ACADEMIC RENEWAL (QEPAR) 2006-2008: A CONTINUUM RESTRUCTURING PLAN March 17, 2006 GREGORY S. CHAN, Ed.D. Provost of the University & Chief Academic Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Catherine Andersen Advisor/Institute Fellow JNGI Associate Provost and Chief Enrollment and Marketing Office Gallaudet University, Washington,
Advertisements

Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
The Blinn Transfer Enrollment to A&M (TEAM) Program Kriss H. Boyd, Ph.D. Executive Director General Academic Programs Texas A&M University Michael J. Yeater,
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Overall the recurring budget increase is $9.8 million. In addition, the budget has $9.5 million of carry forward funds. This budget reflects no tuition.
Enrollment Management Overview Faculty Senate Fall 2009.
First in 2009 Advancing the Vision April 19, 2002 Report of the First in 2009 Coordinating Council.
Just Think State of the University Address Presented by Chancellor Thomas F. George September 17, 2003.
BREAK. DISCUSSION: In what ways can life-space and academic planning support community life at UC?
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
Kent State University Internal Strategy Forum Kent State University Internal Strategy Forum April 5, 2002 Action Projects Opportunities.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
Background on Nonprofit Boards A Primer. Nonprofit Organizations Revenue generated by a nonprofit organization (through donations, grants or corporate.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Portland State University Report to the Oregon State Board of Higher Education.
Johnson & Wales University’s Strategic Plan Denver Campus Presentation.
The University Infrastructure and the Graduate Dean
Maria Thompson Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs Academic Affairs Restructuring Proposal 23 April 2012.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
TOP 25 A summary of the plan. An update on the progress that’s been made. A challenge for faculty. FEBRUARY 2011.
Academic Budget Presentation March 4, FY05 University Budget Unit Description NonExempt BudgetExempt Budget Total Budget President's Units 2,121,8942%
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
INTO Oregon State University Update. OSU Provost & Executive Vice President INTO OSU Center Director INTO OSU Board of Advisors INTO Managing Director,
BUILDING THE VISION Gregory G. Dell’Omo FACULTY CONVOCATION August 26, 2005.
Ron Strauss Lynn Williford Jim Dean Office of the Provost.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Enrollment Management Institute Peralta Community Colleges Goals, Objectives and Expected Outcomes.
STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY An Overview by: Dara Meyers Georgia Southern University.
Right-Sizing Academic Affairs The New Normal at Appalachian State University Board of Trustees Retreat March 22, 2012.
Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Academic Affairs Current Status and Goals for.
December 2010 Board of Trustees Overview of the New Accreditation, Accountability, and Assessment Committee Structure.
INTEGRATED STEM INITIATIVE ON THE SOUTH PLAINS NSF INNOVATION THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
Libraries NI Irene Knox Chief Executive. Delivering Tomorrow’s Libraries Lifelong learning, formal and informal Access to digital skills and services.
Image & Advancement 2nd Annual Progress Report. Image Enhancement 1. Prepare a long-range marketing plan 2. Communicate the Western Advantage to existing.
Timeline of Events BudgetBudget Cuts (July 2000) –Five Years in a Row beginning FY01 FacultyFaculty Assembly Disbands (Spring 2002) Ad-HocAd-Hoc Committee.
Overview of the Self Study Presented to NAQAAE Review Team November 7 th, 2010 November 7 th, 2010.
The Strategic Plan for 2015 – 2020 Growing Alabama’s International University Approved by the Board of Trustees of Troy University July 11, 2015.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Introduction to the UND’s New Budget Model. Existing Budget Model? UND’s budget approach has been historical and incremental Meaning: The next year’s.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
Sop Board of Governors Retreat President’s Report.
Sam Afrane Provost College of Arts and Social Sciences (CASS)
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
2012 Conference Building a Secure World Through International Education Aligning the Campus with the Internationalization Goals of the University: University.
2011 Strategic Planning Values Excellence Access Achievement Stewardship Respect.
TCF Volunteers Conference BG Sam Hines, Ph.D. Provost & Dean of the College 25 February
SDSU 101. SAN DIEGO STATE AND THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM HISTORY, FACTS, AND ORGANIZATION.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost
April Chancellor’s Forum
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Enhancing Academic partnerships DSA Faculty Fellows
FGCU GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
Diversity & Inclusion at UCONN
Presentation transcript:

