Www.scrd.ca Regional Water Service Development Cost Charges Update October 2014 Bryan Shoji, P.Eng. General Manager, Infrastructure Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

Union of B.C. Municipalities Clinic on Understanding Development Cost Charges September 24,
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Local Government Finance BUSINESS RATES AND POOLING.
Infrastructure and Public Facilities Needs Assessment Planning Department County of Hawai`i.
BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 8, 2013.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
Charlie Lake Sewer Collection System & Lagoon Upgrades Thursday June 20 th, 2013.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Copyright Rehmann Robson Pennfield Charter Township Water and Sewer Utilities Rate Study.
1 The Fiscal Basis for Civic Endeavour Enid Slack Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance University of Toronto Conference on “Building Spaces that.
DECEMBER 15, :00 PM TWSD RATE ADJUSTMENT HEARING.
2015 Municipal Budget Overview Borough of Montvale April 14, 2015.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
2013 City Budget Manhattan ~ Kansas Work Session Two.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, July 7, 2015.
Financing Your CIP …and Planning Ahead for New O&M.
2006 Budget Challenges Additional Increases in Pension Contributions = +$451,200 Additional Assessment from RVSA = +$315,000 Increases in Fuel and Utility.
2014 Municipal Budget Township of Harrison June 16,
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners December 18, 2012.
Overview of System Development Charges Presented to the Ad Hoc Committee on Large Diameter Water Mains by Chris Cullinan, Acting CFO January 8, 2014.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
2013 Budget Presentation. Outline Planning Framework Proposed Tax Rate Increase Analysis of cost drivers Detailed work plan Strategic Linkage Timeline.
City of North Miami Beach Quarterly Financial Analysis Second Quarter – FY 2015 Data as of March 31, 2015.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Water Rates (Utility versus SDCs) Information to Utility Advisory Board September 21, 2009.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
1 Water and Wastewater Capital Charges Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners April 5, 2011.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
Speaking points – resource gap Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation Water Symposium March 2010 Sébastien Labelle Director, Policy, Programs.
Nassau-Amelia Utilities FY 2008 Utility Rate Study Presented by: Andrew J. Burnham July 9, 2007 Nassau-Amelia Utilities.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
CITY OF NANAIMO Revenue Policy Update October 26, 2015.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
Property Taxes. Provide the municipality with the funding it needs to provide services to its residents –Garbage collection, libraries, pools, parks,
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
1 Overview of Mineral Taxes in Colorado State Severance Tax and Federal Mineral Lease Revenue House and Senate Finance Committees Marc Carey and Jason.
City of Port Moody DRAFT Financial Plan Tuesday, April 23 rd, 2013.
City of Rosenberg Property Taxes & Tax Rates July 28, 2015July 28,
City of Ottawa 2014 Development Charges Background Study Affordable Housing July 8, 2014.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
2018 Preliminary Tax Levy Preliminary tax levy must be certified to the County by end of September for property tax statements mailed in late November.
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
RUSSELL - ROSSBURN WATER SUPPLY
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Madras System Development Charges
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
System Development Fees
Municipality of Central Elgin
2010 Draft Budget.
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Review of Planning Department November 19, 2018
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
Capital Improvement Plans
Introduction Last comprehensive review was undertaken in 2012/2013
Presentation transcript:

Regional Water Service Development Cost Charges Update October 2014 Bryan Shoji, P.Eng. General Manager, Infrastructure Services

Background Comprehensive Regional Water Plan projects the water needs of the region and related infrastructure requirements to the year adopted by the SCRD in June 2013 Business Plan and Rates Development report calculates the annual user fee rates required to sustain the continued operation, maintenance and capital replacement of the Regional Water System - adopted by SCRD in December 2013 DCC Bylaw Update will incorporate the recommendations in these reports. First update since bylaw adoption in –Review of Regional Water DCCs only. North and South Pender Harbour Water Service Areas to be reviewed separately.

How do local governments pay for new infrastructure? Negotiate Development Agreements during rezoning process Require Servicing Agreements for frontage improvements during subdivision or building permit process. Assess DCCs Apply for grants, use Gas Tax Revenue Use property tax revenue, parcel taxes, or user fees

What are DCCs? Funds capital projects are needed to support growth…only projects which support growth are included (facilitates development) Based on the ‘user pay’ principle – growth pays for growth Operations, maintenance and projects benefiting only existing customers are not included Not just another tax – DCCs are based on need, not on comparisons to other local governments - Development Cost Charge Best Practices Guide Allow development to proceed by sharing the cost burden through the pooling of revenues - Large infrastructure projects cannot be funded by a single developer (e.g. New Water Treatment Plant) Without adequate DCCs, existing taxpayers pay for future needs or infrastructure projects are deferred

Do DCCs affect housing affordability? Housing prices based on market values – not costs Increased costs (DCCs, building materials, financing, etc.) can impact Developer’s profit margin or willingness to pay high raw land costs Draft bylaw provides incentive to build smaller units and mixed use projects – townhouse and apartment DCCs based on $/square metre rather than per unit - consistent with the We Envision Regional Sustainability Plan

DCC update objectives Update DCC capital projects list and cost estimates to ensure future growth needs can be met Review growth projections to ensure appropriate amount of DCCs are collected Ensure consistency with OCPs and Financial Plan Combine 3 geographical DCC Bylaws into single bylaw Include incentives to construct more sustainable units Clarify exemptions and DCC credits/rebates

How are DCCs Calculated? Total “DCC project” costs » Minus portion assigned to existing residents (37%) » Minus existing DCC reserves (~ $800,000) » Minus Municipal Assist Factor (1%) Divide by growth Capital $ Growth

Major DCC Projects Chapman Water System Projects –Source Water Development $1,360,000 –Water Treatment Expansion $7,050,000 –Transmission upgrades $2,500,000 –Distribution upgrades$13,500,000 –Demand management $600,000 Eastbourne Water System Projects –Source Water Development $150,000 –Water Treatment Expansion $50,000 –Distribution upgrades $250,000 Egmont/Cove Cay System Projects –Distribution upgrades $250,000

Proposed DCC rates

Rate Comparison

Impacts if rates aren’t updated? Deferred infrastructure projects – Chapman Water Treatment Plant at capacity Greater share paid by existing rate payers Developments postponed due to lack of capacity Strong reliance on grant funding DCC reserves not keeping up with costs/needs

Review process and next steps

Questions/Comments