Casemix in 2012/13 and beyond Paula Monteith, the Casemix Service, NHS IC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Steve Henderson Clinical Advisor, Tier 2 services Greater Manchester Health Authority.
Advertisements

Best Practice Tariffs Falls and Fractures: Towards Best Practice Sam Alderson Economic Adviser – PbR Development Team.
Payment by Results: Setting the Tariff Liz Eccles Deputy Director of Policy and Strategy Department of Health.
What is commissioning? Paul McManus Pharmacist Advisor Yorkshire and the Humber Office North of England Specialised Commissioning Group North of England.
Service Planning for New Workforce Models Shelley Horne Director Clinical Service Reform, SA Health April 2011.
Options for the Future of Payment by Results (PbR) – Consultation exercise Sebastian Habibi – May 2007.
HRG4 Design and Clinical Engagement Dr. N.K.Griffin Consultant Paediatrician Northampton General Hospital Part time secondment to HSCIC.
Midland Region Primary Healthcare Forum 30 May 2014.
Features of HRG4 Paula Monteith Principal Casemix Consultant – Finance & Commissioning.
Preventable Hospitalizations: Assessing Access and the Performance of Local Safety Net Presented by Yu Fang (Frances) Lee Feb. 9 th, 2007.
Update: Operational Delivery Networks Denise McLellan Transitional Lead, Networks and Senates, Midlands and East November 2012.
Using Payment by Results to commission better quality clinical care Eileen Robertson Payment by Results (PbR) Development Team.
Future of Payment by Results (PbR) PCT network – 19 Feb 2007.
Patient-Focused Funding & Payment by Results The UK Experience CEO Forum, Kananaskis, Alberta February 16, 2009 Robert J. Bell – Chief Executive Royal.
NICE and NICE’s equality programme in 2012 Nick Doyle Clinical and public health analyst.
HRG4 and Payment By Results Roadshows 2009 Information Breakout Session Part 1.
The BHRUT Clinical Strategy Presentation for stakeholders, patients and the public.
NICE in a changing world National Leading Improvement for Health and Well-being programme 12 May 2011 Gillian Mathews Implementation consultant.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Introduction to HRG4 Reference Cost Grouper Presented by Chris Knee Senior Information Analyst and Peter Broughton Senior Casemix Consultant.
WHAT'S AHEAD? Kathy Whitmire Dale Gibson February 15, 2011 HIPAA 5010, ICD-10, ACO's, VBP, HIGLAS, PECOS.
Making patients’ views count Frequent Feedback Service Regula Dent Marketing Manager Picker Institute 21 April 2009.
Decision Support for Quality Improvement
Memorial Hermann Healthcare System Clinical Integration & Disease Management Dan Wolterman April 15, 2010.
Facts about the Trust £110 million pound turnover 1,619 staff plus staff employed by contractors 33,365 inpatient and day cases were treated 10,670 elective.
NICE quality standard for COPD Craig Grime Technical Analyst Quality Standards NICE
© Nuffield Trust The organisation of hospital services in Europe: Recent trends and strategic choices Dr Rebecca Rosen Senior Fellow The Nuffield Trust.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.
London cancer services: Implementing the model of care London Borough of Bromley Health Scrutiny Sub-Committee meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2011.
1 The Service Vision in Northern Ireland. 2 The Northern Ireland Model Overview of Model - John Cole Connected Health - Andrew Hamilton Chief Executive.
Respiratory Service Framework Asthma and COPD Care (Nursing) Project Learning and Development Strategy.
Health Strategy Management Contracting and Commissioning 5th February 2015 Pam Kaur Group Finance Manager University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire.
© RSR Consultants Ltd HRG4 Background RSR Consultants Ltd retain copyright to these slides (produced March 2009) and are free to be used for non-income.
Chapter 15 HOSPITAL INSURANCE.
