OMB Circulars: Guidebooks to Grants Management National Extensions and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference May 19, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Management & Budget
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
A Guide for UW-Madison Administrators & Faculty Basics of the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), OMB Circular A-21, and Cost Principles March 28, 2006 Robert.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Sponsored Programs How to Budget. BUDGETING BASIC CONSIDERATIONS  Benefit the Project  Allowable Costs  Total Cost Concept  Direct Costs  Indirect.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM August 2014 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Research Administration for Scientists Tim Quigg, Associate Chair and Lecturer Computer Science Department, UNC-Chapel Hill OMB Circular A-110: Administrative.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
We Are All in This Together: Close Out Issues Researchers, Administration Teams and Sponsored Projects Staff Arriving Together at the End of a Sponsored.
NCURA Regional Meeting April 5, 2011 Allowable Costs – Proposal Development to Project Closeout Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration.
OMB Circular A-21 Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Negotiating Federal Awards April 17, Negotiating Federal Awards Vincent (Bo) A. Bogdanski Assistant Director, Office of Sponsored Projects, University.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
GRANT POLICIES: “Do’s and Don’ts” Rebecca Bound, Research Administrator, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison Cheryl.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Mission of the Office of Migrant Education To provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational opportunities.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
I have a Grant, Now What??! John Hulvey Office of Sponsored Programs Administration and Accounting.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Presented by Urmila Bajaj January 26, 2017
Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

OMB Circulars: Guidebooks to Grants Management National Extensions and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference May 19, 2010

Presenters Rebecca Bound, Research Administrator, College of Agricultural & Life Sciences Research Division Petra Schroeder, Assistant Dean, Office of Research Services, The Graduate School Ron Ravel, Managing Officer, Research and Sponsored Programs,

The OMB Circulars  A-21: Cost Principles for Educational Institutions (“Why”)  A-110: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants & Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non- Profit Organizations (“How”)  A-133: Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations (“What”)

Why do we have Circulars? Guide and inform Sponsored Project Management Maintains relationship of trust between sponsors, institution and public (stewardship), and reputation with colleagues Future awards depend on it Audit findings and cost disallowances Criminal, civil and administrative penalties (compliance)

Where can I find the Circulars?  OMB website:  Mini guides available from NCURA (National Council of University Research Administrators):

A-21: Purpose  Applies to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions  Principles established in A-21 are designed to provide that the Federal Government bears its fair share of total costs, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, except where restricted or prohibited by law

A-21: Key Ideas  Institutions must treat similar costs consistently as either Direct costs or F&A (Facilities and Administration, also known as Indirect) costs.  Certain types of costs will be included in the institution’s F&A cost rate and will not be charged as Direct costs to Federal projects.

A-21: Key Ideas  A-21 Section C: In order for costs to be reimbursable by the Federal Government, they MUST BE: Necessary Reasonable Allocable Allowable Permissible Consistently Treated

Necessary  Costs applied to the project MUST be necessary to accomplish the scope of work.  To be necessary, the cost applied must be absolutely essential to achieve a certain result or results.

Reasonable  If the nature of the goods or services acquired or applied to the project reflect the action that a “prudent person” would take under similar circumstances.  Emphasis would be upon one acting in good judgment.  Not excessive or extreme; fair.  “Man on the street” test

Allocable  Cost is incurred solely for advancement of work on the project  Application of cost is in proportions that can be approximated through reasonable methods.  Cost is necessary and deemed assignable to the project

Allowable  Allowability of costs is defined specifically in OMB Circular A-21 Section J General Provisions of the cost principles.  Note: Section J does not indicate whether the cost should be treated as a direct cost or an F&A cost.

Consistently Treated  Like costs must be treated the same in like circumstances… consistently  Costs may be treated as direct costs only or as F&A costs only.

