New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Advertisements

The New Uniform Guidance
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
OMB Uniform Guidance “Super Circular”
The Uniform Guidance: A Top Ten List
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Presented by Colleen Ravenfeld Office.
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Grant Guidance Changes
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
Uniform Guidance: Summary of Significant Changes 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
GPD Indirect Cost Rate Training OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) 2 CFR Part 230 Appendix A – General Principles GPD Indirect Cost Rate Agreement Chief,
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, AND COST PRINCIPLES 2 CFR CHAPTER 1, CHAPTER 2, PART 200, ET AL. Uniform Guidance Training June.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
Impact of Changing Regulations University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Dynamic Changes Occurring! OMB’s Uniform Grant Guidance August 25, 2015 Presented by: Adam Roth, StreamLink Software Michelle Watterworth, Plante Moran.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Uniform Guidance Updates: What PI’s and their staff need to know April 2, 2015 Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
August, 2013 Grants Circular Reform Update Office of Management and Budget For more information visit
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
The Uniform Guidance © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC SC GFOA 2015 Fall Conference Brian D’Amico.
Safeguarding Federal Funds OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance Alabama Department of Education.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
OMB’s “Super Circular”: What Community Development Professionals Need to Know National Community Development Association Presented by Bob Lloyd January.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Sponsored Projects Administration What’s in it for Researchers? Proposed Changes in Federal Research Guidance (A-81) Pamela A. Webb Associate Vice President.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
Subrecipient Monitoring
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
Uniform Guidance Discussion
2 CFR 200- aka Uniform Guidance.
Office of Sponsored Programs ~ Jacksonville State University
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
2018 HUD Start Up 2 CFR 200.
Council on Financial Assistance Reform’s Uniform Guidance Training
Implementing the Uniform Guidance
Presentation transcript:

New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE: Some of the slides in this presentation were taken from a COFAR webinar conducted on January 27, 2014

Objectives Streamline guidance for Federal Awards to ease administrative burden Strengthen oversight over Federal funds to reduce risks of waste, fraud, and abuse Increase efficiency and effectiveness of Federal awards to ensure best use of the more than $500 billion expended annually 2

WHAT HAS CHANGED? The Office of Contracts and Grants is in the early stages of reviewing and comparing the Uniform Guidance to the existing OMB Circulars. Communication and training will be provided to campus at the completion of our review. A highlight of changes already noted are as follows:

Subrecipients Monitoring and Oversight Requirements for Pass-through Entities , Requirements for pass-through entities Includes audit responsibilities that were in A-133 The pass-through entity must: Put specific information in the subaward, including indirect cost rate Do a risk assessment to determine appropriate subrecipient monitoring AND must monitor subrecipients Consider if specific subaward conditions are needed Verify subrecipients have audits in accordance with Subpart F Make any necessary adjustment to the pass-through entity’s records based on reviews and audits of subrecipients Consider actions to address subrecipient noncompliance 4

Information Contained in a Subaward Following information must be identified to subrecipient at time of award and put in the subaward (and when changes are made to the subaward) ( (a)): Federal award identification, e.g., DUNS number Indirect cost rate for the Federal Award (including if the de minimus rate is charge per Indirect (F&A) costs) Requirements imposed by the pass- through entity Requirement to provide access to records for audit 5

Evaluating Subrecipient Risk to Determine Appropriate Monitoring The pass-through entity must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for the purpose of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring, which may include consideration of factors such as ( (b)): Prior experience with same or similar subawards Results of previous audits Whether new or substantially changed personnel or systems Extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring 6

Required Subrecipients Monitoring Procedures When monitoring of subrecipients, the pass-through entity must ( (d)): Review reports required by the pass-through entity Follow-up to ensure subrecipient takes appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the subaward from the pass- through entity identified through audits, on-site reviews, and other means Issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to subawards made by the pass-through entity Not new requirement – taken from A-133 7

Additional Subrecipient Monitoring Tools Following tools may be useful, depending upon the risk assessment ( (e)) Providing subrecipient training and technical assistance Performing on-site reviews Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements under , Audit services [in Cost Principles] No listed tool is required nor is the list of tools all inclusive Determination on which tools is a matter of judgment for the pass-through entity based upon its assessment of risk 8

Cost Principles – Administrative Costs Should normally be treated as indirect (F&A) costs May be charged as direct cost if ALL of the following are met: Must be integral to a project or activity Individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity Such costs are explicitly included in the budget or have prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs

Cost Principles Indirect (F&A) Costs Federal acceptance of approved IDC rate(s) New de minimis rate One time extension of up to 4 years

Cost Principles Indirect (F&A) Costs ( continued) Federal awarding agencies must accept approved negotiated indirect cost rates under (c)(1) unless a different rate is required by Federal statute or regulation, or when approved by a Federal awarding agency head or delegate based on documented justification as described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.

Cost Principles Indirect (F&A) Costs (continued) A 10% de minimis IDC rate available is now available under § (f) – It says, “ any non-Federal entity that has never received a negotiated indirect cost rate, except for those non-Federal entities described in Appendix VII to Part may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) which may be used indefinitely. Importantly, if chosen, the non-Federal entity must use the 10% rate on all federal awards until the entity negotiates an approved rate with their cognizant agency.

Cost Principles Indirect (F&A) Costs (continued) (g) Any non-Federal entity that has a federally negotiated indirect cost rate may apply for a one-time extension of a current negotiated indirect cost rates for a period of up to four years. This extension will be subject to the review and approval of the cognizant agency for indirect costs. If an extension is granted the non-Federal entity may not request a rate review until the extension period ends.

Cost Principles Cost Accounting Standards And Disclosure Statement Was not eliminated Threshold for CAS raised to $50M Streamlined review for changes to reduce the risk of non-compliance and audit findings

Selected Items of Cost – Compensation – Personal Services Strengthen Internal Controls Removed Examples Federal Agencies may approve methods for blended/braided funds Use of institutional base salary for IHE

Selected Items of Cost – Conferences R equires conference hosts/sponsors to exercise discretion and judgment in ensuring that conference costs are appropriate, necessary and managed in a manner that minimizes costs to the Federal award. Allows costs of finding local dependent care

Selected Items of Cost – Entertainment Costs Unallowable unless 1.Those costs have a programmatic purpose and are authorized in the approved budget for the federal award, or 2.Those costs have prior written approval from the federal awarding agency

Selected Items of Cost – Travel Costs Provides that temporary dependent care costs that result directly from travel to conferences and meet specified standards are allowable.