Lymphoedema Management: the Northern Ireland Model Jane Rankin Regional Lead Lymphoedema Network Northern Ireland (LNNI) February 2010.
Clinical Coding Service Manager
Chapter 15 HOSPITAL INSURANCE.
2009 HRG4 Road Shows Finance & Costing Break Out Session Reference Costs 2008/09 Payment by Results – Operations.
Cardiff and the Vale Healthcare Community Programme for Health Services Improvement Clinical Services Redesign Workshop 8 th Sep 06.
Healthcare Resource Groups. What are HRGs? Casemix methodology underpinning system of payment to providers and contract pricing Aggregation of OPCS or.
SB 810 THE CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL CARE ACT  Introduced February 18, 2011  Author: State Senator Mark Leno  Similar legislation has been passed twice before.
Western NSW Integrated Care Strategy To transform existing services into an integrated Western NSW system of care that is tailored to the needs of our.
CAMHS Data Event Barbara Fittall 5 th March 2013.
- 1 - Investing in your health Building a better NHS for people in Bedfordshire & Hertfordshire PROPOSED MONITORING ARRANGEMENTS 20th June 2005.
Health Quality Ontario: Health System Performance New Zealand Master Class March 25, 2014.
NHS Outcomes Framework Key Measure is replicated in Department of Health’s proposed contribution to the cross-Government Transparency Framework Measure.
HRG4 HealthCheck. The Science of Casemix The Operating Environment Now and Next HRG4 HealthCheck Things you Need to Know Help! Key Messages Session Overview.
London Health Libraries Induction 15 th September 2008 The NHS in London Mandy Guest Knowledge Service Manager Islington Primary Care Trust London Health.
The impact on practice, costs and outcomes of New Roles for health professionals in Europe (MUNROS) Antoinette de Bont Erasmus University Rotterdam European.
One Episode of Care ……. National Demonstration Hospitals Program Sharon Donovan, Executive Director - Nursing Services Wendy Hubbard, Director - Allied.
London cancer workshop 9 th March Agenda TimeSession 2.00pmWelcome and objectives 2.10pmThe model of care 2.25pmProvider network development 2.45pmQuestion.
Performance assessment A performance assessment framework is a collation of statistics across a district or within a hospital and is far removed from.
Commissioning Integrated Rehabilitation and Re-ablement Services? Cath Attlee and Ray Boateng 1.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative 2010 Update.
Why Develop HRG4? John Madsen, Programme Manager Stephen Cole, Principal Casemix Consultant.
A Healthy Future More prevention – earlier intervention East Lancashire Teaching PCT’s Strategic Commissioning Plan.
HRG4: Impact on Arrhythmia Care Donna Elliott-Rotgans Cardiology Service Manager UCLH / The Heart Hospital.
NUH Clinical Strategy 2010 Dementia. 1 The story In February 2009 the National Dementia Strategy was launched. It is a five year plan to transform the.
Diseases of Childhood Expert Working Group 1 st March 2012.
Creating incentives for better quality: Lessons from the English NHS Jennifer Field, Associate Director National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Vascular Surgery in Thames Valley Dr Will Orr Clinical Lead CVD Thames Valley NHS England 1.
HRGs, PBR and Tariffs for IR Dr Erika Denton Working in partnership with.
National Cancer Peer Review Programme NUSG Meeting 6 December 2012.
A ssociation of Public Health Observatories Hospital Activity data Roy Maxwell SWPHO & Bristol University Dr Richard Wilson Sandwell PCT.
A clinically led programme: 5 hospitals 5 Clinical Commissioning Groups 2 PCT Clusters Aim: Improve health services and ensure they have a long term future.
Regenerative Therapies KTN Meeting, Sheffield, April 2013 Paul Trueman, Smith & Nephew Securing Market Access for Regenerative Therapies.
Basics of Clinical Coding and HRGs
Basics of Clinical Coding and HRGs
How will the NHS Long Term Plan work in our community?
Presentation transcript:

