COMPARISON OF AFFINITY OF SOIL AND LIGNITIC HUMIC ACIDS TO Cu(II) AND Cd(II) IONS Miloslav Pekař Martina Klučáková Gabriela Barančíková 1 Mikuláš Madaras 1 Jarmila Makovníková 2 Institute of Physical and Applied Chemistry Faculty of Chemistry Brno University of Technology Czech Republic Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute 1 Research Station Prešov 2 Research Station Banská Bystrica Slovakia Humic Substances Seminar VII March , Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA
CZ SK Europe and we
lignite mine Locations: source & scientists
Soil contamination remediation
First task selected humic acids + selected metal ions affinity
Soils 1.Calcaric Fluvisols on carbonated meadow sediments 2.Gleyic Fluvisols on non-carbonated meadow sediments 3.Calcaric Chernozems on loess 4.Haplic Luvisols on loess loams 5.Dystric Cambisols on flysch
Lignite WaterAshCombust.HCOS Composition of combustible matter (weight %) Average composition (weight %) CHOSN
Humic acids source C H N OC alif C arom weight % fluvisol fluvisol chernozem luvisol cambisol lignite
Adsorption isotherms cadmium chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
Adsorption isotherms copper chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
Relative adsorbed amount cadmium chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
copper Relative adsorbed amount chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
Desorption cadmium chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
Desorption – total chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite cadmium
Desorption copper chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite
Desorption – total chernozem fluvisol 1 luvisol fluvisol 2 cambisollignite copper
Conclusions lignite humic acids work comparable or better affinity, strength explanations needed (?) long-term adsorption/desorption
thanks......for your attention (soil & lignite)