Contracts & Subawards. And the winner is… YOU AWARD RECEIVED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Documentation Transactions posted to sponsored funds Sponsored Programs Administration October 2012.
KSU Sponsored Projects Overview Sponsored Research Network for Department Administrative Staff May 21, 2013.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
Compliance Issues Mr. Rashawn Farrior ATE Financial Management Grant Workshop October 23, 2012 Hosted by: American Association of Community Colleges.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Dr. Chellu S. Chetty Associate VP for Research and Sponsored Programs February 23, 2010 Time and Effort Reporting.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Research & Technology Transfer New Faculty Orientation August 12, 2013.
Conducting Collaborative Projects Part 4 OSP Awareness Feb 16, 2011 osp.syr.edu
Managing Your Grant: A Roadmap to the Finish Line Carol Gelormine Manager of Grant Accounting Division of Finance & Treasury Catherine Bruno Post-Award.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
Life Cycle of an Award1 Office of Sponsored Programs Post-Award Overview of Award Management/ Life Cycle of an Award.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
Andrew Nobleman & Halima Turner  Reporting Frequency: The Grants Officer, after coordination with the DOC operating unit, shall prescribe the frequency.
Subrecipient Monitoring, Cost Transfer, and Time and Effort Certification Training Patrick Landry, Jr. Ella Lee Lynne Tardiff Tai Nguyen March 18, 2014.
Solving the Mystery of Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs Office Technology and Economic Development November 4, 2009.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Highlights of Post Award Sponsored Project Administration July 11, 2007 Office of Research Training & Compliance.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-133 Presented to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation.
Task Force on Federal Grant and Contract Compliance: Implementation Activities Dr. Jack Finney and Dr. Bill Knocke.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Reimbursement Statements What you need to know. Let’s Take a Closer Look… …at invoicing, cost ledgers, SB and budget revisions.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Washington University in St Louis Compliance Office 1 Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Funds An Audit Perspective University Compliance Office November.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Sponsored Research Accounting1 Cost Transfers Policy and Procedure.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Post-Award Grant Administration Presented by: Sponsored Program Accounting Updated: Fiscal Year 2014.
Setting Up a New Recharge Center
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Research & Technology Transfer
Proposal Routing Overview
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
Subrecipient Monitoring
Post-Award Grant Administration
Managing Federal grants
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

Contracts & Subawards

And the winner is… YOU AWARD RECEIVED

Now What? The contract process begins between ORTT and your Sponsor.

What is a Contract? A Contract…  …is a binding agreement  …is legally enforceable  …must be signed by a designated authorized official (Dr. Andrew Sustich)

What is a subcontract (subaward)? A Subcontract…  …is between a party to the original contract and a third party  …is a binding agreement  …is legally enforceable  …must be signed by a designated authorized official (Dr. Andrew Sustich)

Subrecipient monitoring  A subrecipient is a third-party organization performing a portion of an externally funded project.  ASU both receives and issues subaward agreements.  SPA assists with post-award financial monitoring of awards to subrecipients

Subrecipient monitoring  Prime recipient must demonstrate reasonable effort to assure subrecipient compliance  Federal award information and compliance requirements identified to subrecipients,  Subrecipient activities are monitored,  Subrecipient audit findings are resolved,  Impact of any subrecipient noncompliance on the pass-through entity is evaluated, and  Subrecipient provides reasonable assurance that required audits and appropriate corrective action on audit findings occurred

Subrecipient monitoring  Subrecipients are subject to all terms, conditions, and regulations of prime agreement.  Copy of prime agreement attached to subaward agreement  Federal regulations:  Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Compliance Supplement, Part 6, Section M. (  Required on all federal subawards  ASU applies to nonfederal subawards for consistency and oversight purposes

Subrecipient monitoring Example: In addition to OMB circulars A-21, A-110, and A-133, this agreement cites:

Subrecipient monitoring  Prior to issuance:  Risk assessment:  Evaluate subrecipient’s environment, systems, and controls sufficiently to identify the level and methods of monitoring required  Identify risks from external sources, i.e., economic conditions, regulatory changes  Identify and react to changes in subrecipients:  financial problems that could lead to diversion of grant funds  loss of essential personnel, licensure or accreditation to operate program  organizational restructuring

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award control procedures:  Provide Federal award and compliance information to subrecipient  Regular PI inquiries to subrecipient concerning the program  Review subrecipient reports and follow-up on concerns  Monitor subrecipient budget expenditures  Perform site visits to review records and observe operations  Offer subrecipient technical assistance, where needed  Recordkeeping system to assure adequate document retention by subrecipient  Tracking system to assure timely submission of required reporting

