Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

IntelliDrive for Safety, Mobility, and User Fee Project Cory Johnson Mn/DOT IntelliDrive Program Engineer.
Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Test Results Cory Johnson, PE Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology MnDOT.
1 This document and its contents are the property of The University of Iowa’s Public Policy Center National Evaluation of a Mileage- Based Road User Charge.
Road Pricing Anthony M. Rufolo Systems Science Seminar May 7,2010.
Oregon Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to WASHTO Construction and Materials Committee Portland, Oregon April 8, 2008 James.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Street Maintenance Funding Issues City Council Workshop April 1, 2013.
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Fuel Tax Revenue Revenue Drivers  Miles Driven (VMT)  Fuel Efficiency.
I-95 Corridor Coalition MBUF Research for the I-95 Corridor Coalition Gary W. Euler.
Value Added Tax (VAT). Definition of VAT - One of the indirect taxes, which are easily receivable, and achieve high productivity, and do not cause reactions.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT STUDY COMMITTEE ON CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING Trucking in Georgia: Big Numbers, Big Impact October 1, 2015.
1 The Oregon Project: How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Alliance Workshop St. Paul, Minnesota.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
Oregon’s Road Usage Charge Program - SB810 Implementation 2015 AASHTO Audit Conference July 21, 2015.
Public Transit Department Bus and Fuel Procurement Strategy AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2013.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to NEACT LaGrande, Oregon August 4, 2005 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative.
The Challenge of Financing Oregon’s Highways
The Oregon Experiment – and Iowa Too! Conclusion In the future, gas tax revenue will not be the primary source for funding our roads.
Myles Vosberg Office of State Tax Commissioner. Taxes imposed on telecommunication services  North Dakota and local Sales and Use Taxes  N.D.C.C. Chapters.
Financing and Funding Will Kempton Chair ASC Financing and Funding Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee on Finance and Administration Director California.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
Oregon’s Experiments in Closing the Transportation Funding Gap Presented to Focus Georgia April 25, 2007 James Whitty Manager, Office of Innovative Partnerships.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Transport Research Arena - TRA Europe 2008 Strategic Session on Road Pricing and Tolling Evolution of Road User Charging Systems in Europe with a Focus.
Highway Trust Fund Primer Published July 27, 2015 National Journal Presentation Credits Producer: Chris Danello, Katharine Conlon Director: Jessica Guzik,
State of Oregon’s Economy Oregon does not have a sales tax –Our schools and general fund agencies receive the majority of their revenue from property and.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
FHWA Attribution of Federal Highway Trust Fund Tax Receipts IFTA Annual Business Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana July 18-19, 2008.
Construction Conference Construction Conference NDDOT’s: NDDOT’s: Future Federal Funding Future Federal Funding State Legislative & Budget issues.
What will we see 20 years from? If we slept for 20 years what would we recognize when we awoke? The future starts….
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
State Public Transportation Partnership Conference Reauthorization of the Surface Transportation Programs Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
Central Kentucky Regional Policy Group Juva Barber Executive Director.
Year Cents Per Vehicle Mile Forecast of Fuel Taxes on Light Duty Vehicles (Oregon) VHighTech.
HIGHWAY TRUST FUND National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission April 2007.
More on Demand-Supply relationships. Demand  Demand relationships are typically drawn in two dimensions D = F(P)  In reality, demand is a functions.
Liberating road users: Options for progress. Liberating road users at ADC 2 September 24, 2010 How are road users constrained? Governments determine 
Status of Funding and Authorization Subcommittee's of Traffic Engineering and Operations and Management Manchester NH 2009 Ken Kobetsky.
Trucking Industry Perspectives on Transportation Funding Greg Owen Head Coach Ability/Tri-Modal Talking Freight – December 16, 2009.
Darrin Roth American Trucking Associations, Inc. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROAD PRICING.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
OVERVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCE OPTIONS SEPTEMBER 28, 2011.
Trucking Trends. Money and Tons Revenue:  $681.7 billion in gross freight revenues (primary shipments only) from trucking, representing 81.2% of the.
Discussion of Crime Control Prevention District Telecommunications Services Sales Tax & Legislative Changes Related to Local Sales & Use Tax on Residential.
13 March 2014 By a California Country Mile The Business Case for Road Usage Charging Matthew J. Dorfman and Travis P. Dunn D’Artagnan Consulting, LLP.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
43 RD ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS 2015 A Multimodal, Smart and Safe European Transport System: The Key Role of Motorways Epic Sana Hotel May.
Nevada Transportation Conference
Auditor of State’s Office Presentation Settlement Director Dan Bastin
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
Auditing with GPS and on-board recording devices
How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation
Strategy to Fund Regional Infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by: James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding

Road User Fee Task Force Legislative Mandate: “To develop a design for revenue collection for Oregon’s roads and highways that will replace the current system for revenue collection.”

