OMB Circulars & Cost Transfers James Trotter, SPA Director Charlie Resare, Subrecipient Monitor Sponsored Projects Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Advertisements

California Department of Food and Agriculture
Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
NIH Grants Management Policies DOM Weekly Fund Management Training.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Audit-Readiness Riverside Community College District Grants Office.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
Costing and Cost Transfers John Caruso Campus Relations Manager, Sponsored Projects Administration.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs May 4, 2010 Topic: Allowability.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
1 FIRST UIC ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE Striving for Excellence March 8 th & 9 th, 2007 Workshop Session: 3 D Best Practices for Sponsored.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration
NIH Grants Management Policies
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Post-Award Grant Administration
Managing Perkins Funds
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

OMB Circulars & Cost Transfers James Trotter, SPA Director Charlie Resare, Subrecipient Monitor Sponsored Projects Administration

Audience This course is intended for “department administrative staff”—including department administrators, division managers, department fiscal managers, department effort coordinators, etc.

Introduction The federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued a number of circulars to define the principles and standards for sponsored projects funded by federal agencies. These Circulars are instructions directed to the agencies but they must still be followed by recipient institutions.

Part 1 OMB Circulars Office of Management & Budget

OMB Circulars The federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued a number of Circulars to define the principles and standards for agreements between federal agencies and research institutions. A clear grasp of the central principles of these Circulars is essential for effective sponsored project management..

Introduction The first part of this session will examine the three circulars most significant to sponsored projects at OHSU: A-21 A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) A-133 The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) spells out each agency’s implementation of these circulars.

Introduction A-21 defines the cost principles applicable to grants and contracts at educational institutions. A-110 sets forth standards for consistency among federal agencies in the administration of grants to and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non- profits. A-133 sets forth standards for consistency in audits of organizations spending federal awards.

Introduction The Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA) website provides a link to the complete text of each OMB Circular:

A-21 Topics Direct vs. Indirect (F&A) Costs Allowable vs. Unallowable Costs Effort Reporting

A-21 Topics Direct Costs are costs that can be directly associated with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity. Examples of Direct Costs: Principal Investigator salary Lab supplies Scientific equipment

A-21 Topics Indirect Costs (Facilities & Administrative) are costs that are incurred for common or joint objectives and cannot be specifically identified with a particular sponsored project, instructional activity, or other institutional activity. Examples of Indirect Costs: Libraries Maintenance Research Administration

A-21 Topics Allowable Costs Must be reasonable Must be allocable Must be treated consistently “Prudent person” test

A-21 Topics Section J specifies which costs are allowable and unallowable as both direct and indirect costs.  Examples of Allowable Costs Equipment, Professional Services, Transportation  Examples of Unallowable Costs Alcohol, Entertainment, Lobbying, Marketing

A-21 Topics Time and Effort Reporting  The purpose of an effort reporting system is to provide a reasonable basis for distributing salary charges among direct and indirect activities.  OHSU uses a semi-annual, after-the-fact effort reporting system.

A-110 Overview 2 CFR Part 215 (formerly OMB Circular A-110)  Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants & Agreements.  “This circular sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies in the administration of grants to and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations.”

A-110 Topics Financial Management Systems Cost Sharing Program Income Reports and Records Termination and Enforcement Close-Out Procedures

A-110 Topics OHSU is accountable to sponsoring agencies and must demonstrate that appropriate financial management systems are in place. A-110 requires institutions receiving federal assistance to maintain “[e]ffective control over and accountability for all funds, property and other assets... and assure they are used solely for authorized purposes.” (Subpart C.21.b.3)

A-110 Topics Cost Sharing is the portion of project costs not borne by the Federal Government Cost Sharing can include: Cash (from recipient) Academic year effort (from recipient) Third party In-Kind Contributions (from outside the recipient organization)

A-110 Topics Cost Sharing must be more than a token amount (i.e., typically more than 1% of project costs). Cost Sharing represents institutional commitment to the project.

