PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business and Fiscal Officers Meeting - 4/20/10 Presented by: Glen Jones, Director Post-Award Research and Sponsored Programs.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Office of Management & Budget
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Sponsored Programs How to Budget. BUDGETING BASIC CONSIDERATIONS  Benefit the Project  Allowable Costs  Total Cost Concept  Direct Costs  Indirect.
A-21 From budgets to post-award…. Agenda What is A-21? – quick overview Budget categories captured by A-21 Proposal budgets and A-21 (overview and tips)
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Jamie Young, Associate Director, Chicago Office for Sponsored Research, Northwestern University.
Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
We Are All in This Together: Close Out Issues Researchers, Administration Teams and Sponsored Projects Staff Arriving Together at the End of a Sponsored.
NCURA Regional Meeting April 5, 2011 Allowable Costs – Proposal Development to Project Closeout Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Research Administration For Scientists COMP Tim Quigg Class 6: February 11 Cost Sharing OMB Circular A-133 Recharge/Service Centers COMP
Accounting & Financial Services 1 Effort Reporting & Cost Sharing Systems November 8, 2004 Campus Council For Information Technology.
Cost Sharing-Presented By Cindy Kiel, CRA, Washington University in St. Louis Kim Small, Washington State University Wanda Bowen, CRA, University of Alaska.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Policy Training Sponsored Project Training Program April 30, 2012 Beverly Blakeney & Jennifer Gagnon April 30, 2012Sponsored Project Training Program1.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
Cost Sharing The Double Edge Sword 1 Dennis J. Paffrath – University of Maryland, Baltimore Executive Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
“Surviving an Audit” (or: Everyday things you can do that will both improve sponsored project management AND reduce audit findings) Al Willie Office of.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
Seminar Series Charge the Stuff that’s Easy to Defend Tim Reuter, Director Post Award Office of Sponsored Research December 5, 2013 Nuts & Bolts of Research.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
Cost Sharing on Sponsored Awards Division of Financial Affairs OSP Roundtable October, 2015.
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
Subaward, Procurement, or Consulting? Herbert B. Chermside, CRA Prepared for Virginia Commonwealth University Grants Administration Training Series © 2003.
“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.
SPA Training & Development
Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration
Project Budgeting.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs
Cost Sharing May 15, 2013.
Project Budgeting.
Overview Post-award Issues for the
Presentation transcript:

PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration

 High level understanding of the following:  Cost-sharing on sponsored projects  Sub-contracts on sponsored projects  OMB Circular A-21 Basics  Uses of Indirect Cost Recovery

 Definition (reference OMB Circular A-110):  Project costs not borne by the sponsor but supported by contributions from the recipient and/or third parties, both cash and in-kind.

 Portion of research costs that are not borne by the sponsor  Primarily required by federal sponsors  Pledge can be a % of total project costs or a fixed amount  Obligation must come from non federal funds  Obligation must not come from federal flow through

 Mandatory – explicit in award document and/or explicit in program announcement or guidelines.  Voluntary Committed – defined and quantified in either dollars or narrative in proposal.  Voluntary Uncommitted – occurs in course of project, was not planned or anticipated.  Cost overruns fall into this category

 Committed cost-sharing  Regardless of mandatory or voluntary, once committed becomes true obligation to the institution.  Must be documented in financial system  Proposal commitments = Award requirements  Voluntary Uncommitted cost-sharing  Treated differently than committed cost-sharing.  Not included in organized research base for F&A rate purposes.  Excluded from effort reporting requirements of A-21, Section J-8.  Does NOT need to be documented

 Personnel – time/effort of PI or other staff  Per OMB A-110, rates for volunteer services shall be consistent with those paid for similar work in the recipient’s organization.  Equipment – sometimes a required match for a new piece of equipment to be provided by the University.  Use of existing equipment is usually not allowable as cost-sharing.  Operational costs – supplies, travel, etc.  “In-kind” cost sharing – donations by third parties.  Quantifiable  Certification/documentation of actual  F&A – reduction in recovery can often be claimed

PI will spend 20% effort for the project at no cost to the agency PI will be available to provide advice PI will use general budget to purchase the $500K laser interferometer PI has access to laser interferometer As opposed to

 How should salary amount in excess of the agency (e.g. NIH) salary cap be handled?  Salary cap is considered voluntary committed, and must therefore be documented and identifiable within the financial records of the institution.

 Current NIH salary cap = $179,700  Dr. Smith’s salary is $250,000/year  Proposed effort on project -10% = $25,000/yr  Max to be charged to grant is $17,970 17,970 = 7.188% = ~7% 250,000  Charge 7% to project and 3% to cost-sharing

 Cost-sharing requirements may be passed along to sub-recipients.  Prime awardee retains ultimate responsibility for the commitment.  Therefore, if sub-recipient does not meet their match requirement, the prime awardee may need to scramble at the end of the project.  Important to monitor as part of invoicing approval process, etc.

