Making All Numbers Whole Making All Numbers Whole or Yes, Virginia There Are No Fractions Yes, Virginia There Are No Fractions by Herbert I. Gross, Judith Bender, & Richard A. Medeiros © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next

Of all the topics that cause students (and, often, teachers as well) anxiety, perhaps the understanding of fractions heads the list. Once the “fear” of fractions sets in, it casts a negative pall on the rest of the students’ mathematical experiences. Preface On the other hand, at least at the computational level, most people do not have the same problem when internalizing the arithmetic of whole numbers. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next

Thus the cornerstone of our approach, which we call “Mathematics as a Second Language”, is that by viewing numbers as adjectives that modify nouns, every problem that involves common fractions can be transformed into an equivalent problem that involves only whole numbers. Preface © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next The goal of our approach is to help students perceive mathematics as a unified whole whereby one topic flows in a seamless way from the previous ones. next

In this context, our approach is to show that once students understand whole number arithmetic they also know the arithmetic of fractions. Preface © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next How this is done is the subject of Module 3.

In particular, our approach converts any problem whose solution requires a knowledge of fractions to an equivalent problem whose solution requires only a knowledge of whole numbers 1. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next To see our approach from a non-threatening point of view, simply consider the anecdote below. Customer: How much horse meat do you use when you make rabbit stew? Owner: Half and half; 1 By way of review the whole numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3, etc… notenote 1 rabbit, 1 horse. next

This joke emphasizes how we usually think of numbers as being adjectives that modify nouns. For example, in talking about distance, we will say 3 inches, 3 feet, 3 meters, 3 miles etc, but never just “3” by itself. In this context, we see amounts not as numbers, but as quantities. By way of review … © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next A quantity is a phrase consisting of an adjective and a noun. Definition The adjective is a number (in the above example, 3), and the noun is the unit (in the above example, inches, feet, meters, or miles).

© 2009 Herbert I. Gross next In the rabbit stew joke, with respect to the nouns “rabbit” and “horse”, the number of each (the adjective, 1) is the same, but the quantities (of meat) are very different. In still other words, 1 “rabbit unit” is not the same as 1 “horse unit”. 1 horse. 1 rabbit,

A novel way to introduce fractions is by asking “What’s my noun?” Application to © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next The Language of Fractions Clerk: Do you want the pizza sliced into 6 pieces or 8 pieces? Customer: Please cut it into 6 pieces because I can’t eat 8 pieces. If this sounds a bit strange consider the following anecdote. next

To be more precise, the word “piece” as it is used in “6 pieces” means “1 of the 6 equally sized pieces into which the pizza is cut”; while as it is used in “8 pieces”, it means “1 of the 8 equally sized pieces into which the (same) pizza is cut”. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Of course, such phrases as “1 of the 6 equally sized pieces into which the pizza is cut” and “1 of the 8 equally sized pieces into which the (same) pizza is cut” are cumbersome to write. Hence, we use an abbreviation which we call a unit fraction.

© 2009 Herbert I. Gross next A half means 1 of the 2 parts of equal size that equal the whole unit. A third means 1 of the 3 parts of equal size that equal the whole unit. A fourth means 1 of the 4 parts of equal size that equal the whole unit. A fifth means 1 of the 5 parts of equal size that equal the whole unit. A sixth means 1 of the 6 parts of equal size that equal the whole unit.... An “nth” means 1 of the n parts of equal size that equal the whole unit. The names for the unit fractions are, halves, thirds, fourths, fifths, sixths,... and “nth’s”; where… next

© 2009 Herbert I. Gross next 1/2 is the symbol for a half. 1/3 is the symbol for a third. 1/4 is the symbol for a fourth. 1/5 is the symbol for a fifth. 1/6 is the symbol for a sixth. 1/n is the symbol for an “nth”. The unit fractions “half”, “third”, etc. are further symbolized as… next

When we count in the usual way; that is, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5..., we are assuming that we know the noun that these adjectives are modifying. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next For example, if we’re counting doughnuts, we do not say,1 doughnut, 2 doughnuts, 3 doughnuts... because we know from the context that the noun is doughnuts. In a similar way we can count by halves, thirds, fourths, fifths, etc. Special Note

© 2009 Herbert I. Gross next For example, if the whole (be it a pizza or anything else) is divided into 7 pieces of equal size and we take 3 of these pieces, we represent this quantity by saying “3 sevenths of the pizza” and writing it as “ 3 / 7 of the pizza”. Thus, for example, we might count 1 seventh, 2 sevenths, 3 sevenths, 4 sevenths, etc. We may think of 3 sevenths as 3 × 1 seventh, and we abbreviate this as 3 / 7. In this context, 3 / 7 is an adjective modifying “of the pizza”; and with respect to 3 / 7, 3 is the adjective and sevenths is the noun.

© 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Definition A number such as 3 / 7, which we read as 3 sevenths, is called a common fraction. In terms of unit fractions, it is an abbreviation for 3 × 1 / 7. The top number (in this case, 3) is called the numerator, and it tells us how many “pieces” we are taking (think of the word “enumerate” which means to count; to count asks the question “how many?” and “how many” is an adjective). The bottom number (in this case, 7 but read as sevenths) tells us the size of each piece relative to the whole. For that reason it is called the denominator (think of denomination which means size, a noun).

The “tricky” part is that the greater the denominator, the smaller the size of each piece. This can be remembered by the following joke… © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Note A man was so grateful to God for surviving a serious operation that he increased his donation to the church from one 10th of his salary to one 20th of his salary.

In other words, if we divide the whole into 20 equally sized pieces, each piece is smaller than it would have been if we had divided the whole into only 10 equally sized pieces. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Note In still other words, as the number of people who get a piece of the same pie increases, the smaller the size of each piece becomes.

In summary, a common fraction is itself a quantity in which the numerator (“top” number) is the adjective and the denominator (“bottom” number) is the noun. More specifically, if the denominator is 7, the noun is sevenths (not 7) where “sevenths” means 1 of what it takes 7 of to make the whole. 2 © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Note notenote 2 If we only think of the word “numerator” as being another name for the word “top”, it would have been wiser to use the word “top” because most people already know what “top” means. A similar argument applies to “denominator” versus “bottom”

Although 3 / 7 is itself a quantity, it is most often used as the adjective part of another quantity 3. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Note notenote 3 In a sense this is equivalent to what is called an adjective phrase in English grammar. For example, in the sentence “She wore a dark red dress”, “dark red” is an adjective phrase in which the adjective “dark” is modifying the adjective “red” and together they form an adjective phrase that modifies the noun “dress”.

For example, if a carton of books contains 35 books, saying 3 / 7 of a carton is another way of saying 3 sevenths of 35 books. In this way the carton of books plays the role of the “pizza”, and a book plays the role of a “piece of the pizza”. If we divide the carton of books into 7 pieces of equal size, then each piece (that is, 1 seventh of the carton) represents 5 books; and therefore 3 sevenths of the carton represents 3 × 5 books, or 15 books. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next Note

Hopefully, this discussion has highlighted the importance of being able to internalize the arithmetic of whole numbers. With this in mind, we conclude this part of our dialogue and will next turn our attention to showing how the adjective/noun theme gives us a unifying thread for understanding all of whole number arithmetic. © 2009 Herbert I. Gross next The Adjective/Noun Theme Concluding Remark