History  Three-Mile Island, 1979 -Slow, nonconsistent decision- making -Uncoordinated Public Information -Loss of credibility with Government and the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Advertisements

Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
Hospital Emergency Management
Emergency response organization (ERO)
TERMINATION AND RECOVERY. Termination of the Emergency Considerations for event termination If the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) has not been activated,
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT IN AN ICS STRUCTURE. EU Mission Statement The Environmental Unit is established to provide technical and scientific expertise and capabilities.
Missouri’s Response Radiation Emergency Callaway/Cooper Nuclear Plants Keith Henke Radiological Response Coordinator Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology.
Ground monitoring and field sampling of soil, vegetation, milk, fish Day 0Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 7Day 14… Plume Sampling Plume Release Evacuation Release terminates.
Albert Coons April 21, 2009 Emergency Preparedness and New Reactor Licensing Process: An Update on Where We Are Now Federal Emergency Management Agency.
A Partnership Dedicated to Radiation Protection Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD) The structure, working groups, and activities.
1 NRC Regulatory Initiatives National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference 2009 April 21, 2009 Bill Dean Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Security.
Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Description Supporting Material Accident Analysis
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Page 1 DOE/NV/ Vision Service Partnership Lessons Learned from FRMAC Participation in Ingestion Pathway Exercises RaJah Mena Alexis Reed Presented.
1 State ESF 6 presentation Michael Whitehead State Mass Care Coordinator.
Erica Bornemann Planning Chief Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
1 Implementation of New Exercise Scenario and Demonstration Area Requirements April 21, 2009 Jacques Singleton Program Specialist, Emergence Management.
Roles and Responsibilities Local Agencies and Responders.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4c – Planning, Training, and Exercising.
What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
HAZWOPER Overview.
Emergency Response: Preparing for Disasters & Emergency Incidents June 2, 2015 Guest Secured Password: rangers!
Hazardous Waste and Emergency Response
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-011 Good Practices for PIOs.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Region I, Boston September 10, 2012.
Presented to: RETA National Conference – Atlanta November 5, 2014 If you’d like to reach SCS Engineers, Tracer Environmental Division please contact us.
The role of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in a nuclear emergency Per Olov Nützmann Administrative Director Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
1 Recent Accomplishments and Opportunities for 2007 ~WEROC~ Kelly Hubbard WEROC Emergency Manager Municipal Water District of Orange County WACO, January.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
Division of Emergency Management & Homeland Security Department of Emergency Services & Public Protection June 25, 2013 Connecticut All-Hazards Response.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) Emergency Planning Overview- Now and in the Future Vermont Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response to a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency Requirements for Infrastructure.
EPA's Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Program June 18, 2009 Presented by: Ronald Fraass, Lab Director National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Unit 4: Functional Areas and Positions
Brevard County Office of Emergency Management Brevard County Emergency Management Robert Lay, Director Charlie Roberts, Sr EM Coordinator Founded 1513.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
[Exercise Name] Full Scale Exercise Player Briefing [Location] [Date] [Logo Here]
Bernards Township Office of Emergency Management February 28, 2012.
New Madrid Earthquake Scenario Water Sector – Impacts & Federal Support CAPT David M. Apanian, P.E., MSCEE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
NRC Region I Lessons Learned Steve Barr Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Region I US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2010 NRC Region I Joint Exercise.
Telephone Survey: Public Tendencies in Emergency Response Regulatory Information Conference March 10, 2009 R. L. Sullivan, NSIR.
Maryland Activities 2009 Frederick Frey Maryland Emergency Management Agency.
© 1999 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation CA95 ROLE OF CSEPP ROLE OF CSEPP.
Unit 4: Operational Phases and Implementation. Unit 4 Objectives  Explain the four phases of continuity and relate their application to the continuity.
Introduction to SEMS and Basic ICS. Goals of Training Basic Understanding: The California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) in place to.
State of Delaware’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
SITE EMERGENCY RESPONSE All sites are different. Different chemicals. Different configurations. Advance planning and training is necessary to protect worker.
M. Kimble. Safety Info. Safety and security specialists supervise and manage programs designed to provide for the safety and security of students, staff.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
[Exercise Name] [Date]
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Hospital Emergency Response Training—Home Training
Campus Emergency Preparedness
Joseph D. Anderson, Chief
FEMA Hostile Action-Based (HAB) Scenario Update
Robert Kahler Branch Chief
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Population Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

History  Three-Mile Island, Slow, nonconsistent decision- making -Uncoordinated Public Information -Loss of credibility with Government and the utility  Federal planning began in 1980, program funded in 1982

REP Staff Bill Clare, Planning Section Supervisor o Teri Engelhart – Program Manager Federal Agency liaison o Vacant - Planner Prairie Island plant/Pierce County o Bob Busch – Planner Point Beach plant/Manitowoc County o Sue Meilahn – Planner Kewaunee Power Station/Kewaunee County o Anita Cornell - Office Operations Associate o Kelly Markor – Office Operations Associate

Kewaunee Point Beach Zion Byron Prairie Island Nuclear Plants Requiring Wisconsin Planning and Exercising LCBWR

Radiological Emergency Planning  Utility Plans, based on NRC regulations  Government Plans -National Response Framework Radiological/Nuclear Incident Annex -Wisc Emergency Response Plan Radiological Incident Annex -County Plans (Annex I) -Municipal plans

Utility Plan  Utility plans are written in accordance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations and rules.  Utility plans address on-site response actions, including off-site notifications to counties and the state.