A-110 Topics Mandatory Cost Sharing is required by the sponsor as a condition of making the award. Voluntary Cost Sharing is not required by the sponsor but may become legally binding as a commitment reflected in the proposed budget. Committed (eg, over salary cap) Uncommitted (not tracked by OHSU)

A-110 Topics Acceptable Cost Sharing must be:  Verifiable and documented in recipient records  Not included as matching for any other federal projects, nor paid from other federal awards  Necessary and reasonable  Allowable under applicable cost principles  Appropriate to all OMB Circular A-110 provisions

A-110 Topics Program Income applies to funds earned during a project period. Program Income includes:  Registration fees for a training or conference award  Products or materials purchased on an award and sold after research has been conducted  Sale of information produced or acquired under the award

A-110 Topics Program Income may be: Added to funds committed to the project Deducted from total project allowable costs Applied to non-federal share of project costs Recipient has no obligation to the Federal Government for funds earned after the project period unless the agency’s regulations or terms and conditions provide otherwise.

A-110 Topics Property Management applies to property purchased under Federal awards, such as land, structures, equipment. Exempt property is that on which the title vests with the recipient upon acquisition with no further obligations.

A-110 Topics Property Management systems must: Conduct a physical inventory every two years Safeguard against damage, loss, and theft Provide adequate maintenance Maintain insurance Sell competitively at highest return, when authorized

A-110 Topics Reports & Records: A-110 sets forth procedures for monitoring and reporting financial and program performance and the required reporting forms, including requirements for record retention.

A-110 Topics Award recipients are responsible for:  managing and monitoring each project, program, function and activity supported by the award.  ensuring that sub-recipients have also met all audit requirements.

A-110 Topics Technical reports must be completed not more than quarterly and not less than annually. Reports must contain: Comparison of actual accomplishments with set goals for the period If applicable, reasons that goals were not met Explanation for any cost over-runs or high unit costs

A-110 Topics Award recipients must notify the awarding agency whenever events occur that have a significant impact on the project or program, or when problems, delays or adverse conditions materially impair the ability to attain program objectives.

A-110 Topics Financial Status Report (FSR) is required on any federally sponsored project. SPA submits financial reports to sponsors. SPA Senior Financial Analyst sends copies of reports to departments for review (eg, End Date Memo, etc.).

A-110 Topics Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records and all other records must be retained for three years from the date of final report, except when: Litigation requires retention until matters have been resolved. Records are transferred to the agency, in which case retention requirements end. Other record retention requirements apply.

A-110 Topics With agency approval, copies can be substituted for original records. Electronically imaged records may be substituted for original records provided the institution establishes appropriate procedures.

A-110 Topics Access to records is allowed to the agency, the inspector general and the comptroller general. Agencies may not limit public access to the recipient’s records without justification.

A-110 Topics Types of Award Termination: By the awarding agency By the awarding agency with recipient consent By the recipient Types of Enforcement: Remedies for non-compliance Hearings and appeals Suspension and termination Debarment

A-110 Topics Close-Out Requirements: All reports submitted within 90 days Prompt payment by awarding agency Recipient refund of unobligated cash advances Accounting for real and personal property Agency right to recover disallowances

A-133 Overview Effective July 1, 1992 (revised June 24, 1997), A- 133 “sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for the audit of … non-profit organizations expending Federal awards.” A-133 requires an annual external audit of all non- federal entities expending $500,000 or more annually in Federal funds.

A-133 Overview A-133 defines the requirements of an audit and explains the responsibilities of the institution, the agency and the auditor A sample of Federal awards and their direct cost transactions is selected and examined to determine if expenditures and procedures were appropriate.

A-133 Topics At OHSU, departments become involved in annual A-133 audits when SPA requires information on source documentation.

Part 2 Costing & Cost Transfers

Costing & Cost Transfers Project costs get charged to accounts according to accepted principles, policies and federal regulations. Occasionally expenses need to be moved between research projects, expenditure types, or differing funds at OHSU. These are called cost transfers, and are allowable only with proper justification, documentation, and approval. The next part of this course moves step-by-step through general cost accounting standards and the stages involved in a cost transfer.

Charging Direct Costs Sponsor funds must be available Costs are allocable to the project Costs are reasonable Costs are allowable Like costs are treated consistently

Allocable To be allocable as a direct cost, the expenditure must benefit only one project, or must be easily and proportionally assigned to multiple projects that benefit.

Reasonable To be reasonable, costs must pass the “prudent person test”. Would the local press make a story out of the costs you are charging to taxpayer funds? If so, you might want to think again.

Allowable For costs to be allowable on a federally sponsored award, “they must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these [federal] principles or in the sponsored agreement as to types or amounts of cost items” (OMB Circular A- 21, C.2.d).

Consistent “Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or F&A costs. Where an institution treats a particular type of cost as a direct cost of sponsored agreements, all costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances shall be treated as direct costs of all activities of the institution.” (OMB Circular A-21, D.1)

Consistent Certain items are generally considered “indirect” (F & A) costs—unless a direct relationship to a specific sponsored project can be established, such as: Salaries of departmental staff Office supplies Telephone expenses Photocopying and postage Etc.

Cost Transfers Cost Transfer: the process for moving an item of expenditure between sponsored projects, expenditure types, or different types of funds. Cost Transfers need justification, documentation, and approval.

Cost Transfer Overview Rules governing Cost Transfers Necessary approvals Walk through of OHSU Adjustment Form Cost Transfers and Audits Strategies for Prevention of Cost Transfers Examples

Avoid the Need All project costs should be appropriately charged to accounts according to accepted accounting principles as well as OHSU policies and the regulations applicable to sponsoring agencies. Ideally, completed transactions should not need correction.

Transfer When Needed However, in certain circumstances, changes are required to move expenses: Between projects Between expenditure types Between different types of funds Cost Transfers need all of the following: Justification Documentation Authorization

Federal Requirements The Federal Government questions the propriety of Cost Transfers on federally funded projects. Cost Transfers can cast doubt on a grantee’s accounting system and internal controls. The Government expects documentation and an authorization process for all Cost Transfers on federally assisted projects.

Federal Requirements Under no circumstances may a Cost Transfer be made with the sole intent of using up the unexpended balance in a federal account. Under no circumstances may an expense be ‘parked’ on one federal project while awaiting the award/set up of the ‘correct’ project.

SPA Procedure SPA reviews the OHSU Adjustment Form for: Allowability Acceptability Propriety of charges If the request does not meet these criteria, it will be returned to the PI. If the request is approved, SPA forwards the form for processing.

Acceptable Reasons Correction of error—but be more specific. Charges benefit more than one program (distribution of costs based on benefits received). Programs involve closely related work.

Unacceptable Reasons To reduce overruns if the transfer is from one federal project to another For reasons of convenience To use unspent money in a project Because the bookkeeper was on leave, etc.

Walk Through of Form Make Cost Transfers using the OHSU (“Transfer Between”) Adjustment Form: services/forms/upload/JE_FOMOPPL_POETA_ Adjustment_Form.xlsx (link needs correction) services/forms/upload/JE_FOMOPPL_POETA_ Adjustment_Form.xlsx Online instructions to this form: services/forms/upload/JE_Guidelines_CFS.pdf services/forms/upload/JE_Guidelines_CFS.pdf

Audits Cost Transfers can be a “red flag” to auditors. Auditors examine: Frequency Justification Remedies

Audit Questions Are Cost Transfers supported by documentation which adequately explains and justifies why the transfers were made? Are Cost Transfers caused by work which is supported by more than one funding source? Are there Cost Transfers between projects which are in an overrun condition to those with unexpended balances?

Cost Transfer Case Study #1 An OHSU employee transfers expenses from one account to another and annotates the cost transfer “to correct an accounting error”. Is this an appropriate justification? Why or why not?

Case Study #1 Answers: If it was an accounting error, the transfer must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organization official. Transfers made solely to cover cost overruns are not allowable.

Cost Transfer Case Study #2 You are asked by a PI to stop at an office supply store on your way to work and pick up a few items. The PI also asked you to get donuts for the lab meeting that morning. When you arrive at work, the PI tells you that all the items should be charged to the grant. Your Department Administrator tells you that these purchases must come from departmental funds. Why?

Case Study #2 Answers: If the supplies are not specifically allocable to the grant, they are considered general office supplies and should not be charged as a “direct” cost to the grant account. Entertainment, such as food, is unallowable under the provisions of A-21.

Cost Transfer Case Study #3 Dr. Miller purchases a much needed piece of specialized equipment for her research on hypertension. When preparing the purchase request, she realizes that the only account with enough money is her grant for research on sleep disorders. Because both grants are funded by NIH, she charges the equipment to the sleep disorder grant. Is this acceptable?

Case Study #3 Answer: The purchase must directly benefit the project it is charged to. Dr. Miller must charge the hypertension study, not the sleep study.

Cost Transfer Summary Cost Transfer is the process of moving an expenditure between research projects, expenditure types, or different types of funds. Cost Transfers should be an exception, not a standard means of operating. Cost Transfers need justification, documentation, and approval.

OMB Circulars & Cost Transfers Questions?