Sharing e-learning resources: collecting, describing and re-purposing other peoples’ resources Alison Dickens and Kate Dickens Subject Centre for Languages,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Centre for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching Supporting & Enhancing Online Teaching & Learning by Catherine Ogilvie Centre for the Enhancement of.
Advertisements

28 March 2003e-MapScholar: content management system The e-MapScholar Content Management System (CMS) David Medyckyj-Scott Project Director.
London Metropolitan University Learning Technology Research Institute Multimedia eLearning: achievements and challenges Tom Boyle London Metropolitan University.
Designing Learning Programs. Ambition in Action Topics /Definition /Components of a learning program /Defining the purpose and focus.
Information Professionals and Learning Object Repositories … more than just metadata quality … Sarah Currier Stòr Cùram Project Librarian JISC X4L Repository.
Designing Open Educational Resources for Re-Use Beverly Leeds University of Central Lancashire.
5 th June London L 2 O – Sharing Language Learning Objects Kate Dickens, University of Southampton
The virtual past for future archaeologists Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles University of Manchester.
The GESCI Content Evaluation Tool Presented by Esther Mwiyeria Country Programme Facilitator Kenya/Tanzania GESCI.
Seven Steps in Designing the eWriting Learning Objects (LOs) eWriting: ESL Writing Success September 2002 – August 2005 ESL/Foreign Languages Department.
Overview of Digital Content Evaluation. Domains of Content Evaluation Quality and comprehensiveness of content Ease of use, functionality, navigation.
Instructional Plan and Presentation Bernard Q Mallada CUR/516 Dr
Some Definitions and Models relating to Learning Objects.
1 Sharing Learning Objects in Health Care - 24 th March 2009www.jorum.ac.uk Repositories and communities: how Jorum can enhance sharing Nicola Siminson.
Introduction and Hands-On Session June 2007 David Millard, Yvonne Howard Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton Kate Dickens, Ann Jeffery, Julie.
Cherchez the ‘Learning Object’ Workshop November 2007 David Millard, Gary Wills, (Yvonne Howard) Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton Julie.
Of LALOs & RUMLOs … and things that go … together in.
Learning Objects WebCT Tea Designer Group Meeting October 19, 2004 Presented by: Jennifer Brown Janey Oliphint.
India-UK Conference on Information & Technology (ICT) in Education & Training Kate Dickens “Reusable Learning Objects (RLOs): English for Academic Purposes”
Re-usable online learning materials: pipe- dream or reality? Julie Watson and Vicky Wright
E-Learning Workshop May Learning Objectives By the end of this workshop you will be know how to: plan and structure an e-learning resource use Articulate.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 POWER PRACTICE Chapter 5 Administrative Software START This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
ICALT 2007 Niigata Japan Su White July Finding the Right Tool for the Community: Bringing a Wiki-Type Editor.
Three-way blending with learning objects: A versatile approach to supporting international and British students using reusable learning objects Julie Watson.
Using and re-using learning objects Julie Watson Academic Co-ordinator, eLanguages
1 everything about. 2 “A FREE online service for UK HE and FE institutions to share, reuse and repurpose electronic learning and teaching resources”.
M1G Introduction to Programming 2 1. Designing a program.
The Learning Design Revolution: Implementing the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) Professor James Dalziel Director, Macquarie University E-learning.
Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.
Dr David Massart, EUN AgLRs – Budapest, Hungary Nov. 2, 2009 Reusable Learning Content Discovery and Exchange.
On the edge: designing online modules in EAP George Blue Julie Watson Vicky Wright
Good practice in Research Data Management Module 6: Tools, training and support.
Arrive UK Julie Watson University of Southampton
VSS supports knowledge management Knowledge based organizations and improving the absorption capacity.
Introduction to Digital Repositories Opening Pandora’s Box?
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
MERLOT’s Peer Review Report Composed from reports by at least two Peer Reviewers. Description Section Provides the pedagogical context (i.e. learning goals,
Extending the Scope of Learning Objects with XML Bill Tait COLMSCT Associate Teaching Fellow The Open University ALT-C Conference Sep 2007.
Sharing Design Knowledge through the IMS Learning Design Specification Dawn Howard-Rose Kevin Harrigan David Bean University of Waterloo McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Origins of IMS Learning Design & its conceptual framework, Oleg Liber, CETIS May 2008.
Using technology for sharing resources Kate Borthwick Subject Centre LLAS.
Open Content Literacy: developing a framework to support newbie content makers and sharers Lindsey Martin and Alison Mackenzie Edge Hill University, UK.
HEFCE/Higher Education Academy/JISC cc-by-sa (uk2.5) Image source – flickr (cc-by) OER and the Open Agenda Malcolm Read, Executive Secretary, JISC.
January 2005MERLOT Reusable Learning Design Guidelines OVERVIEW FOR MERLOT Copyright 2005 Reusable Learning This work is licensed under a Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial.
To create an Interactive Learning Template To create new learning content for new courses to be hosted on the Virtual Learning Environment (vle) Learning.
MURLLO – Management, Use and Re-purposing of Language Learning Objects Kate Dickens, eLanguages, Modern Languages, University of Southampton Dr Hugh Davis,
Re-using online learning materials: application and process Julie Watson and Vicky Wright
Introducing Learning Object Creator: supporting a pedagogic approach to creating your own e-learning materials Kate Borthwick Subject Centre LLAS.
Developing and evaluating web- based multimedia learning objects: a case study Peter Chalk LTRI & CCTM Learning Technology Exhibition 22/3/05 London Metropolitan.
Making educational practices more open with OER Professor Andy Lane, Senior Fellow, Support Centre for Open Resources in Education.
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
Is there a role for online repositories in e-Learning? Sarah Hayes Andrew Rothery University of Worcester.
OER in the Social Sciences: Tacit models of resource creation Anna Gruszczynska, C-SAP (Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Sociology, Anthropology.
Resources in Moodle Dubravka Crnić. Moodle supports a range of resource types which teachers can add to their courses. In edit mode, a teacher can add.
An Experience Report from the Use of Digital Repositories in Building a New Module Simon McGinnes Trinity College Dublin.
OER Humanities: The HumBox Project Alison Dickens (Project Director) Subject Centre LLAS.
About the NDLR What is the NDLR? The NDLR is a HEA funded national service promoting and supporting the sharing and creation of digital learning.
‘X is for Languages:’ the XML project Creating Xerte learning materials for Modern Languages Kate Borthwick Senior Academic Coordinator, Centre for Languages,
Using, developing and sharing your teaching resources Kate Borthwick Subject Centre LLAS, University of Southampton.
MOTIVATING ESP STUDENTS IN A SELF-ACCESS CENTRE – A CASE STUDY Perdiki Fotini, Malivitsi Zoe.
Learning Management System. Introduction Software application or Web-based technology used to plan, implement, and assess a specific learning process.
About the NDLR What is the NDLR? The NDLR is a HEA funded national service promoting and supporting the sharing and creation of digital learning.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
MA English Language Teaching: Online
RLOs: Tailored technology to support objective learning
Using GOLD to Tracking L2 Development
Development Officer Jorum (Communications).
Gail E. Tompkins California State University, Fresno
Presentation transcript:

