Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
Advertisements

1 SECOND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY (ANBP-2) Enalapril/ACEI vs. HCTZ, n = 6,083 Randomized, open-label (blinded endpoint review) All CV events.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
PAD A Call to Action. PAD: A Call to Action - What is peripheral arterial disease (PAD)? and why is it so dangerous? - Diagnosing PAD in the primary care.
Overcoming the challenge of blood pressure control in prediabetic and diabetic patients: PICASSO T2D Study Efficacy and tolerability of fixed dose combination.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
Absolute cardiovascular disease risk Assessment and Early Intervention Dr Michael Tam Lecturer in Primary Care
UKPDS Paper 36 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit UKPDS slides are copyright and remain the property of the University of Oxford Diabetes.
UKPDS Paper 81 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit UKPDS slides are copyright and remain the property of the University of Oxford Diabetes.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Treatment of Hypertension Chapter 25 Richard E. Gilbert, Doreen Rabi, Pierre LaRochelle, Lawrence.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge
Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure How explosive is the cocktail?
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
Who should have statins 18 th March Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation.
1 The JNC 7 recommendations for initial or combination drug therapy are based on sound scientific evidence.
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
IDC Diabetes Update: Recent Research and Impact on Diabetes Management Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes –Post DCCT findings--improving glycemic control and.
Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Philip A Kalra Lead Nephrologist for ASTRAL, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK, On behalf of the ASTRAL TMC and collaborators UK MULTI-CENTRE TRIAL IN ATHEROSCLEROTIC.
FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee 1st June 2008 Rury Holman Clinical outcomes with anti-diabetic drugs: What we already know.
Morbidity and Mortality in Contemporary CAD Patients With Hypertension Treated With Either a Verapamil/Trandolapril or Beta-Blocker/Diuretic Strategy (INVEST):
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Hypertension & diabetes: new guidelines Janice Douglas, MD Case Western University Cleveland, OH George L Bakris, MD Director of the Hypertension/Clinical.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
CARU The HY pertension in the V ery E lderly T rial – latest data Stephen Jackson Professor of Clinical Gerontology King’s Health Partners.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
To assess the prognostic value of variability in home-measured blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in a general population. Objective: Methods: BP.
Diabetes... Common and underdiagnosed Causes macro- and microvascular events Reduces duration and quality of life.
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
7/27/2006 Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated with Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril* * Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
Polypill x Aspirin Project Groups 3 and 4
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
1 ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic Status January 28, 2004.
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Number of participants with diabetes by trial Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2008;371:
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and.
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
Blood Pressure and Lipid Trials: Rationale, Importance and Design
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
Comparison of baseline characteristics in participants who subsequently had an incident cardiovascular event or new-onset diabetes in the Prospective.
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
51st Annual Scientific Session for the LIFE Investigators
Cholesterol and blood pressure values at baseline and after 15 days of dark-chocolate and white-chocolate consumption Characteristic Dark chocolate before.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
The results of the SHARP trial
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Average change in blood pressure (BP) from recruitment to 6-month postrecruitment in intervention and control patients >50 years included due to having.
Presentation transcript:

Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n = 758) Less tight BP control (n = 390) ACE inhibitor to maximum dose (n = 400) Beta-blocker to maximum dose (n = 358) Previous antihypertensive treatment BP ≥ 150/85 mm Hg (n = 421) No previous antihypertensive treatment BP ≥ 160/90 mm Hg (n = 727) UKPDS 38: BMJ 1998;317:703–13 UKPDS 38: study design

UKPDS 38: participant characteristics Tight (n = 758) Less tight (n = 390) Age (years) BMI (kg/m 2 ) HbA 1c Systolic BP (mm Hg) Diastolic BP (mm Hg)94 On antihypertensive treatment (%) Total cholesterol (mmol/l) HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)1.1 Current Smokers (%) UKPDS 38: BMJ 1998;317:703–13

UKPDS 38: tight control had a greater effect on blood pressure Blood pressure (mm Hg) Baseline9 years Tight Less tight Systolic BP Baseline9 years Diastolic BP UKPDS 38: BMJ 1998;317:703–13

UKPDS 38: relative risk reduction with tight blood pressure control Relative risk reduction tight vs less tight BP control (%) Microvascular endpoint Diabetes death MI All-cause mortality Stroke Peripheral vascular disease Any diabetes endpoint ** * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 ** * * UKPDS 38: BMJ 1998;317:703–13

UKPDS 39: similar effects of beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor Any diabetes endpoint Blood pressure (mm Hg) Years from randomisation Captopril Atenolol Systolic Diastolic Microvascular Diabetes death MI Stroke PVD Absolute risk (events/1000 patients years) Captopril Atenolol Adapted from: BMJ 1998;317:713–20

UKPDS 39: reasons for non-compliance non-compliant patients (%) Captopril Atenolol Cough Increased creatinine Intermittent claudication Bronchospasm Impotence GI Dizzy, tired, unwell Depression Headache Allergic reaction UKPDS 39: BMJ 1998;317:713–20