SCDOT Needs, Funding Challenges, and Economic Development or “Getting to Good” Robert St. Onge, SCDOT 16 July 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Highway 46 in BeresfordHighway 19 North of Humboldt Highway 73 South of Lemmon Interstate 90 East of Wyoming Line.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Steve Varnedoe Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to the Joint.
Highway Improvement Program Funding Status With ARRA Rhode Island Department of Transportation April 8, 2010.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
SCDOT’s Strategic Direction Janet Oakley Secretary of Transportation South Carolina Alliance to Fix Our Roads September 22, 2014 Janet Oakley Secretary.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
SFY Proposed Budget Presented April 16, 2013 Robert J. St. Onge, Jr. SCDOT Secretary of Transportation Christy A. Hall, P.E., CPM SCDOT Deputy.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
1 1 CRTPA Board Meeting 09/20/2010. CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX) CSX Transportation – serves every major population and industrial center east of the Mississippi;
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Juva Barber Executive Director. What is KBT? Kentuckians for Better Transportation educates and advocates for all modes of transportation to promote a.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
California’sInfrastructureCrisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment 2011 “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Michigan Infrastructure and Transportation Association A STATE IN NEED.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Sue Mulvihill, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
2014 SCAPA Summer Conference Christy A. Hall, P.E. Deputy Secretary for Engineering.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Asset Management Cindy VanDyke Office of Planning Georgia Department of Transportation.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
The Road to New Hampshire's Future. Transportation Funding Overview/summary Operational deficit Preservation and Maintenance Capital needs.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
AT THE CROSSROADS Building for the Next Generation Council of State Governments May 30, 2008 Lexington, Kentucky.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Virginia Transportation Finance A Primer Presented by: Tom Boyd VDOT Asst Commissioner for Finance.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
1 Camden County Road & Bridge Department Larry E. Lampe Superintendent This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Review and Comment on Draft 2009 Ten-Year State Highway Operation and Protection Plan Presented to California Transportation Commission February
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Facing Funding and Weather Challenges: Impact of Weather Events on Treatment Selection and Pavement Condition PPRA Fall Meeting 2014 November 17-19, Baltimore,
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy
Presentation transcript:

SCDOT Needs, Funding Challenges, and Economic Development or “Getting to Good” Robert St. Onge, SCDOT 16 July 2012

Infrastructure, Jobs, and Economic Development “The state’s ports, rivers, rail and roads are essential arteries of commerce in South Carolina. Transportation, distribution and logistics depend on them, and they need to be maintained and expanded when necessary.” SC Department of Commerce Infrastructure defines the State!

Port of Charleston “ The engine for economic development in South Carolina”

4 SC Industries Rely on the Port, Highway Connections 4 More than 700 companies from every county import or export through our ports. One in 11 S.C. jobs is related to trade – growing as we leverage logistics, export and agricultural advantages. Businesses of all sizes – about half with fewer than 50 employees. International trade and foreign investment are the very fabric of business and employment in South Carolina.

SCDOT’s Mission and Goal Mission (Section , SC Code of Laws) The department shall have as its functions and purposes the systematic planning, construction, maintenance and operation of the state highway system and the development of a statewide intermodal and freight system that is consistent with the needs and desires of the public. SCDOT’s core service is to provide a safe, properly- maintained road and bridge network supporting citizens, tourists, and commerce.

SCDOT Responsibilities 4th Largest State-Maintained System in U.S. 41,429 highway miles 8,377 state-owned bridges Over 550,000 traffic signs 9 Welcome Centers 19 Rest Areas 115,000 miles of ditches 128,000 roadside acres mowed 23,000,000 linear feet of curb and gutter Over 1,200,000 driveway entrances Over 20,000,000 linear feet of sidewalk Over 1,700 miles of guardrail 5,639 state owned traffic signals and flashers

Rank of State Systems RankState Total DOT Miles Population Land Area (sq. mi.) 1TX80, M K 2NC79, M 48.7 K 3VA57, M 39.6 K 4SC41, M 30.1 K 5PA39, M 44.8 K Source: FHWA Highway Statistics 2008 Table HM-10 Public Road Mileage 2008 Miles by Ownership Generated October 2009 Population data: US Census.gov 2010

Comparison with Neighboring State Highway Systems State Miles DOT Maintained Total Public Miles % State Owned # of Employees # of State Employees per 100 Miles of State Rd. NC79,466105,10375%10, SC41,42966,25462%4, GA17,997121,87514%5, TN13,88192,17315%4, FL12,084121,3869%7, NATION779,7354,042,76819%223, Source: FHWA Highway Statistics 2008 Table HM-10 Public Road Mileage 2008 Miles by Ownership Generated April 2012 Census Bureau Chart:govs/apes/10stall

System Mileage in S.C. Type of System Mileage Lane Miles Interstate8513,793 Primary9,47123,726 Federal Aid Secondary 10,27921,089 Non Federal Aid Secondary 20,82841,853 Total41,42990,461 Mileage, also referred to as “center line miles” is quantified by length of roadway and most statistics use center line miles. Lane miles are quantified by area.