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  ORTT provides SPA with executed subaward  SPA:  Excluded Parties List for debarred parties  FSRS (Federal Subaward Reporting System) FFATA (Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act) for subawards >$25K  Internal record to maintain award information and budget

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  Subrecipient invoices should be submitted directly to SPA:  Current and cumulative costs  Signed statement certifying that costs are in compliance with A-21 and/or sponsor requirements  SPA reviews for allowability and availability of funds  May request additional support for charges

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  If approved, SPA submits to PI for approval:  PI to review for improper, unallowable, unusual, or excessive costs  Subject to the same terms, conditions, and regulations as prime  Does the invoice reflect the work being reported in conversations and technical reports?  Was each expense necessary for the performance of the grant?  Request further information as needed  Typically, vendor receipts. Subaward terms require that evidentiary support be maintained by the subrecipient for the entire audit period, whether or not the prime ever requests such support

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  If you have any concerns over a subaward invoice, please contact SPA immediately to determine necessary actions  If approved, PI submits for payment:  Academic department requisitions payment in a timely fashion  Under no circumstance should invoices be held without cause, as this violates ASU’s responsibility to provide prompt payment for services rendered  Requisition approved by PI, chair, dean, and SPA; payment issued

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  PI must monitor technical reports and expenditures and maintain regular contact with subrecipient:  Sufficient progress in the right direction  Charges appearing on invoice are appropriate  Notify the department and SPA of any deficiencies that may necessitate revision of the subaward relationship  Modifications to subawards must be issued by ORTT as the contracting authority for sponsored projects

Subrecipient monitoring  Post-award financial monitoring procedures:  Annual A-133 compliance:  SPA issued A-133 compliance confirmation to each subrecipient  Corrective action or refund may be indicated by audit findings  Subrecipients not subject to A-133 audits may be asked to submit audited financial statements, certification of costs, or other documentation deemed necessary for assessing compliance

Subrecipient monitoring  Prime Sponsor: DOI USFWS  Prime Recipient: ASU-J  Incrementally funded  ASU awarded $44,025  Subaward budget $22,883, or 52% of total award

Subrecipient monitoring  Subawards are budgeted in supplies under account Other Contracted Services. Be cognizant of this special budget line to avoid overspending your supplies budget.

All that to say… 1.Subawards are subject to the same terms, conditions and regulations as the prime award. 2.ASU must make a reasonable effort to ensure sub-recipient compliance. 3.Call SPA with ANY concerns or questions.

Helps facilitate research…  Material Transfer Agreements (MTA)  Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) &list=PL37FF7F40AD4BB9C5&index=5 Other Contracts

BREAK TIME!

Cayuse  What is it?  A third-party grant submission manager  ASU-J’s official grant repository and approval management system  How does it work?  PI’s (or ORTT) download an opportunity and create a proposal  Cayuse automatically populates it with the correct federal forms, if available  Once “built,” proposals are routed through the approval process and then submitted  How can it help?  Cayuse is: centralized, easy to access, uniform, and has excellent tech support  Can easily upload attachments  Makes storing and tracking submitted proposals MUCH easier

Cayuse Continued… Access Cayuse through the ORTT Website: OR directly: Warning : Explorer and Mozilla Firefox are preferred web browsers. Cayuse does not work properly with Safari or other browsers.

Internal Funding Opportunities  Faculty Research Awards Committee (FRAC)  Compensated Leave (October)  Faculty Reassignment (February)  Faculty Development Endowment (October & February)  Faculty Research Award (February) awards-committee/index.dot

Compensated Leave  Compensated leave may be granted for research, writing, other professional creative activities, graduate study leading to advanced degrees, travel for study/research, retraining tenured faculty members who teach in programs being phased out, or for further study to upgrade specific program(s).

Faculty Reassigned Time  40 Semesters provided by Office of Research & Technology Transfer (ORTT)  Spring Competition  Submit proposals to ORTT  Fall, Spring, or full year

Faculty Development Endowment  Lane: international travel up to $1000  Deutsch: domestic travel and other activities up to $500  Contingent upon health of stock market  Applicant has not received an award from the fund for 3 years

Faculty Research Award  $40,000 provided from E&G  Spring competition for following fiscal year  Seed money for larger grants  Used to expand scholarly activity  Only one proposal per PI  Encouraged to include students in proposal  Consult with faculty representative

Faculty Research Award Cont. Special consideration for: 1)First time applicants 2)Non-tenured applicants 3)An applicant who has not received this award for 10 years

Questions/Comments?  Homework  your proposal draft to Carla or Rebekah (Cheryl) by noon Friday.