Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Advertisements

PBIS TIER 1: FAMILY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGIES
Purpose of Instruction
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
State Implementation Grants for Improving Services for Children with ASD and other Developmental Disabilities and the State Public Health Coordinating.
Planning for the Future: Understand DMH-DD Systems and Service Options Presented By: Kadesh Burnett; St. Louis County Regional Office Family Support Coordinator.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Exciting New Partnership Opportunity I am Moving, I am Learning! Early Childhood Programs December 19, 2013.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Reducing Disproportionality in Suspensions and Positive Behavior Supports Suzann Wilson Lori Rogerson.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Partnering with States to Improve Transition Services: Online and In-Person Approaches Mary E. Morningstar Patricia M. Noonan Amy Gaumer Erickson Barbara.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Expanded School Mental Health Services In Rural Communities Youth Health Service, Inc. Elkins, WV (Randolph, Tucker, Pocahontas, Barbour, Upshur Counties)
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University.
Interagency/Community-Based Planning: State & District Level Planning for Tertiary Support Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Joan Macy and Kaitlyn Stratemeier,
Adair County System of Care Overcoming Obstacles to Helping Others.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
The Role of Community Resource Mapping in the Mental Health and Schools Together-NH Initiative New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
Using Online Instruction in Positive Behavior Support Training Kansas Institute for Positive Behavior Support (KIPBS) Rachel Freeman.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
The Arizona Community of Practice (AzCoPT) June 12,
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Sustainability of PBS Implementation: State-wide Planning in Kansas March 27, 2008 Rachel Freeman University of Kansas.
Prevention and Early Intervention Program East Region.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Vermont’s Early Childhood & Family Mental Health Competencies A story of Integration & Collaboration  How can they help me?
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
DE-PBS Cadre May 8, Appreciation “Gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today, and creates a vision for tomorrow” -Melody Beattie.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Session 7. Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project 2 nd Annual State Conference July 9-10, 2009.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Strange Bedfellows: Building and Maintaining Collaborations between, among, and within State agencies for PROMISE Grant partnerships.
PARTNERS IN CHANGE CII DESE. Missouri’s Little Engine That Could: A School Improvement Journey.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Effective Collaboration Between Migrant and Homeless State Education Programs Presented By Lisa Phillips, State Coordinator for NC 2012.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Understanding Positive Behavior Support Closing the Gap Conference November 12, 2009 Pamela A. Clark, MSW.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Supporting District Structures & Teams through a State-Level Plan Susan Barrett, Implementer Partner Center on PBIS Brenda Melcher Central Region Coordinator.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
The Missouri—Show Me Outcomes Story. Missouri Integrated Model (2007 SPDG)
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Division of Student Support Services
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.
Family Guide: Understanding Transition Team Members’ Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas

Purpose of Presentation Share how interagency collaboration is increasing in Missouri Describe the tiered implementation training beginning in the MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Provide examples from organizations in Missouri who Are implementing PBS Are supporting individuals with disabilities

Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery No system to inform schools that other agencies are working with the child and family Agencies and schools do not work together to develop one plan with the child and family Often agency people feel that they are asked to take sides – parents vs. the school School personnel spending 60 - 120 minutes during meetings focusing only on the problems   Challenges of current system listed above were identified by local agency partners during the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years. No system to inform schools that other agencies are working with the child and family Agencies and schools do not work together to develop one plan with the child and family Often agency people feel that they are asked to take sides – parents vs the school School personnel spending 60 - 120 minutes during meetings focusing only on the problems Parents not sharing what it is like at home Schools expecting parents to do it all - telling them what to do instead of collaborating around goals, dreams for child and providing information about the child’s current status in relation to the goal, then outlining specific steps to reaching the goal “Too many words” because so many different systems are working to provide services to the child and family

Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery (Continued…) Parents not sharing what it is like at home Schools expecting parents to do it all - telling them what to do instead of collaborating around goals and dreams for child “Too many words” or with “too much Jargon” because so many different systems are working to provide services to the child and family

Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery (Continued…) Extra resources are required for each agency to develop similar training for staff Each agency must have their own experts or do with out expertise

Interagency Collaboration Started in 2008 Agencies included: Missouri SW-PBS Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Office of Quality Schools Office of Special Education Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled Department of Mental Health Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Comprehensive Psychiatric Services Started in 2008 as a result of Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled joining the SW-PBS initiative

Why Collaborate Across Systems? Share information and resources Increase effectiveness of services Establish regional interagency supports Leverage limited state funds

History of MO SW-PBS Training Format 1999 Training Format The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) local improvement grants (LIGs) are awarded to districts to attend trainings throughout the year and during summer institutes. Staff from the University of Missouri PBS Center provides the trainers for these activities. MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools

Trainers in Regional Centers MO SW-PBS 2006 - Present 1999 2006 Training Format 22 Consultants in 9 regions, 5 Tier 2/3 consultants, state data/web consultant, state coordinator and MU PBS personnel provide training/technical assistance on standardized curriculum for multiple levels and stakeholders MU DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers SW-PBS Trainers Schools Schools

Interagency Collaboration – First Steps Trainers in Regional Centers 1999 2006 2008 DMH MU DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers SW-PBS Trainers CPS DDD Schools Schools

Interagency Collaboration 1999 2006 2011 DMH MU DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers SW-PBS Trainers CPS DDD CommunityMental Health RO SB40 BRT Transition Coordinators Schools Schools Community Support Specialists

Missouri Interagency PBS Progress Self-assessment and action plan Interviews and focus groups Community mapping Pilot tool used to facilitate interagency planning Development of training resources in process Behavior Resource Team Members attend Summer Institute Tiered implementation of PBS Schools Organizations

Two Regional Interagency Pilots Awareness training in PBS for District team, Agencies in DD, Mental Health, Families, etc School-wide PBS tools to assist districts created and embedded within the statewide training system (this is created with the team but embedded in the SWPBS training systems) Assistance in helping regional teams create strategies that will improve PBS planning for individual students within regions Training Service Coordination Communication Etc.

Add a Statewide Problem-solving System to Encourage Interagency Use of PBS Funds Planning Team State Team District Team School Planning Team

Latest MO Mapping Example at the State Level Next Version of MO MAP

Combined Map: Home Counties With Meetings/Services Related to PBS

Mo DDD Tiered Supports Model Mo SW Model Regional Consultants - Unit of Implementation = School Building - System of Recognition (Bronze, Silver Gold) - Training designed for implementation phases - SET -ODR -Big ‘5’ School Team to design implementation of school wide Tier 1 and 2 strategies Mo DDD Tiered Supports Model Regional Behavior Resource Team Members - Unit of implementation = Agency or Family - System of Recognition of implementation -Trainings to be designed for Implementation phases -ASSET -EMT (incident reports) -Big ‘7’ Agency/Family team – design and implement systemic Universal Strategies Systems Data Like MO SWPBS, MO DDD Tiered Supports is designed around the central structures of data, systems, and practices developed across levels including-state level, regional level, local level, agency level, family level and individual level. DATA - Data will inform implementation of MO DDD Tiered Supports at all levels and phases. Similar to an office discipline referral collected in school settings, the MO DDD collects Event Management Tracker (EMT) indicator measures. These data have been organized in such a way to allow regional staff access to “ready” reports across informational indicators including: number of reportable incidents per type of incident, total number of incidents per month, number of incidents per day of the week, time of day of incidents, number of individuals producing the incidents, number of events by restraint type, number of events by location. These reports are available to be aggregated at the appropriate planning level - state, regional, agency, or individual. Regional Behavior Resource Team (BRT) personnel will support and coach providers and families to make data-based plans and decisions informing practices. Similar to the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) administered in school settings informing SWPBS implementation, the MO DDD is piloting the Agency Systems and Supports Evaluation Tool (ASSET), a tool to inform implementation of proactive, preventative and positive teaching systems and/or strategies currently in place at an agency level. Work towards a comparable tool to inform family planning is in progress. In addition, the MO DDD is standardizing tools and data-based processes statewide for prioritization of referrals as well as risk assessment. The availability of these data sets and reports will enable regional BRT to monitor effectiveness of services as well as implementation fidelity. Systems-Systems include the context of processes, supports, procedures, and rules that are in place supporting the implementation of a given practice or program.. Systematically, BRT staff across the state will implement training and coaching processes based on data. Behavior Resource Teams will be supported by professional behavior analysts regionally and by a state steering committee. This statewide committee will be supported and led by the MO DDD Chief Behavior Analyst (see Appendix B). Practices-MO DDD is taking a new approach to behavior problem solving by concentrating system-wide efforts on prevention and universal strategies of positive behavior supports and person centered planning in addition to specialized and intensive supports as necessary, using MO DDD’s Tiered Supports model. For example, state personnel will train standard practices of coaching and PBS implementation for BRT who will then train standard practices of coaching and PBS implementation for providers/families. These training/coaching practices at all levels will be informed by the data, systems, and tools previously described, guiding BRTs to focus families and/or agency staff on skill acquisition and person-centered, quality of life outcomes. Practices

MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Supports Practices include: 3) Intensive individualized behavior supports-to be developed and implemented by licensed professionals. 2) Specialized strategies for common problem situations; and 1) Universal strategies-proactive, preventative, positive teaching based strategies for staff and families to Improve Quality of Life

An example of the DD Model in action The Rolla Behavior Resource Team and Tiered Supports Coaching with Future Care, a DD residential service provider