Sharing e-learning resources: collecting, describing and re-purposing other peoples’ resources Alison Dickens and Kate Dickens Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics & Area Studies 8 th March 2006 – HE Academy Subject Centre Annual Conference

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Overview Introduction –Collecting: what are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey –Describing: general and pedagogic metadata –Repurposing: reuse and learning objects Sharing of experiences Repurposing checklist Concluding comments/discussion

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –Do you produce materials that could be shared electronically? The majority do produce materials (82%) with only 18% not producing any materials. Office style documents (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) and other web resources, (11%) produce on-line quizzes or crosswords). Targeted to particular hardware e.g. mobile materials for PDA’s and mobile phones or for particular subject areas, French, medicine or business for example. Eight (12%) produce multi-media materials (video, audio or conferencing.) Six (9%) produce materials through Hot Potatoes.

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –Do you use other people’s e-teaching materials? Most useful – images, explanations, case studies, articles, research projects, role-plays, diagnostic tests Moderately useful – exercises/quizzes, corpora, question banks Least useful – courses, simulations, problems

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –What factors make sharing materials easy? Compatible formats, platforms and technology. Interoperability Accessibility e.g. eliminating the need to enter passwords Copyright-free or cleared/IPR resolved Potential for customising (with the proviso that some teachers may not like to have their materials altered). Technological simplicity (teachers and learners may not be as technically competent as they need to be thus materials must be easy to navigate and access).