Casemix in 2012/13 and beyond Paula Monteith, the Casemix Service, NHS IC

Overview Deliverables in 2012 –Payment March 2012: Local Payment 2012/13 Summer 2012: SenseCheck 2013/14 Autumn 2012: RoadTest 2013/14 –Costing March 2012: Reference Costs 2011/12 Deliverables in 2013 –Payment March 2013: Local Payment 2013/14 Summer 2013: SenseCheck 2014/15 Autumn 2013: RoadTest 2014/15 –Costing March 2013: Reference Costs 2012/13 And Beyond… –Patient Pathway Groups (PPGs)

Local Payment 2012/13: HRG4 BaseReference Costs 2009/10 (but see LP 11/12 “out of synch” changes) Number1,527 HRGs (increase from 1,504 in LP 11/12) OPCS ICD-10 OPCS 4.6 (TOCE back to OPCS-4.5 RC 2009/10 design structure) ICD-10 4 th Edition (TOCE back to ICD-10 RC 2009/10 design structure) Key Design Changes Cross-chapter - enhanced length of stay logic for minor procedure HRGs to derive HRG from primary diagnosis if length of stay is longer than pre-set minimum (2 days*) Cancer Treatment Services (SB, SC) - Same Day admissions HRGs introduced for Chemotherapy / Radiotherapy to capture core HRG where only treatment is unbundled Dental Services (CZ) – 26 discrete HRGs for treatment of teeth Cardiac Procedures (EA) – redesign to accommodate cardiac devices and procedures Digestive (FZ) – net increase of 16 HRGs to better accommodate age, surgical approach New endoscopy HRGs to differentiate scope type, diagnostic only, diagnostic with biopsy, therapeutic and combined upper and lower GI tract Maternity Services (NZ) – effective redesign of delivery HRGs to introduce planned, emergency and with complications splits in C-sections, remove age splits, reflect differential resource use of Epidural / Induction / Intervention Key Technical Changes Flag Outputs Separate columns for each flag type (SSC, BPT and Flag) Will output flags for Non-Admitted Care (OP CDS) Will contain a prefix to denote the flag type to differentiate the sets (e.g. SS23 or BP88)

Reference Costs 2011/12: HRG4 Number1,657 HRGs (increase from 1,559 in RC 10/11) OPCS ICD-10 OPCS 4.6 ICD-10 (Not ICD-10 4 th Edition) Key Design Changes Cross-chapter – coding enhancements for “principal extended categories” (supports adherence to coding standards and (hopefully) improved data quality Cardiac Procedures (EA) – expansion of design to reflect (more) devices – e.g. EA57Z Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Digestive (FZ) – increased granularity in HRGs for children (< 2 years, 2-18), improved recognition of High Cost Devices, separate identification of surgery for obesity – e.g. FZ85Z Restrictive Stomach Procedures for Obesity Hepatobiliary Surgery (GA) – clarification of HRG content by removal of “category” reference in labels Orthopaedic Surgery (HA / HB / HR) – introduction of site-specific “minimal” HRGs (more minor than “minor”) to narrow activity distribution of lower resource HRGs Breast Surgery (JA) – refinements to support BPT identification – Mastectomies split between “simple” and complex” reconstruction Urological Surgery plus (LB) – introduction of age splits, acknowledgement of highly specialised procedures – e.g. LB71Z Total Pelvic Exenteration Maternity Services (NZ) – effective redesign of non-delivery HRGs to support Maternity pathway aspirations (standard / specialised / complex) Diagnostic Imaging (RA) – age splits for specific HRGs (MRIs, CTs) to identify children’s activity, introduction of 3 new HRGs for Cardiac MRIs

HRG4 Recap ScopeUnderpinned by 4 national standard datasets for : Inpatient Care and Day Case Care (zero length of stay) Critical Care (Intensive Care for Adults, Children, Neonates) Outpatient Care (not admitted, hospital-based, includes interventions) Emergency Medicine (not admitted, hospital-based, investigations) ServicesIdentified by OPCS (intervention / procedure) and ICD-10 (diagnosis) for: All Surgical and Medical treatments, including Major Trauma Care Cancer Treatment Services Maternity Services Rehabilitation Services and Specialist Palliative Care MethodClinically owned (professional bodies), Policy Endorsed (Framework) Procedure-precedence in grouping, with discrete care events “unbundled” Recognition of additional resource use of: Patient Characteristics – e.g. age, complications, comorbidities Clinical Characteristics – e.g. multiple procedures BenefitsCosting, funding, benchmarking, service planning, performance measurement

The Catalyst for Change Change in Government (May 2010) has seen transformation of healthcare policy and national and local structures to commission / deliver it: Proposed Health and Social Care Bill 2011, will create new organisational landscape with: Clearer demarcation of specialist service provision (limited number of centres of excellence) and clearer responsibility for commissioning (regional / national levels) Increased need to identify “specialist” patient journeys at local / national levels Increasing number of groups responsible for commissioning of non- specialist NHS services Clinical Commissioning Groups (GPs plus) National organisations other than the Department of Heath taking responsibility for establishing the scope, structure, and levels of national tariff payment NHS Commissioning Board Monitor

