKA - Albanian Institute of Authorized Chartered Auditors Towards application of new standards on accounting and auditing – Albanian challenge on implementing.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Audit Committees: practices in the EU Manfred van Kesteren Bucharest, December 4th 2014.
Miami, 10 May Dr. Árpád Kovács Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Sustainable Constitutional State.
STRENGTHENING NTERNAL AUDIT CAPACITIES IN THE HUNGARIAN PUBLIC SECTOR.
INSPIRE/GINIE Workshop Objectives To discuss directions for the construction of a European Spatial Data Infrastructure (ESDI) Share the current State of.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
Grosu-Axenti Diana Financial Inspection Director Financial Inspection vs External & Internal audit in Republic of Moldova.
INTOSAI Task Force Global Financial Crisis - Challenges for SAIs and the WGPD Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU EUROPEAN COMMISSION Relations between External Audit, Internal.
2nd SIGMA NETWORKING SEMINAR
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Co-operation Between the Ministry of Finance and the Court.
1 INTERNAL AUDIT IN BULGARIA – DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES PEM PAL IA CoP Sofia, Bulgaria April 17-20, 2012.
Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Finance Ministry of Finance Budget Supervision Office of the Republic of Slovenia 1 Miran Gostiša Ljubljana, 27th January.
Alexander Consulting Enterprise 10/16/2015 The European Union and the EURO.
International Symposium on the changing role of Parliament in the budget process: Experiences from PUIC Countries and EU Member States Cooperation between.
22/10/20151 SAIs and PIFC Assessment policies Ankara, 8 July 2008 Robert GIELISSE Head of unit DG BUDGET.B.4 European Commission.
PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL (PIC) SYSTEM OF HUNGARY Ms. Edit NÉMETH CENTRAL HARMONISATION UNIT FOR PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL, HUNGARY BUDAPEST, 25 TH OF JUNE,
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
Risk Management Standards and Guidelines
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU TURKISH PUBLIC INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEM Naci AĞBAL.
BNAO ROLE FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC FINANCES Tzvetan Tzvetkov, CIA, CGAP, CRMA - President of the Bulgarian National Audit Office.
Information Security Systems Cost Effective Authenticity & Integrity in CEN/FISCALIS eInvoicing Good Practice Guidelines Nick Pope – Principal Consultant,
Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial control Bilateral screening:
RIFIX IACOP Working Group Concept Paper Svilena Simeonova Prague, March 2016.
Financial Management and Control in the Dutch Public Sector Prague, March 24, 2016 Manfred van Kesteren.
Legislative, normative and institutional framework of EU member states in relevant issues (internal control and risk management) - some key points drawn.
Financial Management and Control (FMC) and Internal Audit (IA) - requirements under Chapter 32 - Financial Control Plenary Meeting on The Progress in Internal.
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
The Principles of Public Internal Control system (PIC)
THE EUROPEAN UNION How does the structure of government within the EU compare with the structure of government in the United States?
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
European Union Duy Trinh.
Accountability: an EU perspective
Assessing a national PIC system
PEMPAL Internal Control Working Group– 45th IACOP Meeting
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Revision of the Internal Control Framework in the European Commission PEMPAL Internal Audit Community of Practice (IACOP) Brussels, 27th February 2017.
years of existence.
Panel discussion: Organising internal audit system and performing audit engagements Ciaran SPILLANE, Principal Advisor, Internal Audit Service of the.
Activities of the Human Resources Working Group
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Role-play on EU decision-making
PIFC Public Internal Financial Control
"Financing Natura 2000 Guidance and Workshops”
The Sigma Experience of Public Internal Financial Control Peer Reviews
Јавна внатрешна контрола
Edit Nemeth, Leader of WG
The EU Model of PIC Raymond Hill Team Leader, PIC Task Force
Presentation transcript:

Public Internal Control in the European Union Robert Gielisse, CIA, CGAP European Commission Principal Advisor , DG BUDG In charge of PIC and PIFC

2. Your presenter Robert GIELISSE – Dutch National CIA, CGAP Principal Adviser, Head of EC PIC/PIFC Task Force Chairperson of EU28 PIC Network and Working Group In EC since 1983, various managerial positions since 1993 Dutch Tax Administration 1978 – 1983 University degrees in Economy and Law

3. History of Internal Control in the EU Pre 2004 CC 10 + 2: Centralised Control System -> PIFC EU 15 Diversity 2004 EU 25 CC 2 + PCC: CCS -> PIFC EU 15 Diversity EU 10 PIFC 2007 EU 27 (Potential) CC: CCS -> PIFC EU 15 Diversity EU 10 + 2 PIFC 2009 Kick start of PIC

4. History of Internal Control in the EU Public internal control modernised in the past 10-15 years all over the EU In some countries started in the 80s but more reforms since 2000 triggered by accessions to the Union of 2004, 2007 and 2013 need for administrative reforms (decentralising central powers) recognition of need to manage risk reduce budget deficit following the financial crisis tax payers claiming value for money

5. Approaches to IC system in the EU Decentralised internal control system (Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, 13 new Member States). The so-called Nordic model Centralised internal control system (Luxembourg, Spain, Greece, Italy). The so-called Latin model Hybrid model (Belgium, France, Portugal)

6. Approaches to IC system in the EU Nordic model Based on full decentralised managerial accountability and functionally independent internal audit. Manager is accountable for meeting organisational objectives (financial and non-financial) Responsible for setting up internal control to address risks and provide reasonable assurance that objectives are achieved by means of effective, efficient, economical operations; legal and regular transactions; Internal auditor assesses adequacy of IC framework including governance, risk management and control; reports to the management and makes recommendations for improvement.

7. Approaches to IC system in the EU Latin model Centralised control function focusing on ex-ante controls, some sub-functions may be delegated Internal control as a centralised collective responsibility in relation to controlling public funds Specifically designated organisations /financial controllers to control economic and financial compliance No internal audit; financial 'audit ' (transaction based verification) is performed by ex-post financial controllers/inspectors Ex-ante controls performed by centralised services (not within the entity) including SAI

8. Approaches to IC system in the EU Hybrid model Various stages of development towards the Nordic model IC in France is a good example for incorporating 'Nordic' principles in a given national administrative culture Mix of centralised approach with decentralised features E.g. decentralisation of (ex-ante) controls

9. Similarities in the IC environments across the EU 25 out of 28 Member States base their systems on COSO framework (including INTOSAI guidelines for internal control) IPPF oriented standards for Internal audit Either IPPF directly applicable in national law Or national standards 'copy' IPPF

10. Differences in the IC environments across the EU Accountability arrangements vary centralised departmental agencies (independent) bodies Shift from input to output oriented management and budgeting Split between political and executive responsibilities not in all countries Internal audit systems do not cover all parts of the public sector or every part in the same way. Coverage of the central government part varies country by country.

11. Managerial accountability across the EU Management and accountability arrangements vary Focus on the achievement of organisational objectives and efficient, economic and effective use of public money (output oriented) Focus on compliance with rules and legal and/or administrative provisions (input oriented)

12. The European Dimension PIFC – Public Internal Financial Control an Internal Control framework for the public sector that Candidate Countries must adopt to fulfil the conditions/ benchmarks of Chapter 32 'Financial control' of the EU Accession Negotiations PIC – Public Internal Control is a denominator for a panoply of Internal Control systems operated in the public sector of the EU-28

13. PIFC – European framework for Internal Control in the Public Sector

14. PIFC - 5 layers of defence for public money Entity - wide Gov’t - wide National Layer 1 Financial Management and Control systems Layer 2 Internal Audit Layer 3 Centralised Budget Inspection (Complaint- driven function to investigate cases of fraud and serious irregularity) Layer 4 State Audit Office Layer 5 National Parliament CHU and Audit Committee PIFC Council Source: European Commission, DG Budget

15. PIFC - 5 layers of defence for public money These 5 layers are complementary: FMC: decentralised ex-ante and ex-post under managerial responsibility IA: to assess economy, efficiency and effectiveness; to provide reasonable assurance about adequacy of IC environment (FMC) Inspection: to pursue cases of fraud, but not proactive (!) EA: to oversee functioning of IC Parliament: to hold the Executive accountable

16. PIC is a hot topic in the Member States Internal Control is now widely used and integral to all governance systems Stakeholders are demanding better quality results, accountability, and transparency Recent reforms and increasing professionalism demonstrate dynamic character of PIC; IC in different Member States is still in transition Reforms focus on streamlining and making existing set-up more efficient

17. Recent developments to IC in the EU Increased attention to objectives and performance management; to risks and governance as a whole; Clearer defined legal mandate for Internal Control Clearer mandates and descriptions of tasks for control and internal audit (and financial inspection) Internal Audit professionalism (certification schemes) Type of engagements (from assurance audit to performance audit and consulting)

18. Developments 2009-2012 2009 Conference on PIFC Structured questionnaire 1st Compendium PIC Conference 2012 outcome Working Group to prepare ‘permanent’ EU 27 Network

19. What EU Commission does in partnership with Member States Initiated Compendium Manages PIC Network Manages PIC working group Co-organises Conferences with Member States Contributes to Discussion Papers Distributes Newsletters

20. PIC network Partnership between the European Commission and Member States to which EC provides coordination and logistical support. Network composed of internal control and internal audit experts from the public sector of every Member State. Platform for sharing experience and good practice when reengineering or otherwise improving public sector governance systems Set up at February 2012 PIC Conference where the 1st ever Compendium on PIC systems in the EU Member States was presented

21. PIC Working Group A PIC Working Group coordinated and chaired by DG BUDG lets Member States dictate the topics for the PIC Conference DG BUDG coordinates and chairs WG meetings and ensures quality control of the outputs Current members: Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, Portugal, and United Kingdom (Austria, Bulgaria, Poland's mandate ended in May 2014)

22. PIC Working Group The Working Group meetings have already produced 4 discussion papers. The topics were endorsed by all participants at the Conference of the EU-28 PIC Network. They are extensively discussed at Conference workshop Optimising Internal Control through Performance Management Continual organisational improvement by integrating Internal Control into the management cycle Quality assurance for Internal Audit Role of Audit Committees for Internal Audit in the Public Sector

23. Keeping the Network informed The PIC Newsletter An edition after each Working Group meeting http://ec.europa.eu/budget/pic/lib/newsletters/PICNewsNo5.pdf

24. Developments 2014 Compendium (2nd edition 2014) http://ec.europa.eu/budget/pic/compendium/index_en.cfm http://ec.europa.eu/budget/pic/lib/book/compendium/HTML/index.html 2014 PIC conference http://ec.europa.eu/budget/pic/conference/index_en.cfm Contact Robert.Gielisse@ec.europa.eu

Thank you! Questions? Robert Gielisse, CIA, CGAP Principal Advisor, DG BUDG In charge of PIC and PIFC