ACADEMIC RENEWAL (QEPAR) : A CONTINUUM RESTRUCTURING PLAN March 17, 2006 GREGORY S. CHAN, Ed.D. Provost of the University & Chief Academic Officer

WHY NOW? President’s Focus Goals Increase enrollment through retention and marketing effectiveness. 5.5Improve fiscal, physical, and personnel resource reallocation for efficiency, equity and excellence. “ With the passing of time, after listening to the concerns of the president, trustees, senior staff, and most importantly, the faculty, I became fully aware of the immediate need for “academic renewal.” An academic renewal will take the University and our academic programs to a higher level of excellence, allowing us to gain national recognition and financial independence from a solely tuition- driven base.” Gregory Chan

PROVOST’S FOCUSED AREAS OF LEADERSHIP ( )  New Academic Structure  New Academic Initiatives  Financial Sustainability and Stability  Student Recruitment, Retention, Graduation

PROVOST’S WORKING GOALS ( )  Actualize President’s Plus 25% Plan & Strategic Goals  Commit to Shared-governance  Implement the Restructuring Plan  Use Program Reviews to Improve Program Quality  Enhance Faculty and Staff Development  Strengthen Financial Vitality  Improve Academic Services

RESEARCH SCHOOLSCOLLEGES INSTITUTES De Paul University, Il5310 Canisius College, NY212 Catholic University of America, DC1122 Seattle University, WA356 Fordham University, NY655 St. Vincent College, NY400 Gonzaga University, WA514 Niagara University, NY041 St. Ambrose University, IA041

CONSULTATION PROCESS Initiation of restructuring by Fr. McCloskey 2000Submission of Restructuring Summary by Dr. Robinson Chair, Ad Hoc Taskforce Aug. 2001Appointment of Dr. Gregory Chan Jan. 2003Phase One of Quality Enhancement Planning for Academic Renewal (QEPAR) Feb. 2003Report from Org. Structure & Leadership by Dr. Robinson and Dr. Weinberg, Co-chairs of QEPAR Ad Hoc Taskforce Feb. 2003Endorsement of QEPAR by the Board of TrusteesAcademic Affairs Committee. July 2005Vice President for Academic Affairs appointed Provost

Sept. 2005Presidential directive for a new structure as a step towards a higher level of excellence Jan. 2006Msgr. Casale announced in a Faculty Forum meeting that Provost will present the new academic structure in March, 2006 Jan. 2006Distribution of “Institutional Foundations of Academic Restructuring” to STU Community Jan-March, 2006Input and consultation with faculty and staff March 9, 2006Senior Staff endorsed Restructuring Plan March 17, 2006Announcement of Restructuring Plan to the STU Community

“ An educational institution within a university for the purposes of organizing its own affairs.” COLLEGE College is defined as an institution of higher learning that grants the undergraduate & graduate degrees in liberal arts or science or both.

“ A teaching community devoted to particular studies, often part of a university.” SCHOOL The key characteristic for the designation of "school" is based on its specialized degree offerings.

“An institution for learning and research, and may offer social and educational activities.” INSTITUTE An institution or society established within St. Thomas University for the promotion of learning, and other Activities that promote the arts, sciences and culture.

BENEFITS OF A NEW ACADEMIC STRUCTURE  WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF ESTABLISHING ACADEMIC COLLEGES, SCHOOLS AND INSTITUTES?  Improve quality of programs and add new programs  Reposition the institution  Intensify partnerships with Student Services and Admissions  Academic Affairs will now also be responsible for recruiting and retaining students.