Effect of New Technology Vehicles on Highway Fund Revenue

Conclusion In the future, gas tax revenue will not be the primary source for funding our roads.

A per-mile charge based on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) within a state Replaces fuel tax for participating motorists A Solution: The Mileage Fee

Collection Possibilities Human Data Gathering Centralized Electronic Collection Collection at Fueling Stations

Structural Issues with Mileage Fee Collection Cost of Start Up and Operations Collection Enforcement Integration with Current Fuel Tax Collection System System Redundancy Ease of Use by Motoring Public

Oregon’s Mileage Fee Concept

A per-mile charge based on miles driven within Oregon by zone. Zone 1 = in state Zone 2 = out of state Optional Zone 3 = rush hour Zone 4 = local option The Concept

Characteristics of Collection VMT collected electronically by zone

Mileage Transfer VMT transmitted electronically at fueling stations VMT data transfer from vehicles when fueling Communication is short range!

Mileage fee imposed as part of fuel purchase Fuel tax deducted from fuel purchase price Gas to Go Commercial Rd., OR May 15, 2006 – 8:00 AM State tax disc. (3.24) Net fuel Mileage fee Total Due FLEET XXXX THANK YOU Characteristics of Collection

On-Vehicle Device GPS Antenna RF Antenna OBDII Port

Mileage Allocation Rush Hour : 50.6 In Oregon : 1,200.7 Non Oregon: No Signal : zones Vehicle Display

Fuel tax maintained for non- equipped vehicles Mileage fee integrates with fuel tax collection system Oregon’s weight-mile tax retained for heavy trucks Allows rush hour pricing Key Features

Vehicles No retrofitting Components installed during vehicle manufacture Service Stations Capital costs (Oregon): $33 million Annual operating costs (Oregon): $1.6 million Cost of Full Implementation

No vehicle location data stored in vehicle No data transferred except mileage totals within zones Data transferred only at time of fueling via short range radio frequency Privacy

1.Retrofitting cost versus long phase-in 2.Setting mileage fee rate 3.Interstate system standardization and revenue allocation 4.Integration with federal solution Policy Issues Remaining

Road User Fee Pilot Program March 2006-April 2007

Oregon’s Pilot Program Purpose: To test technology and system Time Line: June 2006 – March 2007 for Full Pilot Pre-Pilot:Preliminary control technology test √ completed Warm Up: 20-vehicle managed start at fueling stations √ completed Full Pilot: Point-of-sale system installed at fueling stations √ completed 280 vehicles pay mileage fee in lieu of gas tax  Nov ‘06 Portion of volunteers in Rush Hour Pricing  Nov ‘06

On-Board Equipment for Pilot Program GPS Receiver

On-Board Equipment for Pilot Program Mileage Counter

On-Board Equipment for Pilot Program Display

Wholesale Level Wholesale Distribution Industry ODOT $ Gas Tax Retail Station $ Cost of fuel + gas tax reimbursement System Integration: No change in gas tax collection

Non-mileage fee vehicleMileage Fee Vehicle $ Mileage Fee + fuel cost $ gas tax + fuel cost Retail Station Consumer Level System Integration: Consumers pay either gas tax or mileage fee, not both

ODOT Gallon & tax data If fuel taxes + mileage fees collected are less than 24 cents per gallon paid for fuel, ODOT remits the difference If total fuel taxes + mileage fees collected exceed 24 cents per gallon paid for fuel, ODOT sends a bill for the balance due Retail Station System Integration: Tax data periodically run through a “true-up” calculation by ODOT

Bulk of revenue stream remains at distributor level (fewer taxpayers) Mileage fee gradually becomes predominant System Integration Retain current multi-state anti-evasion processes Fuel tax retained as redundant system to guard against system failure and tampering

RUFTF Website

And Now Some non-approved OBSERVATIONS