John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
Advertisements

Nisqually Glacier Glaciers are important sources of fresh water to human, plant and animal components of downstream communities. Glacier-fed streams traditionally.
THE RED RIVER. FUNDING ad valorem tax based on value of property in the district - ad valorem tax based on value of property in the district
® Cumberland River Basin 2007 Hydrologic & Hydraulic Drought Joy Broach – Aquatic Biologist Planning Branch - Environmental Section SWPBA Tennessee November.
Conowingo Hydroelectric Power Station and Muddy Run Pump Storage Facility Welcomes the Citizens Advisory Committee.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Skiatook Lake Drought Issues and Management.
Hydrological Information System Module 20 – Integrated Reservoir Monitoring System.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District February 2013.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE – ACF Operations Bailey Crane Water Management USACE, Mobile District.
WHY DAM THE COLORADO RIVER? BROUGHT TO YOU BY BRANDON DOZIER.
History of Dam Building in the Klamath Basin Originating in Southern Oregon and extending through Northern California, the Klamath River Basin represents.
Lake Sidney Lanier Water Supply for Atlanta, Georgia Field Photos 11/19/07 by J. Ebert.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana January 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
‘The world’s greatest plumbing system’ An example of how a river is managed to use its water as a resource.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply Out look Lake Powell Lake Mead.
Making Better Decisions in an Uncertain World Reservoir Operations Modeling.
Hydroelectric Power
Hydropower Dams © The GlobalEd 2 Project Photo credit: Noodle snacks, Wikimedia Gordan Dam, a dammed hydro facility in Tasmania.
HYDROPOWER DAMS By Hydro Power Group PYP 6 – Sekolah Ciputra
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. General facts: Third largest drainage basin in the World The Mississippi drains 1/3 of USA and a small part of Canada. Second longest.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Tulsa District The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers and Its Cooperative Partners.
Hydrologic Modeling with SSARR and HEC-HMS
Youghiogheny River Lake Storage ReAllocation for Downstream Water Supply by Werner C. Loehlein, P.E.
VILLAGE OF PATCH, NM, FEASIBILITY STUDY Village of Patch Case Study Seattle Environmen tal Planning Class June, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque.
MVS Mainstem Forecast Model Update: NETMISS2 by Joel Asunskis, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, St. Louis District Water Control U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers October.
Hydro-Electric Power Station Lecture No: 4. “”A generating station which utilizes the potential energy of water at a high level for the generation of.
February 26, 2003 Presentation in Clarksville, Virginia to the Bi-State Commission Overview of and Interlink of John H. Kerr, Philpott, and Private Hydropower.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Savannah River Basin Drought Workshop October 24-25, 2012.
Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
Chapter 2C Section 1 Fresh water is an essential resource.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
1 Scheduling the TVA Hydro System Using RiverWare’s Optimization Suzanne H. Biddle, P.E. Tennessee Valley Authority.
Using a dam (hydroelectric). How does it work? The theory is to build a dam on a large river that has a large drop in elevation. The dam stores large.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Southwestern Division Pacesetters – Army Strong – Engineer Ready! The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its Southwestern Division.
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Simulating Temperature Management under Climate Change at Detroit Lake, OR Norman Buccola, John.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Understanding Sedimentation and Land Use Cover Relationships in the Lake Sidney Lanier Watershed Russell A.
Fairy Lake Annual General Meeting Dave Macpherson Water Management Technical Specialist Parry Sound District Ministry of Natural Resources.
Lake Sydney Lanier Northeast Georgia Chris McCurdy & Andrea D. Roche.
Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Real-Time Conservation Pool Storage Accounting for the Falls Lake Project.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
 Woodcock Creek Lake Anne Grill Vtrip Extra Credit.
Reservoirs. Various Uses  Irrigation, electricity generation, flood control, water supply (urban), improved navigation, fish culture, recreation, combination.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Reservoir Operating Criteria Proposed Modifications Lovell, Wyoming July 29, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Susan Sylvester Department Director Operations Control Department Mechanics of the Primary Water Management System.
Group Members Tevin Walker Deidre Brown. Objectives Define the term HYDROELECTIC ENERGY To identify the use/importance of this energy source To explain.
Reclamation and Hoover Dam It’s All About The Water.
1 Bonneville Power Administration. 2 BPA markets power from 31 federally owned dams, one non-federal nuclear plant, and wind energy generation facilities.
Objectives..describe and explain hard and soft flood prevention strategies Page GCSE Geography AQA A.
Savannah River Projects
USACE Savannah District Water Management Overview
Effects of persistent drought on Lake Mead and the Las Vegas Valley
GANDHINAGAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Drought Response Workshop
Diamon Lester and Lamar Bradford
Albeni Falls Dam Operations
Presentation transcript:

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Project Purposes Flood Control (PL , Flood Control Act of 1944) Hydroelectric Power (PL ) Recreation (PL ) Water Supply (PL ) Fish and Wildlife (PL ) Low Flow Augmentation (PL ) no longer required because of FERC Project license number 2009 for Gaston and Roanoke Rapids

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Pertinent Information Large interest in flood control following the August 1940 flood resulted in authorization of John H. Kerr Construction Contract was awarded April 1948 Construction completed in June 1951 Filling began on 30 June 1952 Watershed drainage area of 7800 square miles Reservoir Surface Area at Elev. 300 of 48,900 acres Length of Shoreline at Elev. 300 of 800 miles

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Pertinent Information Top of Dam at elevation 332 Lowest portion of dam is at elevation tainter flood gates 42’ wide by 32’ tall Tainter gate discharge capacity at 320 is 615,000 cfs 6 turbines rated at 32,000 kw each 1 turbine rated at 12,000 kw 2 station service units rated at 1,000 kw each Turbine Discharge Capacity originally was 34,000 cfs

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir The structure of John H. Kerr Dam required: 624,244 cubic yards of concrete, 1,200,000 tons of sand and crushed stone, 7,550,941 pounds of reinforcing steel, 1,317,786 pounds of structural steel, 578,440 barrels of cement and 515,286 pounds of miscellaneous steel and iron

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir

What were the effects of the changed guide curve?

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Flood Control Operation John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Flood Control Operation

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Power Pool Operation John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Power Pool Operation

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir

John H. Kerr Reservoir—Zone A Operation Zone A (Interchange Zone)—The sum of the minimum contract energy amounts are being met by the Kerr-Philpott system in toto. The project having the higher percent of hydropower storage remaining produces the higher portion of total minimum contract energy. Typically enough energy is being produced at each project to meet minimum flow commitments downstream.

John H. Kerr Reservoir—Zone B Operation Zone B (Below Guide Curve)—Kerr minimum contract energy amounts are being met by the Kerr project. If Philpott reservoir is in a flood status, then part of Kerr’s minimum contract energy will be picked up by Philpott. Enough energy is being declared and turbine discharge produced to provide minimum downstream flow needs.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone C Operation Zone C (Above Guide Curve But Below Bottom of Flood Control Pool)—Minimum energy amounts are being met by the Kerr project. If inflows are high or Kerr Reservoir is high enough above the guide curve, then extra energy and turbine releases are declared. However, releases are not to exceed 8,000 cfs from the Roanoke Rapids Dam into the lower Roanoke River.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone D Operation Zone D (Striped Bass Spawn Storage)—Striped bass spawn target flows downstream are made by Kerr Dam and then by Roanoke Rapids Dam. Target flows are bound by a lower, median and upper flow threshold.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone E1 Operation Zone E1 (300 – 312, Lower Controlled Flood Pool)—Will hold 1.64 inches of rainfall runoff. Turbine releases of up to 20,000 cfs are made at Kerr Dam. Releases of 20,000 cfs are made at the Roanoke Rapids Dam. This is full turbine plant at the Roanoke Rapids Dam.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone E2 Operation Zone E2 (312 – 315, Middle of Controlled Flood Pool)—Will hold 0.49 inches of rainfall runoff. Turbine releases of up to 25,000 cfs are made at Kerr Dam. Releases of 25,000 cfs are made at the Roanoke Rapids Dam. This is full turbine plant at the Roanoke Rapids Dam plus a spill of 5,000 cfs through the spillway gates.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone E3 Operation Zone E3 (315 – 320, Upper Part of Controlled Flood Pool)—Will hold 0.95 inches of rainfall runoff. Turbine releases and tainter gate (spillway) releases of up to 35,000 cfs are made at Kerr Dam. Releases of 35,000 cfs are made at the Roanoke Rapids Dam. This is full turbine plant at the Roanoke Rapids Dam plus a spill of 15,000 cfs through the spillway gates.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone E4 Operation Zone E4 (320 – 321, Lower Uncontrolled Flood Pool)—Will hold 0.22 inches of rainfall runoff. Turbine releases and tainter gate releases of 85 percent of inflow to Kerr Dam are made in the lower Roanoke River from Roanoke Rapids Dam. Releases will be greater than or equal to 35,000 cfs from RR Dam. Lake Gaston will be surcharged.