Interstate Needs Source: SC Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan, 2008

Interstate System Challenges Of the 851 total miles, 113 miles of interstate are high usage, carrying over 70,000 vehicles a day. Nearly 30% of all roadway travel in SC occurs on the interstates. System is in need of widening and resurfacing for today’s level of use. System needs to grow by 400 lane miles to handle anticipated requirements out to Today’s average cost to add an additional lane in each direction for an interstate is $20 million per mile. Approximately 50 interchanges out of 271 will require reconstruction over the next 20 years. Today’s average interstate interchange costs $45 million, a rural interchange costs $35 million. Currently, 117 bridges on the interstate are classified as functionally obsolete and 28 are structurally deficient.

“Getting to GOOD” Interstate System $340M additional needed per year to increase capacity up to a “good” condition. $35M additional needed per year to maintain interstate pavement in a “good” condition

Level of Service B (Good)Level of Service F (Failing)

Primary System US and SC routes Primary system mileage: 9,475 miles – capped by state law, SC Code Section – 2,140 urban; 7,336 rural For “good” levels of service: 20-year widening needs estimated at $11 Billion

“Getting to GOOD” Primary System $440M additional needed per year to increase capacity up to a “good” condition. $90M additional needed per year to maintain primary system pavement in a “good” condition

Secondary Road System

“Getting to GOOD” Secondary System $540M additional needed per year to maintain secondary road pavement in a “good” condition

Characteristics of the Secondary System Total of 31,122 miles: 20,854 miles not eligible for federal funding 486 are dirt 60 are cemetery, school drives, or other segments that have been converted for other uses (such as parking lots) 10,580 miles have average daily traffic of less than 200 vehicles

S-279 Fairfield County

S-308 Saluda County

S-194 Florence County

S-1870 Richland County

What About Bridges?

Total Bridges in South Carolina - 8,377 Replacement Category Number of Bridges Structurally Deficient * 907 Closed for Safety Reasons 7 Weight Restricted 408 Functionally Obsolete** 774 * (low structural rating and eligible for federal bridge funding) ** (capacity/lane width deficiencies) Source: SCDOT Maintenance Office June 1, 2012 Present Bridge Replacement Needs

Present Bridge Replacement Needs Summary as of July 1, 2011

Bridge Program Highlights Inspect over 6,000 bridges per year Underwater inspection of 50 to 60 bridges per year Structural Health Monitoring and Load Test Program Unknown Foundation Testing Program Ravenel Asset Management Projects No. 1 (completed) and No. 2 (active) No. 3 (under development to include moveable bridges) Advanced project selection protocol using a comprehensive “bridge management system” (BMS) combined with sound “engineering judgment” Bridge preservation including painting and decks Maintenance force capability to construct new bridges Pilot Program initiated using temporary bridges

“Getting to GOOD” Bridge Program $31M additional needed for replacement per year to bring the bridge system to a state of “good” condition

SCDOT Revenues/Resources

Department of Transportation's Estimated Revenue Projections FY REVENUES (in millions) $ Motor Fuel User Fee Interest Toll Revenues Maintenance Trust Fund Misc. (Permits, Sale of Property & other ) Interagency Transfers (12.3) - CTC Donor County Transfer/SIB Transfer (63.9) - Debt Service (DOT & Toll) $ State Revenues $ Federal Reimbursement Revenues $1,298.8 Total Estimated Revenues

SCDOT SFY 2012 –13 $1.401 B Appropriations Budget January 19,

$814 Million Funding Plan (Federal/State Match) FEDERAL LANDS $10 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM $246 INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE $169 PLANNING $15 CMAQ $16 SAFETY (SRS,SAFETY,RHPD) $45 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM $161 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT & REHAB $108 MASS TRANSIT $43 Current Federal Funding

Motor Fuel Revenue Trend % increase in SC population; gas tax revenue flat!

Call to Action Re-build the State Highway Trust Fund!! * SCDOT needs an additional $1,476M per year for 20 years (total of $29B) to bring our roads to a level of service of “Good” Good Condition Estimated Cost/Year (Additional Funding) Pavement$665,000,000 Capacity$780,000,000 Bridge Replacement$31,000,000 Total Combined$1,476,000,000* $500M more a year will bring our system to “Fair”

Investment Scenario Impact of $500 Million Additional Funds per year to the State System $120 million could be used to: – replace approximately 70 deficient bridges. $140 million could be used to: – resurface approximately 1,243 lane miles of primary and secondary roads. $84 million could be used to: – widen approximately 4 miles of interstate or reconstruct 2 interstate interchanges. $56 million could be used to: – resurface approximately 340 lane miles interstate. $100 million could be used to: – widen approximately 14 miles of congested roadways.

Local sales tax programs have combined to generate almost $2 billion in local tax revenues in Aiken, Beaufort, Berkeley, Charleston, Dorchester, Florence, Horry, and York Counties. These local funds were used as match money to allow the State Infrastructure Bank to approve an additional $2 billion in funding toward additional transportation projects in those counties. Local Sales Tax Programs

Questions?