Accountability in Colorado Accountability Advisory Committees September 21, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
World’s Best Workforce  Board Level Curriculum and Instruction  December 18, 2013.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education.
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
Presentation to DLT Copper Stoll Sept 16, Data Walls  Assessment is the first step in an effective teaching-learning cycle:  Assessment is the.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
To provide new information for anyone who is familiar with the former School Improvement process To discuss the information that has been added to,
District Planning in ePlan July Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Renee Palakovic Director of Planning
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Unified Improvement Planning Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Version 1.4 Summer 2010.
School Improvement Planning Thompson School District Summer 2010 The horizon leans forward, offering you space to place new steps of change. -- Maya Angelou.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Accountability 2.0 Overview Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.4.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
What is Expected in Updating Your SIP? Metro-Nashville Public School System School Improvement Plan Process September 2008.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Strategic Planning The Big Picture Region 3 ESA September 30, 2004.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
1 Educational Accountability Act of 2009 (SB09-163) Colorado Department of Education February 6, 2012.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
GCEL Conference February 2016
Unified Improvement Planning 101
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Unified Improvement Planning Basics II: Action Planning
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
State Accountability Updates & HB Rulemaking
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
Using Local Flexibility in School Accreditation and SB-163 Updates
Briefing on Development of Performance Frameworks
Accountability Updates
Understanding Your School and District Performance Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Accountability in Colorado Accountability Advisory Committees September 21, 2010

What is Accountability? Holding ourselves (students, parents, educators, and community members) responsible for meeting identified student achievement goals and targets through a continuous cycle of planning, evaluation, and reporting.

Roles & Responsibilities Available on our District website on the left sidebar called “ Accountability Advisory Committee”

Legal Context for Accountability Federal Level – NCLB (AYP and School Improvement) State Level – Education Accountability Act (SB )

The Act Builds Upon... HB , establishing student academic growth as the cornerstone of Colorado’s accountability system SB , establishing readiness for Postsecondary and Workforce success as Colorado’s overarching goal for all students SB , updating its core concepts in recognition of lessons learned and new technology, while retaining its high expectations and accountability for student results Revised district accreditation process established by CDE in 2008 in cooperation with school districts throughout the state

Major Purposes of the Act Aligning conflicting accountability systems into a single system that passes federal muster Modernizing and aligning reporting of state, district and school performance information Holds the state, districts, and schools accountable for performance on the same set of indicators Enhancing state, district and school oversight of improvement efforts Creating a fairer, clearer and more effective cycle of support and intervention

Major Components 1.District and School Performance Framework Reports 2.District and School Improvement Plans Performance Plan Improvement Plan Priority Improvement Plan Turnaround Plan 3.Reporting Electronically (SchoolView) 4.State Support and Technical Assistance

1. Performance Frameworks Purpose – Establish a common framework for holding districts and schools accountable for academic performance – Provide a body of evidence related to state- identified performance indicators to support district and school performance management

1. Performance Frameworks (Cont’d) Four Key Performance Indicators – Academic Achievement on CSAP – Academic Growth on CSAP – Academic Growth Gaps on CSAP – Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness (ACT, Graduation & Drop Out Rate)

Key Performance Indicators are Weighted (Cont’d) Performance Indicators Total AchievementGrowthGrowth GapsPWR Districts and High Schools 15 Points35 Points15 Points35 Points100 Points Middle and Elementary Schools 25 Points50 Points25 Points0 Points100 Points

District Performance Framework, Page 1 Five possible Accreditation Categories Plan Type Assignment & Accreditation Category Indicator Ratings No Points for Finance & Safety

Performance Indicator Summary, Page 1

2. Colorado Unified School Improvement Plan One Plan, Many Purposes Formal Template Prescriptive Public Document Action Planning (Goals and Actions)

2. Colorado Unified School Improvement Plan Template Section I: Summary Information about the School – Student Performance Measures for State and ESEA Accountability (Status, Growth, Gaps, PWR) – Accountability Status and Requirements for Improvement Plan (CDE Plan Designation) – ESEA Accountability (Title I) Section II: Improvement Plan Information – Comprehensive Review and Selected Grant History – School Contact Information Section III: Narrative on Data Analysis & Root Cause Identification – Gather and Organize Relevant Data – Analyze Trends in the Data and Identify Priority Needs – Root Cause Analysis – Create the Data Narrative

Colorado Unified School Improvement Plan Template Section IV: Action Plan(s) – School Goals Worksheet AYP, Status, Growth, Gaps, PWR CELA, Scantron, DIBELS, other – Action Planning Worksheet (Major Improvement Strategies) – School-based planning and monitoring tools Formal Process Three Week Data Cycle Flexible Formative Description of Action Steps to Implement the Major Improvement Strategy Timeline Key Personnel* Resources (Amount and Source: federal, state, and/or local) Implementation Benchmarks

Improvement Plans There are four plan types that use the same template Performance Plan Improvement Plan Priority Improvement Plan Turnaround Plan

Location Accreditation Plan Designation (Official CDE Outcome) District: DistrictTurnaround High Schools: Hidden Lake HSTurnaround Westminster HSPriority Improvement Middle Schools: Crown PointePerformance Clear Lake MSPriority Improvement Scott Carpenter MSTurnaround Shaw Heights MSPriority Improvement Elementary Schools: Crown Point ESPerformance Fairview ESTurnaround FM Day ESTurnaround Flynn ESImprovement Harris Park ESPriority Improvement Hodgkins ESTurnaround Mesa ESTurnaround Metz ESImprovement Sherrelwood ESTurnaround Skyline Vista ESPriority Improvement Sunset Ridge ESPerformance Tennyson Knolls ESImprovement Westminster ESPriority Improvement

Accreditation Improvement Plan TypesAccreditation Categories Performance Plan Accreditated with Distinction Accredited Improvement PlanAccreditated with Improvement Priority Improvement Plan Accredited with Priority Improvement Plan Turnaround PlanAccredited with Turnaround Plan

Colorado Unified School Improvement Plan Timeline Aug. 15, Performance Frameworks received from CDE Oct. 15, Districts submit school accreditation categories to CDE Nov. 15, CDE confirms final recommendation for school improvement plan designation and accreditation category which will be will be published on SchoolView Jan. 15, Priority Improvement & Turnaround Plans are submitted to CDE Apr. 15, All “other” plans are submitted to CDE for publication on SchoolView NOTE: Our deadline for submitting Improvement Plan’s is October 19 th

October 19 th Presentation to BOE & DAAC Where: Westminster HS (Cafeteria) Who: Principal, lead teachers, BAAC members What: Achievement Results (CSAP, CELA, Scantron PS, PWR, Levels Movement) School Improvement Plan How: Format: “Science Fair” Data Walls (Problem, Intervention, Effect, Conclusion) School Improvement Plan and Process

Next Steps… Quality Criteria for Reviewing Plans – Become familiar with review tool Sample Unified School Improvement Plan – As a school team read and discuss – Review while using the Quality Criteria – Index Cards