John H. Kerr Dam—Zone E5 Operation Zone E5 (Kerr is Greater than El Upper Part of Uncontrolled Flood Pool)—Tainter gate releases of 100 percent of inflow to Kerr Dam are made in the lower Roanoke River from Roanoke Rapids Dam. Releases from Roanoke Rapids Dam will be equal to or greater than 35,000 cfs.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream and Downstream Users John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream and Downstream Users Upstream UsersDownstream Users Recreation Hydropower Water Supply Wildlife and Fisheries Industry and Urban Timber Harvesting Prison Farm

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream verses Downstream Operational Conflict Example John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream verses Downstream Operational Conflict Example  Upstream Recreation verses Downstream Recreation: Upstream recreation interests prefer a stable lake level with inflows passed downstream unbuffered whether they are large or small. Downstream recreation interests prefer a steady river in which to fish and boat. This means storing flood waters behind Kerr Dam with high lake levels which impact upstream recreation users. This also means lower reservoir levels during drought events when extra water is released from Kerr Reservoir to boost downstream river levels.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream verses Downstream Flood Release Operational Conflict John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Upstream verses Downstream Flood Release Operational Conflict  Upstream Hydropower verses Downstream Hydropower: Upstream: The turbines at Kerr Dam can pass about 33,000 cfs during a flood event. Downstream: The turbines at the Dominion Roanoke Rapids Dam located downstream can only pass flows up to 20,000 cfs and have to spill additional flood releases with a loss of hydropower generation and a loss of revenue. Dominion would prefer capping flood releases at Kerr Dam to an average of 20,000 cfs.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Downstream verses Downstream Flood Release Operation Conflict John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Downstream verses Downstream Flood Release Operation Conflict  Downstream Timber Harvesting, Hunters and Fishing Interests: Prefer flood releases to be capped at 8,000 cfs (river channel capacity). But if the flood storage in Kerr Reservoir is threatened, then 35,000 cfs or higher would be ok to limit the duration of the flood plain flooding.  Downstream Agricultural Interests: Prefer capping long term flows at 20,000 cfs. Flows greater than 20,000 cfs impact crop and grazing lands and flood farm roads. Some farm lands may be impacted at flows exceeding 12,000 cfs.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Operational Conflict For Downstream verses Downstream Continued……. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Operational Conflict For Downstream verses Downstream Continued…….  Downstream Non-agricultural Interests: These interests could withstand flows possibly up to 45,000 cfs during extreme floods without damage to property. Preference is to see flows to about 40,000 cfs to reduce duration of flood flows.  Downstream Prison Farm: Earthen dike protects this area that would be threatened by flows of 35,000 cfs and overtopped by flows of 40,000 cfs. Preference is to wisely use the controlled flood storage behind Kerr to prevent large flood releases.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Project Accomplishments John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Project Accomplishments Flood Damages Prevented $390,852,800 total since filling Average Annual Hydropower Generation 433,817,800 kWH Typical Annual Recreational Visitation Range is from 3 to 4 million visitors

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Striped Bass Spawn Success John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Striped Bass Spawn Success

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir