The Cooperation Platform for Research and Standards: improving the interface between ICT research and standardization Presentation at EASST2006, 24 August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19 November 2004 PDS/1 6cp Workshop Programme of Work PASR-2005 Pieter De Smet.
Advertisements

Research/standards collaboration The standardizers view ETSI ETP Conference, October 2006 John Ketchell, CEN Director of Pre-Standards as Chair,
WP7 Internal Evaluation & Quality Assurance Green Employability Project StudioCentroVeneto - Toni Brunello and Paolo Zaramella Vienna, 10th January 2012.
TVET working group contributions. What are the possible options for obtaining decent living and working conditions without joining the informal economy?
1 Lessons learned – success factors for biodiversity projects Peter Tramberend Environment Agency Austria.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
Making Innovation Affordable Jo Derbyshire European Commercial Manager
- The NAMA Facility - Experience with Providing Support for the Implementation of NAMAs NAMA work programme – SBI in-session workshop 5 June 2014, Bonn.
European standardization for competitiveness and innovation: making a more effective landscape Ségolène Martin, ‘Research Integration’ Programme Manager.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Developments in cooperation between research and standardization related to security and secure communications Presentation at eMayor clustering event,
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
1. 2 OPERATIONAL PLANNING Mission Vision Goals HETC PROJECT PROPOSAL University of …………….. We are here now Data Collection Data Analysis Problem Identification.
0 Area Network Day - Summer Agenda 09:15 – 10:30 Assessing Pupil Progress 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45 – 12:00Raising Standards in Reading using.
COBIT 5: Framework, BMIS, Implementation and future Information Security Guidance Presented by.
Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly Kick Off Event WP 7 Plan 1 st period Inova+
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
European Association of Aerospace Industries Paola Chiarini Bordeaux, 17 th January 2003 Project Manager AeroSME AeroSME Project The AeroSME Project a.
Self-evaluation of project concepts for application in Horizon 2020
United Nations Statistics Division
An introduction to the project, its main objectives and its methods & milestones Presentations to EU Project Officers, 2 nd April, 2004, Brussels.
WP1 presentation Christian Jagersma Bucharest, 1-4 March 2010 Agentschap NL (NL Agency)
August 2007 Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia August 2007 Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia Theme : Innovating Towards Sustainability.
Project Implementation Plan and Principal Activities
WP5 - Mapping Indian Research Potential Sourabha Rani, ITSMA, INDIA Activities for Year 5 & 6.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA ACTIVITIES ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: EXPERIENCE AND CHALLENGES By. H.R.T. Muzale and R. Toba.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
ENABLER, BLARK, what’s next? Steven Krauwer Utrecht University / ELSNET.
Mapping standardization with IST research (Deliverable D18 on ‘reverse mapping’) COPRAS Annual Review 15 March 2006 Prof. Tatiana Kovacikova, on behalf.
The NAMA Facility – Support for the Implementation of NAMAs.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
ENV-NCP-TOGETHER PARTNER MEETING WORK PACKAGE 3 02/03/2010 c Beta Technology.
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Actions Open call in Objective 11.1 Calls for PCPs in specific public sector domains in objectives 5.3, 5.4 and 3.5
ELOGMAR-M Review Meeting, Shenzhen, 31/03/ First Review Meeting - Web-based and Mobile Solutions for Collaborative Work Environment with Logistics.
Work Package 4: Developing appropriate standardization paths Presentation at the 2 nd Annual Review Meeting 15 March 2006, Brussels Scott Hansen The Open.
Project planning for the last reporting period Presentation at 2nd COPRAS annual review, 15 March 2006, CEN/CENELEC meeting centre, Brussels John Ketchell.
Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly Kick Off Event WP 7 – Dissemination, Exploitation Strategy and Standardization Inova+ Co-Living.
ERGEG Public Hearing 30. June 2005 Congestion Management Guidelines.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Kurt König Head of Unit “Communication and Awareness” Innovation Directorate
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE NA3 procedures.
Number: TR/06/B/F/PP/ WASTE-TRAIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING, EDUCATION, CONVEYING INFORMATION ON UP-TO-DATE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DECISION MAKERS/STAFF.
1 ERASMUS+ CAPACITY BUILDING IN THE FIELD OF YOUTH.
Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced.
Faculty career development through establishing institutionalized mechanisms to address the needs of pre- tenure and post-promotion faculty in the IDEAL.
Overview deliverables and achievements second reporting period Presentation at 2nd COPRAS annual review, 15 March 2006, CEN/CENELEC meeting centre, Brussels.
A Proposal on the Implementation Mechanism of OIC-VET.
Implementation recommendations 1st COPRAS review Presentation at 2nd COPRAS annual review, 15 March 2006, CEN/CENELEC meeting centre, Brussels Bart Brusse.
1 How to participate in FP7 Miroslav Polzer Austrian Science and Research Liaison Office Ljubljana Centre for Social Innovation ZSI, Vienna / Austria several.
Progress Report on Quality Issues SIPUS – Strengthening of Internationalisation Policies at Universities in Serbia February 18, 2015 Belgrade, Serbia.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
REGIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP COMESA/SADC – Examples of Best Practice Policies for EE promotion Presentation by Luc Kevo Tossou Energy.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Lessons from the Evaluation Phase
Analytical Summary of Replies to the Questionnaire for Governments
General presentation of the initiative May 2017 Presented by: Name Lastname, Role – Organisation’s.
Implementing the ESS Vision 2020
Application Form – Part C
INSPIRE-based e-reporting pilots
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