 In order to be claimed as c/s, must meet all the same criteria to be allowable on the award:  Incurred during award period  Allowable expenditure to the project  Necessary and reasonable for accomplishing project goals and objectives  Must be auditable

 Items normally treated as indirect costs (e.g. office supplies, clerical salaries, etc.)  Specifically unallowable costs  Cost sharing used on another project

 Funding sources should be identified at the time of proposal submission to ensure that commitments are in place.  In other words, “don’t put it in the proposal if you aren’t willing and able to cover the cost!”

 Some agencies may require c/s expenditures to occur at same pace as sponsored award.  Consider total cost to the institution – hidden costs of c/s include:  Loss of fringe benefits and indirect cost recovery  Increase in research base for F&A calculations  Staff time at both departmental and central level for accounting and reporting of c/s

 Cash – those outlays that involve an actual outlay of cash by the institution (personnel, supplies, equipment, etc.)  In-kind – non-cash contributions provided by non-federal third parties, e.g.  Volunteer services  Donated supplies/equipment – must use current fair market value  Either type must be identifiable and able to be documented.

 There are several “not so obvious” negative impacts of voluntary cost-sharing.  Negative impacts:  Lowers F&A rate  Complicates effort reporting system  Increases administrative costs for tracking/reporting cost-share

 If there is no documentation (i.e. in the payroll distribution system) of the time devoted to research, an agency may factor in additional dollars into the research base.  This may hurt your rate negotiation process!  Better to be able to bury them in documentation.

 Basics of the F&A rate:  Pooled expenditures – those that cannot be allocated to a particular project (i.e. indirect costs)  Base expenditures – those direct expenses that make up an institution’s MTDC base  Rate = Pool Base  Goal is to keep the pool high and the base low.  Where does cost-sharing fit in?

Indirect Expenses (pooled costs) = 100,000 MTDC Base = 200,000 Rate = 100,000 = 50% 200,000 Add 20,000 of cost sharing expenses to base. Indirect Expenses (pooled costs) = 100,000 MTDC Base = 220,000 Rate = 100,000 = 45.45% 220,000

 Only commit to cost-sharing when required.  Only commit to the level of the amount required.  Only commit what you are prepared to deliver.  DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT!

Differentiation between a subcontractor and a vendor is the first step:  Subcontract: An agreement written under the authority of and consistent with the terms of the Prime Award (grant or contract) that transfers a portion of the research or substantive effort to another organization.  A subcontract is normally signed by both parties.

 Personal Services Contract: A written agreement that transfers a specialized service not available through a routine service provider.  The contractor requires a specialized knowledge in a particular field and often requires originality, creativity, and decision- making abilities.  The agreement is intellectual and professional in nature, and is normally signed by both parties.

 Purchased Services: Are orders to procure goods and services that are normally routine in nature.  They are normally signed only by the Purchasing party.

 A subcontract is an appropriate procurement mechanism when:  1. The collaboration is substantive programmatic work which is beyond mere analytical work-for- hire normally conducted by a routine service provider.  2. The collaboration is substantial enough that the collaborating individual or organization will participate in preparation of results, publication, presentation or other collaborative participation beyond routine analytical work.  3. The collaborator will maintain control of the work to be performed under the subcontract.

 Subcontracts are typically identified in the proposal and/or approved by the sponsor.  SPA has a team dedicated to preparation and administration of subcontracts.  Approval of invoices from subrecipients is a shared responsibility:  PI responsible for verifying work proceeding at an expected pace, and expenses are reasonable based on work completed.  SPA responsible for verifying budget, allowability of expenses, etc.

 Approve scope of work and related budget  Ensure receipt of required deliverables and/or progress reports and review for appropriateness  Align deliverables/progress reports with invoices submitted for payment  Coordinate any modifications with the SPA contracts team (e.g. change in scope, rebudget request, etc.)

 Federal awards – OMB Circular A21 outlines allowability for certain types of expenditures.  A21 = “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions”  Guidance on what should be direct charged to projects vs. what we recover via our indirect cost rate  Specifically, costs of a clerical or administrative nature are considered “sensitive” and care must be taken if direct charged (typically recovered via indirects)

 The following items are considered sensitive, and require extra justification to directly charge to federal projects:  Clerical and administrative salaries  Office supplies (includes computers by definition of equipment threshold)  Telephone line costs (local)  Postage  Other

 Certain criteria need to be met in order to allow these types of expenses as direct charges:  Must be able to identify the costs specifically to the project with a high degree of accuracy  Costs must be incurred for a different purpose or circumstance (how the item is used, not “what it is”) OR part of a “major project” as defined in the circular.  Costs must have been explicitly budgeted, with justification, and awarded.

 ICR funds are set up in the general fund range, and must follow the “rules” for the general fund.  Typical expenditures include items necessary to the research, but which might be considered questionable, or unallowable, if charged directly to a sponsored project.

 Examples of expenditures include:  Office supplies, toner, computers, etc. (those items which we discussed as being A21 sensitive)  Travel  Memberships, dues  Books, journals  Miscellaneous items which are not easily identifiable to a particular project (e.g. shared by multiple projects)