State Plan  The State Plan is written in accordance with FEMA/NRC regulations (NuReg-0654) and the Code of Federal Regulations.  Plans are reviewed annually by FEMA and must include a crosswalk to criteria described in NuReg-0654.

County Plans  Risk county plans must also be written in accordance with FEMA/NRC regulations, reviewed annually, and include a crosswalk to NuReg  Ingestion county plans must be written to include actions to mitigate and respond to a radiological incident.  Other counties should have a radiological annex that includes response plans for radiological incidents such as transportation accidents.

Planning Standards  Assignment of Responsibility  Emergency Response Support & Resources  Emergency Classification System  Notification Methods  Emergency Communications  Public Education & Information  Emergency Facilities & Equipment  Accident Assessment  Protective Response  Radiological Exposure Control  Medical & Public Health Support  Recovery and Re-entry Planning  Exercises and Drills  Radiological Emergency Response Training  Responsibility for Planning

Emergency Planning Zone  10 mile diameter circle with the plant at the center.  Counties within the 10 mile area are considered “risk” counties.  The 10 mile EPZ is where plume related Protective Actions are taken.

Ingestion Planning Zone  50 mile diameter circle with the plant at the center.  Counties outside of the 10 mile area but within the 50 mile zone are considered “ingestion” counties.  The 50 mile IPZ is where sampling of food products, water, vegetation, and soil will be analyzed for contamination.

Exercises  The exercise cycle is currently 6 years. (changing to 8 yr cycle) During this 6 year cycle, the state must conduct at least one ingestion exercise and each plant must be exercised every other year.  Hostile Action planning requirements will begin in A Hostile Action Ex will have to be conducted before the end of 2015 and once every 8 years thereafter.  Participants must include players from the utility, state and the risk county(s).  months of planning; Exercise Evaluation Guides and scenario must receive FEMA approval. Nation-wide, REP is adopting the HSEEP methodology.

Exercise Evaluation  State and Counties are evaluated on 6 criteria. 1) Emergency Operations Management 2) Decision-making for protective actions 3) Implementation of protective actions 4) Field measurement and analysis 5) Emergency notification and public information 6) Support operations/facilities

Emergency Operations Management Facilities, Equipment, Plans and Procedures  FEMA initially evaluates the State and County EOCs and reception centers.  Also evaluated are command and control, communications, equipment and supplies, survey instruments, laboratory operations, maps, and supplies of KI.  Notification processes and mobilization are evaluated for effectiveness and timeliness. Both primary and back-up systems may be evaluated.

Decision Making for Protective Actions  The utility recommends a protective action and the State Radiological Coordinator evaluates the recommendation and WEM and the County(s) must concur on whether to go with the utility’s recommendation.  Decisions regarding schools, special populations, livestock, and KI must be demonstrated.  Emergency worker exposure control, KI.

Implementation of Protective Actions Once a protective action decision is made, it must be implemented.  Management of emergency worker exposure control.  Instruction to take KI. (EW vs. Public)  Implement decisions regarding schools and functional needs populations.  Traffic access and control.

Field and Laboratory Operations  Field team equipment.  Field teams (DHS, CST, RAP) take samples from various media; air, ground, water, vegetation. The samples must follow a chain of custody and be couriered to the Mobile Lab or the State Lab of Hygiene.  Mobile Lab equipment and operations.

Notification and Warnings  Sirens - Exception areas - Failure of sirens  Press releases, media briefings  EAS messages  Public Inquiry Hotline

Care of Evacuees  Reception Centers - Monitoring and decontamination, public, emergency workers and vehicles.  Congregate Care Centers - Registration - Mass Care - Medical Services

Ingestion Exercises  An ingestion exercise must be done once during each six-year (soon to be 8) cycle for the state and each risk county.  Ingestion exercises are usually two days and involve more players. Planning can take months.  Recovery actions are evaluated. Re-entry, return and relocation decisions, as well as many agriculture and disposal issues are demonstrated.

Emergency Classification Levels  Classification levels are determined by plant conditions - Notification of Unusual Event - Alert - Site Area Emergency - General Emergency

NARS and PARs The ultimate goal of EOC activities is to protect the health and safety of the public.  Sectors vs. Sub-areas  Default PAR  15 minute rules  Situational evaluation

Real Events  WEM automatically activates the State EOC at the Alert level.  State agencies include DATCP, DNR, DHS, DCF, DOT (State Patrol and Highways), DMA, PSC, DOC, and DOJ.  Federal agencies could include DOE (FRMAC,RAP), FEMA, NRC, CDC, FDA, USDA, and EPA.  Other agencies – American Red Cross, VOAD.

Questions?