Permissible  Costs must be permissible under the law AND  Costs must be permissible under terms/conditions of the award

Costs normally treated as F&A Costs  Administrative and Clerical Salaries  Telecommunications -- Local Telephone Service Including phone equipment such as telephones, cell phones, pagers, fax machines, and line charges  Postage Including U.S. Postal Service, Federal Express, UPS  Office supplies  Dues and memberships

Costs normally treated as F&A Costs (cont’d.)  Subscriptions, Books, and Periodicals  General Purpose Equipment Non-research equipment which may be used for general office purposes such as desktop computers, laptop computers, printers, fax machines, copy machines, and office furniture.  General computer services and networking costs  Staff recruitment and relocation

Exceptions: When is a cost eligible?  A cost normally treated by your university as an F&A cost may be appropriate as a direct cost on a Federally sponsored project if: The cost is necessary, reasonable, allocable, allowable, and permissible under the law, terms/conditions of the award, and the circumstances are “unlike.” “Unlike” circumstances may be determined by the nature of the project, such as those detailed in Exhibit C of OMB Circular A-21.

Exceptions: Documentation  Investigators should provide clear justification in Federal project budgets for direct cost items that normally are treated as F&A costs.  The fact that the sponsoring agency allows such costs to remain in the awarded budget may not be interpreted as approval for these items as CAS exceptions.

F&A Rate Calculation Facilities Costs + Admin Costs (capped at 26%) Organized Research Base* = F&A Rate *Organized Research Base = All direct expenses related to organized research, including: Sponsored Project Costs University-funded competitive awards Overdrafts Committed Cost Sharing

OMB A-110  Sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies in the administration of grants to and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations  Includes many pre-award, post-award and after the award requirements related primarily to institutional infrastructure (i.e., purchasing system, draw down of federal funds, etc.)

A-110 Subpart A (General)  Purpose: To ensure consistency.  Definitions: From a to oo.  Effect on other issuances: A-110 supersedes all other regulations.  Deviations: Allows for conditions under which exceptions may be granted.  Subawards: Also subject to requirements

A-110 Pre-award  Forms and instructions SF-424 series  Grant, Contract, Cooperative Agreement Use is mandated Cooperative Agreement = Substantial involvement of the executive agency Contract = Acquisition of property or Services, a Deliverable

Cost Sharing or Matching  Portion of project or program costs not borne by the Federal Government. Mandatory (required by Sponsor for eligible submission) Voluntary (not required by Sponsor)  Quantifiable commitments in budget justification or proposal  May be encouraged in RFP

Cost Sharing or Matching  Criteria: Verifiable from the recipient's records. Not included as contributions for any other federally- assisted project or program. Necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives (A-21). Allowable under the applicable cost principles (A-21). Not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statute to be used for cost sharing or matching. Provided for in the approved budget when required by the Federal awarding agency.

A-110 Post-award requirements  Financial and Program Management  Property Standards  Procurement Standards  Reports and Records  Termination and Enforcement

Standards for financial management systems  Recipient’s financial system must provide: - Financial results of each sponsored project -Identification of source & application of funds -Control & accountability for all funds, property and other assets -Comparison of outlays to budget amounts -Written procedures

Revision of Budget and Program Plans  Prior Approval Required for: Change in scope or objective of the project Change in key personnel listed in the application or award document The absence for >3 months or 25% reduction in time by the PI The need for additional Federal funding The transfer of amounts budgeted for indirect costs to account for increases in direct costs (if approval for such is required)

Revision of Budget and Program Plans  Prior approval may not be required for: Pre-award costs 90 calendar days prior to award One-time extension of the expiration date of the award for up to 12 months (with written request at least 10 days before the current project expiration) Carry forward of unobligated balances to subsequent funding periods

After the Award Requirements Establishes procedures for close-outs, disallowances, and Adjustments  All financial, performance, and other reports as required to be submitted 90 calendar days after the date of completion of the award  Unless extended, all obligations incurred under the award shall be liquidated within 90 calendar days after the funding period/completion date  Agency must make prompt payment  Recipient should refund any unobligated cash advance

After the Award Requirements The closeout of an award does not affect: The right of the Federal awarding agency to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review The obligation of the recipient to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions Audit Requirements Record retention

A-133: Audit Requirements  Sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among federal agencies for the audit of States, local governments, and other non-profit organizations receiving federal funds  Defines federal responsibilities for implementation and monitoring of such requirements

Thank You!