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –What factors make sharing materials difficult? Issues of copyright, IPR and ownership (when added to repositories and materials banks) Loss of control over material (who is using, altering, selling?) Scope for modification (repurposing) and reuse Technology and format (inc. technological skills) Pedagogic approaches – different teaching and learning styles Restrictions on access Cost Materials too specific to one course/context Lack of will to share

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –What qualities of a resource are most important for sharing? High priority – duration (length), interactivity, adaptability, format, learning activities, can be built upon, retrievability, self- contained, feedback, clear descriptions Medium priority – size, explicit learning outcomes, includes references Medium to low – assessment, independent

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? LLAS e-learning survey results: –What support would be most useful in developing shareable e-learning resources? Highly useful – funding, copyright advice, collaborating with others, research data, training Highly to moderately useful – designated design, repository, prescribed structure, learning technologist, more commitment from senior managers

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? Examples from LLAS Materials Bank: –Phonetics Book (.pdf)Phonetics Book –Arabic for beginners (in-house 'Interactive Language Learning Authorware‘ – output in.html)Arabic for beginners –Linguistic quizzes (Hot Potatoes output in.html)Linguistic quizzes –Spanish Grammar Question Bank (QM Perception)Spanish Grammar Question Bank –Linguistics item bank (in-house MCQ program downloaded free from Materials Bank)Linguistics item bank –The Book in Middle French (For use on mobile phones and with PDAs in.html format)The Book in Middle French

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Collecting resources: What are the issues? Issues arising from LLAS Materials Bank: –Incompatible formats –Cannot be altered –Downloading (in zipped files) –Changes in software (QMP) –Broken links (where resources are hosted away from LLAS) –Password protection (where access is restricted to UK HE) –Not technically professional –Design

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Issues surrounding e-learning resource description – Why? What? Who? WHY describe an e-learning resource? –Resource discovery –Fitness for purpose –Content v context WHAT part of an e-learning resource do you describe? –Learning design – content sequencing –Learning object –Asset - disaggregation WHO describes an e-learning resource? –Cataloguer –Teacher –Student

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Issues surrounding e-learning resource description – How? When? Which? HOW can an e-learning resource be described? –‘General’ metadata - RLLOMAP –‘Contextual’ metadata –Cataloguing interface WHEN to describe an e-learning resource? –Adding to repository –Revision/re-versioning of content –Additional context of use WHICH repository are e-learning resources stored in? –JORUM – ‘open’ system –SC CMS/website/materials bank – ‘open’ system –Intralibrary, bespoke repository eg CLARe – ‘closed’ systems

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Describing: Contextual (Pedagogic) Metadata Key questions –Who is it for (learner or teacher or both)? –What level is included – national frameworks for the subject, university level, general (e.g. beginners, intermediate, advanced)? –How much description is needed? (e.g. suggestions for teaching/learning activities) –What are the differences between a learning object and learning resource (pedagogical asset) –Controlled vocabularies (e.g. LTSN pedagogic vocabulary)

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference What is re-purposing? Re-purposing is taking an existing resource and re- presenting it in a mode which facilitates re-use ‘Holy Grail’ of re-purposing is to create resources which will continue to be easily re-used to support teaching and learning in a range of contexts How can ‘learning objects’ facilitate this? What are the copyright implications? How will resources be stored/delivered?

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference LO design features Designing for online delivery and re-usability –make learning activity-led –scaffold learning (provide sufficient feedback and help) –create clear and prominent task instructions –ensure consistency of style and granularity* –create context-independent LOs* –use single template and development tool* –recreate tasks using bank of interactive task templates* –connect and maintain weblinks easily* –develop LOs as single packages, interoperable - for use in different VLEs*

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference What do YOU think are the critical success factors that make resources ‘attractive’ for re-use? What has your Subject Centre /constituency done in this area? Have you taken existing materials and re-purposed them? –Were there any barriers? –What was easy? –What was difficult?

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Some of our critical success factors for re- use Availability – open/closed repository; SC website /materials bank Description (appropriate metadata) = Relevant (resource discovery) Disaggregation prior to reconstruction as learning objects (asset stripping??) Easy to edit – simple customisation (feeling of ownership) Some materials are simply just not appropriate for re- use …

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Repurposing Checklist Intended as a formative support tool for teacher- learning object developers 3 sections: content, pedagogy and technology –Content: format of content (text, video, audio, image), size/length, potential for customisation… –Pedagogy: learning activities, learning outcomes, role of learner/teacher, feedback, assessment –Technology: file type, availability of software (to access resource), copyright… Checklist Questions Presented as a learning object with feedback (in preparation)

8 th March 2006Subject Centre Annual Conference Some examples from the web The virtual linguistics campus Is business entrepreneurship for me? E-languages RLO CETL CETL Merlot repository repository Wisc-online repository repository LLAS Materials Bank Materials Bank