HRG4+ (expected RC 12/13) Numberc. 1,800+ groups (2012/13) ScopeGoverned by national standard datasets as per HRG4, (APC, OP, CCMDSs, EM) but extending to Community Care – see Community Information Data Set (April 2012) ServicesIdentified by OPCS (intervention / procedure) and ICD-10 (diagnosis) for: All hospital-based Surgical and Medical treatments – see previous, plus Community Care (including nursing services, health visiting, outreach) MethodClinically owned (professional bodies), Policy Endorsed* (Framework) Procedure-precedence in grouping, with discrete care events “unbundled”, but Improved recognition of diagnosis in APC, including recognising the multiply comorbid (often with increasingly multiple interventions); extending the use of proxies for severity of diagnosis (previously trialled), acknowledging the interactive nature of (some) CCs - extended acknowledgement of truly “specialised” services, especially for infants (New): Use of diagnosis in Outpatients, Emergency Medicine, Community Improved Quality Criteria – extended procedure hierarchies, re-instigation of within chapter HRG relationship (renumbering, re-chaptering), and more BenefitsCosting, funding, benchmarking, service redesign - especially for “specialist services”: a response to the changing provider landscape

And Beyond: PPGs Number24 groupings initially (a working concept – 2013/2014?) ScopeUses national standard datasets across care continuum from : EM or Outpatient Care, through Admitted Patient Care to Community Care Assumes diagnosis can be used as a “common language” across care settings to identify patients with similar expected resource needs ServicesIdentified by updated ICD-10 (diagnosis) (4 th Revision) for 4 key service areas: Stroke (8) Diabetes (5) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (8) End of Life Care (3) Grouping logic requires ‘event’ qualification following diagnostic entry to pathway MethodInitial premise: for a subset of patients, healthcare interventions during a standard “year of care” can be indicated by diagnosis Based on National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical standards for care pathways for specific long-term conditions Not a replacement for the HRG classification - uses HRGs to construct (therefore cost, and price) the care pathway to establish “expected” care, and begin to measure deviation from NICE “best practice” and / or the national norm, at a local level Aims to cover multi-provider, multi-setting care that continues beyond a single care event (e.g. disease management) Designed to respond to the changing commissioner landscape...

And Beyond: PPGs (ii) BenefitsFor NHS commissioners, possibilities include : Whether local healthcare delivery deviates from an approved clinical benchmark (NICE), and from national / regional norms, and to use this evidence to improve commissioning in future years; A reduced administrative burden by commissioning care pathways that reflect the needs of the local population without paying for individual events or paying for the same event twice Better visibility of the care provided across pathways and between settings, with standardised identification of patients on a pathway, and those that could or should be, but are not Improved understanding of the link between commissioning of care and clinical appropriateness and effectiveness at the patient level ValueNHS Costing (2009/10 approximations for admitted patient care medical admissions, excluding unbundled events) : Stroke £493m (≈1.3%) Diabetes £77m (≈0.2%) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) £232m (≈0.6%) End of Life Care £69m (≈0.2%)

Summary HRG4 for 2012/13 LP (1,527) has substantially changed from 2011/12 LP (1,504) –More age splits (infants) and length of stay splits as proxy for severity –Greater precedence of diagnosis where appropriate HRG4 for 2011/12 RC (1,657) has substantially changed from 2010/11 RC (1,559) –More CC splits and (infant) age splits –More multiple procedures where feasible (and codeable) –More HRGs to capture specific devices (nb – costs!) –Accommodation of funding policy requirements from 2012/13 LP Improved documentation is available:- service/reference/downloads service/reference/downloads But, improved specificity and sophistication requires better coding and better costing HRG4 for 2012/13 RC will be HRG4+ (payment use subject to policy decision)

The Casemix Vision To enrich the current HRG4 classification and respond to the changing needs of the healthcare infrastructure Especially for providers of increasingly specialist care To prove the concept that PPGs are capable of recognising appropriate and effective commissioning, in a standard and formalised manner For local and national health populations To continue to maintain yet develop a Casemix Product Suite that supports innovative clinical practice and policy development And enhances understanding of care at the patient level Mystified, aghast, intrigued?