The Cooperation Platform for Research and Standards: improving the interface between ICT research and standardization Presentation at EASST2006, 24 August 2006 University of Lausanne Bart Brusse, COPRAS Project Manager

Standardization and research should ideally proceed in parallel but… Don’t start thinking about standardization until they are in the final stages of their activities Discover they don’t have sufficient resources and time to pass their output through standardization Don’t have the means to continue the path through standardization after completing their activities Don’t have mechanisms for addressing projects’ output Are scattered and don’t provide a ‘guichet unique’ where standards and standards bodies can be addressed Are missing out on valuable contributions to ongoing standardization processes …research projects……and standards bodies

COPRAS aims to address these issues for current & future projects 1.Support ongoing research projects by developing ‘Standardization Action Plans’ (SAPs) with them 2.Support future projects by developing ‘Generic Guidelines’ on interfacing between IST research & standardization 3.Establish more permanent support for RTD/standards interfacing in ICT Principal goals

SAPs: addressing the standardization gap at the end of a projects’ lifespan Identify standards related output among projects earlier & focus their standards related activities Arrange broader exposure of projects’ objectives among standards organizations Initiate constituency building at an early point in time pre-empting projects’ tangible standardization output Start Half way EndRequirements analysisTests & pilots ‘Standardisation gap’ Standardization processes IST project duration Technical developments

COPRAS addressed virtually all IST projects in FP6 calls 1 & 2 Call projects addressed 92 projects responding to questionnaire (55,09%) Plans with 16 projects Call projects addressed 55 projects responding to questionnaire (51,40%) Plans with 19 projects Define cooperation possibilities between projects Focus projects’ standardization efforts on targets actually achievable Help selecting standards bodies early and prepare contacts with them Structure preparatory process (e.g. creating industry awareness) for making submissions Define concrete action steps for constituency building, preparing technical specifications and disseminating results Issues addressed in Standardization Action Plans

First experiences point towards broad requirement for support Response & feedback from projects is very high Intention to interface with standardization is high across virtually all areas Few projects started standards activity in time Few projects allocate sufficient resources Financial implications are sometimes not foreseen Continuation of standardization work beyond a project’s lifespan is often (financially) complicated Standardization support is an issue for many projects but poor preparations and bureaucracy complicate RTD/standards interfacing process

But several aspects on the side of the industry also create barriers… Projects focus on too many standards bodies –Time and resources required per organization underestimated –Misjudgement standards generating potential of their project Standardization processes are running trains –Synchronization problems due to projects’ short lifespan… –…but waiting too long means loss of momentum Industry may not be waiting for specific contributions –Window of opportunity may be closed or not yet open –Insufficient market requirement hence little industrial support Market dynamics are essential when determining projects’ standardization potential

…and a scattered environment complicates initiating cooperation No tools for determining and/or finding the right standards organization to interface with –Over 100 organizations crowing the ICT standards world –Lots of overlap between different organizations No generic mechanisms to find standards in a maze of standards bodies & industry consortia Different commercial arrangements used in the standardization domain cause confusion –Membership rules, availability of output –Confidentiality & IPR policy Effort is required on the side of standards organizations addressing these issues

Addressing the issues: Generic Guidelines for ICT research projects July 2005: “Generic Guidelines for IST projects interfacing with ICT standards organizations”: Clarify the benefits from interfacing with standardization for research projects and their consortium partners How to determine whether research projects should plan to interface with standardization How to build standardization efforts into a project’s work plan Most common processes & deliverables in standardization Criteria to apply for selecting standards bodies matching projects’ objectives Guidelines: Guidelines brochure:

Testing the water: initial responses from projects in FP6 Call 4 Questionnaire send out to > 200 ICT research projects that recently launched activities –Response rate > 40% –Less than 10% is sure they will not generate results that may be relevant to standardization, but almost 25% does not have any resources allocated to standardization activities –75% of projects that received or downloaded the Generic Guidelines expects to use them during their lifespan Main usage of Generic Guidelines so far –identifying standards organizations to interface with –Reviewing the allocation of (standardization) resources –Encouragement to start standards activity at an earlier point in time

Additional aspects that need addressing according to projects > 55% feels research projects should be able to obtain additional resources to complete standardization activities after the formal termination of their activities > 45% feels standards organizations should provide specific mechanisms and/or facilities encouraging research projects to interface with them > 20% feels standardization support should be structurally embedded in publicly funded ICT research programmes

Further improvements that may help breaking down barriers More facilities are needed for projects presenting new technologies for standardization in a pre- competitive environment Specific arrangements for temporary (and low cost) membership of standards organizations should be made available to research projects Differences in the background and working methods of standards organizations should be clarified

Breaking down the barriers between research & standards: towards FP7 Generic Guidelines –New and updated release planned early 2007 –Transformation guidelines into interactive platform version COPRAS Open Meeting 17 January 2007 –Conference addressing all aspects of ICT research and standards interfacing –Focus on 7th Framework Programme –Registration at: Planning of COPRAS follow up activity –Support of ICT research standards interfacing in FP7 –Address pending issues and further improvements

Thank you for your attention; Questions? Bart Brusse, COPRAS Project Manager Tel: