Informational Session for UH Faculty and Staff November 18,2014 The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) New Uniform Guidance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHEILA T. LISCHWE, PH.D. OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS UNIFORM GUIDANCE WORKING GROUP Uniform Guidance: What is the Impact at CU?
Advertisements

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
A DEEPER LOOK INTO THE CHANGES TO COME Presented by: Susan Cessac, Manager of Cost Analysis Heather Dempsey, Senior Accountant – Cost Analysis University.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
1. An Introductory Look at the New Omni-Circular Big changes have arrived! Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM August 2014 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
The Uniform Guidance: A Top Ten List
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
OMB Uniform Guidance Faculty Presentation Chris G. Green, CPA Director, Sponsored Programs.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Presented by Colleen Ravenfeld Office.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Grants Administration Updates - OMB’s Uniform Guidance Division of Grants Administration Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Texas Education.
Grant Guidance Changes
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Uniform Guidance April 21, 2014 Sara Bible Office of the Vice Provost and Dean of Research.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
Uniform Guidance: Summary of Significant Changes 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL.
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Nicole Pilman, Uniform Guidance Implementation Coordinator Sue Paulson, Assistant Controller Pamela A. Webb, Associate VP for.
Conducting Collaborative Projects Part 4 OSP Awareness Feb 16, 2011 osp.syr.edu
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Compliance Corner and Uniform Guidance Update MRAM December 2014 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Purchasing Changes 2 CFR OSU Grants & Contracts Financial Administration.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Uniform Guidance Updates: What PI’s and their staff need to know April 2, 2015 Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW December 2014 Update. Important Dates Applicable to new awards and (possibly) new funding increments issued on and after December.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
1 Uniform Guidance on Managing Federal Awards (Christine Hamble)
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Fiscal Compliance Corner – Uniform Guidance Update MRAM October 2014 Ted Mordhorst Assistant Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting.
Lifecycle of an Award Reporting, Close-outs and Audits Michelle Vazin, Vanderbilt University Michele Codd, George Washington University.
Sponsored Projects Administration What’s in it for Researchers? Proposed Changes in Federal Research Guidance (A-81) Pamela A. Webb Associate Vice President.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
Post-Award Grant Administration Presented by: Sponsored Program Accounting Updated: Fiscal Year 2014.
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Understanding the Uniform Guidance Effective Dates
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
SRS Quarterly BA Meeting December 16, 2014 Welcome
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 October 8, 2014
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Office of Grants Fiscal
Presentation transcript:

Informational Session for UH Faculty and Staff November 18,2014 The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) New Uniform Guidance

Agenda Background Application Pre-award changes Cost Principle changes Post-award changes Q&A 2

Background Primary Objective: Reduce both administrative burden and risk of waste, fraud and abuse for Federal awards. 3

Background – Reform Timeline 4

Background 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) – replaces OMB Circulars A-21, A-110, and A-133 Though parts still live on: – Subpart C (Pre-award) – Subpart D (Post-award) – Subpart E (Cost Principles) – Subpart F (Audit) 5

Application New awards issued on or after 12/26/14 Increments to existing awards issued after 12/26/14, if Federal awarding agency modifies terms and conditions (T&C) Existing Federal awards that do not receive incremental funding with new T&C will continue to be governed by original award 6

Application Grants and Cooperative Agreements Contracts follow Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and UG for cost principles – (e.g. use of electronic records not explicitly formalized in FAR) NOTE: As always, award terms and conditions prevail over UG 7

Pre-award Changes Simplify Applications Give More Time to Apply Clarify Entitlement to F&A Voluntary Cost Sharing 8

Simplify Applications Federal awarding agency must: display standard information on OMB- designated government-wide website use OMB approved application forms – ORS will notify once forms are available 9

Give More Time to Apply Funding opportunities must be open for at least 60 calendar days Federal awarding agency may decide to post funding opportunities for less than 60 calendar days but never less than 30 calendar days, unless exigent circumstances arise and are approved by the agency head 10

Clarify Entitlement to F&A UH should receive Full F&A as a prime or subrecipient unless: prohibited by Federal law for a class of Federal awards or a single Federal award or approved by a Federal awarding agency Head - OMB’s intention is for all sponsors to recognize negotiated rates 11

Voluntary Cost Sharing not expected cannot be used as a factor during the merit review unless criteria for consideration and award determination factors are explicitly included in the funding announcement highly discouraged by UH if no incentives 12

Cost Principle Changes Admin/clerical support Computing devices Conferences Participant support costs Publication and printing costs 13

Cost Principle Changes Terminal Vacation Leave Rate Visa Costs 14

Admin/clerical support No longer need to prove “major project” status (as described in A-110); must show it is “integral” and can be specifically identified to project Must be explicitly budgeted or have prior written approval 15

Computing devices Such as laptops, netbooks, smart phones, & tablet computers – hardware costs Must be essential, though not solely dedicated, to the performance of a Federal award OMB expects UH policies (E2.214 Security and Protection of Sensitive Information) on safeguarding the devices and data are followed 16

Conferences Allowable only when purpose is for dissemination of technical information beyond UH and necessary and reasonable for successful performance under a Federal award – Interpret “beyond UH” = collaborators, beneficiaries, and general public 17

Participant support costs Allowable with prior approval on conferences or training projects, not research MTDC exclusion for participant support costs applies only to conference grants or training grants 18

Publication and printing costs Now can be incurred outside the performance period of the award Costs must be charged prior to closeout of award 19

Terminal vacation leave rate Cannot charge last account; must be either indirect costs or via fringe benefit rate Change in Federal regulations means RCUH will now have to create a terminal vacation leave rate like UH UH will need to make its rate uniform for all funds 20

Visa Costs For projects that need skills from foreign persons, short-term visa fees if applicable can be proposed as direct costs Criteria for directly charging of visa costs must be: – Critical and necessary for the conduct of the project; – Allowable under the applicable cost principles; – Consistent with UH cost accounting practice and policy (i.e., handling of short-term visa costs for non-extramural activities); and – Meet the definition of direct cost in the applicable cost principles Examples include TN, J-1, O, and H-1B visas 21

Post-award changes Reporting Prior approvals Record Retention Subrecipient Monitoring 22

Reporting Requirement to relate performance to financial information has not changed NEW: Use of OMB-approved government- wide standard report formats such as Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR), Federal Financial Report (FFR) - ORS will notify if any additional changes 23

New Language: ‘‘By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729–3730 and 3801– 3812).’’ Financial Reporting – Required Certifications Old Language: OMB Circular A-21 § K. Certification of charges: … "I certify that all expenditures reported (or payment requested) are for appropriate purposes and in accordance with the provisions of the application and award documents." Significantly new language required for annual and final financial reports and invoices is shown in bold. 24

Prior Approvals Welcome changes: PI’s “disengagement” (v. absence) for more than 3 months No prior approval required for re-budget from direct to indirect 25 Am I Disengaged?

Prior Approvals (Cont’d) NEW – Prior approval required for changes to approved cost sharing Issue – Expanded authorities expire 12/26/14; Will agencies implement Research Terms & Conditions by then? 26

Record Retention Allows for electronic record retention Federal award-related information should be collected, transmitted and stored in open and machine readable formats ORS will update related policies and procedures 27

Subrecipient Monitoring - Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determination Perform and document a case-by-case determination Subrecipient v. Contractor Determination Checklist available on ORS website – required for all service or subaward agreements 28

Subrecipient Monitoring – F&A De minimis rate of 10% of MTDC for subawardees that have never received a negotiated F&A rate UH no longer has to negotiate rates with subrecipients 29

Subrecipient Monitoring and Management – Fixed Price Subawards With prior written approval from the Federal awarding agency, UH may provide subawards based on fixed amounts up to the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $150,000) Payments based on meeting specific requirements Accountability based on performance and results Mandatory Cost Sharing not allowed and Voluntary Cost Sharing not encouraged 30

Subrecipient Monitoring Required Information Pass Through Entities (PTE) must provide certain subaward information to the subrecipient ORS developed a Subaward Information Checklist tool for internal use - available on ORS website 31

Subrecipient Monitoring Risk Assessment Risk Assessment must be performed and documented for each subrecipient – refer to Subrecipient Monitoring Flowchart ORS will perform the risk assessment and notify the project of the risk level and monitoring procedures – refer to Monitoring Procedur es 32

Subrecipient Monitoring Monitoring Procedures Invoices should be accompanied by performance and financial reports Project must review the subrecipient’s performance and financial reports in a timely manner prior to reimbursement 33

Subrecipient Monitoring – Payments PTE must make payment to subrecipients within 30 calendar days after receipt of an invoice, unless there are outstanding performance or financial issues. 34

Subrecipient Monitoring Tax Clearance Subrecipient must obtain Hawaii State and IRS Tax Clearance in accordance with HRS § Projects should advise their potential subrecipients to obtain tax clearances as soon as possible (during the proposal stage) to enable timely payments. 35

Q&A Q: OMB is leaving it up to non-Federal entities to decide whether it wants to manage two sets of rules (before UG and after UG). What is UH planning to do? A: For simplicity, UH intends to apply entity-wide system changes (i.e. Effort Reporting) to all Federal awards, effective 12/26/14. 36

Q&A Q: Do I have to keep my old funding in a separate account from my new funding after the UG goes into effect? A: No! 37

Q&A Q: Now that agencies are giving us more time to apply, does that change the ORS deadline for proposal submission? A: No. ORS still requests that you notify us as soon as you intend to apply and submit the application at least five business days prior to the due date. 38

Q&A Q: What happens if the Federal awarding agency doesn’t honor the UH negotiated rate? A: The project should request documentation of the Federal awarding agency head’s approval for the lower rate. If unavailable, please notify ORS for follow up. 39

Q&A Q: What counts as prior approval? For example, if I state my intention to charge a cost in my progress report and Federal agency issues award without mention, is that approval? A: It depends. Check terms & conditions or refer questions to the Federal awarding agency. 40

Q&A Q: A portion of the budget on an award with Cost Sharing was deobligated during the project period. Can Cost Sharing be reduced? A: Yes. With prior agency approval, Cost Shared amounts can be proportionately reduced. 41

Q&A Q: Are we really allowed to eliminate time and effort reporting? A: Yes! (They say). However, adequate internal controls must be in place to support compensation for personal services charged to the award. UH will need to evaluate before making any revisions to our current time and effort reporting system. 42

Q&A Q: Should I wait until the subaward is executed before notifying the subrecipient to obtain a Hawaii State Tax Clearance? A: No! This process should be initiated at the proposal development stage. 43

Q&A Q: Are we allowed to make payments to a subrecipient prior to review of the performance and financial reports? A: No. As part of the required monitoring procedures, these reports must be reviewed prior to payment. 44

Contact Information Dennis Nakamura, Compliance Officer – or Dawn Kim, Compliance Manager – or

Procurement Grace period to July 1, 2016 General Standards Methods of Procurement UH – Eff. July 1, 2016, require sealed bids for construction > $150,000 (currently $250,000) using Federal funds RCUH - Update of RCUH Procurement & Disbursing Policies posted October 29,

Procurement General Standards and Methods 47

Procurement - Methods 48