Carol Franks, KDE Literacy Consultant

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The 21st Century Context for

Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness Podcast 4.

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 2.

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.

Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.

When Students Can’t Read…

1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.

On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.

Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.

Evaluating School Literacy Programs October 22, 2009 Presented by Pamela Wininger, Reading Consultant Carol Franks, Writing.

Student Growth Objective (SGO) Evaluating SGO Quality

School Writing Programs October 7, 2009 Presented by Carol Franks, Writing Consultant, KDE , ext

Office of Student and School Success “Ensure equality of outcome for Washington State’s 1.1 million students” Our Mission… Andrew E. Kelly Assistant Superintendent.

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August

Commit” ” to Program Reviews Rhonda Back Program Review Director Bath County Public Schools Kentucky Association of School Councils September 17, 2014.

Aligning Curriculum Standards, Instructional Practices and Assessment.

Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.

REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.

Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.

ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.

Iowa Core Leadership Webinar Series March Webinar Outcomes We will respond to YOUR questions regarding the Iowa Core. We will provide time.

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.

Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.

Writing Policy Review Process Rebecca Woosley Carol Franks Renee Boss KDE Literacy Consultants 1.

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.

Collaborative Assessment Tool.  Overview of the CAT ◦ History of CAT ◦ Purpose of CAT  Structure of the CAT ◦ Reflective Practice ◦ The Process ◦ Documentation.

Curriculum Mapping Overview Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D Compiled and Presented to IUP undergraduate students.

2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.

School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.

Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment.

FCRR Reports: Reviews of Pre-K Reading Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research February, 2005 Tampa, Florida.

Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”

T WO FOR O NE P ROGRAM R EVIEWS Beth Sumner Assistant Superintendent Trigg County Public Schools Kentucky Association of Assessment Coordinators October.

Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development

ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.

March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.

Evaluating Center Components

School Writing Programs Kentucky Department of Education October 2009.

After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.

WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.

CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.

Fall, 2011 Get ready, Get set………..It’s Here. PROGRAM REVIEW Wide Lens View Senate Bill 1-March 2009 Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living Career.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,

Outcomes… Providers will have a general and broad understanding of Alaska STEPP. Providers will identify areas that their individual work connects to.

SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.

Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

FCRR Reports: A Resource for Selecting Reading Programs

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11  What role will student feedback play in your district next year?

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

Achieving More with An Assessment Inventory Neil GuptaWorthington City Schools Cathy HeidelbergEducational Service Center of Central Ohio Devin AndersonBuckeye.

PURPOSES OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.

Verneice DanielsELA / Reading Kitari LewisMath Abraham RiserMath L. Washington – ThomasELA / Reading Jetta WilliamsSocial Studies.

Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.

Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.

Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.

District Literacy Program A Summary of the.  The Henderson County School District Literacy Program includes elements mandated in Senate Bill 1.  The.

Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,

Accreditation follow-up report

Presentation transcript:

Carol Franks, KDE Literacy Consultant

Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum, student work samples, formative and summative assessments, professional development and support services, and administrative supports and monitoring. KRS (1)(i) Senate Bill 1 (March 2009)

Program Reviews for 3 areas Arts & Humanities Writing Practical Living/Career Studies

Program Reviews... provide a tool for on-going discussion and reflection lead to on-going improvement in the program lead to student success in the program

Let’s glance through sample pages of the Writing Program Review early draft.

Standards Curriculum & Instruction Formative & Summative Assessments Professional Development & Support Services Administrative/Leadership Support & Monitoring

Arrangement Standards – 4 as defined by Senate Bill 1 Demonstrators – statements that describe what is happening in a school considered to be fully functioning Fully Functioning Characteristics – for a demonstrator, specific occurrences in a school considered to be performing at high levels Examples of Evidence – schools may use to support decisions

ActionTimeline Pilot Program Reviews in a small number of districts to gather evidence and further inform the design Spring 2010 All schools have access to Program Reviews in draft form Spring 2010 Revise Program Reviews based on pilot resultsSpring 2010 Program reviews finalized; Professional Development provided to schools and districts Spring/Summer 2010 All schools/districts implement Program Reviews for new state assessment system School Year

Sample Questions for Pilot Schools Is this doable? Do PR allow for diversity between schools? Do PR encourage innovation? Are the characteristics measureable?

Revisions after the Pilot Process Decreased size Less repetition, redundancy Clearer characteristics More evidence listed

Program Review Process Compose team Using analytic method to determine Level of Implementation at the characteristic and demonstrator levels Identify evidence Determine Performance Rating at the standard and program levels

Program Review Process Teams use their professional judgment

Program Review Process Not ThisBut This

at CNA Program reviews Program: Writing Standard 1Standard 2Standard 3Standard 4 Demonstrator 1 Demonstrator 2 Demonstrator 3 Demonstrator 4 Demonstrator 5 Demonstrator 6

Purpose of the Program Review But This To inform the school’s program in order to develop a process of on-going improvement and growth Schools develop a plan for improvement and may include in School’s Comprehensive Improvement Plan

We asked pilot schools... Does the program review process provide valuable information about a school’s program? (needs/successes)

Where to Learn More Go to KDE’s website Select Instructional Resources Select Program Reviews

What can you do now to prepare your schools for program reviews?

Questions?

Contact Information Arts & Humanities Program Review Robert Duncan at Practical Living/Career Studies Program Review Nancy Graham at Writing Program Review Carol Franks at Program Reviews Rae McEntyre at