P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT Charles Kniseley Slide presentation by Anthony White 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
LOCAL REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF). Page 2 Local Revolving Loan Funds Indications that HUD and GAO will heavily monitor and audit the RLF activities HUD.
Excess Cost Debra Jennings Lynne Fairfax Slide Presentation by Anthony White A UGUST 2012 P ART B E XCESS C OST 1.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
State Auditor’s Office April 22, 2010 Brad White, CPA Single Audit Coordinator.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C Michigan Electronic Grants System (MEGS) Application for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.
West Virginia’s Experience. West Virginia Issues  SEA Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS) – USED Waiver  LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) – OSEP Verification.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Compliance Supplement  What is the Compliance Supplement  Important sections of the CS  For what should or should not be used  New Information for.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
State Auditor’s Office March 10, 2010 Brad White, CPA Single Audit Coordinator.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) edgar.html.
A State Department Perspective.  Headed by an elected State Superintendent ◦ No state board of education  425 School Districts  12 Cooperative Educational.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Maintenance of Effort Office of Special Education Fall Forum 1.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
Financial Management  Subgrantees shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to insure proper distribution of and accounting for Federal.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs.
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Texas Education Agency Grants Administration Training for Nonprofit Grantees Hosted by the Division of Grants.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
IDEA Maintenance of Effort
Excess Cost Debra Jennings Lynne Fairfax
Managing Federal grants
Time Distribution Report OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B. Paragraph 8 h. Standard Operating Procedures
State Oversight Responsibility for Use of IDEA Funds for Children 3-5
Presentation transcript:

P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT Charles Kniseley Slide presentation by Anthony White 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 1

“T HE P UZZLE P ALACE ” G ENERAL S UPERVISION 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 2 State Performance Plan Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Integrated Fiscal Accountability Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementatio n Data on Processes and Results Effective Dispute Resolution Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE CrEAG OSEP Policy Guidance Statutes and Regulations OMB A-133 & Compliance Supplement IFA : Integrated Fiscal Accountability 3

G UIDANCE ON P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT  Part C Statute and Regulations  Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)  OMB Circular A-133 and Compliance Supplement  OSEP Policy Letters  CrEAG 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 4

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE Part C Requirements 5

P ART C S TATUTE AND R EGULATIONS 34 CFR § (b) Prohibition Against Supplanting: “…the total amount of State and local funds budgeted for expenditures in the current fiscal year for early intervention services for children eligible under this part and their families must be at least equal to the total amount of State and local funds actually expended for early intervention services for these children and their families in the most recent preceding fiscal year for which the information is available.” IDEA section 637(b)(5)(B) 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 6

W HAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN MEASURING S TATE AND LOCAL EFFORT ? Total State and local funds may include:  State general funds;  Public funds generated in local service areas and used for Part C purposes;  Funds for Part C early intervention functions and services contributed by partner agencies (both at the State and local level); and/or  State funds used to meet matching requirements (under Medicaid, SCHIP, TANF, etc.) 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 7

W HAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN MEASURING S TATE AND LOCAL EFFORT ? 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 8 State A

P ART C S TATUTE AND R EGULATIONS 34 CFR § (d)(2) Policies Related to Payment for Services: (2) If a public agency spends reimbursements from Federal funds (e.g., Medicaid) for services under this part, those funds are not considered State or local funds for purposes of the provisions contained in 34 §CFR /19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 9

P ART C S TATUTE AND R EGULATIONS 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 34 CFR § (b) Allowances: (1) Decreases in the number of children who are eligible to receive early intervention services under this part. (2) Unusually large amounts of funds expended for such long-term purposes as the acquisition of equipment and the construction of facilities. 10

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE EDGAR Part C Requirements 11

EDGAR Subpart F: What are the Administrative Responsibilities of the Grantee?  § Compliance with statutes, regulations, and applications.  § Records related to compliance. 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 12

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE EDGAR OMB A-133 & Compliance Supplement Part C Requirements 13

OMB A-133 §___.500(d)(1) Compliance In addition to the requirements of GAGAS, the auditor shall determine whether the auditee has complied with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that may have a direct and material effect on each of its major programs. 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 14

OMB A-133 C OMPLIANCE S UPPLEMENT  Establishes specific requirements within the 14 areas for Federal programs across all Federal agencies  Using the Supplement, auditors identify findings specific to different Federal programs, including those within the Department of Education (e.g., IDEA, Title I, etc.)  Section G of the supplement addresses Matching, Level of Effort, and Earmarking 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 15

S ECTION G: M ATCHING, L EVEL OF E FFORT, E ARMARKING  Control Objectives  Control Environment  Risk Assessment  Information and Communication  Monitoring 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 16

P OSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS OF NOT MAINTAINING FISCAL EFFORT IN P ART C 1. Audit implications  Noncompliance with MOE requirements  Pay back the amount by which the State failed to meet MOE.  Paybacks must be made out of non-federal funds. 2. Grant implications  Ineligibility for grant funds if unable to provide the application assurance for the prospective fiscal year. 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 17

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE Part C Statute and Regulations OMB A-133 & Compliance Supplement Part C Requirements OSEP Policy Guidance 18

OSEP P OLICY G UIDANCE  1994 Letter to McWhorter  2000 Letter to Picard  2002 Letter to Watson  2004 Letter to Hensley  2009 Letter to State  2009 ARRA Guidance documents  State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) Fact Sheet 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 19

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE Part C Statute and Regulations Compliance Supplement & OMB A-133 Part C Requirements OSEP Policy Guidance CrEAG 20

C RITICAL E LEMENTS AND A NALYSIS G UIDE (C R EAG) Questions addressing MOE in Part C: Critical Element Fiscal System - 2: Does the State have procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure appropriate use of IDEA funds at the State level?  Related Question C- How does the lead agency ensure that the total amount of State and local funds expended for early intervention services in one year is maintained or increased in each subsequent year? 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 21

5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE Part C Statute and Regulations OMB A-133 & Compliance Supplement Part C Requirements OSEP Policy Guidance CrEAG 22