 … BENEFITS OF ESTABLISHING ACADEMIC COLLEGES, SCHOOLS AND INSTITUTES?  College, Schools, and Institutes establish unit goals and benchmarks:  Level of performance  Accountability  Growth plan  College, Schools, and Institutes define autonomy and reward system, based on University mission and Presidential priorities:  Local budget control  Revenues & Expenditures

 WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS AND PROGRAM COORDINATORS?  Academic programs will be headed by a coordinator reporting to the chair.  Each department will be headed by a chair reporting to an academic dean.  All current program coordinators and department chairs will continue their leadership roles throughout the academic year, and most likely throughout the transitional academic year.

 WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS?  A clearer chain of command and greater accountability.  More administrative support to increase enrollment, develop evening, weekend offering.  Create new learning options for students through partnerships, such as 2+2 programs.  A certain percentage of the additional income, resulting from performance output that exceeds the base outcomes, will be reallocated to the unit as in-house discretionary funds to be used for:  Faculty development  New program development  Unit improvements

 WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE FACULTY?  Increase program quality and accountability  Unit-based budget participation and control  Funding for faculty development  Reward for excellence  WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE STAFF?  Renewed spirit  Restored sense of belonging  Heightened sense of job security  Sense of personal accomplishment and pride  More advancement opportunities

 WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE STUDENTS?  Funding will be available for academic services, i.e. writing center, advising center, etc., which will improve student retention. New facilities for learning and living will also improve student satisfaction. The new structure will provide:  Discipline focused dean to support the student’s major  Retention of quality students,  Healthy competition among college and schools to retain students  Focused faculty involvement in student recruitment, orientation, instruction, and advising  More student engagement  School-based scholarship and award opportunities

 WHAT ARE THE FINANCIAL BENEFITS?  Having this structure will afford the University greater “financial stability” thereby addressing one of the most imperative components of a stable institution. Fund-raising opportunities include:  Colleges, schools and Institutes can be named after corporations and/or individuals.  Each college, schools and institutes can endow chairs, have targeted fund-raising activities, and collaborate effectively with admissions in enrollment campaigns.  The new structure will help attract more endowment for scholarship programs.  Colleges, schools and institutes can raise endowment dollars.

During the transitional period, the Provost and transitional team facilitators will work with other divisions, such as the Office of University Advancement, to raise funds for the new academic structure. $75,000 Seed money for transitional period FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS?

In Conclusion :  WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF A NEW ACADEMIC STRUCTURE?  More autonomy and reward to academic units that enhance:  Student Success  Faculty Teaching  Research and Service  Resource Management  Program Growth  Entrepreneurship

THE NEW ACADEMIC STRUCTURE OFFICE OF THE PROVOST PROVOST OF THE UNIVERSITY & CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICER ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR ACADEMIC SUPPORT SERVICES ASSISTANT PROVOST FOR RECORDS & ACADEMIC COMPUTING DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE PROVOST

DEAN, BISCAYNE COLLEGE  ALL ACADEMIC FOUNDATIONS  DEPT. OF ENGLISH & HUMANITIES  DEPT. OF HISTORY, PHILOSOPHY & GLOBAL STUDIES  DEPT. OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & COUNSELING

DEAN, SCHOOL OF PASTORAL MINISTRIES & RELIGIOUS STUDIES  DEPT. OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES  INSTITUTE FOR PASTORAL MINISTRIES

DEAN, SCHOOL OF BUSINESS  DEPT. OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION  DEPT. OF MANAGEMENT  DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES (Pending)  DEPT. OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTANCY (Proposed)  INSTITUTE OF GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP (Proposed)

DEAN, SCHOOL OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT  DEPT. OF NATURAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICS & COMPUTER SCIENCE  CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY BUILDING

DEAN, SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP STUDIES  DEPT. OF EDUCATION  INSTITUTE OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT (Executive Director)  INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION & MEDIA (Executive Director)

TIMELINE FOR RESTRUCTURING

“We are standing at the threshold of excellence. Let’s move forward! ACADEMIC RENEWAL (QEPAR) : A CONTINUUM Now, it’s up to us… the administration, faculty and staff to accept the challenge by embracing change and not fearing it!